1
|
da Rocha LR, Dias RB, Fernandes MBC, Prinz R, Eirado TP, Costa IDS, Monteiro MJ, da Silva CER, Dos Santos CT, Fogagnolo F. A new option for bone regeneration: a rapid methodology for cellularization of allograft with human bone marrow stromal cells with in vivo bone-forming potential. Injury 2023; 54 Suppl 6:110777. [PMID: 38143129 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of severe musculoskeletal injuries, such as loss of bone tissue and consolidation disorders, requires bone transplantation, and the success of this bone reconstruction depends on the grafts transplant's osteogenic, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive properties. Although the gold standard is autograft, it is limited by availability, morbidity, and infection risk. Despite their low capacity for osteoinduction and osteogenesis, decellularized bone allografts have been used in the search for alternative therapeutic strategies to improve bone regeneration. Considering that bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are responsible for the maintenance of bone turnover throughout life, we believe that associating BMSCs with allograft could produce a material that is biologically similar to autologous bone graft. For this reason, this study evaluated the osteogenic potential of bone allograft cellularized with BMSCs. First, BMSC was characterized and allograft decellularization was confirmed by histology, scanning electron microscopy, and DNA quantification. Subsequently, the BMSCs and allografts were associated and evaluated for adhesion, proliferation, and in vitro and in vivo osteogenic potential. We demonstrated that, after 2 hours, BMSCs had already adhered to the surface of allografts and remained viable for 14 days. In vitro osteogenic assays indicated increased osteogenic potential of allografts compared with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). In vivo transplantation assays in immunodeficient mice confirmed the allograft's potential to induce bone formation, with significantly better results than β-TCP. Finally, our results indicate that allograft can provide structural support for BMSC adhesion, offering a favorable microenvironment for cell survival and differentiation and inducing new bone formation. Taken together, our data indicate that this rapid methodology for cellularization of allograft with BMSCs might be a new therapeutic alternative in regenerative medicine and bone bioengineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Rosa da Rocha
- Teaching and Research Division, Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jamil Haddad (INTO), Av. Brasil, 500, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-070, Brazil.
| | - Rhayra Braga Dias
- Teaching and Research Division, INTO, Av. Brasil, 500, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-070, Brazil
| | | | - Rafael Prinz
- Teaching and Research Division, INTO, Av. Brasil, 500, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-070, Brazil
| | - Thiago Penna Eirado
- Teaching and Research Division, INTO, Av. Brasil, 500, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-070, Brazil
| | - Isabela de Souza Costa
- Teaching and Research Division, INTO, Av. Brasil, 500, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-070, Brazil
| | - Mauricio J Monteiro
- Materials Division, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia (INT), Av. Venezuela 82, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20081-312, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Fabricio Fogagnolo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Anaesthesiology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, São Paulo, SP 14049900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gazor R, Asgari M, Abdollajhifar MA, Kiani P, Zare F, Fadaei Fathabady F, Norouzian M, Amini A, Khosravipour A, Atashgah RB, Kazemi M, Chien S, Bayat M. Simultaneous Treatment of Photobiomodulation and Demineralized Bone Matrix With Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Improve Bone Healing in an osteoporotic bone defect. J Lasers Med Sci 2021; 12:e41. [PMID: 34733764 DOI: 10.34172/jlms.2021.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The ability of simultaneous treatment of critical-sized femoral defects (CSFDs) with photobiomodulation (PBM) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) with or without seeded adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) to induce bone reconstruction in ovariectomized induced osteoporotic (OVX) rats was investigated. Methods: The OVX rats with CSFD were arbitrarily separated into 6 groups: control, scaffold (S, DBM), S + PBM, S + alendronate (ALN), S + ASCs, and S + PBM + ASCs. Each group was assessed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and histological examinations. Results: In the fourth week, CBCT and histological analyses revealed that the largest volume of new bone formed in the S + PBM and S + PBM + ASC groups. The S + PBM treatment relative to the S and S + ALN treatments remarkably reduced the CSFD (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.009 and P = 0.01). Furthermore, S + PBM + ASCs treatment compared to the S and S + ALN treatments significantly decreased CSFD (Mann Whitney test, P = 0.01). In the eighth week, CBCT analysis showed that extremely enhanced bone regeneration occurred in the CSFD of the S + PBM group. Moreover, the CSFD in the S + PBM group was substantially smaller than S, S + ALN and S + ASCs groups (Mann Whitney test, P = 0.01, P = 0.02 and P = 0.009). Histological observations showed more new bone formation in the treated CSFD of S + PBM + ASCs and S + PBM groups. Conclusion: The PBM plus DBM with or without ASCs significantly enhanced bone healing in the CSFD in OVX rats compared to control, DBM alone, and ALN plus DBM groups. The PBM plus DBM with or without ASCs significantly decreased the CSFD area compared to either the solo DBM or ALN plus DBM treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rouhallah Gazor
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Asgari
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.,Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; And Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Guilan, Iran
| | - Mohammad-Amin Abdollajhifar
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pejman Kiani
- Department of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Zare
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Fadaei Fathabady
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Norouzian
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdollah Amini
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Armin Khosravipour
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Rahimeh B Atashgah
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biomaterials, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 13169- 43551, Iran
| | - Mahsa Kazemi
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sufan Chien
- Price Institute of Surgical Research, University of Louisville, and Noveratech LLC, Louisville, Kentucky; USA
| | - Mohammad Bayat
- Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Price Institute of Surgical Research, University of Louisville, and Noveratech LLC, Louisville, Kentucky; USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu F, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Yin P, Fang C, Wang J. Influence of in vitro differentiation status on the in vivo bone regeneration of cell/chitosan microspheres using a rat cranial defect model. JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION 2019; 30:1008-1025. [PMID: 31159676 DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1619959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the in vitro osteogenic differentiation status on the in vivo bone regeneration of cell/chitosan microspheres qualitatively and quantitatively. To this end, rat bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs) were seeded onto apatite-coated chitosan microspheres. The constructs were osteogenically differentiated for 0, 7, 14, and 21 days followed by calvarial defect implantation in vivo for up to 8 weeks. In vitro studies showed that BMSCs in the constructs proliferated from day 0 to day 7. The activity and gene expression of alkaline phosphatise increased from day 0 to day 14 and then decreased. The gene expression of collagen type I and osteocalcin peaked at day 21. In vivo, constructs retrieved from day 0 group were filled with fibrous tissues and capillaries, but no bone formation was observed. Constructs retrieved from day 7 and day 21 groups showed progressive bone formation, whereas those retrieved from day 14 group had the highest percentage of bone formation. These data suggested that to generate a substantial amount of bone in vivo, not only the in vitro osteogenic differentiation was necessary, but also the period of pre-differentiation was important for the cell-scaffold constructs. The period of pre-differentiation for 14 days was found to be the most suitable for chitosan microspheres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Xu
- a Department of Stomatology , Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha , China.,b The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology , Wuhan University , Wuhan , China
| | - Yingfang Wu
- a Department of Stomatology , Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha , China
| | - Yiyi Zhang
- a Department of Stomatology , Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha , China
| | - Ping Yin
- a Department of Stomatology , Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha , China
| | - Changyun Fang
- a Department of Stomatology , Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha , China
| | - Jiawei Wang
- b The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology , Wuhan University , Wuhan , China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu J, Zhou P, Long Y, Huang C, Chen D. Repair of bone defects in rat radii with a composite of allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells and heterogeneous deproteinized bone. Stem Cell Res Ther 2018; 9:79. [PMID: 29587852 PMCID: PMC5870513 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0817-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Revised: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the bone tissue engineering domain, seed cells, scaffold and cell-scaffold composites are three focuses. In this study, the feasibility of using allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells(ADSCs) combined with heterogeneous deproteinized bone (HDB) to repair segmental radial defects was investigated by observing the repair of the defect area. Methods ADSCs were cultured in vitro, purified, antigen-detected and osteogenic differentiation potency-measured; then, the ADSCs of the third generation were seeded into HDB to prepare an ADSCs-HDB composite partly with osteogenesis induced cells. Sixty Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups with 15 in each group. A bone defect (4 mm in length) was created at the left radius in each rat. Two kinds of ADSCs-HDB composites were implanted in the ADSCs osteogenesis group or ADSCs group; HDB was implanted in the negative control group; nothing was filled in the blank control group. The bone defect repair was evaluated by gross observation, molybdenum target X-ray examination and histological analyses after surgery. Results Gross observation: the bone defect area was completely filled and difficult to recognize in the ADSCs osteogenesis group. The connection of the ADSCs group was strong, but the implants were clearly identifiable. The joints of the negative control group were slightly thick but the connection was unstable. In the blank control group, kermesinus tissue was between the two ends and bones were not connected after 8 weeks. Molybdenum target X-ray examinations: In the ADSCs osteogenesis group, evident bridges in the graft were observed in the defects in the fourth week; the defects were filled with new bone completely and a marrow cavity appeared at 8 weeks. In the ADSCs group, there were some callus formations, but the radial defect was still obvious at 8 weeks. In the negative control group, fracture lines were clear. In the blank control group, no osseous bridges were observed, which resulted in bone nonunion eventually in 8 weeks. There were significant differences in the callus density between experimental groups and the blank control group at 4 and 8 weeks (P < 0.01). Histological measures showed that the rate and quality of the new bone formation and remodelling was significantly different between the experimental and control groups. Conclusions A composite of ADSCs-HDB has a strong osteogenic ability. It can repair segmental bone defects well and is promising to serve as grafting material in bone tissue engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Liu
- Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, China.
| | - Peng Zhou
- Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, China
| | - Yu Long
- Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, China
| | - Chunxia Huang
- Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, China
| | - Danna Chen
- Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, China.,School of Biological Science and Technology, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arkudas A, Lipp A, Buehrer G, Arnold I, Dafinova D, Brandl A, Beier JP, Körner C, Lyer S, Alexiou C, Kneser U, Horch RE. Pedicled Transplantation of Axially Vascularized Bone Constructs in a Critical Size Femoral Defect. Tissue Eng Part A 2017; 24:479-492. [PMID: 28851253 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Axial vascularization represents a mandatory requirement for clinically applied larger scale vascularized bone grafts. The aim of this study was to combine the arteriovenous (AV) loop model in the rat with a critically sized femoral bone defect and to successfully transplant axially vascularized bone constructs into the defect. MATERIALS AND METHODS In Groups A and C, an AV loop together with a clinically approved hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP) matrix, mesenchymal stem cells, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 were implanted into a newly designed porous titanium chamber with an integrated osteosynthesis plate in the thighs of rats, whereas in Groups B and D, the same matrix composition without AV loop and, in Group E, only the HA/β-TCP matrix were implanted. After 6 weeks, the constructs were transplanted into a 10 mm femoral defect created in the same leg, in Groups A and C, under preservation of the AV loop pedicle. Group F served as a control group with an empty chamber. Ten days (Groups A and B) and 12 weeks (Groups C-F) after transplantation, the femora together with the constructs were explanted and investigated using computed tomography (CT), micro-CT, X-ray, histology, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS Ten days after transplantation, Group A showed a maintained vascular supply leading to increased vascularization, cell survival in the scaffold center, and bone generation compared to Group B. After 12 weeks, there was no difference detectable among all groups regarding total vessel number, although Group C, using the AV loop, still showed increased vascularization of the construct center compared to Groups D and E. In Group C, there was still enhanced bone generation detectable compared to the other groups and increased bony fusion rate at the proximal femoral stump. CONCLUSIONS This study shows the combination of the AV loop model in the rat with a critically sized femoral defect. By maintenance of the vascular supply, the constructs initially showed increased vascularization, leading to increased bone formation and bony fusion in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Arkudas
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany
| | - Amelie Lipp
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gregor Buehrer
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany
| | - Isabel Arnold
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Dafinova
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Brandl
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany .,2 IZKF Research Group for Experimental Stem Cell Transplantation Medical Clinic and Policlinic II, Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (ZEMM), University Clinic of Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany
| | - Justus P Beier
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany .,3 Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand and Burn Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, RWTH University of Aachen, Germany
| | - Carolin Körner
- 4 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Science and Technology of Metals, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefan Lyer
- 5 Section of Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine (SEON), Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung-Professorship, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Alexiou
- 5 Section of Experimental Oncology and Nanomedicine (SEON), Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung-Professorship, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany .,6 Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Raymund E Horch
- 1 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|