De Novo Upper Extremity Lymphedema After Elective Hand Surgery in Breast Cancer Survivors

Current evidence on patient precautions for reducing breast cancer-related lymphedema manifestation and progression risks

Risk management and self-management strategies for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) must balance best-evidence guidelines and associated risk factor knowledge. There is an evidence-based practice gap in the understanding of whether a change in education about risk factors and whether behavioral changes actually influence BCRL manifestation or progression. The purpose of this study was to (1) review if current evidence supports or refutes patient precautions to prevent the manifestation and/or progression of BCRL, (2) review if behavioral changes result in the prevention or reduction of BCRL, and (3) identify related gaps of knowledge for future research. Evidence map methodology was used to systematically review literature related to reducing the risk of BCRL. Literature searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane for the categories of trauma, blood pressure, temperature, air travel, and behavior change. One hundred and forty-eight articles were included for full-text review, of which 37 articles were included in this study. Within the confines of limb and trunk circumferential and/or volume enlargement, a 'just in case' approach to patient education on risk factors may not be appropriate for breast cancer survivors at risk of manifesting lymphedema. Patient education about precautionary risks for the onset of BCRL needs to align with research evidence. There is scant evidence about the risks of BCRL progression suggesting a need for future research.

The Risk of Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Surgery Should Not Restrict Necessary Hand Surgery Interventions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of lymphedema onset or exacerbation in patients undergoing upper extremity interventions, both nonoperative and operative, after breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

The study inclusion criteria were the following: (1) prior history of breast cancer surgery or lymphedema from the cancer; (2) upper extremity intervention, ipsilateral to the breast cancer side; and (3) follow-up of at least 1 month. Patients were evaluated for demographic information, type of breast cancer procedure and hand intervention, number of lymph nodes dissected, preexisting lymphedema, exacerbation of lymphedema, and new-onset lymphedema.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients undergoing 385 hand interventions (300 injections, 85 surgeries) were reviewed. Median follow-up was 31 months (range: 1-110). Nineteen patients had preexisting lymphedema ipsilateral to the hand procedure and none experienced an exacerbation of their lymphedema. Three patients developed new-onset lymphedema ipsilateral to their hand intervention at an average follow-up of 30 months (range: 4-67). One patient had a single injection and developed lymphedema over 5 years later. One had 2 injections in the same hand on the same date and developed lymphedema 3 months later. The third patient had 2 injections in the right hand, 1 injection and 1 surgery in the left hand, and developed either lymphedema or swelling due to rheumatoid arthritis in the right hand 1 year after the injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have undergone breast cancer surgery can safely undergo upper extremity intervention with low risk of lymphedema exacerbation or onset.

Prospective Analysis of Simulated Pneumatic Tourniquet Use and Oedema Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background: Tourniquet use during upper extremity surgery in patients with a history of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial due to the perceived but unproven risk of lymphoedema. We prospectively evaluated upper extremity swelling in patients with a history of unilateral ALND using a standardised tourniquet model. Methods: A tourniquet was applied to the upper arm bilaterally, with the unaffected side serving as an internal control. Each arm was subsequently held in an elevated position to reduce swelling. Hand volume was measured using an aqueous volumeter. Results: The patients' ALND arms experienced slightly greater increases in volume following tourniquet application compared to their healthy control arms. However, this amount of oedema was temporary and reversible, as both arms experienced spontaneous resolution of swelling with no significant difference in residual hand volume at the conclusion of the study. Conclusions: Tourniquet use may be safe in patients with a history of ALND. Further investigation is needed to verify this in a surgical setting. Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic).

A Systematic Review of Peripheral Neuropathies in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Controversy exists regarding the influence of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in the development of peripheral neuropathies. Our aim was to evaluate the association of secondary lymphedema with peripheral neuropathies in patients with breast cancer. We performed a systematic review by querying PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid Medline and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The keywords "lymphedema" AND ("neuropathy" OR "carpal tunnel syndrome" OR "cubital tunnel syndrome" OR "neuropathic pain") and synonyms in titles and abstracts were used to perform the search. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Discrepancies were found in studies that analyzed whether a cause-effect association exists between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and secondary lymphedema. No evidence indicated that lymphedema predisposes to developing peripheral neuropathies such as CTS or brachial plexopathy. No studies found an association between patients with breast cancer at risk of or with lymphedema and the development or worsening of CTS. Carpal tunnel release can be safely performed in patients with BCRL. Neuropathic pain worsens with lymphedema, and treatment seems to improve the pain. Our study did not find enough evidence to conclude that BCRL is associated with the development of peripheral neuropathies. Carpal tunnel release is a safe procedure that can be performed in patients with BCRL and does not influence the development or worsening of lymphedema. Neuropathic pain seems to worsen after development of lymphedema, and treatment has been found to improve neuropathic pain.

Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Stenosing Tenosynovitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Although aromatase inhibitors are the first-line treatment in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, there is increasing evidence that they can induce carpal tunnel syndrome and stenosing tenosynovitis. This systematic review summarizes the risk factors, incidence, and management for patients with aromatase inhibitor-induced carpal tunnel syndrome and stenosing tenosynovitis compared to tamoxifen or placebo.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted (to March 19, 2020), supplemented with Google Scholar, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and The Journal of Hand Surgery. Two reviewers independently completed the primary and secondary screens and the quality appraisal.

RESULTS

This study reviewed 577 abstracts and included 19 studies. Risk factors for aromatase inhibitor-induced carpal tunnel syndrome or stenosing tenosynovitis included hormone replacement therapy before trial entry, history of musculoskeletal symptoms, age younger than 60 years, prior chemotherapy, and body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2. The incidence can be increased up to 10 times compared to tamoxifen. Patient discontinuation of aromatase inhibitor treatment because of carpal tunnel syndrome and stenosing tenosynovitis was reported. Nonsurgical management led to complete resolution of carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms in up to 67 percent of cases. Although most aromatase inhibitor-induced stenosing tenosynovitis original studies were low quality, all recommended surgical release for symptom resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides current knowledge of the associated risk factors, management options, and quality of literature for aromatase inhibitor-induced carpal tunnel syndrome and stenosing tenosynovitis. Early recognition can prevent self-discontinuation of an aromatase inhibitor and long-term sequelae of poorly treated carpal tunnel syndrome and stenosing tenosynovitis.

Ipsilateral Intravenous Catheter Placement in Breast Cancer Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

There is a continued perception that intravenous line (IV) placement is contraindicated in the arm ipsilateral to prior breast cancer surgery to avoid breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the risk for development of BCRL in ipsilateral arm IV placement compared to contralateral arm IV placement to prior breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review, via our Integrated Clinical Systems and Epic Electronic Heath Record of IV placement for anesthesia and surgery in patients with a prior history of breast cancer surgery with or without axillary lymph node dissection. Complication rates were compared for IVs placed in the ipsilateral and contralateral arms. We identified 3724 patients undergoing 7896 IV placements between January 1, 2015, and May 5, 2018, with a prior history of breast cancer surgery via their index anesthesia and surgical procedures.

RESULTS

The median time from breast cancer surgery to IV placement was 1.5 years (range, 1 day to 17.8 years). Of 2743 IVs placed in the arm contralateral to prior breast cancer surgery, 2 had a complication, corresponding to an incidence of 7.3 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-26.3 per 10,000). Of 5153 IVs placed in the arm ipsilateral to prior breast cancer surgery, 2 IVs had a complication, for an incidence of 3.9 per 10,000 (95% CI, 0.5-14.0 per 10,000). The frequency of complications was not found to differ significantly between the groups (P = .91), and the 95% CI for the risk difference (ipsilateral minus contralateral) was -23 to +8 complications per 10,000. The complication rate is similar when only the first IV placed following breast cancer surgery is considered (overall 5.4 per 10,000 [95% CI, 0.7-19.4] per 10,000; contralateral 7.0 [95% CI, 0.2-39.0] per 10,000, ipsilateral 4.4 [95% CI, 0.1-24.2] per 10,000; P = 1.00; 95% CI for risk difference [ipsilateral minus contralateral], -41 to +22 per 10,000).

CONCLUSIONS

We found very few complications in patients who had an IV placed for surgery following a previous breast cancer surgery and no complications in those patients with IV placement ipsilateral with axillary node dissection. Avoidance of IV placement in the arm ipsilateral to breast cancer surgery is not necessary.

Lymphoedema After Breast Cancer Treatment is Associated With Higher Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

Excess body weight has been identified as an important risk factor for lymphoedema following breast cancer treatment, however it remains unclear how much risk increases as weight increases. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and risk of lymphoedema in breast cancer patients, and to estimate the level of risk by BMI category.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic search of all articles published through May 2018 in PubMed and the Cochrane library. Studies that included data on BMI and lymphoedema in breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. We compared risk of lymphoedema in BMI groups as: BMI<25 versus BMI≥25, BMI<25 versus BMI≥30, BMI≥25 to <30 versus BMI≥30, BMI<30 versus BMI≥30, BMI<25 versus BMI≥25 to BMI<30.

Results:

After exclusion of ineligible studies, 57 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference in BMI between patients with lymphoedema compared to those without lymphoedema was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.3–2.2). Compared to patients with a BMI<25, risk of lymphoedema was higher in those with a BMI >25 to <30 (odds ratio [OR] 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5), a BMI≥25 (OR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.9), or a BMI≥30 (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.4). Compared to patients with a BMI of >25 to <30, risk of lymphoedema was higher in patients with a BMI>30 (OR 1.5; 95% CI,1.4 to 1.8).

Conclusion:

Excess body weight is a risk factor for lymphoedema following treatment of breast cancer, with the magnitude of risk increasing across higher categories of BMI.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Management in Breast Cancer Survivors at Risk for Lymphedema: A Markov Model

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survivors that have undergone axillary lymph node dissection have an increased risk of developing same-side upper extremity lymphedema. Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome in the ipsilateral limb may not receive appropriate surgical therapy (carpal tunnel release) because of concerns that it may trigger or worsen lymphedema.

METHODS

A state transition cohort model was used to evaluate the treatment options for breast cancer survivors at risk of upper extremity lymphedema presenting with carpal tunnel syndrome. The model reflected three treatment strategies: (1) early surgical intervention, (2) delayed surgical intervention, or (3) nonsurgical management. Both life-years and quality-adjusted life-years were modeled over a 30-year time horizon.

RESULTS

Over a 30-year time horizon, the preferred strategy was delayed surgery, which resulted in 21.41 quality-adjusted life-years. Early surgery and nonsurgical management yielded 20.42 and 21.06 quality-adjusted life-years, respectively. The model was robust and was not sensitive to variation in any of the parameters within the clinically plausible ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this decision analytic model, the optimal choice for breast cancer survivors with mild carpal tunnel syndrome who are at risk for lymphedema would be delaying surgery until severe symptoms develop. This strategy balances the potential increased risk of lymphedema following carpal tunnel release with the decreased long-term risk of severe carpal tunnel syndrome. The model comprehensively assesses a controversial area in the breast cancer and hand surgery literature to inform decision-making for patients and clinicians.