The Cardioplastic Approach to the Treatment of Infected Aortic Grafts

Open repair with latissimus muscle flap coverage for treatment of infected thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair

A male patient, 70 years of age, was evaluated for an infected thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). After presenting with persistent fever, a positron emission tomography scan found an infected aortic stent graft. The patient underwent open repair with explantation of the infected TEVAR, extensive periaortic debridement, graft replacement with a Dacron graft, and complete coverage with a latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Tissue culture revealed Clostridium spp. He was discharged home with long-term ampicillin and sulbactam. A postoperative computed tomography scan showed no recurrence of infection. Open surgery with latissimus muscle flap coverage is an achievable option for infected TEVAR.

Robotic-assisted closed-chest management of a fungal-infected prosthetic aortic graft: a case report

Background

Fungal prosthetic graft infections are associated with high mortality, typically requiring aggressive surgical debridement. We present an alternative, minimally invasive approach to address these challenging clinical cases.

Case presentation

A 76-year-old Caucasian male with prior aortic root and arch replacement presented with localized chest wall tenderness after being hit by a car door. Computed tomography angiogram incidentally identified fluid in the anterior mediastinum, surrounding his ascending aortic graft. Rather than undertaking a high-risk reoperative sternotomy and redo complex aortic reconstruction, we elected to proceed with a robotic-assisted, minimally invasive debridement of the aortic graft, coupled with an omental wrap, entirely within the closed chest. Microbiology was positive for Aspergillus species. The patient made an uncomplicated recovery and was discharged home on antifungal therapy, likely to continue indefinitely.

Conclusions

Infected prosthetic aortic grafts can be successfully managed with debridement and pedicled omental flap coverage via a minimally invasive approach within the closed chest, obviating the morbidity of a complex reoperative open procedure.

Y-shaped Muscular Wrapping Technique Avoiding Re-infection of a Replaced Aortic Graft: A Cadaveric Study

Replacing an infected prosthetic thoracic aorta graft carries a high re-infection risk. We previously reported two clinical cases successfully treated with a new muscular wrapping technique: latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap with a distally based serratus anterior (SA) extension; however, a cadaveric study to prove the regular existence of the distal attachment area was lacking. We tried to establish an appropriate way of elevating the combined muscle flap safely. All of the cadavers were preserved using the Thiel embalming technique to retain flexibility. We checked for the existence of the distal attachment area between the LD and SA. Combined muscle flaps were elevated proximally while identifying the thoracodorsal artery, including the LD and SA branches. After the SA branch was ligated and cut, the SA muscle was manually peeled from the LD muscle with only the distal tight attachment area remaining. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed using a multislice computed tomography system. Six human cadavers (three men, three women: 91 years old, on average) were examined. All six LD and SA combined muscle flaps showed a distal tight attachment area at the level from the seventh rib to the ninth rib. The tip of the SA muscle easily reached the sternum. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography failed to reconfirm the distal vascular flow from the LD to the reverse SA muscle, which we had visualized in a clinical case. We demonstrated the anatomical reliability of the new Y-shaped muscular flaps, which are suitable for preventing re-infection of aortic graft replacement.

Cardioplastic Approach to Omental Flap Coverage for Severe Aortic Root Infections in the Opioid Era

Aortic root abscesses are severe sequelae of endocarditis that clinically manifest as life-threatening infection. As the opioid epidemic continues to yield a national crisis, the incidence and severity of this disease process have increased. Reconstruction of the aortic root is a challenging undertaking and carries the risk of recurrent infection. The omentum has an established reputation as a reliable flap in thoracic reconstruction, given its amorphous form and immunogenic properties, but it has not been utilized for aortic root infections. We present a novel indication for the omental flap using a cardioplastic approach in coverage of aortic root reconstruction. Four patients were treated with pedicled omental flap coverage after aortic root reconstruction. All patients had successful flap healing with no evidence of recurrent infection. This series demonstrates the technical feasibility and clinical utility for providing soft tissue coverage and antimicrobial protection when used in aortic root reconstruction.

Successful treatment of thoracic aortic graft infection by omental flap following vacuum-assisted closure therapy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative thoracic aortic graft infection (TAGI) is a serious and potentially fatal complication. The classical approach is to replace the infected graft. However, this approach has a high mortality rate. Alternatively, treatment of TAGI without graft replacement can be performed METHOD: Herein, we present a 72-year-old case with mediastinitis and graft infection after type A aortic dissection operation and successful treatment using omental flap coverage following vacuum-assisted wound closure therapy without graft replacement.

CONCLUSION

The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and remains infection-free to date.

Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap with a Distally Based Serratus Anterior Extension for Salvaging Aortic Graft Infection

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Omental Flap Coverage for Management of Thoracic Aortic Graft Infection

BACKGROUND

Since the first reported use of prosthetic aortic grafts, infection has remained a feared complication. Pedicled omentum is the preferred flap in managing thoracic aortic graft infection (TAGI); however the literature is sparse. The authors present their experience with TAGI managed with pedicled omental flaps.

METHODS

A single-institutional review from 2007 to 2018 was performed to analyze postoperative outcomes of omental flap reconstruction, performed by 2 surgeons, after a confirmed diagnosis of TAGI. The primary outcomes of overall complication rate, 30-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated with univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty patients requiring omental flap reconstruction after TAGI met inclusion criteria. The patient cohort included 14 men and 6 women with a mean age of 60.6 ± 12.9 years and a mean Charlson comorbidity index of 3.3 ± 2.1. Nine patients (45%) received omental flap reconstruction at the time of incipient TAGI surgical management by the cardiothoracic surgery team, whereas 11 patients received delayed reconstruction (mean, 6.22 days [range, 1-27]). The most common complications were graft leak (20%) and pseudoaneurysm (25%), with only 1 patient developing recurrent infection. Overall 30-day mortality was 20%. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and delayed omental flap reconstruction were associated with 30-day mortality (P = .04). Four of 11 patients (36.4%) who received delayed omental flap reconstruction died within 30 days, whereas 0 of 9 patients (0%) in the immediate omental coverage group died within 30 days (P = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

High mortality rates associated with TAGI exemplify the challenges associated with this disease process and patient population. Pedicled omentum is a safe adjunct with promising results to the management of TAGI while significantly reducing the risk of reinfection.

Reflection of pioneers: redo thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair controversies in thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery

Reoperative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair is frequently necessary and brings with it a unique set of challenges. Typically, most reoperative repairs are necessitated by aortic disease progressing into previously healthy aortic tissue from a replaced section of the aorta (an extension of the previous repair) or, to a lesser degree, because of a late complication of prior distal aortic repair (an open or endovascular repair failure). Characterizing the reason for the reoperation as well as the location of prior repair is the first step towards anticipating major outcomes following such repair. Since the introduction of endovascular repair for aortic aneurysms, indications for open repair have become more specific and limited; many centers have justified using endovascular approaches in patients with prior open aortic repair by deeming these patients "high risk" because of their previous incision. Our analysis found that reoperative repairs were not typically subject to worse early outcomes than patients without prior distal aortic repair, except for the more complicated types of reoperation, which involve infection.