A Low-Cost Simulator for Training in Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation

Merits of simulation-based education: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The drive to improve surgical proficiency through advanced simulation-based training has gained momentum. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated evidence regarding the impact of plastic surgery-related simulation on the performance of residents.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library and review of articles was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol. An inverse-variance random-effects model was used to combine study estimates to account for between-study variability. Objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) scores and subjective confidence scores were used to assess the impact of the simulation with positive changes from the baseline indicating better outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies pooling 367 trainees who participated in various simulations were included. Completion of simulation training was associated with significant improvement in subjective confidence scores with a mean increase of 1.44 units (95% CI: 0.93 to 1.94, P < 0.001), and in OSATS scores, with a mean increase of 1.24 units (95% CI: 0.87 to 1.62, P < 0.001), both on a 1-5 scale. Participants reported high satisfaction scores (mean = 4.76 units, 95% CI = 4.61 to 4.91, P = 0.006), also on a 1-5 scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in surgical simulation markedly improved objective and subjective scoring metrics for surgical trainees. Several simulation devices are available for honing surgical skills, with the potential for advancements. The evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of simulations; thus, incorporating simulation into training curricula should be a priority in the field of plastic surgery.

A systematic review of surgical simulation in gender affirmation surgery

The burgeoning field of gender affirmation surgery (GAS) has become increasingly complex, challenging plastic surgeons to meet high standards for their patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emphasis on remote learning ushered in the increased use of surgical simulation training, offering residents the opportunity to trial challenging procedures before treating patients. This systematic review seeks to summarize current simulation training models used in GAS. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA-P guidelines using the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were English-language peer-reviewed articles on surgical simulation techniques or training related to the field of gender surgery. Skills and techniques taught and assessed, model type, equipment, and cost were abstracted from articles. Our search criteria identified 1650 articles, 10 of which met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. Simulation models included those that involved cadavers (n = 2), synthetic benchtop (n = 5), augmented/virtual reality (n = 2), and 3D-printed interfaces (n = 1). The most common procedure involved breast or pectoral reconstruction and/or augmentation (n = 5), followed by vaginal reconstruction (n = 3). One simulation model involved facial GAS. All models focused on surgical technique and anatomy, three on suture skills or knot-tying, and one on surgical decision-making. The evolving field of GAS requires that plastic surgery trainees be knowledgeable on surgical techniques surrounding this scope of practice. Surgical simulation not only teaches residents how to master techniques but also helps address the sensitive nature of GAS.

Endoscopic Resection for Vascular Anomalies in Children: A New Standard

OBJECTIVE

To report an innovative endoscopic surgery for subcutaneous vascular malformations and intramuscular fibro-adipose vascular anomaly (FAVA) at our center.

BACKGROUND

Historically, open surgical resection has been the treatment of choice. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery have led to the successful application of endoscopic resection techniques for the surgical management of diseases of soft tissue.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of vascular anomalies were included in this retrospective review. Data were extracted from our Vascular Anomalies Center database between September 2019 and October 2022, including sex, age, symptoms, diagnosis, sites of surgery, previous treatment, surgery, and follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 13 females and 15 males in the current study, with ages ranging from 1 to 17 years. The diagnoses included microcystic lymphatic malformation (LM) (n = 8), Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome (n = 7), venous malformation (n = 6), FAVA (n = 6), and mixed cystic LM (n = 1). Surgical sites included the lower extremity (n = 24), abdominal wall (n = 2), upper extremity (n = 1), and thoracic wall (n = 1). Five patients had an intramuscular lesion (FAVA). The endoscopic technique used 2 or 3 small ports in a gas inflation manner. Surgery included thrombectomy, radical resection, and debulking of vascular anomalies. Postoperative sclerotherapy with bleomycin was performed through a drainage tube in 6 patients with microcystic LM. Technical success was obtained in 27 patients. The conversion to open surgery was performed in one patient owing to the deep location of the lesion. No wound-related complication was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive, effective, and safe treatment for subcutaneous vascular malformations and intramuscular FAVA. This approach can set a new standard that minimizes wound complications and reduces recovery time in patients undergoing resection for benign soft-tissue lesions.

A Description of Breast Models Used to Teach Clinical Skills

Background: Health care trainees lack opportunities to practice breast assessment and clinical skills with patients, making breast models significant for hands-on training. Insufficient training leads to low competence across practitioners in breast health areas of practice, including clinical lactation. The aim of this review was to describe types of breast models used to teach clinical skills of the breast across breast health areas. The secondary aims were to describe education interventions that included each model and identify whether multiple skin tones were available in models. Methods: Authors conducted a scoping review to identify which types of breast models are used to teach clinical skills across breast health areas of practice and determine gaps in literature regarding how clinical lactation skills are taught. The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, MedLine, and ProQuest. Inclusion criteria were students/professionals engaging in breast model simulation. Eighteen studies were reviewed. Authors extracted data on participants, breast health area, breast model, intervention, evaluation, general outcomes, skin tone, and research design. Results: The most common skill area was clinical breast exam (n = 7), while least was breastfeeding education (n = 1). Most models were commercial (n = 12). Zero studies described skin tone. Generally, breast model simulations were correlated with increased clinical skills and confidence regardless of model used. Conclusions: Despite demonstrated gain of skills, this review reveals inconsistent use of breast models and evaluation, exclusion of diverse skin tones, and lack of breast models reported to teach clinical lactation skills.

Simulation in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a scoping review

Since the origins of surgery, simulation has played an important role in surgical education, particularly in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This has greater relevance in contemporary settings of reduced clinical exposure resulting in limited work-based learning opportunities. With changing surgical curricula, it is prescient to examine the role of simulation in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

A scoping review protocol was used to identify relevant studies, with an iterative process identifying, reviewing and charting the data to derive reported outcomes and themes.

Of the 554 studies identified, 52 studies were included in this review. The themes identified included simulator modalities, curriculum elements targeted and relevant surgical competencies. There was a predominance of synthetically based simulators, targeting technical skills largely associated with microsurgery, paediatric surgery and craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Existing simulators largely address high-complexity procedures. There are multiple under-represented areas, including low-complexity procedures and simulation activities addressing communication, collaboration, management and leadership. There are many opportunities for simulation in surgical education, which requires a contextual appreciation of educational theory. Simulation may be used both as a learning method and as an assessment tool.

This review describes the literature relating to simulation in plastic and reconstructive surgery and proposes opportunities for incorporating simulation in a broader sense, in the surgical curriculum.

Mind the Gap: a Competency-Based Scoping Review of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Reported Simulation Training Models

BACKGROUND

Simulation training has become an integral part of plastic surgery postgraduate curricula. It facilitates the acquisition of skills in a safe environment that can be later transferred to real-life settings. A variety of models have been described covering some aspects of the specialty better than others. The aim of this study was to identify and classify all the previously reported plastic surgery simulation models and the possible gaps having the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) list of competencies as a guide.

METHODS

Through a Delphi process, the complete list of ACGME minimum requirements for certification was analyzed to identify domains amenable for simulation training. A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed looking for all previously reported simulation models in plastic surgery. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and parallel blind review were used to identify eligible models.

RESULTS

A total of 81 ACGME competencies were identified. Following a 3-round Delphi process, consensus was reached on 19 reconstructive and 15 aesthetic surgery domains suitable for simulation training. 1667 articles were initially retrieved from Pubmed, of which 66 articles were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive (65%), quasi-experimental (24%) and experimental studies (11%) were found. For the 34 identified ACGME competencies, there were simulation models described for 58.8% of these, mostly covering reconstructive surgery (84.2%) while for aesthetic surgery it was 13.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review has identified that there are still gaps in ACGME competencies that could benefit from new simulation training models, especially in those related to aesthetic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Use of Simulation in Plastic Surgery Training

The nationwide focus on patient safety and the health of residents has increased the demand for educational tools outside the operating room. Simulation is a valuable tool for assessing and developing surgical skills in a controlled and safe environment. The use of simulation as a formal component of training has been increasing in various surgical subspecialties. In general surgery, simulation examinations such as the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery have become a prerequisite to board certification. Although formal simulation examinations in plastic surgery are not universal, there has been an increase in the use of simulation to increase resident competency in the operating room. For now, we will review the current state of simulation in craniofacial, hand, microvascular, and esthetic surgery and discuss applications for the future. We will also discuss the evolving role of artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and augmented reality in plastic surgery training and testing.