Poly Implants Prosthèse Breast Implants: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Impact of the withdrawal of macrotextured implant on reconstruction practices

INTRODUCTION

On 22 November 2018, the French Society for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery recommended that Allergan® macrotextured breast implants be recalled, a decision endorsed by the French national health products safety agency (ANSM) on 2nd April 2019. At the Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center (CGFL) in Dijon, we decided to stop using macrotextured implants as of November 2018 in favor of smooth implants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the recall of macrotextured implants on breast reconstruction surgical practices and their complications.

METHODS

This is a single-centre, retrospective study performed at the CGFL in Dijon, France. Reconstruction techniques and complications were compared between two periods, i.e. before the recall of macrotextured breast implants (period 1: 1st September 2017-November 22, 2018) and after the recall (period 2: 23 November 2018-31st March 2020). All patients who underwent breast reconstruction for the first time were included.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 168 reconstructions in period 2, and 159 in period 2. The rate of use of breast implants during reconstructions decreased significantly in period 2 (53.6% vs. 23.9%; P<0.001). The rate of autologous reconstructions increased significantly for muscle sparing latissimus dorsi (2.4% vs. 12.6%; P<0.001) and exclusive fat grafting (9.5% vs. 21.5%; P<0.01). Clavien-Dindo Stage IIIb complications decreased in period 2 (10% vs. 18.4%; P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Since the recall of macrotextured breast implants, the reconstruction rate has decreased in our centre in favor of autologous techniques with lower complication rates.

Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Breast Implant Rupture Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation is the most common aesthetic operation performed in the United States and worldwide; 1,862,506 breast augmentation procedures were performed in 2018, an increase of 27.6 percent compared to 2014 data.

METHODS

In the present study, the authors performed a systematic review to identify the accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing breast prosthesis rupture. Studies in which the ultrasound diagnostic test was compared to a surgical finding as a reference standard were reviewed.

RESULTS

As a result, 20 primary studies were included in the analyses, with a total of 1987 patients and 3297 prostheses. The use of ultrasound for diagnosis of breast prosthesis rupture presented the following results: pooled sensitivity, 73.7 percent (95 percent CI, 70.2 to 77.1 percent); pooled specificity, 87.8 percent (95 percent CI, 86.5 to 89.0); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.7762; diagnostic odds ratio, 11.04 (95 percent CI, 5.79 to 21.08).

CONCLUSION

This study supports that ultrasound of breast prostheses is an adequate tool in the diagnosis of rupture.

A Study on Breast Reconstruction in a Developing Country: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Techniques and Oncologic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer, with an incidence of 33.2 per 100,000 in Iranian population, is considered as the most common cancer in Iranian women. Nowadays, with the increasing survival rates, breast reconstruction has been integrated into surgical techniques of breast cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of breast reconstruction in Iranian population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in Imam Hospital between January 2008 and June 2018. All the patients underwent breast reconstruction surgery. The trend of reconstruction and complication rates were 2 major outcomes. Logistic regression model was used to predict complications. Student t test was used to compare means.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients underwent 60 autologous breast reconstruction surgeries and 152 patients underwent 193 prosthesis-based reconstruction surgeries. Most of cases were invasive ductal carcinoma ± ductal carcinoma in situ (126 cases, 68%). Among 253 surgeries in 207 patients, 98 cases (38.7%) were 2-stage implant, 91 (36.0%) were 1-stage implant, 3 (1.2%) were acellular dermal matrix + prosthesis, 31 (12.2%) were pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, 25 (9.8%) were latissimus dorsi flap ± prosthesis, and 4 (15.8%) were latissimus dorsi flap. Among prosthesis-based reconstructions, chemotherapy could predict the occurrence of complications (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.07-7.68), whereas none of these factors could predict the occurrence of complications in autologous reconstructions. The most prevalent complication was seroma formation (48.5% of all complications). Overall complication rates (including major and minor) were higher among autologous reconstructions compared with prosthesis-based reconstructions (45.8% and 21.1%, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The trend of breast reconstruction is changing in Islamic Republic of Iran as a developing country. Implant-based reconstruction has surpassed autologous reconstructions in recent years. In terms of complications, we observed higher rates among autologous reconstructions.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma as a Result of Likely Industrial Grade Ruptured Poly Implant Prosthèse Silicone Buttock Implants

The Poly Implant Prosthèse (PIP) implants were withdrawn from the market in 2010 due to the use of a nonmedical grade silicone filler. In 2012, the French medical authorities and the International Confederation of Societies of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery recommended the extraction of PIP implants. However, during the duration of this scandal, each country in the world did not agree with a uniform procedure, and this rule was not implemented in its entirety. Although laboratory test results on PIP implants were negative for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, there are many reports in the literature of several complications associated with PIP implants, including high rupture rates and the fact that they are 3 to 5 times more likely to produce local tissue reactions. On the other hand, the development of more strange and worse prognosis complications, such as the development of squamous carcinoma associated with the use of silicone implants (not necessarily related to PIP implants), is less known. To date, only 6 cases have been reported, and all are related to breast augmentation. The authors made the first report of primary gluteal squamous cell cancer related to rupture and delayed removal of PIP silicone buttock implants.

Level of Evidence: 5