Volume Resuscitation in Patients With High-Voltage Electrical Injuries

Electrical injuries and outcomes: A retrospective review

Electrical burns (EI) differ from other burn injuries in the immediate treatment given and delayed sequelae they manifest. This paper reviews our burn center's experience with electrical injuries. All patients with electrical injuries admitted from January 2002 to August 2019 were included. Demographics; admission, injury, and treatment data; complications, including infection, graft loss, and neurologic injury; pertinent imaging, neurology consultation, neuropsychiatric testing; and mortality were collected. Subjects were divided into those who were exposed to high (>1000 volts), low (<1000 volts), and unknown voltage. The groups were compared. P < 0.05 was considered significant. One hundred sixty-two patients with electrical injuries were included. Fifty-five suffered low voltage, 55 high voltage, and 52 unknown voltage injuries. High voltage injuries were more likely to be male (98.2% vs. 83.6% low voltage vs. 94.2% unknown voltage, p = 0.015), to experience loss of consciousness (69.1% vs. 23.6% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (20% vs. 3.6% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.032), and undergo amputation (23.6% vs. 5.5% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.024). No significant differences were observed in long-term neurological deficits. Twenty-seven patients (16.7%) were found to have neurological deficits on or after admission; 48.2% recovered, 33.3% persisted, 7.4% died, and 11.1% did not follow-up with our burn center. Electrical injuries are associated with protean sequelae. Immediate complications include cardiac, renal, and deep burns. Neurologic complications, while uncommon, can occur immediately or are delayed.

Hidden realities of electrical injuries

ABSTRACT

The clinical spectrum of electrical injury ranges from the absence of any external physical signs to severe and life-threatening trauma. This article discusses the fundamental concepts and misunderstandings surrounding electrical injuries and the best practices for evaluation and treatment.

Utilization and Efficacy of Resuscitation Endpoints in Trauma and Burn Patients: A Review Article

Shock is a sequelae in trauma and burn patients that substantially increases the risk for morbidity and mortality. The use of resuscitation endpoints allows for improved management of these patients, with the potential to prevent further morbidity/mortality. We conducted a review of the current literature on the efficacy of hemodynamic, metabolic, and regional resuscitation endpoints for use in trauma and burn patients. Hemodynamic endpoints included mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), urinary output (UO), compensatory reserve index (CRI), intrathoracic blood volume, and stroke volume variation (SVV). Metabolic endpoints measure cellular responses to decreased oxygen delivery and include serum lactic acid (LA), base deficit (BD), bicarbonate, anion gap, apparent strong ion difference, and serum pH. Mean arterial pressure, HR, UO, and LA are the most established markers of trauma and burn resuscitation. The evidence suggests LA is a superior metabolic endpoint marker. Newer resuscitation endpoint technologies such as point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS), thromboelastography (TEG), and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may improve patient outcomes; however, additional research is needed to establish the efficacy in trauma and burn patients. The endpoints discussed have situational strengths and weaknesses and no single universal resuscitation endpoint has yet emerged. This review may increase knowledge and aid in guideline development. We recommend clinicians continue to integrate multiple endpoints with emphasis on MAP, HR, UO, LA, and BD. Future investigation should aim to standardize endpoints for each clinical presentation. The search for universal and novel resuscitation parameters in trauma and burns should also continue.

The role of invasive monitoring in the resuscitation of major burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Increasingly, in major hospitals invasive monitoring endpoints are utilised to guide the acute resuscitation of burns. The aim of this review is to evaluate effects of invasive monitoring for major burns patients (>20% total body surface area) to prevent early organ dysfunction. Five databases were searched for randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that evaluated invasive monitoring within the acute phase (first 24 hours). Invasive monitoring included transesophageal echocardiogram, central venous pressure measurement, and pulmonary artery catheterisation. Primary outcomes included multiple organ failure scores, renal and cardiac dysfunction measurements, compartment syndrome and lactate at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included mortality and intensive care unit stay. Ten studies involving 401 major burns patients were included. Data pooled from four studies demonstrated significantly improved cardiac index at 24 hours compared to non-invasive endpoints (MD: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.82, P=0.00001). Five studies pooled showed significantly increased urine output with invasive monitoring (MD: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.34, P=0.02), whereas there was no difference in blood lactate levels (MD: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.44-0.22, P=0.43). There was a trend for lower mortality in invasive monitoring groups compared with non-invasive controls; however, the difference was not significant. There remains insufficient evidence to determine whether invasive monitoring to guide fluid resuscitation improves patient outcomes after major burn trauma. Although meta-analysis determined significantly improved cardiac index and urine output, further studies are required.