The Use of Pedicled Perforator Flaps in Chest Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Reliability

Clinical reliability of pedicled perforator flaps in the management of adult limb and trunk soft tissue sarcomas: Experience of two French expert centres

INTRODUCTION

Limb-sparing surgery combined with radiation has become the standard treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Despite the many advantages of reconstruction procedures, such as muscle-sparing flap and local reconstruction, the use of pedicled perforator flaps remains non-consensual due to doubts about their reliability when associated with radiotherapy. This study evaluated their surgical reliability in reconstructive surgery for limb and trunk soft tissue sarcomas, in terms of healing time, wound disorders, and postoperative complications, regardless of radiation timing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We realized a retrospective, observational, bi-center study (Cancer University Institute of Toulouse Oncopole, France and Bergonié Institute Bordeaux, France) and describes pedicled perforator flaps performed between January 2015 and January 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 74 flaps were included. The median age of the population was 70-year-old. The group consisted of 68.8% (n = 51/74) propeller flaps. We found a partial necrosis rate of 28.4% (n = 21/74), scar disunion of 48.6% (n = 36/74), local infection of 10.8% (n = 8/74), and venous congestion of 13.5% (n = 10/74). Only 16.2% (n = 12/74) required secondary surgical repair to a local complication. The average length of stay was 7.3 days  [1.0-25.0]. The mean operating time of our flaps was 133.4 min [38.0-280.0].

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicled perforator flaps are a surgical technique that can be used in reconstructive surgery for limb and trunk soft tissue sarcomas in adults, regardless of radiation timing. However, these flaps carry a high rate of postoperative complications so they should be reserved for expert surgeons in referral centers.

Outcomes and Reliability of Perforator Flaps in the Reconstruction of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Defects: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common and debilitating disease, in which the only effective treatment involves a wide excision of the affected skin. Secondary wound healing and skin grafting are two well-known options for managing these defects, but perforator flaps provide a new therapeutic alternative by ensuring reconstructions of large defects, reducing donor site morbidity, and enhancing functional recovery. The aim of this study was to achieve a systematic review of perforator flaps use in HS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched from 1989 to 2021. The PRISMA statement was used in the study selection process and the review was registered on PROSPERO. Furthermore, patient characteristics, operative technique, complications, and recurrences were searched.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles were selected including 286 patients and 387 flaps. Axillary localization was mostly represented (83.2%). Direct donor site closure was achieved in 99.1% of cases. In total, 15.1% of the flaps presented at least one of the following complications: wound dehiscence (5.5%), partial necrosis (2.9%), hematoma or seroma (2.1%), infection (2.1%), venous congestion (1.8%), and nerve injury (0.3%). Two cases of total necrosis were recorded. Recurrence of the disease was observed in 2.7% of the defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicled perforator flaps are a reliable and reproducible technique in the reconstruction of HS defects. They are associated with a low recurrence rate while ensuring an effective reconstruction with reduced morbidity and faster recovery compared to the techniques classically used in this indication.

Superior epigastric artery perforator flap for reconstruction of deep sternal wound infection

BACKGROUND

The treatment of deep wound sternal infection requires loco-regional pedicled flaps, usually with muscular flaps. Perforator propeller flaps represent the ultimate progress in the history of reconstructive surgery. We report here our experience with the superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) flaps to repair sternal defect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six patients presenting deep sternal wounds infection were treated with SEAP propeller flap, between March 2015 and June 2017. The mean age was 71.5 (range 53-83) years. The mean length and width of the defect were 16.2 × 7 cm (ranging 8-20 × 4-10). An elliptical skin flap pedicled on the SEAP was harvested in the inframammary fold and rotated up to 90° to cover the defect.

RESULTS

All SEAP flaps achieved a successful entire coverage of the defect. The mean size of the skin paddle of the flap was 20.2 × 7.3 cm (ranging 14-27 × 6-9). All flaps were able to provide a complete sternal wound cover. Venous congestion was present in five cases and adequately treated by leech therapy; necrosis was distal in one case, and interesting the entire superficial flap in two cases but with deep tissues remaining viable and able to cover the mediastinum: an infected flap required revision. Satisfyingly, at 2-years postoperative follow-up all-patients were alive with a successful mediastinal cover.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEAP Perforator propeller flap is an alternative to muscle flaps to achieve treatment of deep and large sternal wound infection.

Sequential propeller flaps in the treatment of post-traumatic soft tissue defects of the lower limb - a case series

INTRODUCTION

Propeller flaps have gained great popularity among reconstructive surgeons; however, the inability to directly close the donor site of large propeller flaps constitutes a well-known limitation of this technique. Skin grafting of the donor area is not always feasible nor desirable. To address large propeller flaps secondary defects, we investigated the use of a second propeller flap harvested from a nearby region of relative skin redundancy to assist the donor site closure generated by the first. Since the donor defect of the second flap is closed by direct suture, the aim of this "sequential" propeller flaps technique is to achieve complete, like-with-like, soft tissue restoration while avoiding skin grafting.

METHODS

From April 2018 to September 2019, eight patients presenting post-traumatic soft tissue defects were planned to be reconstructed by means of the sequential propeller flaps technique, for a total of 16 propeller flaps. The locations of the defects included the distal leg in four cases, the heel in two cases, the proximal lateral thigh in one case and proximal posterior thigh in the remaining one. All the flaps but one were harvested as a perforator-based propeller type and rotated by different degrees around the skeletonized perforator. In one patient, due to an intraoperative complication following the first flap harvest, the harvest of the second flap was abandoned.

RESULTS

In all but one patient, a complete, tension free primary closure of all wounds was achieved without complications, the functional recovery as well the esthetic outcome were excellent. One patient showed intraoperative signs of vascular insufficiency involving 15% of the first flap. The plan of harvesting the second flap was intraoperatively abandoned and the definitive wound closure with a free muscle gracilis was carried out the following week.

CONCLUSION

In some selected cases, the use of multiple propeller flaps performed in sequence allows the surgeon to obtain complete, like-with-like wound closure with vascularized tissue avoiding a free tissue transfer procedure, however, it requires a vast experience with propeller flaps and meticulous preoperative planning.

Oncologic safety of propeller flap and free flap in reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The propeller flap is a reliable option for reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection. However, some parts of the resection margin may move away from its original position during flap rotation and thus can be excluded from the clinical target volume of adjuvant radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate local recurrence after soft tissue sarcoma resection with propeller flap or free flap reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of soft tissue sarcoma followed by a free flap or propeller flap reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The 1- and 3-year local control rates were 94.6% and 88.6% in the free flap group vs 90.6% and 87.5% in the propeller flap group, without statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (88.6% vs 87.5%) and disease-free survival (82.5% vs 74.8%) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no significant difference in local control and disease-free survival rates between propeller flap and free flap reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to obtain surgical information for determining the accurate clinical target volume of adjuvant radiotherapy and the area for meticulous follow-up postoperatively.