Nasal Reconstruction: Current Overview

Hair follicle extraction combined with an expanded scalp flap for facial organ reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Use of scalp skin for facial organ reconstruction represents a mainstream procedure for organ reconstruction. In most cases, adequate amounts of skin can be obtained by using tissue expanders, but harvesting sufficient scalp tissue in patients with low hairlines is challenging. Hair follicular unit extraction (FUE) is one approach to resolve this problem. With FUE, hair follicles are removed from the scalp skin, which can then be prepared as a donor site to obtain sufficient amounts of hairless skin.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of FUE when combined with an expanded scalp flap for facial organ reconstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with low hairlines requiring facial organ reconstruction were selected for this study. The area of skin extension and hair removal were determined prior to surgery, a process which was performed in three stages. Stage I consisted of hair follicle removal using the FUE technique at the donor site. Stage II involved expander implantation using water injections. In Stage III facial organ reconstruction was completed.

RESULTS

With the use of the FUE technique, hair follicles from the donor scalp were thoroughly removed and the donor scalp tissue was successfully expanded. Postoperatively, no evident scar formation at the reconstruction site or contracture of the expanded flap was observed. All patients were satisfied with the outcome of their reconstruction procedure.

CONCLUSION

FUE provides a means for hair follicle removal from the donor site and can be employed to achieve a safe and effective procedure for facial reconstruction in patients with low hairlines.

Diversity of the free helical rim flap: A case series tailoring the microsurgical technique to esthetically optimize full-thickness nasal defect reconstructions

INTRODUCTION

The free helical rim (FHR) flap offers like-with-like reconstruction for full-thickness nasal defects. A case series of nasal reconstruction using an FHR flap was presented, detailing surgical steps and refinements, as well as functional and esthetic outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a retrospective cohort study of composite nasal defect reconstruction with FHR flap from August 2018 to March 2020. Descriptive data were analyzed by SPSS software.

RESULTS

Six cases were recruited, four were unilateral alar defects, one was hemi-nose, and one was ala plus tip. The average size of the defect was 2.5 × 2.8 cm2. Three FHR flaps were designed with retrograde pedicles and three with anterograde pedicles. The facial artery and veins were the recipient vessels in all cases. Vascular grafts were used in all six cases. Descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral (DLCxF) artery and vein functioned as interposition vascular conduits in five cases. Superficial forearm vein grafts were used in one case. One patient needed flap re-exploration due to venous congestion. One patient had partial flap necrosis due to delayed infection, and one developed delayed wound dehiscence in the irradiated wound. The average follow-up was 18 months.

CONCLUSION

The FHR flap has consistent vascular anatomy. It can be raised as an anterograde or retrograde flap for a contralateral or ipsilateral inset. FHR flap can be used in extensive composite nasal defects. This case series demonstrates that interposition vascular grafts are invariably needed and the possibility of using forearm vessels as grafts instead of DLCxF artery and vein.

Anchored Suture Technique for the Reconstruction of Paranasal Skin Defects Secondary to Melanocytic Nevus Excision

To describe a modified anchored suture technique combined with varied flaps for the repair of paranasal skin defect secondary to melanocytic nevus excision. The feasibility and effectiveness of the technique were discussed. A total of 26 patients (10 male and 16 female) with an average age of 11.1 years were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent the anchored suture technique. The subcutaneous tissue of the free margin of the cheek flap was sutured to the deep pyriform ligament. The local flaps were designed according to the size and shape of the defect. The diameter of the nevi ranged from 2.8 to 7.5 cm, with most being 3 to 5 cm (50%). Among the 26 patients, 17 patients underwent the anchored suture technique and nonadvancement flap, whereas the other 9 patients underwent the anchored suture technology and advancement flap with auxiliary incisions. Twenty-five patients had a symmetric nasal alar and unapparent scar and were satisfied with postoperative aesthetic outcomes. Thus, the anchored suture method combined with different flaps to repair paranasal defect is an effective and affordable technique to reconstruct paranasal tissue connections.

A Novel Repair Idea on Nasal Sidewall Defect in Asians: Local Tissue Regeneration

BACKGROUND

The traditional ways indicate using different types of flap to repair the nasal sidewall defect, but the scar in the donor area or bloated flap is a problem that cannot be ignored. This study propose the clinical application of the principle of tissue regeneration priority in small defects (defect diameter <1.0 cm) of nasal sidewall.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 3 patients experienced the tumor excision and tissue regeneration healing in situ from January 2019 to January 2020. In this group, the nasal sidewall defect was treated with wound moist theory, preventing infection, to promote the wound regeneration and repair.

RESULT

The longest follow-up time was 8 month, all patient undergone half a year follow-up at least. One of them were left small sunken scars but all of them healed up well and satisfied with the results.

CONCLUSION

When dealing with the small defect of the skin and soft tissue on the nasal sidewall (defect diameter <1.0 cm), this article provided a new idea that is application of the priority principle for tissue regeneration repair rather than traditional flap used for 1-stage repair. For the small defects of the skin and soft tissue on the nasal sidewall, the tissue regeneration and natural repair in situ can achieve satisfactory effects. More importantly, it has the advantages of simplicity, ease of operation, and fewer complications.

Reconstruction of nasal vestibular obstruction after total nasal reconstruction using superior subcutaneous pedicle nasolabial flaps

Objective and Methods

Nasal obstruction after total nasal reconstruction is a serious complication that contributes to breathing difficulty, snoring, and obstructive sleep apnea, which can negatively influence daily activities. However, few treatments have been reported in detail for this condition. Here, a case of nasal vestibular obstruction after total nasal reconstruction that was treated with bilateral superior subcutaneous pedicle nasolabial flaps is reported.

Results

An intranasal stent was used postoperatively for five months to prevent restenosis. Internal stenosis was not noted 25 months postoperatively. The patient could breathe easily through his nose and mouth dryness improved.

Conclusion

The flap is relatively thin, easy to elevate with high flexibility and stable blood flow, and useful for nasal vestibular lining reconstruction.

Reconstruction of Cutaneous Nasal Alar Defects Following Melanocytic Nevus Resection

OBJECTIVE

The reconstruction of nasal alar defects after resection of a melanocytic nevus becomes one of the most challenging procedures for surgeons. Choosing the most appropriate technique is still difficult sometimes. The authors reviewed our cases and published experience on choosing optimal surgical methods to repair different types of nasal alar defect following melanocytic nevus resection.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients who were treated between 2016 and 2019 in Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital were evaluated. The surgical methods included primary closure, full-thickness skin graft, composite auricular graft, interpolated melolabial flap, paramedian forehead flap including hair-bearing paramedian forehead flap.

RESULTS

Among the 152 patients with a melanocytic nevus, 49 underwent primary closure, 38 were treated with a full-thickness skin graft, 16 composite auricular graft, 28 were treated with interpolated melolabial flap, and 21were treated with paramedian forehead flap including 14 with hair-bearing paramedian forehead flap. Most skin graft, composite auricular graft, and flaps were survived. Patients who completed follow-up were satisfied with the contour of the nasal ala.

CONCLUSIONS

After resection of the melanocytic nevus, the surgeon should choose the most appropriate surgical method for alar reconstruction according to the characteristics of the defect and personal desire of patient or the guardian.

Use of Dorsal Nasal Flap in Combination With Nasolabial Perforator Propeller Flap for Reconstruction of Nasal Skin Defects of Medium to Large Size; A Simpler Alternative to Frontal Flap

ABSTRACT

Nasal reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures in plastic surgery. To get optimal aesthetic and functional results, the surgeon should know all the options well. Forehead flap is the gold standard technique for closure of medium to large defects of the nose. Although it provides a very good color and texture match, it may become a difficult option in patients with poor condition. The aim of this study was to define a simpler technique for nasal reconstruction using combined local flaps.Twelve patients, operated using a dorsal nasal flap combined with a nasolabial perforator propeller flap, were presented in the study. Properties of the patients, defect size and locations, and complications were evaluated.The mean size of the reconstructed defects was 10.1 cm2. No flap loss was observed. Venous congestion was the most common complication and resolved spontaneously in all cases. Two cases had partial distal necrosis, which also healed spontaneously.Closure was achieved successfully in all cases with a medium to large nasal defect using a combined dorsal nasal flap and nasolabial perforator propeller flap. This method can be used as an alternative to forehead flap.

Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Nose: The Aesthetic Approach to Total Defects

BACKGROUND

 Reconstruction of complex defects involving nose and close facial units represents an aesthetic and functional challenge. Restoring satisfactory nasal shape, combining aesthetic, nasal function and patent airways is mandatory. In this paper, we describe our approach to total nose defects and we report our 20-year experience in microvascular nose reconstruction.Clinical cases are shown to illustrate different surgical techniques and the evolution of our approach.

METHODS

 Nasal reconstruction procedures were performed on 21 patients between 2000 and 2020 using the radial forearm flap (RFF) or anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. Reported reconstructions included total/subtotal nasal defects, caused by cancer resections. The key point of our approach is the expanded forehead flap for skin coverage. Reconstruction is completed by cartilage grafts to restore nasal framework and to shape nasal tip. Ancillary procedures were needed in some cases to optimize aesthetic outcomes.

RESULTS

 Twenty-one patients completed the multistage nasal reconstruction. The RFF flap was used in 56% of the cases (n = 11), while the ALT flap was used in 44% (n = 10) of our case series. No difference has been detected in the number of reconstructive stages required to achieve the final result comparing RFF and ALT reconstruction (3.3 vs. 3.1 reconstructive steps). Ancillary procedures were performed in 7 patients.

CONCLUSION

 Microvascular tissue transfer plays a key role in full-thickness nasal defects restoration. Comparing the two groups, both the RFF and ALT are effective and reliable options in lining reconstruction, although with different indications. Expanded forehead flap, combined to free cartilage graft, is our gold standard to provide external skin coverage to rebuild the nasal framework. According to our current approach, accurate preoperative planning, supported by modern technologic tools, multistage reconstruction, and ancillary procedures are useful to accomplish satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Use of a multilayered acellular dermal substitute with simultaneous full-thickness skin graft for the one-stage coverage of nasal skin defects

BACKGROUND

Nasal skin defect closures are challenging because the nose is a complex anatomic structure with several subunits, and the nasal tip and ala represent particularly difficult subunits to reconstruct. The traditional full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) is an easy and well-established method, but often results in undesirable outcomes in terms of the nasal contour caused by a lack of dermal tissue.

AIMS

The purpose of the study is to report the outcomes of the simultaneous application of the acellular dermal substitute (Matriderm^® ) with FTSG in the treatment of nasal skin defects.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Five patients with various nasal skin defects were treated with multilayered Matriderm grafts followed by FTSGs harvested from the pre- or postauricular region. Graft survival, scar quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated and compared with 10 patients treated with conventional FTSGs.

RESULTS

One-stage Matriderm-aided FTSGs were well-taken in all cases. Scar quality in the Matriderm group (8.0 ± 1.9) was statistically superior to that in the FTSG only group (10.8 ± 1.7). The Matriderm-aided graft was also superior in patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The multilayered application of Matriderm in combination with FTSG is a reliable method for covering nasal skin defects, especially in the thick skin zone of the tip and ala.