A Study to Evaluate Change in Ventricular Volume Obtained by Cranial Distraction for Craniosynostosis

Changes in Ventricular Volume After Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Syndromic and Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the response of the ventricular system to cranial vault surgery in patients with craniosynostosis. This study aims to evaluate the changes in the cerebral ventricular system in response to posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) in patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of all patients with craniosynostosis undergoing PVDO from 2000 to 2022 was completed. Patients were included for analysis if they had pre and postoperative cranial computed tomography scans. Ventricular volume (VV) and intracranial volume (ICV) were calculated using segmentation software.

RESULTS

Both patients with syndromic synostosis and nonsyndromic synostosis (NSS) experienced a significant increase in ICV after PVDO, but only patients with NSS experienced a significant VV change ( P = 0.004). After normalization by ICV, total, lateral, and third VV changes retained significance with percentage increases of 114%, 117%, and 89%, respectively ( P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

The differing results between cohorts reinforce the concept that the intracranial milieu is different between patients with syndromic synostosis and NSS. The results of the NSS cohort suggest that these patients may exist in a compensated state in which a reduction in cerebral blood flow and VV allows for the maintenance of parenchymal health to prevent the development of intracranial hypertension. Further studies may explore VV as a surrogate marker of ICP elevation, and the utility of cranial vault remodeling on nonsynostotic pathologies with cephalocranial disproportion.

Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Craniosynostosis, a condition of premature cranial suture fusion, can have significantly detrimental effects on development and growth due to sequelae of increased intracranial hypertension (ICP), exophthalmos, and upper airway obstruction. Evolving surgical treatments now include distraction osteogenesis (DO) due to its many benefits relative to standard cranial vault remodeling procedures. This article provides an overview and update of different surgical applications of DO for patients with craniosynostosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

DO has been utilized successfully for single and multisuture craniosynostosis with or without midface hypoplasia to increase intracranial volume, decrease ICP and improve aesthetics. It has been applied in single suture synostosis, posterior vault DO, fronto-orbital advancement, monobloc DO and Le Fort III DO. DO has been applied through modification of traditional surgical procedures with success in maintaining goals of surgery while reducing risk.

SUMMARY

DO is still a relatively new and evolving surgical technique for patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. With promising benefits, consideration for each procedure should be weighed until longer-term data is available.

Rotation flap distraction osteogenesis for unicoronal synostosis

Unicoronal craniosynostosis is notoriously difficult to treat, with long-term studies demonstrating high rates of relapse and the need for reoperation using open fronto-orbital advancement. Applying the principles of distraction osteogenesis to cranial vault remodeling has demonstrated promising short-term results that compare favorably with traditional methods, with simultaneous correction of both frontofacial and endocranial morphology, along with significant increases in intracranial volume. Here, the authors demonstrate their technique for rotation flap distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of unicoronal synostosis and provide case examples.

The video can be found here: https://vimeo.com/519505008.