Tang L, Zhou X, Huang S, Zou Y. Combined Great Toe Dorsal Nail-Skin Flap and Medial Plantar Flap for Reconstruction of Degloved Finger Loss.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2024;
153:143-152. [PMID:
37039517 DOI:
10.1097/prs.0000000000010517]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Historically, the degloved finger with the total loss of nails and skin has been resurfaced in two stages. Furthermore, proximal finger amputation requires an additional bone-tendon graft and an expanded great toe wraparound flap transfer for better outcomes. This article recommends a novel strategy to address these problems in a single stage using a dorsal nail-skin flap and medial plantar artery perforator flap.
METHODS
From March of 2015 to June of 2018, nine procedures were performed to resurface with skin loss to the metacarpophalangeal joint level, and three amputated fingers were reconstructed with an extra bone-joint-tendon graft simultaneously. The dorsal great toe donor was covered with a thin groin flap, and the medial plantar site was covered with a full-thickness skin graft. A standardized assessment of outcome in terms of sensory, functional, and aesthetic performance was completed.
RESULTS
All flaps survived. The contour and length of the reconstructed digits were comparable with the contralateral finger. The mean static two-point discrimination was 11.0 mm (range, 9.0 to 14.0 mm). The average score of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were 2.5 (range, 0 to 5) and 90.1 (range, 82 to 96), respectively. The mean Foot and Ankle Disability Index score was 95.6 (range, 93 to 99). At the last follow-up, the functional and aesthetic outcomes, and the restored sensation, were satisfactory for all fingers.
CONCLUSION
This strategy may provide an alternative for selected patients seeking cosmetic resurfacing and functional reconstruction, preserving a weight-bearing plantar area with less morbidity.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, IV.
Collapse