One-Piece Fronto-orbital Distraction With Midline Splitting But Without Bandeau for Metopic Craniosynostosis: Craniometric, Volumetric, and Morphologic Evaluation

Craniosynostosis in Africa: Insights from 8 Countries-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Craniosynostosis is a congenital skull deformity that impacts development and quality of life of children if left untreated. This study aimed to evaluate literature regarding presentation, treatment, and outcomes of craniosynostosis in Africa.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Fourteen retrospective/prospective studies with 620 patients and 14 case reports involving 27 cases (8 countries) were included. In 12 articles, 56.6% of patients (317/560) were males, with a mean age of 2.4 years (confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.7). Abnormal head shape was the most reported presentation in 77.8% of cases (332/427, 8 articles). Syndromic craniosynostosis was seen in 25.2% (CI: 13.7%-36.6%). Common phenotypes were trigonocephaly in 31.5% (CI: 3.6%-59.4%), anterior plagiocephaly in 23.2% (CI: 5.1%-41.3%), and scaphocephaly in 22.1% (CI: 13.5%-30.8%). Five hundred seventy eight patients, 99.5% (CI: 99.0%-100.0%), underwent surgical treatment. Vault remodeling was performed in 72.9% patients (CI: 47.4%-98.6%). Postoperative complications included cerebrospinal fluid leaks 5.4% (CI: 0.0%-11.6%) and surgical site infections 4.5% (CI: 0.0%-10.8%). Follow-up ranged between 0.2 and 40.9 months; 95.6% of cases (CI: 90.1%-100.0%) exhibited improved deformity and neurological deficits at last follow-up. The mortality rate was 3.1% (CI: 0.0%-6.9%, 2 articles).

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies on craniosynostosis in Africa highlight the need for more research. Treatment with open techniques yields few complications and a low mortality rate. Early diagnosis and collaborative data reporting will enhance understanding of its burden and variations across Africa.

A critical eye on metopic craniosynostosis: A retrospective study assessing orbital dysmorphology as a marker of disease

This investigation sought to ascertain whether orbital morphology could predict genuine metopic craniosynostosis (MCS). The study retrospectively analyzed preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) scans of patients who underwent surgical correction for MCS. MCS severity was evaluated using the interfrontal angle (IFA). Orbital dysmorphology was assessed based on multiple angles, including supraorbital notches and nasion (SNS), infraorbital foramina and nasion (INI), zygomaticofrontal suture-supraorbital notch-dacryon (ZSD), and orbital long axis (OLA). Results were juxtaposed against age/gender-matched controls and individuals with non-synostotic metopic ridge (MR). The study included 177 patients: 68 MCS, 35 MR, and 74 control subjects. All orbital measurements exhibited significant differences across groups. IFA demonstrated a strong association with all orbital measurements, particularly SNS (B = 0.79, p < 0.001). SNS showed the highest area under the curve among orbital measurements (0.89). Using a 95% sensitivity threshold, the optimal diagnostic angle for SNS was 129.23° (specificity 54%, sensitivity 96%). These findings suggest a correlation between orbital dysmorphology and trigonocephaly severity. The observed dysmorphology manifested in a superomedially accentuated rotational pattern. Importantly, SNS angle predicted MCS, with an angle greater than 130° indicating <5% likelihood of MCS diagnosis. The simplicity of measuring SNS angle on any 3D-CT scan highlights its practical use for assisting with MCS diagnosis.

Validating the Supraorbital Notch-Nasion-Supraorbital Notch Angle as a Marker for Metopic Craniosynostosis Severity

OBJECTIVE

Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS) can be difficult to differentiate from metopic ridge (MR) or normal frontal morphology. This study assess whether the supraorbital notch-nasion-supraorbital notch (SNS) angle can help identify MCS.

METHODS

Records of 212 patients with preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were examined. The SNS angles, surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings, and CranioRate metopic severity scores (MSSs) were compared with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with Youden J-statistic and cross-validation of regression models assessed the ability of these measures to predict surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients were included, consisting of 78 MCS, 37 MR, and 97 controls. Both the mean SNS angle (MCS: 111.7 ± 10.7 degrees, MR: 126.0 ± 8.2 degrees, controls: 130.7 ± 8.8 degrees P < 0.001) and MSS (MCS: 5.9 ± 2.0, MR: 1.4 ± 1.9, controls: 0.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) were different among the cohorts. The mean SNS angle (111.5 ± 10.7 versus 129.1 ± 8.8, P < 0.001) was lower in those who had surgery and CranioRate score (5.9 ± 2.1 versus 0.8 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) was higher in those who underwent surgery. SNS angles were positively correlated with surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings ( r = 0.41, P < 0.05) and CranioRate MSS ( r = 0.54, P < 0.05). The ROC curve requiring high sensitivity revealed an SNS angle of 124.8 degrees predicted surgery with a sensitivity of 88.7% and a specificity of 71.3%. A ROC curve using the CranioRate MCC values ≥3.19 predicted surgery with 88.7% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Orbital dysmorphology in patients with MCS is well captured by the supraorbital-nasion angle. Both the SNS angle and CranioRate MSS scores accurately predict surgical intervention.

Superior Long-term Appearance of Strip Craniectomy Compared with Cranial Vault Reconstruction in Metopic Craniosynostosis

Background:

Strip craniectomy with orthotic helmet therapy (SCOT) is an increasingly supported treatment for metopic craniosynostosis, although the long-term efficacy of deformity correction remains poorly defined. We compared the longterm outcomes of SCOT versus open cranial vault reconstruction (OCVR).

Methods:

Patients who underwent OCVR or SCOT for isolated metopic synostosis with at least 3 years of follow-up were identified at our institution. Anthropometric measurements were used to assess baseline severity and postoperative skull morphology. Independent laypersons and craniofacial surgeons rated the appearance of each patient’s 3D photographs, compared to normal controls.

Results:

Thirty-five patients were included (15 SCOT and 20 OCVR), with similar follow-up between groups (SCOT 7.9 ± 3.2 years, OCVR 9.2 ± 4.1 years). Baseline severity and postoperative anthropometric measurements were equivalent. Independent adolescent raters reported that the forehead, eye, and overall appearance of SCOT patients was better than OCVR patients (P < 0.05, all comparisons). Craniofacial surgeons assigned Whitaker class I to a greater proportion of SCOT patients with moderate-to-severe synostosis (72.2 ± 5.6%) compared with OCVR patients with the same severity (33.3 ± 9.2%, P = 0.02). Parents of children who underwent SCOT reported equivalent satisfaction with the results of surgery (100% versus 95%, P > 0.99), and were no more likely to report bullying (7% versus 15%, P = 0.82).

Conclusions:

SCOT was associated with superior long-term appearance and perioperative outcomes compared with OCVR. These findings suggest that SCOT should be the treatment of choice for patients with a timely diagnosis of metopic craniosynostosis.

An Open Cranial Vault Remodeling Procedure for Craniosynostosis: A Retrospective Study

Craniosynostosis is a skull malformation occurring due to the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. This pathological entity is a relatively commonly observed congenital malformation and is reportedly seen in 1/1,700–1,900 live births. The study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the open cranial vault remodeling (OCVR) in children with craniosynostosis.

Medical records of 76 children with craniosynostosis who were diagnosed at the neurosurgery departments of our centers for 11 years (from January 2010 to December 2020) were retrospectively examined. Among them, 54 consecutive children who underwent OCVR were included in this study. Surgical outcomes were discussed with a related literature review.

Fifty-four (32 males and 22 females) consecutive children received OCVR for craniosynostosis with a mean age of 12.6 ± 7.1 months. Eight children were syndromic. Three children were shunt-induced craniosynostosis. Syndromic children were four with Apert, two with Pfeiffer, and two with Crouzon syndrome. Twelve children were brothers/sisters. The misshapen skull was the most commonly recorded symptom in 49 children (90.7%). The most affected sutures were bicoronal craniosynostosis found in 20 children. The complication rate was 9.3% (n = 5). Two of these five children needed reoperation for optimal remodeling. One child died postoperatively in the intensive care unit due to cardiac arrest.

These findings demonstrated that the OCVR approach is an efficient surgical method to get good outcomes. Satisfactory results with an acceptable complication rate can be obtained with expert hands. Further studies are warranted to support these findings.

Anthropometric cranial measurements in metopic craniosynostosis/trigonocephaly: diagnostic criteria, classification of severity and indications for surgery

ABSTRACT

Metopic craniosynostosis is the second most frequent type of craniosynostosis. When the phenotypic presentation has been deemed severe the treatment is surgical in nature and is performed in infancy with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling. At the time of this writing, there is no consensus regarding an objective evaluation system for severity, diagnostic criteria, or indications for surgery. This study aims to review the anthropometric cranial measurements and the relative diagnostic criteria/classification of severity/surgical indications proposed so far for this skull malformation, and to investigate if there is any scientific support for their utility.

Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Craniosynostosis, a condition of premature cranial suture fusion, can have significantly detrimental effects on development and growth due to sequelae of increased intracranial hypertension (ICP), exophthalmos, and upper airway obstruction. Evolving surgical treatments now include distraction osteogenesis (DO) due to its many benefits relative to standard cranial vault remodeling procedures. This article provides an overview and update of different surgical applications of DO for patients with craniosynostosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

DO has been utilized successfully for single and multisuture craniosynostosis with or without midface hypoplasia to increase intracranial volume, decrease ICP and improve aesthetics. It has been applied in single suture synostosis, posterior vault DO, fronto-orbital advancement, monobloc DO and Le Fort III DO. DO has been applied through modification of traditional surgical procedures with success in maintaining goals of surgery while reducing risk.

SUMMARY

DO is still a relatively new and evolving surgical technique for patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. With promising benefits, consideration for each procedure should be weighed until longer-term data is available.

Pediatric Fronto-Orbital Skull Reconstruction

Craniofacial surgery in children is a highly challenging discipline that requires extensive knowledge of craniofacial anatomy and pathology. Insults to the fronto-orbital skeleton have the potential to inflict significant morbidity and even mortality in patients due to its proximity to the central nervous system. In addition, significant aesthetic and ophthalmologic disturbances frequently accompany these insults. Craniosynostosis, facial trauma, and craniofacial tumors are all pathologies that frequently affect the fronto-orbital region of the craniofacial skeleton in children. While the mechanisms of these pathologies vary greatly, the underlying principles of reconstruction remain the same. Despite the limited data in certain areas of fronto-orbital reconstruction in children, significant innovations have greatly improved its safety and efficacy. It is imperative that further investigations of fronto-orbital reconstruction are undertaken so that craniofacial surgeons may provide optimal care for these patients.