Upper Lip Fat Grafting Using the Anatomical Subunit and Fat Compartment Principles Improves Lip Cant and Symmetry in Patients With Unilateral Upper Lip Asymmetries

Enhancing Philtrum Morphology Using Fat Grafting Combined with Percutaneous Rigottomy in Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip

BACKGROUND

Improving the philtrum morphology of patients with a secondary cleft lip deformity has been a challenge in cleft care. Combining fat grafting with percutaneous rigottomy has been advocated for treatment of volumetric deficiency associated with a scarred recipient site. This study assessed the outcome of synchronous fat grafting and rigottomy for improvement of cleft philtrum morphology.

METHODS

Consecutive young adult patients ( n = 13) with a repaired unilateral cleft lip who underwent fat grafting combined with rigottomy expansion technique for enhancement of philtrum morphology were included. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional facial models were used for three-dimensional morphometric analyses including philtrum height, projection, and volume parameters. Lip scar was qualitatively judged by a panel composed by two blinded external plastic surgeons using a 10-point visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Three-dimensional morphometric analysis revealed a significant (all P < 0.05) postoperative increase of the lip height-related measurements for cleft philtrum height, noncleft philtrum height, and central lip length parameters, with no difference ( P > 0.05) between cleft and noncleft sides. The postoperative three-dimensional projection of the philtral ridges was significantly ( P < 0.001) larger in cleft (1.01 ± 0.43 mm) than in noncleft sides (0.51 ± 0.42 mm). The average philtrum volume change was 1.01 ± 0.68 cm 3 , with an average percentage fat graft retention of 43.36% ± 11.35%. The panel assessment revealed significant ( P < 0.001) postoperative scar enhancement for the qualitative rating scale, with mean preoperative and postoperative scores of 6.69 ± 0.93 and 7.88 ± 1.14, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Synchronous fat grafting and rigottomy improved philtrum length, projection, and volume and lip scar in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Quantifying outcomes of autologous fat transplantation in different facial deformities: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat transplantation has become a common treatment for facial deformities. However, facial deformities are the result of complex diseases with different causes, and there has been no review on the effectiveness of autologous fat transplantation for facial deformities of different aetiologies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Web of Science, Embase, and Medline Ovid databases was performed up to December 2022. Two investigators independently performed screening and data extraction according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, followed by a meta-analysis using random-effects model for surgeon and patient satisfaction, facial symmetry, and complication rates. Twelve-month postoperative fat graft retention was estimated by meta-regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the criteria, including 13 case series studies, 14 cohort studies, and four randomized clinical trials, with a total of 1572 patients. Follow-up visits within 6-12 months were performed in most of the studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed high overall surgeon satisfaction of 97% (95% CI: 92%-100%) and patient satisfaction of 95% (95% CI: 89%-99%), with a low complication rate of 3.4% (95% CI: 1.9%-5.9%). At 12 months postoperatively, a lower retention rate of 43% (95% CI: 28%-58%) was estimated in cases of acquired atrophic deformities compared with 64% (95% CI: 57%-71%) in cases of mixed deformities. Overall, autologous fat transplantation improved facial symmetry by 13% (95% CI: 8.4%-18%).

CONCLUSION

Autologous fat transplantation is generally a safe and effective procedure that can compensate for facial volume deficits and improve facial symmetry but may be less effective in cases of acquired atrophic facial deformities.

Autologous fat graft in cleft lip patients: a comprehensive systematic review of technique, outcomes, and complications

Cleft lip is a common craniofacial anomaly and aesthetic obstacle. Different procedures, techniques, and steps are required for repair. These procedures may result in secondary abnormalities or volume deficiencies that can be managed by different methods such as autologous fat grafting. We aim through this study to identify the technique of autologous fat graft in cleft lip deformity and the patient characteristics for selecting this particular technique. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The study systematically reviewed MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases without time-limitation. A total of 14 articles published in the period between 2004 and 2022 were included, then patients in each study who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. A total of 519 patients who underwent autologous adipose tissue augmentation of cleft lip deformity were included and analyed. Autologous fat graft is found to be safe, effective in improving lip appearance as well as contour, and associated with high satisfaction rate among cleft lip patients. A selected patients with vermilion deficiency, whistle deformity, or overall lip volume deficiency is found to have a higher satisfaction rate. The most frequently reported complications were excess fullness, nodule formation, graft resorption, and nostril deformity.

Long-Term Photogrammetric- and Panel Assessment-Based Outcome Study of Staged Reconstructive Approach for Hypertelorism Correction

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of hypertelorism is challenging for plastic surgeons, and limited long-term outcome data are available. The purpose of this long-term study was to report a single-surgeon experience with a staged reconstructive protocol for hypertelorism correction.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the records of patients with hypertelorism who were surgically managed by a single surgeon between 1978 and 2000. Bone (orbital box osteotomy and orthognathic surgery) and soft tissue (rhinoplasty and epicanthoplasty) surgeries were performed based on a patient-specific surgical protocol. Included patients were divided into a childhood group and an adolescence or adulthood group according to their age at orbital repositioning (≤12 and >12 years, respectively). Patients were invited for clinical interviews in February 2020 to evaluate whether requests for revision surgery had been made. The photogrammetric analysis-based hypertelorism index was calculated at preoperative and long-term postoperative times. Satisfaction with the long-term outcome was judged by both surgical professionals and laypeople.

RESULTS

In total, 14 patients with hypertelorism of different etiologies were included, with no request for revision surgery during an average follow-up of 29 years. The preoperative hypertelorism index was higher than the long-term postoperative evaluation (all, P < 0.05) for both childhood and adolescence or adulthood groups. Intergroup comparison revealed no significant difference for the hypertelorism index and panel assessment-based satisfaction with long-term outcome analysis (all, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the complexity and wide spectrum of clinical presentation of soft tissue and bone deformities in hypertelorism and current outcomes, the surgical approach to these patients should be staged and individualized for achievement of a balanced result between functional (orbital, occlusion, and psychosocial) and aesthetic parameters.