Photogrammetric Outcomes of Primary Nasal Correction in Unilateral Cleft Lip Patients: Early Childhood Results From a Single Surgeon's Experience

Primary Rhinoplasty for Unilateral Cleft Lip: A Long-Term Cohort Assessment of Aesthetic and Anthropometric Outcomes

The decision to undertake rhinoplasty maneuvers during cleft lip repair remains controversial. Little data compare long-term outcomes with and without primary rhinoplasty (PR). This study compared nasolabial outcomes in cohorts with unilateral cleft lip (UCL) treated with and without PR at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia using standardized aesthetic and anthropometric assessments.

Retrospective cohort study.

Tertiary care pediatric hospital.

Patients who underwent lip repair for UCL.

Cleft lip repair with and without PR.

Anthropometric analyses and crowdsourced aesthetic assessments using Americleft nasolabial appearance reference scales and pairwise comparisons.

Among 208 patients, 155 (74.5%) and 53 (25.5%) underwent lip repair with and without PR at 4.5 ± 1.1 months. Primary rhinoplasty (β = 0.345, P = .037) and a lower Cleft Lip Severity Index (β = -0.341, P < .001) predicted superior pairwise rank at 4.9 ± 1.9 years of age. History of PR predicted decreased columellar deviation angle (CDA) (β = -2.375, P = .019) and improved nostril symmetry (β = 0.111, P = .038). Increased columellar-labial angle (r = 0.27, P = .002), improved nostril symmetry (r = -0.23, P = .01), and decreased CDA (r = -0.45, P < .001) correlated with superior ratings. Patients with ˂20 days of postoperative nasal stenting had inferior lateral ratings (2.4 ± 0.6 vs 2.1 ± 0.5, P = .005). Those who underwent surgery at ˂5.3 months had inferior nasal projection (Goode's ratio 0.56 ± 0.09 vs 0.62 ± 0.08, P = .006).

Primary rhinoplasty for UCL offers superior aesthetic results in early childhood by layperson and anthropometric assessments. Specific improved characteristics from PR-CDA and nostril symmetry-most greatly influence layperson perception of nasal appearance. Older age at surgery predicted increased nasal projection, while prolonged nasal stenting predicted superior profile appearance.

"Primary Correction of the Cleft Nasal Septum: A Systematic Review"

Patients affected by cleft lip and palate have a characteristic nasal deformity; however, the treatment timeline varies amongst providers. There has been a shift from a more conservative approach to earlier intervention in order to allow for more normal development of the nose. Form, function, and future development all must be considered. For this reason, this investigation was undertaken to present the current literature available on the effects to all aspects of primary septoplasty in the cleft nasal deformity.

An initial list of 222 papers was identified, and it was determined that 16 papers fit the inclusion criteria. Studies were included in which the initial age of operation for the majority of patients was between 3 and 12 months and in which patients underwent septal repositioning at the time of cleft lip repair. These papers were all reviewed by a single author initially, and the results recorded. All results were then verified by a second author for accuracy and completeness.

Symmetry was found to be improved by primary septoplasty. Growth was not found to be impaired in any study; data was insufficient to indicate that growth was improved. Obstruction was improved as determined both by imaging, endoscopy, and patient survey. Finally, reoperation rates occurred at an acceptable rate not exceeding that of primary rhinoplasty without septoplasty.

Primary septoplasty leads to better aesthetic symmetry and function of the cleft nose without impairing growth. This change is maintained into adulthood often without the need for revisionary surgery.

Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Results, Growth Restriction, and Avoiding Secondary Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Primary rhinoplasty during correction of unilateral cleft lip continues to be a topic of debate because of concerns that early nasal intervention may affect nasal and maxillary development over the long term. This study aims to determine the volume and quality of evidence for and against primary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were pulled from PubMed and EMBASE and screened by title and abstract. Studies with human participants undergoing rhinoplasty at the time of unilateral cleft lip repair and some evaluation of the nasal outcome were included. Studies with a large proportion of syndromic patients, case reports, editorials, letters, reviews, studies exclusive to bilateral clefts, and studies not available in English were excluded. Those that met criteria were then systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were included. Ten articles that assessed the results of primary rhinoplasty subjectively all supported cleft lip repair with primary rhinoplasty. Sixteen articles assessed the results of primary rhinoplasty objectively, with 15 supporting primary rhinoplasty during cleft lip repair. Eight of nine studies that evaluated nasal growth and development over time found no restriction in nasal development. Five studies with a follow-up period of at least 6 years found that the percentage of patients who avoided revision rhinoplasty ranged from 43% to 100%. There were significant risks of bias in the majority of studies.

CONCLUSION

The majority of studies reviewed support that primary rhinoplasty during unilateral cleft lip repair results in good outcomes with limited or no effect on nasal growth.

Outcomes of Open Rhinoplasty for Unilateral Cleft Patients using Photogrammetric Analysis - An Evaluative Study

Introduction

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty is a challenge due to the complex anatomy of the nose, with structural deformity and difficulty in surgical management. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an anatomical-based approach on enhancing tip and alar symmetry in secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty using photogrammetric evaluation.

Methods

The study was conducted on 57 adult patients seeking rhinoplasty after primary repair of congenital unilateral cleft lip deformity. All patients were operated upon using an external open rhinoplasty approach using an anatomical-based surgical technique. The cases were periodically followed up at three, six, 12 and 18 months for both aesthetic and functional outcomes with photogrammetric analysis of facial profile using the software Mirror Suite programme to compare before and after the surgical procedure.

Results

The photogrammetric analysis showed a significant improvement of facial angles (P = 0.05). The nasofrontal angle changed from a median of 146° to 132.5°, nasolabial angle of 73° to 95°, nasofacial angle of 21.5° to 32° and nasomental angle of 105° to 130°. The rotation angle of the nasal tip showed a significant cephalic rotation with a mean increase of the tip elongation of 1.8 cm achieved per lateralised millimetre.

Discussion

Secondary rhinoplasty in unilateral cleft deformities needs accurate evaluation of the anatomical and pathological abnormalities. Open approach is preferred with using costal cartilage graft allowing adequate columellar lengthening, maxillary enhancement and alar repositioning which leads to optimise the definition, projection and cephalic rotation with better stabilisation and symmetry of the nasal tip.

The Role of Nasal Sill Correction in Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Evaluating outcomes after cleft rhinoplasty can be challenging because of the lack of objective measures that would lead to a more desirable outcome.

METHODS

This study is a 10-year retrospective review of 30 consecutive patients who underwent secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty performed by a single surgeon. Subjective ratings were made using the Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation (UCL SOE), which rates 4 components (nose, cupid's bow, lateral lip, and free vermillion) with a score of 0 to 2. Multiple anthropometric measurements (nostril height ratio, width ratio, medial ¼ height ratio, sill ratio, nostril area ratio, columellar angle, tip projection ratio, and nasolabial angle) were taken using a free National Institutes of Health program, ImageJ. Standardized photographs were compared at T0 (preoperatively), T1 (<6 weeks postoperatively), and T2 (>6 weeks postoperatively).

RESULTS

There were 30 patients who met our inclusion criteria: 10 males (66.7%) and 20 females (66.7%). Of these patients, 26 (86.7%) had a complete cleft lip and 4 (13.3%) had an incomplete cleft lip. The patients' average age at time of surgery was 16.2 years with a mean follow-up of 17.9 months. Subjective scores in both nasal and overall UCL SOE ratings improved from T0 to T1, 0.7 to 1.2 (P ≤ 0.001) and 3.6 to 4.7 (P ≤ 0.001), respectively. Visual analog scores in nasal and overall UCL SOE ratings improved between T0 and T2, 0.7 to 0.9 (P = 0.023) and 3.6 to 4.8 (P = 0.002), respectively. Of all the objective measures, nasal sill ratio and cleft height to width ratio correlated with improved subjective ratings across multiple time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that objective measures such as nasal sill and nostril shape (cleft height to width ratio) correlate with improved subjective visual analog scale using the UCL SOE. The nasal sill is an often overlooked, yet essential, part of creating an aesthetically pleasing nose during cleft rhinoplasty.

Modified Use of Costal Cartilage in Asians for the Correction of Nostril Asymmetry in Unilateral Secondary Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Weak alar cartilage and lack of soft tissue on the cleft side are considered to be the main critical factors leading to the asymmetry of bilateral nostrils. The costal cartilage can provide strong structural support and can be used to maintain long-term stability of nostril shape after surgical correction. With the advancement in rhinoplasty techniques, the application and understanding of costal cartilage in cleft lip nasal deformity is still on going. Herein, we present our technique of applying costal cartilage to provide nostril support and correct asymmetry in Asian patients with unilateral secondary cleft lip nasal deformity.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients who underwent nostril asymmetry correction from January 1, 2013, to October 31, 2018, were analyzed retrospectively. Modified integrative alar cartilage strut and diced nostril augmentation with costal cartilage were implemented to improve the collapsed and flat cleft-side nostril. The release and restoration of muscle and bone were also performed when required. Surgical outcomes were analyzed based on the comparison of nostril parameters, the shape and contour, and symmetry of bilateral nostrils after surgery. During postoperative follow-up, the patients' satisfactions with the corrective outcomes were also investigated.

RESULTS

All patients received the corrective operations with complete survival of all implanted cartilages. The nostril width was narrower in postoperative group (P < 0.05). The nostril height and long axis angle were higher postoperatively (P < 0.05). After correction, the proportion of moderate type increased from 13.4% to 80.4%, whereas the proportion of horizontal type decreased from 86.6% to 17.5%. The symmetry score on the nostril parameters manifested the rate of high score (AS >3) in postoperative groups were 84.5%, 93.8%, and 87.6% for width, height, and angle of the long axis, respectively. They were higher compared with those of preoperative group (0%). More than 95% of the patients were satisfied with the overall aesthetic outcome of the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Through ameliorating its constructive technology and optimizing its filling form, the modified use of costal cartilage displayed excellent correction effects in the width, height, and long axis angle asymmetry of Asian patients' nostril. Precise and comprehensive rhinoplasty technique is the cornerstone for achieving satisfactory long-term aesthetic outcomes, especially in severe cases, such as secondary cleft lip nasal deformity.