A Sequential Thoracoacromial Artery Perforator Flap for Reconstructing the Donor Site of Sternocleidomastoid Myocutaneous Flaps: Extended Indications and Technical Modifications

The thoracoacromial trunk: a detailed analysis

PURPOSE

The thoracoacromial trunk (TAT) originates from the second part of the axillary artery and curls around the superomedial border of the pectoralis minor, subsequently piercing the costocoracoid membrane. Knowledge about the location, morphology, and variations of the TAT and its branches is of great surgical importance due to its frequent use in various reconstructive flaps.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to establish anatomical variations, their prevalence, and morphometric data on TAT and its branches. The results of 55 consecutive patients who underwent neck and thoracic computed tomography angiography were analyzed. A qualitative evaluation of each TAT was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 morphologically different TAT variants were initially established. The median length of the TAT was set at 7.74 mm (LQ 3.50; HQ 13.65). The median maximum diameter of the TAT was established at 4.19 mm (LQ 3.86; HQ 4.90). The median TAT ostial area was set to 13.97 mm (LQ 11.70; HQ 18.86). To create a heat map of the most frequent location of the TAT, measurements of the relating structures were made.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the morphology and variations of the branching pattern of the TAT were presented, proposing a new classification system based on the four most commonly prevalent types. The prevalence of each branch arising directly from the TAT was also analyzed. It is hoped that the results of the present anatomical analysis can help to minimize potential complications when performing plastic or reconstructive procedures associated with TAT.

Superficial Peroneal Neurocutaneous Flap for Coverage of Donor Site Defect After the Combined Transfer of Toe and Dorsal Foot Flap

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of digital loss with soft tissue defects remains a tough challenge. Although a combined flap of toe and dorsal foot skin provides a good option for "like-for-like" hand reconstruction, the disappointed donor site morbidity prevents it from popularity. In this study, we presented experiences of the superficial peroneal neurocutaneous (SPNC) flap for donor site closure after the combined toe and dorsal foot flap transfer.

METHODS

Superficial peroneal neurocutaneous flaps were used to cover foot donor site defects in 9 patients. The flaps harvested from feet including 3 cases of wrap-around flap with dorsal foot flap, 4 cases of 2nd toe flap with dorsal foot flap, 2 cases of 2nd and 3rd toe flap with dorsal foot flap. The flap size, operation time, and complications were documented, and the donor sites were evaluated by the subjective outcome measure, the foot evaluation questionnaire, and the Vancouver Scar Scale.

RESULTS

All flaps but one survived completely without complications. Marginal necrosis occurred in the distal part of the flap in one case, which was treated by daily dressings. The skin grafts on the lower leg healed uneventfully. The average operation time of flap transfer was 40 minutes. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 16 months, and patients were content with the results of the foot donor site according to the outcome measures. All the patients were able to wear normal shoes walking and running with a normal gait, and none sustained complications of skin erosion or ulceration. Protective sensibility was obtained in all the flaps. Two patients complained of cold intolerance and 2 could not wear a thong sandal. The donor site scars on the lower leg were measured 3.2 on average on the Vancouver Scar Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPNC flap is a practical procedure for donor site closure on the foot, especially when extra dorsal foot skin is elevated with a toe flap for hand reconstruction.

Clinical management of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: patients not eligible for free flaps, a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The management of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tongue represents the most demanding treatment planning in head and neck surgery. Ablation followed by free flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard, but not all patients are suitable for this strategy. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive view of surgical reconstruction possibilities in patients not eligible for free flaps.

METHODS

Following PRISMA recommendations, a systematic literature review was conducted searching for original papers that investigated outcomes of patients treated by surgical ablation for tongue SCC followed by reconstruction with local or pedicled flaps. Selected papers were read and data extracted for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study design was case series in sixteen papers, cohort study in the remaining four. Four different local flaps (BMM, FAMM, NLIF, SMIF) and four regional flaps have been discussed in included studies (IHF, SFIF, SCM, PMMC).

CONCLUSION

The improved anatomical knowledge makes local flaps a reliable alternative to free tissue transfer in cases requiring small-/medium-sized defects. Regional flaps still represent cornerstones in reconstruction of the tongue. Ease of execution, costs-to-benefit ratio, low-rate complications, minimal donor site morbidity represent the best advantages choosing local/regional flaps.

A Retrospective Study of an Updated and Traditional Surgical Approach of the Distally Based Sural Flap

BACKGROUND

 The distally based sural flap (DBSF) is one of the armamentarium in the lower limb reconstruction. However, the flap has not gained popularity due to concerns about its reliability and donor site morbidity. Based on the anatomy characterization, we combined and developed five modifications to improve the vascular supply and reduce donor site morbidity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 The authors performed a comparison of retrospective study that included patients who underwent either traditional distally based sural flap (tDBSF) or modified distally based sural flap (mDBSF) surgery approach for ankle, heel, and dorsal foot coverage between January 2007 and May, 2019. The five modifications developed to improve the reliability of the flap include: 1. shift the pivot point more proximally 7.0 cm above the lateral malleolus, 2. preserve the lesser saphenous vein and include branches that communicates with the flap, 3. harvest thinner fascial pedicle, 4. change the skin incision to "S" shape, 5. closure of the donor site with a propeller flap.

RESULTS

 Thirty-one patients underwent mDBSF, and 23 received tDBSF. There were no significant differences in the size of the DBSF. Mean pedicle width was significantly narrower in mDBSF (1.63 ± 0.52 cm vs. 3.81 ± 0.70 in tDBSF). The pivot point was also found to be higher in mDBSF (8.01 ± 0.63 cm vs. 5.46 ± 0.56 cm) above the lateral malleolus. In mDBSF, the size of the propeller flap required for donor site closure was 53.45 ± 19.06 cm² (range 33-80 cm²). The rate of partial necrosis between mDBSF and tDBSF was significantly different (9.68 vs. 34.78%). While the other complications had no difference.

CONCLUSION

 The modifications applied to the harvesting of the DBSF have achieved higher survival rate, lower dehiscence rate, and shorter hospital stay time in comparison with traditional approach in our retrospective study.

Propeller Flaps for the Anterior Trunk

Various types of propeller flaps from multiple donor sites can be used to reconstruct anterior trunk skin defects. The actual selection depends on the condition and location of the recipient site, especially if it is to be the chest or abdomen that requires attention. Before surgery commences, it is always important to use an imaging analyses such as computed tomography angiography to examine and identify perforators that could perfuse a perforator-pedicled propeller flap (PPPF), as it is the most multifaceted imaging technique. Clusters of perforators that can be commonly used for the "workhorse" PPPFs for the thoracic and abdominal regions are the internal mammary artery perforator, the musculophrenic artery perforator, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator. These perforators are reliable and large enough to support long and large propeller flaps that will cover most defects in this region, while still allowing primary donor-site closure.