Lymphatic Leaks of the Thigh and Inguinal Region: Combined Plastic Surgery Approaches for an Effective Treatment Algorithm

Lymphatic flow through (LyFT) ALT flap: an original solution to reconstruct soft tissue loss with lymphatic leakage or lower limb lymphedema

INTRODUCTION

The lympho-venous shunt using the distal vein of ALT flap pedicle allowed at the same time the coverage of the inguinal defects and to perform lymphovenous shunt into a run-in vein of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle, draining the lymph through the flap pedicle. Surgical technique, complications and final outcomes (both clinical and lymphoscintigraphic) are reported.

METHODS

Five patients (45.8 y.o.[22-70]) with groin soft tissue loss with lymphatic leakage or lower limb lymphedema, benefited of the described technique. The ALT flap was used to cover the defect and, at the same time, we could perform a lymphovenous shunt between afferent lymphatics to the thigh and the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle, distal to the perforator nourishing the flap. Clinical and lymphoscintigraphic assessment of the limbs, cease of lymphorrhea or cellulitis/lymphangitis episodes, eventual downstaging of physiologic/physical therapy were recorded. LYMphatic Quality Of Life in leg (LYMQoLLeg) and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

Average flap size was 88.8cm² (range 84-126). The mean number of multi-lymphovenous anastomosis (MLVA) performed was 1.8 (range 1-3) per patient with 1-3 lymphatics shunted into each vein. Only one hemato-seroma requiring surgical revision. Mean improvement of perometer values was 48.2% (range 27.7-67.7) with an average follow-up of 13.6 months (range 12-17). Lymphoscintigraphy showed disappearing of the lymphatic leak and lymphedema with a high satisfaction of LYMQoL score.

DISCUSSION

The combination of pedicle flap with lympho-venous bypass as lymphatic derivation concept, improving the chronic morbidity scenarios of lymphatic complications.

Use of fluorescence imaging during lymphatic surgery: A Delphi survey of experts worldwide

BACKGROUND

Fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is increasingly used during lymphedema patient management. However, to date, no guidelines exist on when it should and should not be used or how it should be performed. Our objective was to have an international panel of experts identify areas of consensus and nonconsensus in current attitudes and practices in fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green use during lymphedema surgery patient management.

METHODS

A 2-round Delphi study was conducted involving 18 experts in the use of fluorescence imaging during lymphatic surgery, all asked to vote on 49 statements on patient preparation and contraindications (n = 7 statements), indocyanine green dosing and administration (n = 10), fluorescence imaging uses and potential advantages (n = 16), and potential disadvantages and training needs (n = 16).

RESULTS

Consensus ultimately was reached on 40/49 statements, including consistent consensus regarding the value of fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in almost all facets of lymphedema patient management, including early detection, assessing disease extent, preoperative work-up, surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, monitoring short- and longer-term outcomes, quality control, and resident training. All experts felt it was very safe, while 94% felt it should be part of routine care and that indocyanine green was superior to colored dyes and ultrasound. Nonetheless, there also was consensus that limited high-quality evidence remains a barrier to its widespread use and that patients should still be provided with specific information and asked to sign specific consent for both fluorescence imaging and indocyanine green.

CONCLUSION

Fluorescence imaging with or without indocyanine green appears to have several roles in lymphedema prevention, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment.