Achieving an Optimal Outcome in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Reoperative Microsurgical Free Flap Surgery: Lessons Learned

ABSTRACT

Microsurgical free flap surgery has revolutionized reconstructive surgery at most academic centers worldwide. However, free flap failures still occur even in the hands of the most experienced microsurgeon. Although we have achieved a great deal of success performing microsurgical free flap reconstruction for various indications, complications from initial free flap surgery that result in reoperation remain a small, but steady percentage. Venous flap congestion is one of the most challenging conditions that result in free flap failure if not resolved promptly. It can be caused by several conditions, and salvage for venous congestion is often difficult and time consuming. Over 20 years, the senior author has encountered 2 unique situations that resulted in venous congestion of the flap requiring reoperative surgery for flap salvage or a second free flap. Several medical conditions can compromise free flap surgery and result in total flap loss. The senior author has also encountered 2 medical conditions resulting in total flap loss. However, both patients received successful second free tissue transfers when combined with unique perioperative management strategies. It is our hope that this review will highlight some unique management strategies for reoperative microsurgical free tissue transfer and serve as "lessons learned" for initial salvage procedures and a second free tissue transfer. We also hope our reoperative approach demonstrated in this review will help the future generation of microsurgeons to avoid such complications altogether so that overall outcome after microsurgical free flap surgery can further be improved.

The Value of an Orthoplastic Approach to Management of Lower Extremity Trauma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

Management of traumatic lower extremity injuries requires a skill set of orthopedic surgery and plastic surgery to optimize the return of form and function. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing demographics, injuries, and surgical outcomes of patients sustaining lower extremity traumatic injuries receiving either orthoplastic management or nonorthoplastic management.

Methods:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, Cochrane, and GRADE certainty evidence guidelines were implemented for the structure and synthesis of the review. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were systematically and independently searched. Nine studies published from 2013 through 2019 compared 1663 orthoplastic managed patients to 692 nonorthoplastic managed patients with traumatic lower extremity injuries.

Results:

Orthoplastic management, compared to nonorthoplastic management likely decreases time to bone fixation [standard mean differences: −0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.46 to −0.25, P < 0.0001; participants = 1777; studies = 3; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence], use of negative pressure wound therapy [risk ratios (RR): 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00–0.24, P = 0.0007; participants = 189; studies = 2; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence] with reliance on healing by secondary intention (RR: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.00–0.10, P < 0.0001; participants = 189; studies = 2; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), and risk of wound/osteomyelitis infections (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23–0.61, P < 0.0001; participants = 224; studies = 3; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Orthoplastic management likely results in more free flaps compared to nonorthoplastic management (RR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.28–9.33, P = 0.01; participants = 592; studies = 5; I² = 75%; moderate certainty evidence).

Conclusion:

Orthoplastic management of traumatic lower extremity injuries provides a synergistic model to optimize and expedite definitive skeletal fixation and free flap-based soft-tissue coverage for return of extremity form and function.