Postoperative Radiation Protocol for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: Statistical Analysis of 370 Sites Followed for Over 18 Months

Efficacy and Safety of Excision Combination Therapies for Earlobe Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different combinations of excision and adjuvant therapies have been applied to improve outcomes for earlobe keloids, though evidence in this field is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to systematically investigate efficacy and safety of these treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to find all relevant studies. Meta-analysis of recurrence rates (RRs) and adverse event rates with 95% confidence intervals, and individual participants data (IPD) were calculated for each intervention when possible. Otherwise, narrative syntheses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 articles, covering 23 treatments for earlobe keloids, were included, indicating a preference for multiple combination therapy. The estimated RRs for 6 interventions (i.e., excision monotherapy, combinations of excision with imiquimod, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, steroids, and steroids with pressure therapy) appeared to be comparable. Electron radiotherapy was found to have potential advantages over X-ray treatment, contributing to the observed heterogeneity. Further meta-analysis using IPD revealed that both combination therapies of excision plus steroid therapy (p=0.003) and excision plus radiotherapy (p=0.003) yielded better recurrence-free survival compared to excision alone. The median recurrence-free interval for combination therapy was 10 months. Adverse event rates were similar among different intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that combining excision with radiotherapy or perioperative steroid therapy has the potential to improve prognosis of earlobe keloids without increasing the risk of adverse events. Overall evaluation of patients' conditions and further studies with sufficient follow-up are warranted for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Treatment outcomes of surgery followed by short-course every other day radiotherapy in keloid

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radiotherapy can significantly reduce keloid recurrence. However, consensus on the optimal radiotherapy dose and treatment schedule remains elusive. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of surgery followed by a short-course of radiotherapy administered every other day for keloid treatment.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 498 patients with keloids treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. All patients underwent electron beam irradiation at a dose of 16 Gy, delivered in four fractions every other day, starting within 24 h post-surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the local control rate.

RESULTS

A total of 130 (26.5%) keloids recurred after a median follow-up of 68.1months (42.6-129.9 months). The local control rates at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years for all patients were 89.5%, 82.5% and 81%, respectively. The highest recurrence rate was observed in keloids located in the chest region (50.8%), followed by the suprapubic (47.8%), head and neck (38.8%), limbs (33.3%) and ear (14%). Both multivariate and univariate analyses identified the presence of pain and or pruritus as an independently prognostic factor for keloid recurrence (p<0.0001). The local control rates at 1-year, 3-years and 5-years for patients with or without symptom of pain or pruritus were 45% vs. 98.8%, 12.5% vs. 95.9%, and 8.8% vs. 95%, respectively (HR:37.829, 95%CI: 24.385-58.686, p<0.001). In the ear keloid subgroup, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year local control rates for patients with pruritus were significantly lower than those without pain or pruritus (60.0% vs. 97.9%, 26.7% vs. 94.7%, 26.7% vs. 94.3%, HR:30.209, 95% CI:14.793-61.69, p<0.001). The same results were found in other location(p<0.001). During treatment and follow-up, two patients experienced infections, and one patient developed a cutaneous fibroblastoma.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a combination of surgery followed by short-course, every-other-day radiotherapy can yield satisfactory local control rates for keloids. Pain and or pruritus symptom was an independently prognostic factors for recurrence of keloid. To further validate these results, a prospective randomized controlled trial is recommended.

A Prospective Study of Patients Presenting With Pre-sternal Keloids

INTRODUCTION

Keloid represents a pathological form of scarring. They are very common in the anterior chest area; nearly 50% of all keloids occur in this location. One of the reasons for this is that folliculitis and acne, known for triggering the development of keloids, are common on the anterior chest. The other reason is the tension load in this area due to the frequent movements of the upper limbs and the respiratory movements. These movements stretch the skin of the anterior chest horizontally. When this cyclical tension is imposed on the anterior chest wounds, there is an exacerbation and prolongation of the inflammation in the reticular dermis of the wound. These stresses induce the growth of keloids along the prevailing lines of skin tension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study in which patients were recruited over a period of one year. Patients presenting with symptomatic pre-sternal keloids and requesting treatment but were unwilling to undergo surgical intervention were included in this study. Patients with a history of previous thoracic surgery were excluded. Baseline assessment and documentation of the lesion were performed. The study patients received three sessions of intralesional injections of a combination of triamcinolone acetonide and hyaluronidase at four weekly intervals. The final assessment was performed four weeks after the third session.

RESULTS

The study included 47 lesions in 47 patients with ages of the patients ranging from 16 to 70 years. Pre-sternal keloids were found to be more common among males than females, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.35:1. Patients presented with pre-sternal keloids that had been present for varying periods ranging from three to 81 months. All of our 47 patients completed the three sessions of the treatment. Following the treatment, there was an improvement in the patient's symptoms, as evidenced by the reduction in the mean pruritis scores and pain scores. There was an overall reduction in the size of the lesion. The decrease in the height of the lesions was more evident than the reduction in the craniocaudal or transverse dimensions of the lesions. There were improvements in Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) vascularity scores and pliability scores following the treatment.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that pre-sternal keloids should be considered as a distinct clinico-pathological entity. There are differences with regard to pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management when compared to keloids elsewhere. Treatment with intralesional injections of a combination of triamcinolone acetonide and hyaluronidase effectively relieves the symptoms and may be considered in patients not willing to undergo surgical intervention. Recurrences can occur and need further treatments.

Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

Keloids (KD) and hypertrophic scars (HTS), which are quite raised and pigmented and have increased vascularization and cellularity, are formed due to the impaired healing process of cutaneous injuries in some individuals having family history and genetic factors. These scars decrease the quality of life (QOL) of patients greatly, due to the pain, itching, contracture, cosmetic problems, and so on, depending on the location of the scars. Treatment/prevention that will satisfy patients' QOL is still under development. In this article, we review pharmacotherapy for treating KD and HTS, including the prevention of postsurgical recurrence (especially KD). Pharmacotherapy involves monotherapy using a single drug and combination pharmacotherapy using multiple drugs, where drugs are administered orally, topically and/or through intralesional injection. In addition, pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS is sometimes combined with surgical excision and/or with physical therapy such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, radiotherapy including brachytherapy, and silicone gel/sheeting. The results regarding the clinical effectiveness of each mono-pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS are not always consistent but rather scattered among researchers. Multimodal combination pharmacotherapy that targets multiple sites simultaneously is more effective than mono-pharmacotherapy. The literature was searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Online search engines.

Postoperative Scar Management Protocol for Asian Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative scar formation remains a morbidity for patients even with the advent of minimally invasive techniques. Furthermore, the significant difference between the Asian and Caucasian skin results in poorer postoperative scar outcomes in Asians, supporting the need for an evidence-based scar management protocol.

METHODS

Following a literature review of the PubMed and the Cochrane databases over the past 10 years, we constructed a novel postoperative scar management protocol for the Asian skin, utilized in a Singaporean tertiary healthcare institution.

RESULTS

We describe a timeline-based scar protocol from the point of skin closure to a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We support the use of intraoperative botulinum toxin for selected high-risk individuals upon skin closure with a follow-up regimen in the postoperative setting. For recalcitrant keloids, we have described a multimodal therapy comprising elements of intralesional steroids, botulinum toxin, lasers, surgery, and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A consolidated postoperative scar management protocol provides the necessary guidance for improved scar outcomes in the Asian skin. There is inherent potential in expanding the protocol to include post-traumatic and burn wounds or support other skin types including the Caucasian skin.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Evaluation of cutout factors with small and narrow fields using various dosimetry detectors in electron beam keloid radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The inherent problems in the existence of electron equilibrium and steep dose fall-off pose difficulties for small- and narrow-field dosimetry.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cutout factors for keloid electron radiotherapy using various dosimetry detectors for small and narrow fields.

METHOD

The measurements were performed in a solid water phantom with nine different cutout shapes. Five dosimetry detectors were used in the study: pinpoint 3D ionization chamber, Farmer chamber, semiflex chamber, Classic Markus parallel plate chamber, and EBT3 film.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated good agreement between the semiflex and pinpoint chambers. Furthermore, there was no difference between the Farmer and pinpoint chambers for large cutouts. For the EBT3 film, half of the cases had differences greater than 1%, and the maximum discrepancy compared with the reference chamber was greater than 2% for the narrow field.

CONCLUSION

The parallel plate, semiflex chamber and EBT3 film are suitable dosimeters that are comparable with pinpoint 3D chambers in small and narrow electron fields. Notably, a semiflex chamber could be an alternative option to a pinpoint 3D chamber for cutout widths≥3 cm. It is very important to perform patient-specific cutout factor calibration with an appropriate dosimeter for keloid radiotherapy.

Risk factors for local recurrence of keloids and hypertrophic scars after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Keloids and hypertrophic scars are benign fibroproliferative lesions that occur as a result of skin injury. Postoperative radiation therapy is used to reduce the recurrence rate because of the high recurrence rate with surgical treatment alone. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with keloid or hypertrophic scars with at least one lesion and who underwent postoperative electron beam radiotherapy at our institution from June 2013 to March 2022 were included in the study, while patients with a follow-up period of fewer than three months were excluded.

RESULTS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 94 lesions in 81 patients. Exactly two years after the treatment, the actuarial local control rate was 86.4%. The chest wall, shoulder, and suprapubic area were identified as high-risk recurrence sites. Compared to other body sites, these sites had significantly lower local control rates (two-year local control rates: 75.5% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.005). After multivariate analysis, treatment site (P = 0.014), male gender (P = 0.019), and younger age (P = 0.029) were revealed to be statistically significant risk factors for local recurrence. Risk factors for keloid recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy were therefore identified.

CONCLUSION

This result could be used for follow-up and as a determinant for the optimal dose/fractionation of postoperative radiotherapy.

Laser Combined with Radiotherapy for Keloid Treatment: A Novel and Efficient Comprehensive Therapy with a Lower Recurrence Rate

BACKGROUND

Keloids are a fibroproliferative skin disorder with a high recurrence rate. Combined therapies are often used in clinical treatment, but, in addition to the relatively high risk of relapse and complexity of the treatment process, side effects remain unknown for combination therapies.

METHODS

A total of 99 patients with keloids in 131 positions were included in this retrospective study. Fractional CO 2 laser therapy was first applied with energy ranging from 360 to 1008 mJ; then, 6-Mev, 900-cGy electron beam irradiation was applied twice. The first pass was initiated within 24 hours after the laser therapy, and the second pass was performed on the seventh day after laser therapy. The Patient and Observer Scar Scale evaluated the lesions before the treatment and at 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. At each follow-up visit, the patients filled out a questionnaire on recurrence, side effects, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The authors found a significant decrease in total Patient and Observer Scar Scale score [29 (23, 39) versus 61.2 ± 13.4; P < 0.001] at the 18-month follow-up compared with the baseline value (before the therapy). A total of 12.1% of the patients had recurrences during the 18-month follow-up period (11.1% partial recurrence and 1.0% complete recurrence). The total satisfaction rate was 97.0%. No severe adverse effects were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser combined with radiotherapy is a new comprehensive therapy comprising ablative lasers and radiotherapy for keloids. It had excellent clinical efficacy, low recurrence rate, and no serious adverse effects.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Evaluations of patient-specific bolus fabricated by mold-and-cast method using computer numerical control machine tools†

The patient-specific bolus fabricated by a mold-and-cast method using a 3D printer (3DP) and silicon rubber has been adopted in clinical practices. Manufacturing a mold using 3DP, however, can cause time delays due to failures during the 3D printing process. Thereby, we investigated an alternative method of the mold fabrication using computer numerical control (CNC) machine tools. Treatment plans were conducted concerning a keloid scar formed on the ear and nose. The bolus structures were determined in a treatment planning system (TPS), and the molds were fabricated using the same structure file but with 3DP and CNC independently. Boluses were then manufactured using each mold with silicone rubbers. We compared the geometrical difference between the boluses and the planned structure using computed tomography (CT) images of the boluses. In addition, dosimetric differences between the two measurements using each bolus and the differences between the measured and calculated dose from TPS were evaluated using an anthropomorphic head phantom. Geometrically, the CT images of the boluses fabricated by the 3DP mold and the CNC mold showed differences compared to the planned structure within 2.6 mm of Hausdorff distance. The relative dose difference between the measurements using either bolus was within 2.3%. In conclusion, the bolus made by the CNC mold benefits from a stable fabricating process, retaining the performance of the bolus made by the 3DP mold.

Ear keloids: An innovative 3-steps combined treatment

INTRODUCTION

An excessive proliferation of fibroblasts and collagen synthesis after an injury may lead to a benign fibrous tumor, known as keloid, which does not regress spontaneously. Earlobes are a very frequent site of onset, since after a trauma (i.e., piercing) keloids may develop either on the helix and on the anterior or posterior lobe, from a few months up to several years after the injury.

OBJECTIVES

To report the effectiveness of a combined protocol of CO2 laser + Dye laser + a portable Blue LED Light medical device for Photobiomodulation Therapy (EmoLED®).

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with a total of 56 ear keloids have been treated in the same session with a single CO2 laser procedure + a pulsed Dye laser procedure with an adjunctive EmoLED® procedure for 3 up to 6 min. A monthly follow-up has been performed with an adjunctive EmoLED® session in case of signs of inflammation.

RESULTS

Among 56 treated keloids, 89.3% of them (50/56) did not recur during a follow-up period (from 6 up to 24 months, mean 16.3 months) while six keloids recurred (6/56, 10.7%) with mild thickening of the scar, thus requiring further treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if an excellent outcome obtained by the synergistic effect of combined laser treatments has already been described (i.e., CO2 laser + Dye Laser), the present study showed the adjuvant procedure with EmoLED® can reduce significantly the risk of keloids recurrences.

Using Zhang's supertension-relieving suture technique with slowly-absorbable barbed sutures in the management of pathological scars: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

An ideal tension-relieving suture should be efficient for >3 months to retrieve normal tensile strength. Most preexisting suturing techniques provided tension elimination followed by relapse and scar proliferation due to absorption and cut-through of the sutures. This study introduces a simple but effective suture technique developed by a senior author (ZYX) to solve this problem.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with pathological scar (PS) had intervention treatment with the proposed suturing strategy at three centers from January 2018 to January 2021. A slowly absorbable 2-0 barbed suture was used for subcutaneous tension relieving with a set-back from the wound edge and a horizontal interval between proposed inserting points of 1 cm. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), scar width, perfusion and eversion of the wound edge were evaluated at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. The time needed to place the tension-relieving suture was recorded and relapse was monitored for 18 months postoperatively.

Results

In total, 76 trunks, 32 extremities and 12 cervical PS were included, with an average subcutaneous tension-relieving suture time of 5 min. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score decreased from 84.70 ± 7.06 preoperatively to 28.83 ± 3.09, 26.14 ± 1.92 and 24.71 ± 2.00 at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (p < 0.0001). The scar widths were 0.17 ± 0.08, 0.25 ± 0.09 and 0.33 ± 0.10 cm, respectively, with perfusion significantly decreased from 213.64 ± 14.97 to 112.23 ± 8.18 at 6 months (p < 0.0001). The wound edge flattened out during the first 3 months in most cases with only two scar relapses.

Conclusions

Zhang's suture technique provides a rapid and long-lasting tension-relieving effect with ideal scar appearances and lower relapse rates in the surgical management of PS.

Double enhancement effect of a surface dose with tungsten rubber bolus in photon radiotherapy for keloids and superficial tumors

To clarify the dosimetric characteristics of a real-time variable shape rubber-containing tungsten (STR) bolus in a clinical plan and investigate the efficacy of the STR bolus in photon radiotherapy for keloids and other superficial tumors. A 5 mm gel bolus or 1 mm STR bolus was placed on a solid water phantom. Tangential irradiation was performed using a TomoTherapy Radixact-X9 and 6 MV X-ray flattening-filter-free beam, and the surface dose was measured with radiochromic film. Clinical-like plans (TomoDirect; TD and TomoHelical; TH) were applied with the same geometry and the dose distributions were measured. The increase in surface dose by the build-up effect and backscatter was 37.7% and 8.0% for the gel bolus, and 40.5% and 26.4% for the STR bolus, respectively. In the TD and TH plans, the increase in surface dose was 27.4% and 48.3% for the gel bolus, and 39.0% and 63.2% for the STR bolus. Similary, changes in the sagittal plane dose were - 3.9% and 6.1% for the gel bolus, and - 6.3% and 6.9% for the STR bolus. The STR bolus effectively increased the surface dose by the build-up effect and backscatter in photon radiotherapy for keloids and other superficial tumors.

Current advances in the selection of adjuvant radiotherapy regimens for keloid

Keloid is a common benign skin tumor in the outpatient department, and patients are often accompanied by itching and pain. Since the pathogenesis is unknown, the effect of single method treatment is unsatisfactory, and therefore the recurrence rate is high. Therefore, comprehensive treatment is mostly used in clinical treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently one of the most effective treatments for keloid. After long-term clinical practice, brachytherapy and electron beam radiotherapy has increasingly become the gold standard of treatment, because brachytherapy provides more focused radiation treatment to focal tissue to significantly reduce recurrence rate, and better preserve normal tissue. With the development of new radiotherapy techniques, more options for the treatment of keloid. Currently, adjuvant radiotherapy has been widely recognized, but there is no consensus on the optimal protocol for adjuvant radiotherapy for keloids. This review provides a review of published treatment options and new radiotherapy techniques for adjuvant radiotherapy of keloids and gives a comprehensive evaluation for clinical treatment.

Ear Keloids Treated with Postoperative Electrons: A Case Series

Introduction Multiple modalities exist for treating keloids ranging from surgical, medical, chemotherapeutic, and radiation therapy. Different techniques of radiation therapy have been used to treat keloids as an adjuvant to surgical excision. With this case series, we report our experience of using electron beam radiation therapy in this setting.

Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 16 ear keloids treated in 10 patients from January 2013 to October 2015 with surgical excision followed by electron beam to a dose of 10 Gy in two fractions over two consecutive days in immediate postoperative period. Patients were evaluated for recurrent lesions, cosmesis, and adverse effects.

Results With a median follow-up of 78 months (range: 67–100 months), recurrent lesion was seen in five cases; a local control rate of 68.75% was seen. Median recurrence-free period was 67 months (range: 12–100 months). Acceptable cosmesis was seen in all cases and no acute or chronic adverse effects were seen.

Conclusion The large follow-up period in our series establishes the role of electron beam radiation therapy in attaining long-term control in keloid patients. The lower total dose with higher dose per fraction used in our patients has acceptable control along with good cosmesis and absent adverse effects.

The Efficacy of CT-Based Conformal Electron Beam Radiation Therapy After Keloid Excision

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant computed tomography-based conformal electron beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with keloids enables radiation oncologists to customize the target volume with precision and deliver the maximal prescription dose while sparing normal surrounding tissues.

OBJECTIVE

To report treatment and cosmetic outcomes by the patient's self-assessment survey.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with keloids, who were treated with postoperative electron beam RT between January 2015 and December 2020, were reviewed. A total of 85 consecutive patients with 136 keloids were included in this study. Subjective cosmetic outcomes were scored by each patient using a 5-point Likert scale survey.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 29.0 months (range, 12.1-77.9 months), and local recurrence was observed in 10 lesions (7.4%). The recurrence rate of keloids occurring in the ear was 5.4%, whereas the recurrence rate of keloids occurring at other body sites was 11.4%. Among the patients who responded to the questionnaire about the cosmetic outcome, 70.2% of patients declared being either very satisfied (44.7%) or satisfied (25.5%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical excision, followed by CT-based conformal electron beam RT, for patients with keloids ensures a high degree of local control resulting in good cosmetic outcomes.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Keloids

Radiotherapy is one of the therapeutic methods for keloids, and the irradiation technique has innovated from superficial X-ray to brachytherapy after decades of clinical practice. At present, the application of adjuvant radiotherapy has been widely accepted by clinicians, while the consensus of optimal adjuvant radiotherapy strategies for keloids has not been reached. Factors such as radiation timing, dose, fractions, and lesion locations may be associated with the clinical outcomes of patients with keloids after radiotherapy while a comprehensive review is lacking. Herein, this review summarized the published literature of adjuvant radiotherapy for keloids involving mechanism, timing, dose, fractions, and complications, etc., which may facilitate clinical decision making.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A 2020 Update of the Algorithms Published 10 Years Ago

BACKGROUND

In 2010, this Journal published my comprehensive review of the literature on hypertrophic scars and keloids. In that article, I presented evidence-based algorithms for the prevention and treatment of these refractory pathologic scars. In the ensuing decade, substantial progress has been made in the field, including many new randomized controlled trials. To reflect this, I have updated my review.

METHODS

All studies were evaluated for methodologic quality. Baseline characteristics of patients were extracted along with the interventions and their outcomes. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comprehensive reviews were included if available.

RESULTS

Risk factors that promote hypertrophic scar and keloid growth include local factors (tension on the wound/scar), systemic factors (e.g., hypertension), genetic factors (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms), and lifestyle factors. Treatment of hypertrophic scars depends on scar contracture severity: if severe, surgery is the first choice. If not, conservative therapies are indicated. Keloid treatment depends on whether they are small and single or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) or multimodal conservative therapy. For large and multiple keloids, volume- and number-reducing surgery is a choice. Regardless of the treatment(s), patients should be followed up over the long term. Conservative therapies, including gel sheets, tape fixation, topical and injected external agents, oral agents, and makeup therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials on pathologic scar management have increased markedly over the past decade. Although these studies suffer from various limitations, they have greatly improved hypertrophic scar and keloid management. Future high-quality trials are likely to improve the current hypertrophic scar and keloid treatment algorithms further.

Efficacy of Surgical Excision and Adjuvant High-dose Rate Brachytherapy in Treatment of Keloid: Our Experience

Background

Keloids are dermal tumors that are due to increased production of collagen caused by abnormal and prolonged wound healing. The incidence of recurrence is extremely high if only conservative measures are used. This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy surgery and high dose rate brachytherapy as an adjuvant therapy for treatment of keloids.

Materials and Methods

50 patients with clinically diagnosed 71 keloids were treated with excision of keloid and post-operative high-dose rate brachytherapy were studied. Complete excision of the keloid till the healthy skin margin was excised. The wound were closed in 2 layers. Subcutaneous tissue closed using absorbable suture, over which a 6F flexible polyethylene tube was placed. High dose rate cobalt-60 brachytherapy was administered. Total of 15 Gy in divided dose, 5 Gy in 3 fractions were administered.

Results

50 patients with 71 keloids were studied. Out of the 50 patients, 12 were male (24%) and 38 were females (76%). Age of the patients ranged between 14 and 71 years. Recurrence rate was 2% with 2 keloids recurring at 5 months interval. 4 patients scored the results as unacceptable, remaining 45 patients rated their results as excellent during their follow up at 10 days, 3 months and 6 months.

Conclusion

Treatment of keloids in the plastic surgeon's practice even today is still challenging. Many therapies have been described, but recurrence rate is high with mono-therapy. Combination therapy especially surgical excision with postoperative radiotherapy is best in preventing recurrence.

Combined laser treatment for ear keloids: Case series: Comparison between two mini-invasive protocols

BACKGROUND

Keloids are benign fibrous tumors derived by excessive proliferation of fibroblasts and collagen synthesis after an injury, and they do not regress spontaneously. Earlobes keloids may develop either on the helix or on the anterior or posterior lobe, up to several years after piercing.

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of a combined protocol of CO2 laser + dye laser versus CO2 laser + dye laser + Enerjet.

METHODS

Eighty patients with a total of 83 ear keloids were divided in two groups: One group has been treated in the same session with a single CO2 laser procedure + a pulsed Dye laser procedure; the second group has been treated as the group one with an adjunctive Enerjet procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 40 patients for a total of 41 treated keloids in the first group, 85.4% of keloids did not recur during a follow-up period (3 months-7 years), 14.6% of the lesions recurred (6/41) with mild thickening of the scar and underwent to further treatments. The second group (40 patients, 42 keloids) results showed a 90.5% of keloids which did not recur during a follow-up period (3 months-2 years), while 9.5% of the lesions recurred (4/42) with mild thickening of the scar and underwent to further treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Lasers demonstrated a synergistic effect when combined together and an excellent outcome has been obtained in the 88% of treated lesions, with a slighter higher prevalence of excellent outcome of the group treated with a further procedure with Enerjet.

Thyroid Dermopathy Treatment of the Foot in the Setting of Graves Hyperthyroidism

Graves' hyperthyroidism is one of the most common autoimmune diseases, caused by autoantibodies acting against the thyrotropin receptor. Extra-thyroid manifestations include ophthalmopathy, acropachy, and dermopathy, which accounts for 4% to 13% of clinical presentations. This is a case study of a 55-year-old female who presented with recurrent soft tissue mass formation over the dorsal right foot. The patient underwent a soft tissue mass excisional biopsy and the pathology report revealed a soft tissue mass secondary to thyroid dermopathy. Given her history of soft tissue recurrence and previous diagnosis, the patient underwent both excisional biopsy and radiation treatment with success. After 1 year of follow-up, the patient had completely healed without complication. This case demonstrates a multidisciplinary approach for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

The epigenetics of keloids

Keloid scarring is a fibroproliferative disorder of the skin with unknown pathophysiology, characterised by fibrotic tissue that extends beyond the boundaries of the original wound. Therapeutic options are few and commonly ineffective, with keloids very commonly recurring even after surgery and adjunct treatments. Epigenetics, defined as alterations to the DNA not involving the base-pair sequence, is a key regulator of cell functions, and aberrant epigenetic modifications have been found to contribute to many pathologies. Multiple studies have examined many different epigenetic modifications in keloids, including DNA methylation, histone modification, microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs. These studies have established that epigenetic dysregulation exists in keloid scars, and successful future treatment of keloids may involve reverting these aberrant modifications back to those found in normal skin. Here we summarise the clinical and experimental studies available on the epigenetics of keloids, discuss the major open questions and future perspectives on the treatment of this disease.

Strontium-90 brachytherapy following intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections for keloid treatment: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Keloid disease is hard to fully eradicate. Recurrence and other unsatisfactory results were found in many patients. No current therapeutic modality has been determined to be most effective for treating keloid scars. Intralesional corticosteroid injections is most commonly recommended for primary management of small and young keloids as well as hypertrophic scars. However, it’s difficult for patients to adhere to long-term triamcinolone acetonide injection therapy because of the pain, inconvenience or complications including hormonal imbalance or irregular menstruation.

Objective

We aimed to determine whether and how Strontium-90 brachytherapy as an adjuvant radiation could affect keloid recurrence after intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections.

Methods

We included keloid patients from March 2019 to September 2019 and randomly allocated them to two groups after 3 intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections at 3 weeks interval. The experimental group received Strontium-90 brachytherapy at a total dose of 15-20Gy, while the control group didn’t receive any adjuvant treatment. We performed both Vancouver Scar Scale scoring and Color Doppler ultrasound examination to monitor and evaluate lesions regularly. A one-year follow-up was completed for each patient.

Results

31 patients who had 42 keloids in total were recruited. We found intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections could effectively reduce the thickness and modify the hardness of small and young keloids. Strontium-90 brachytherapy reduced the one-year recurrence rate from 85.7 percent to 44.4 percent after 3 intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections. The lesions’ thickness or elasticity was not affected by Strontium-90 brachytherapy.

Conclusion

Strontium-90 brachytherapy as an adjuvant radiation could effectively reduce small sized keloids recurrence after intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections. It worked by enhancing the lesions’ stability post-injection.

Trial registration

The clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2000030141.

Name of trial registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/)

A retrospective study of hypofractionated radiotherapy for keloids in 100 cases

At present, the consensus on the best treatment for keloids is the combination of clinical and surgical therapies, if necessary, associated with adjuvant radiotherapy like brachytherapy. Whereas, the uniform scheme of radiotherapy in keloids is unclear. Here, we conducting a retrospective analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of a specific treatment regimen (20 Gy in 5 fractions) in keloid patients. We retrospectively analysed the medical records of keloid patients receiving auxiliary postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) treatment from 2009 to 2019. The patients were treated with the hypofractionation method of 20 Gy in 5 fractions. We compared the local control rate and complications, using the chi-square test and logistic regression analyses. After screening, we identified 100 keloid patients in this study, with a median follow-up of 59 months. In this study, the overall local control rate of keloid lesions was 84.8%. After multivariate analyses (primary keloid or not, family history, interval from surgery to irradiation and site), our research showed that primary keloid, site and interval from surgery to irradiation were significantly related to recurrence. Acute radiation injury and late radiation injury accounted for 3% (erythema) and 1% (skin sclerosis) of the total cases, respectively. Our results indicate that a postoperative hypofractionation with radiation dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions may be effective, easy to accept and safe for keloid patients.

Chest keloids: effect of surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence, a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chest keloids are a difficult sub-group of scars to treat, likely secondary to the high wound tension in the area that promotes excessive fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. Excision and adjuvant radiotherapy has been demonstrated as an efficacious treatment for keloids in general, but no meta-analysis exists to support the claims for chest keloids. This study aims to identify the rate of recurrence after surgical resection and radiotherapy on patients with chest keloids.

METHODS

A search was performed using Embase, MEDLINE, Pubmed and Cochrane database on 22 December 2018 for terms 'radiotherapy', 'keloid' and 'chest'. Papers included met a prospectively designed inclusion criteria assessed by multiple investigators.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, including 1 randomized controlled trial, were included for a total of 400 patients with a chest keloid scar managed with surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall pooled-estimate of recurrence rate was 22% (95% CI 12-32%). Meta-regression did not demonstrate a significant effect for method of wound closure, type of radiotherapy, radiotherapy dose (BED₁₀ ) and study type.

CONCLUSION

Excision and adjuvant radiotherapy represents an effective method of treatment for chest keloids, however sufficient prospective data, including randomized controlled trials, did not yet exist to support these findings. Further studies with sufficient sub-group analysis for keloid location are required to add to the pool of literature that can be added to this meta-analysis.

The Efficacy of Surgical Excision Plus Adjuvant Multimodal Therapies in the Treatment of Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Research evaluating the efficacy of multimodal therapy for the treatment of keloids has reported combination regimens are most effective.

OBJECTIVE

To compare recurrence rates for keloids treated with surgery plus one adjuvant intervention (dual therapy) versus surgery plus 2 or more adjuvant interventions (triple therapy).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of combination treatment for keloids.

RESULTS

After full-text review, we included 60 articles representing 5,547 keloids: 5,243 received dual therapy, 259 received triple therapy, and 45 received quadruple therapy (the latter 2 groups were combined for analysis). The difference in recurrence rates between dual (19%) and triple therapy (11.2%) was not significant (p = .343). However, the difference in recurrence rates between dual therapy using surgery and radiation (18.7%) and triple therapy using surgery, radiation, and a third intervention (7.7%) was significant (p = .002). The differences for surgery and intralesional triamcinolone (TAC) showed trends toward significance, because keloids treated with dual therapy (21.7%) had a higher recurrence rate than those treated with triple therapy comprised of surgery, TAC, and another intervention (13.7%; p = .099).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy using surgery plus radiation and/or TAC as one of the adjuvant treatment modalities may achieve the lowest recurrence rates for keloids.

Prophylactic external beam radiation therapy for keloid prevention in thyroid surgery patients

BACKGROUND

Poor cosmesis, secondary to keloid or hypertrophic scar, following thyroid surgery may cause considerable patient distress and be a significant challenge to treat. In this case series we examined the efficacy of prophylactic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prevention of keloid formation in keloid-prone patients undergoing thyroid surgery. While much has been published about documenting the efficacy in reducing keloid formation following keloid excision, very little literature exists documenting prophylactic use related to surgeries with the goal of prevent de novo keloid formation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a series of ten patients, who underwent a prophylactic EBRT for keloid prevention after thyroid surgery between January 2013 and February 2019. Patient demographics, primary diagnosis, surgical procedure, EBRT dosage, and post-operative visit records were reviewed.

RESULTS

All ten patients who received EBRT for keloid prophylaxis following a thyroid surgery were female. Half of the patients were African Americans, 40% Caucasians, and 10% Hispanic. The mean age was 46.40±15.63 years with BMI of 31.5±5.5 kg/m2. Radiation was initiated within 6 hours of the surgery with an average radiation dose per session of 5.7±1.7 Gy. The total average EBRT dose delivered was 17.4±4.2 Gy. Mean follow-up period was 13 months post-thyroidectomy, with the longest follow-up at 23 months. One patient, who underwent a lateral neck dissection in addition to thyroid surgery, developed hypertrophic scar in less than 10% of her incision length. Nine other patients (90%) showed no post-surgical keloid nor hypertrophic scar formation and patients were satisfied with postsurgical cosmesis.

CONCLUSIONS

We examined the efficacy of prophylactic EBRT in keloid-prone patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Prophylactic EBRT following thyroid surgery is effective in achieving a satisfactory cosmetic outcome in patients at high risk for keloid formation.

A prospective comparative study of radiotherapy effect upon scar quality

INTRODUCTION

The effect of radiation on uncomplicated postoperative scars is unclear. This study aimed to analyze irradiated and non-irradiated scars in patients with unilateral breast cancer, who underwent oncoplastic breast reduction surgery and radiation therapy (RT), to identify how postoperative scar changes with radiation.

METHODS

Twenty breast scars in 10 patients were analyzed after unilateral breast-conserving surgery, oncoplastic breast reduction, and RT. Scars were assessed using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) by two independent blinded observers and three-dimensional scar analysis camera. Paired t-test between irradiated and non-irradiated scars in each patient and correlation of scar score differences with potential contributing factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The VSS was significantly lower for the irradiated scar than that for the non-irradiated contralateral scar (1.40 vs. 4.05, p = 0.001), although time interval from the last radiation to scar assessment had a negative correlation with paired differences of VSS (Spearman's correlation coefficient: -0.637, p = 0.048). Compared with the non-irradiated scar, the irradiated scar showed a significantly high level of hemoglobin (1.04 vs. 1.26, p = 0.017) and melanin (0.55 vs. 0.63, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative scars with radiation showed better results in objective and subjective assessments than scars without radiation. These findings suggest that radiation has a positive effect on general scar maturation.

Tomotherapy as an Alternative Irradiative Treatment for Complicated Keloids

The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment of complicated keloids with helical tomotherapy (HT) and electron beam radiotherapy. From July 2018 to September 2018, 11 patients with 23 keloid lesions treated with HT were enrolled. Additionally, 11 patients with 20 lesions treated with electron beam radiotherapy in the same period were enrolled. Patients in both groups were treated within 24 h after surgical excision of the keloid lesion with 13.5 Gy in three consecutive daily fractions. The median follow-up period was 15 months. The local control rate was 91.3% and 80% in the HT group and the electron beam group, respectively. No acute adverse effects were observed in either group, but most patients exhibited pigmentation. No radiation-induced cancer occurred in these patients up to the time of this report. Pain and pruritus improved for all patients and more obviously for three patients with complicated keloids treated with HT. The measured surface dose was 103.7–112.5% and 92.8–97.6% of the prescribed dose in the HT group and the electron beam group, respectively. HT can be considered an alternative in cases where it is not feasible to use multiple electron fields, due to encouraging clinical outcomes.

Single Institution Experience of Postoperative Electron Beam Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Keloids

Purpose

Surgical excision followed by postoperative radiation therapy is an accepted modality to prevent keloid recurrence. Our practice has been to use electron beam radiation postoperatively to prevent recurrence, and we share our experience with this method in this study.

Methods and Materials

Twenty-two patients with 40 keloids treated postoperatively with electron beam radiation at our institution from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Electron beam radiation was used for treatment in all cases, and radiation was initiated within 24 hours of surgery. A dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions was delivered to the postoperative scar in 95% of the sites, and 8 Gy to 10 Gy in a single fraction was delivered to the remaining 5%. The patients were followed up, and recurrences were documented.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 7-66 months), local control and cosmesis were achieved in 90% (36 of 40) of the treated sites with electron beam radiation therapy delivered at a dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions. All recurrent keloids were located on the anterior chest wall over the sternum. There was no difference in outcome based on age, sex, or keloid length.

Conclusions

Electron beam radiation therapy is a feasible, convenient, and safe modality for postoperative treatment of keloids. It achieves excellent local control with no grade 3 or higher toxicities.

Where do you insert a drain tube during breast reconstruction?

PURPOSE

A drain tube is commonly inserted during breast reconstruction surgery. This leads to a scar in addition to the scar on the breast. This study was performed to investigate how patients feel about the drain scar and to clarify its ideal location.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey about the drain scar was distributed to 38 consecutive breast reconstruction patients and a total of 104 female doctors and nurses engaged in breast reconstruction. The drain scars were evaluated using the Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) Scar Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 32% of the patients expressed some anxiety about the drain scar. Patients who were anxious about the drain scar had higher scores on the JSW Scar Scale than those who were not anxious. Younger doctors and nurses preferred the drain scar to be on the side of the chest, while older doctors and nurses preferred the drain scars to be at the axilla.

CONCLUSIONS

About a third of the patients had some anxiety associated with their drain scar after breast reconstruction surgery, and this anxiety level was correlated with objective assessment of the scar. Thus, more patient involvement or the provision of more information regarding drain placement is required.

Risk factors of recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiation therapy for keloid: Comparison of long-term local control rate

Aim

To investigate the new risk factors for keloid recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy (RT) and evaluate the effectiveness of tranilast in combination with electron beam RT by comparing the local control rate.

Background

Identifying patients at high risk of recurrence after postoperative RT for keloids remains a challenge. Besides, no study examined the effectiveness of tranilast in combination with RT after surgery for the prevention of keloids recurrence.

Materials and Methods

This study included 75 lesions in 59 consecutive patients who had undergone postoperative RT at our institute. The follow-up period and prescription of tranilast were examined beside several potential risk factors, such as multiple lesions, size, and shape.

Results

The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 6-147 months). Twenty-one lesions in 17 patients recurred in a median of 12 months after treatment (range, 1-60 months). Local control rates of all 75 lesions were estimated as 93%, 78%, 70%, and 68% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. Multiple lesions constituted a significant risk of recurrence (P = 0.03). A larger long axis was significantly related to the recurrence (P < 0.01). Irregular shape was associated with a significantly worse local control rate (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the local control rate between patients receiving tranilast and those who did not (P = 0.52).

Conclusions

Multiple lesions and irregular shape were risk factors of keloid recurrence after postoperative electron beam RT. The effectiveness of tranilast was not demonstrated in the study.

Continuous tension reduction to prevent keloid recurrence after surgical excision: Preliminary experience in Asian patients

Surgical excision combined with postoperative radiotherapy is considered one of the most radical but most effective keloid therapeutic option. However, radiotherapy may not be appropriate for all keloid patients. In this study, we propose an alternate approach to prevent keloid recurrence and provide preliminary assessment in clinical efficacy of this treatment for keloids. Forty consecutive patients with different keloid sites underwent excision without postoperative radiation. After surgery, the tension offloading device was used at least 6 months for the purpose of continuous tension reduction at surgery incision. Scars were assessed independently using scar scale at before and 24-month follow-up. Overall, 38 patients completed this research. Clinical results showed that 35 patients achieved healing with an esthetic appearance at 24-month follow-up. Three patients showed relapse and the recurrence rate was 7.9%. Both of VSS (Vancouver Scar Scale) and JSW (Japan Scar Workshop Scar Scale) scores decreased significantly at 24-month follow-up visit than before. No severe complications were reported. Using the tension offloading device could greatly decrease tension on the surgical incision. The technique of continuous tension reduction could be used as an alternative method to prevent keloid recurrence under the condition of without radiotherapy.

Surface brachytherapy in the treatment of keloid scars in Mexico

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate that superficial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy by means of Leipzig applicators or moulds with catheters is an adjuvant treatment with impact on local control and low toxicity.

BACKGROUND

Keloid scars occur in 5-15 % of cases, secondary to an uncontrolled proliferation of fibroblasts and reduction in the inhibition of growth factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive study in patients with keloid scars who were treated with superficial HDR brachytherapy in the General Hospital of Mexico between November 2009 and December 2013.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were evaluated, and the mean follow-up was 22.18 months (range 8-48). The anatomic site treated was the ear in 72 patients (90.0 %), anterior thorax in 5 patients, retroauricular region in 2, and abdomen region in 1 patient. The application was performed 24 h after surgery; the dose for 79 patients (99 %) was 1500 cGy/3 fractions, and 1 received 500 cGy in 1 fraction. Adequate healing occurred in 76 patients (95 %), and the local failure was 5 % (95 % CI). Acute toxicity occurred in 15 % (12 patients) with grade 1 radioepithelitis. Chronic toxicity occurred in 22 patients (27.5 %) with grade 1 hypopigmentation and 18 patients (22.5 %) with grade 1 fibrosis. The cosmetic result was good in 72 patients (90 %). During follow-up, 2 patients presented recurrence, and 2 patients persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with superficial brachytherapy in keloid scars using a mould with catheters or a Leipzig applicator is a therapeutic option that results in 95 % local control and low toxicity.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars-Japan Scar Workshop Consensus Document 2018

There has been a long-standing need for guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars that are based on an understanding of the pathomechanisms that underlie these skin fibrotic diseases. This is particularly true for clinicians who deal with Asian and African patients because these ethnicities are highly prone to these diseases. By contrast, Caucasians are less likely to develop keloids and hypertrophic scars, and if they do, the scars tend not to be severe. This ethnic disparity also means that countries vary in terms of their differential diagnostic algorithms. The lack of clear treatment guidelines also means that primary care physicians are currently applying a hotchpotch of treatments, with uneven outcomes. To overcome these issues, the Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) has created a tool that allows clinicians to objectively diagnose and distinguish between keloids, hypertrophic scars, and mature scars. This tool is called the JSW Scar Scale (JSS) and it involves scoring the risk factors of the individual patients and the affected areas. The tool is simple and easy to use. As a result, even physicians who are not accustomed to keloids and hypertrophic scars can easily diagnose them and judge their severity. The JSW has also established a committee that, in cooperation with outside experts in various fields, has prepared a Consensus Document on keloid and hypertrophic scar treatment guidelines. These guidelines are simple and will allow even inexperienced clinicians to choose the most appropriate treatment strategy. The Consensus Document is provided in this article. It describes (1) the diagnostic algorithm for pathological scars and how to differentiate them from clinically similar benign and malignant tumors, (2) the general treatment algorithms for keloids and hypertrophic scars at different medical facilities, (3) the rationale behind each treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars, and (4) the body site-specific treatment protocols for these scars. We believe that this Consensus Document will be helpful for physicians from all over the world who treat keloids and hypertrophic scars.

Combining micro-plasma radio-frequency with hypofractionated electron-beam radiation as a novel treatment of keloids: A case series

RATIONALE

Micro-plasma radio-frequency (MPR) technology has been demonstrated a safe and effective treatment for kinds of scars, but there is no report about the application of the MPR on keloids. In this investigation, we creatively use MPR technology combining with hypofractionated electron-beam radiation to cure keloids.

PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSES

From February 2013 to December 2016, 22 Asian patients (16 male, 6 female, age 19-46 years, mean age 28.14 ± 7.31 years) with keloids over half a year were enrolled in this study.

INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES

All patients received a single MPR technology treatment by roller tip at 80-100 watt, and then hypofractionated electron-beam radiation of 6 MeV were performed twice, within 24 hours and one week after the operation with 9 Gy per time. Improvement were determined by the Vancouver Scar Scales (VSS) according to digital photographs. The results show that the volume of keloids reduced significantly among most patients. Only 3 patients encountered with mild to moderate hyperpigmentation, and none of malignance and worsening or recurrence of scars was observed.

LESSONS

MPR technology combined with post-operative hypofractionated electron-beam radiation therapy is an effective method for patients with multiple keloids distributed widely on the body with minimal complications, especially for patients with widely distributed keloids.

Surgical Excision of Keloids Followed by In-office Superficial Radiation Therapy: Prospective Study Examining Clinical Outcomes

Background:

Keloids are benign proliferative scars that often occur among individuals of color, and are thought to be the result of excessive collagen deposition that occurs after injury to the skin. The treatment of these scars is difficult with often poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical excision followed by in-office superficial radiation therapy (SRT) as a method to improve keloid remission.

Methods:

Participants for this study were recruited from June 2016 through February 2017 with 48 subjects enrolled and completed this study. All keloids were surgically resected and participants received 3 consecutive days of a customized dose of SRT, with a maximum cumulative dosage of 18 Gy. Patients were followed over the course of 12 months to monitor outcomes.

Results:

In this cohort, we found 39 (81%) to have achieved successful remission with 9 (19%) being classified as refractory. There were no adverse effects or medical complications reported as a part of this study.

Conclusion:

Study outcomes support the clinical benefits of surgical excision followed by SRT as a practical and efficient treatment for keloids.

Z-plasty and Postoperative Radiotherapy for Anterior Chest Wall Keloids: An Analysis of 141 Patients

Background

The therapies for anterior chest wall keloids include surgical excision, postoperative radiotherapy, silicone taping stabilization, and steroid plaster. However, to date, there is no universally accepted combination treatment strategy for anterior chest wall keloids.

Methods

All consecutive patients with single or multiple anterior chest wall keloids who underwent keloid excision, tension-reducing suturing, z-plasty, and postoperative radiotherapy in 2013-2016 in Nippon Medical School were included in this case series study. Only keloids that arose from small injuries such as folliculitis or acne were selected. The surgery was followed by tension-reducing self-management of the wounds with silicone tape and steroid plaster. The postsurgical radiotherapy modality was 18 Gy administered in 3 fractions over 3 days. The primary study outcome was keloid recurrence during the 24-month follow-up period. Recurrence was defined as the development of stiff and red lesions in even a small part of the scar that did not respond to 6 months of steroid plaster therapy.

Results

In total, 141 patients with 141 lesions were enrolled. Of the 141 lesions, 15 (10.6%) recurred. All recurrences were successfully treated by steroid plaster and steroid injection. The recurrence patients did not differ from the nonrecurrence patients in terms of the size of the original keloid or gender distribution.

Conclusions

Anterior chest wall keloids can be successfully treated by customized plans that involve appropriate surgical modalities (including z-plasty) followed by postoperative radiotherapy (18 Gy in 3 fractions over 3 days) and scar self-management with silicone tape and steroid plaster.

Managing keloid scars: From radiation therapy to actual and potential drug deliveries

The aetiology of keloids is becoming clearer, but many questions remain, including about the most optimal treatment. Current therapies include surgical excision, radiotherapy, and various pharmaceutical drugs. However, none of these drugs are keloid-specific. Moreover, all current interventions are associated with high recurrence rates. Here, we review the pharmaceutical interventions that are currently available. All are based on the fact that keloids are an expanding solid mass with intense chronic inflammation at its advancing edges. Consequently, current pharmaceuticals aim to reduce the mass and/or symptoms of keloids, similar to surgery and radiotherapy. They include chemotherapies, immunotherapies, volume-reducing therapies, and anti-inflammatory therapies. We also describe new advances in keloid pharmaceuticals. They include drugs that were designed to treat systemic diseases such as hypertension or breast cancer but were found to also treat keloids. Furthermore, recent progress in genetic, epigenetic, and stem cell therapies suggests that they could become useful in the keloid field. This review of pharmaceutical advances will hopefully promote additional research and the development of effective and specific pharmaceuticals for keloids.

Surgical excision and postoperative radiotherapy for keloids

Keloids can be treated in a number of ways, including by surgery. Multiple studies now show that while surgical monotherapy associates with extremely high rates of recurrence (50%-80%), postoperative radiotherapy can significantly reduce these recurrence rates. Ongoing improvements in radiation technology have further increased the safety and efficacy of this combination protocol. Of the various radiotherapies that have been used in this setting, electron beam (β-ray) irradiation is currently the best due to its excellent dose distribution and safety. The maximal biologically effective dose (BED) for keloids is 30 Gy (using an estimated α / β ratio of 10); increasing the dose has no further benefits and elevates side effects. Over the last two decades, we have modified and then fine-tuned our radiotherapy protocol for keloid excision wounds. Thus, our early protocol was used for all body sites and consisted of 15 Gy/3 fr/3 days. We then customised the radiotherapy protocol so that body sites that are highly prone to recurrence (e.g. the anterior chest) receive higher doses while low recurrence sites like the earlobe receive a much smaller dose. More recently, we tweaked this body site-customised protocol so that fewer fractions are employed. Therefore, we currently apply 18 Gy/3 fr/3 days to high-recurrence sites, 8 Gy/1 fr/1 day to earlobes and 15 Gy/2 fr/2 days to other body sites. These radiotherapy protocol changes were accompanied by the evolution of body site-customised surgical approaches. As a result of these developments, our overall keloid recurrence rate is now below 10%.

HtrA1 Is Specifically Up-Regulated in Active Keloid Lesions and Stimulates Keloid Development

Keloids occur after failure of the wound healing process; inflammation persists, and various treatments are ineffective. Keloid pathogenesis is still unclear. We have previously analysed the gene expression profiles in keloid tissue and found that HtrA1 was markedly up-regulated in the keloid lesions. HtrA1 is a serine protease suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of various diseases, including age-related macular degeneration and osteoarthritis, by modulating extracellular matrix or cell surface proteins. We analysed HtrA1 localization and its role in keloid pathogenesis. Thirty keloid patients and twelve unrelated patients were enrolled for in situ hybridization, immunohistochemical, western blot, and cell proliferation analyses. Fibroblast-like cells expressed more HtrA1 in active keloid lesions than in surrounding lesions. The proportion of HtrA1-positive cells in keloids was significantly higher than that in normal skin, and HtrA1 protein was up-regulated relative to normal skin. Silencing HtrA1 gene expression significantly suppressed cell proliferation. HtrA1 was highly expressed in keloid tissues, and the suppression of the HtrA1 gene inhibited the proliferation of keloid-derived fibroblasts. HtrA1 may promote keloid development by accelerating cell proliferation and remodelling keloid-specific extracellular matrix or cell surface molecules. HtrA1 is suggested to have an important role in keloid pathogenesis.

Radiation Therapy in Keloids Treatment: History, Strategy, Effectiveness, and Complication

Objective:

Radiation therapy combined with surgical excision was considered as one of the most effective treatment plans for keloid lesions. However, there was no unanimity found over present literatures regarding the issue on optimized treatment strategy for keloids. We here provide a comprehensive review over this issue and emphasize on the influencing factors.

Data Sources:

The data analyzed in this review were searched from articles included in PubMed and EMBASE databases.

Study Selection:

The original articles and critical reviews discussing the application of radiation therapy in keloids treatment were selected for this review.

Results:

The application of radiation therapy has transitioned from simple superficial X-ray irradiation to brachytherapy. Furthermore, several factors including radiation type, dose, fraction, interval, and complications were reviewed, and the results revealed that these factors were significant toward clinical outcome at various levels.

Conclusions:

Both past and present evidence support the idea that combination therapy of radiation and surgical therapy is safe and feasible. However, the optimization of treatment strategy was based on different radiation types and should take dose, fractions, interval, and complications into consideration, which will then decrease the rate of recurrence and increase the level of satisfaction.

Piercing Ear Keloid: Excision Using Loupe Magnification and Topical Liquid Silicone Gel as Adjuvant

Background

Keloid is an abnormal growth of scar at the site of skin injury, which usually does not regress. It proliferates beyond the original scar. The ear keloid usually develops after piercing injury to wear ornaments. A patient usually asks for removal of keloid, as it is aesthetically unpleasant. Patient may sometimes complain of itching and pain.

Aim

The study was conducted to analyze results following excision of keloid with its tract and topical silicone gel as the postsurgical adjuvant.

Materials and Methods

Ear keloids measuring less than 0.5cm or more than 5cm in maximum dimension were excluded from the study. Nonpiercing causes such as burns, trauma, and recurrent keloid were excluded from the study. The study was carried out on 22 patients who had keloid because of piercing injury, including 4 cases with both ear keloids. Of 26 ear keloids, 19 had the tract or connecting tissue. The lesion was excised under anesthesia using magnification. For all the operated cases, topical liquid silicone gel was used as postsurgical adjuvant therapy. The method of application of topical silicone gel was taught to each patient and was considered significant.

Result

The magnification helped in identification of tract in 73% of the cases in this study. Twenty patients had successfully responded to proposed treatment, and two patients developed recurrence while using topical silicone gel as the adjuvant. These two patients were managed with conventional triamcinolone injection.

Conclusion

The topical silicone gel as postsurgical adjuvant therapy avoided the use of painful postsurgical injection or radiotherapy for the 1-3cm primary ear keloids. The advantages of magnification were better clearance of keloid tissue, easier identification of tract and removal of keloid pseudopods, meticulous suturing, and comfortable elevation of a small local flap.

Lower energy radial shock wave therapy improves characteristics of hypertrophic scar in a rabbit ear model

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) on scar characteristics and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1/Smad signaling in order to explore a potential modality for the treatment of hypertrophic scars (HS). The HS model was generated in rabbit ears, then rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups: Lower (L)-ESWT [treated with rESWT with lower energy flux density (EFD) of 0.1 mJ/mm²], higher (H)-ESWT (treated with a higher EFD of 0.18 mJ/mm²) and the sham ESWT group (S-ESWT; no ESWT treatment). Scar characteristics (wrinkles, texture, diameter, area, volume of elevation, hemoglobin and melanin) were assessed using the Antera 3D^® system. The protein and mRNA expression of TGF-β1, Smad2, Smad3 and Smad7 was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. The Antera 3D^® results indicated that wrinkles and hemoglobin of the HS were significantly improved in both of the rESWT groups when compared with the S-ESWT group. However, these changes appeared much earlier in the L-ESWT group than the H-ESWT. Scar texture was also improved in the L-ESWT group. However, rESWT did not influence HS diameter, area, volume of elevation or melanin levels. rESWT had no effect on TGF-β1 or Smad7 expression in either of rESWT groups. Although no difference was observed in Smad2 mRNA expression in the L-ESWT group, the Smad3 mRNA and protein expression significantly decreased when compared with the H-ESWT and S-ESWT groups. By contrast, Smad2 and Smad3 mRNA expression were upregulated in the H-ESWT group. These results demonstrated that rESWT with 0.1 mJ/mm² EFD improved some characteristics of the HS tissue. Downregulation of Smad3 expression may underlie this inhibitory effect. Inhibition of the TGF-β1/Smad signal transduction pathway may be a potential therapeutic target for the management of HS.

Treatment of Keloids With Excision and Adjuvant Radiation: A Single Center Experience and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Management of keloids has remained a conundrum, because an optimum treatment regimen has yet to be elucidated. Currently, treatment varies widely between more conservative measures, such as steroid injections, topical medications, and silicone sheeting, to more aggressive options, such as surgery and postoperative radiation. The latter combination has been touted to have superior results, with the lowest rates of pathologic scar recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to critically evaluate the effectiveness of surgical excision and radiation treatment in patients with keloids. Surgical resection of surgeon-selected keloids, combined with state-of-the-art postoperative cutaneous radiation therapy, was used at a major tertiary referral center. For patients with poor follow-up, phone calls were made to determine recurrence. In addition, we present a review of the current literature to provide a comprehensive synopsis of current keloid treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients' records were reviewed. There were a total of 84 keloids upon pathology review. The overall recurrence rate for all keloids was 27%, and in those followed greater than 1 year, recurrence for keloids was 74%. About half the patients with more than 1 year of follow-up experienced recurrence more than 1 year after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

At this time, the evidence supporting surgery and radiation for the treatment of keloids remains equivocal, and randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this treatment protocol. Most importantly, our data reinforce the need for long-term follow-up in this patient population.

Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars Can Now Be Cured Completely: Recent Progress in Our Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars and the Most Promising Current Therapeutic Strategy

Keloids and hypertrophic scars are fibroproliferative disorders of the skin that are caused by abnormal healing of injured or irritated skin. It is possible that they are both manifestations of the same fibroproliferative skin disorder and just differ in terms of the intensity and duration of inflammation. These features may in turn be influenced by genetic, systemic, and local risk factors. Genetic factors may include single nucleotide polymorphisms, while systemic factors may include hypertension, pregnancy, hormones, and cytokines. The most important local factor is tension on the scar. Over the past 10 years, our understanding of the pathogenesis of keloids and hypertrophic scars has improved markedly. As a result, these previously intractable scars are now regarded as being treatable. There are many therapeutic options, including surgery, radiation, corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil, cryotherapy, laser therapy, anti-allergy agents, anti-inflammatory agents, bleaching creams and make-up therapies. However, at present, we believe that the following combination of three therapies most reliably achieves a complete cure: surgery, followed by radiation and the use of steroid tape/plaster.

S-shaped Wound Closure Technique for Dumbbell-shaped Keloids

Dog-ear collection, Z-plasty, and W-plasty are often performed for excision of dumbbell-shaped keloids; however, these procedures require additional incisions or excision of normal skin. Thus, an S-shaped wound closure technique was performed. The keloid lesions were extralesionally excised above the deep fascia, and the wound edges were shifted in opposite directions along the major axis to form an S-shape. The incision was closed by applying deep fascial sutures, subcutaneous sutures, and superficial sutures. Postoperative external beam radiation therapy was started within 6 hours after surgery at a dose of 20 Gy applied in 4 fractions. All wounds were covered with silicone-gel sheeting and fixed with tape after suture removal. No intralesional corticosteroid injection or oral tranilast was administered. Corticosteroid tape was applied in cases with suspected postoperative recurrence. Scoring was performed using the Manchester Scar Scale. A total of 8 lesions were treated. Temporary erythema and scar elevation were observed in 2 chest lesions; however, both were flattened and turned white using corticosteroid tape. Other than these 2 lesions, there was no recurrence or complication. The mean score improved from 15.8 to 7.2. The S-shaped wound closure technique has 3 advantages. First, no additional incision or excision is required, and additional scarring and keloid recurrence can be avoided. Second, aesthetic results are good, and noticeably long and zigzag-shaped scars can be avoided. Third, dispersion of tension on the scar can be expected. Although the S-shaped wound closure technique has limited application, it is a useful option for keloid treatment.