Ramirez's Abdominoplasty Technique Combined With Intraperitoneal Chemohyperthermia After Surgical Cytoreductive Procedures for the Treatment of Advanced Intraperitoneal Cancer in Patients With Ventral Hernia

Outcomes of complex abdominal wall reconstruction at the time of CRS and HIPEC

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreduction Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a treatment option for patients with peritoneal metastatic cancer. This procedure has been shown to improve survival, however, patients are often left with abdominal wall and soft tissue defects requiring further surgical correction. We aim to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of abdominal reconstruction performed concurrent with CRS/HIPEC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review on patients with peritoneal metastases who received CRS/HIPEC therapy and abdominal wall reconstruction at tertiary center from 2012 to 2018. Records were evaluated for the patient characteristics, oncologic history, operative details, and postoperative course. Complications were graded with the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

Five patients aged 29-54 years old met the inclusion criteria. The most common type of cancer within this cohort was colorectal cancer. To close the abdomen, four patients underwent component release, biologic mesh placement, and primary fascial closure. The last patient was closed with adjacent tissue transfer. Two patients experienced Grade I complications: deep vein thrombosis and leukocytosis (both self-resolved). Three patients experienced Grade II complications: atrial fibrillation, anemia, and a wound infection which required readmission. No patients experienced grades III, IV or V complications. The follow up period was a median of 5.3 months [r: 2.6-21.9 months].

CONCLUSION

The patients benefitted therapeutically from combined abdominal reconstruction and CRS/HIPEC with minimal complications and good long-term survival. We advocate for the coupling of these procedures as the benefits outweigh the risks, and allows wound closure at the time of surgery.

Large and complex ventral hernia repair using "components separation technique" without mesh results in a high recurrence rate

BACKGROUND

Recurrence rates after component separation technique (CST) are low in the literature but may be underestimated because of inadequate follow-up methods.

METHODS

Prospective patient follow-up was performed of consecutive patients who underwent repair of large and complex ventral hernias using CST without mesh utilization. Primary outcome was recurrent hernia determined by clinical examination at least 1 year after surgery in all living patients. Current literature underwent meta-analysis regarding outcomes and mode of follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were included with a mean age of 52.2 years and a mean defect size of 214.9 cm(2), respectively. Twenty-nine patients (38.7%) had a recurrent hernia after a mean of 40.9-month follow-up, and this was significantly higher than in the literature (14.0%, P < .01). Sixty-four percent of studies in the literature were unclear about the method of determining recurrent hernia or included telephone follow-up and questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

CST coincides with a high recurrence rate when clinical follow-up is longer than a year. Reported recurrence rates are probably underestimated because the method and duration of follow-up are inadequate.