Zone I Flexor Profundus Tendon Repair in Children 5–10 Years of Age Using 3 “Figure of Eight” Sutures Followed by Immediate Active Mobilization

Pediatric Flexor Tendon Injuries

The diagnosis and management of pediatric flexor tendon injuries present unique challenges to the hand surgeon. Examination of young children is not always straightforward, and tendon lacerations are frequently diagnosed late--sometimes weeks or months after the inciting injury. Four- and six-strand repair techniques are supported by recent literature, though the surgeon must remain diligent to ensure gliding of a bulky repair in a narrow tendon sheath. Beyond the operating room, postoperative management must be tailored to accommodate nuances specific to patient age and behavioral development. A fluid, patient-specific approach to every stage of management is critical for the successful treatment of pediatric flexor tendon injuries.

Flexor tendon rehabilitation in the 21st century: A systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

The rehabilitation of patients following flexor tendon injury has progressed from immobilization to true active flexion with the addition of wrist motion over the last 75 years.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This review specifically intended to determine whether there is evidence to support one type of exercise regimen, early passive, place and hold, or true active, as superior for producing safe and maximal range of motion following flexor tendon repair.

METHODS

The preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-P 2015) checklist was utilized to format the review. Both reviewers collaborated on all aspects of the research, including identifying inclusion/exclusion factors, search terms, reading and scoring articles, and authoring the paper. Articles were independently scored by each reviewer using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES).

RESULTS

A total of nine intervention studies that included a rehabilitative comparison group were systematically reviewed: one pediatric, four comparing passive flexion protocols to place and hold flexion, and four comparing true active flexion to passive and/or place and hold flexion.

DISCUSSION

This review provides moderate to strong evidence that place and hold exercises provide better outcomes than passive flexion protocols for patients with two to six-strand repairs. The studies included in this review suffered from methodological limitations including short timeframes for follow-up, unequal group distribution, and limited attention to repair site strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a lack of superior benefits following true active motion regimens, there is not sufficient evidence to support true active motion as an effective or preferable choice for flexor tendon rehabilitation at this time.

Use of the Volar Plate of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint as a Distally Based Flap in Flexor Tendon Surgery

The usual treatment for flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) avulsions as well as FDP lacerations in the distal part of zone I is tendon reinsertion into bone. Although there are several different techniques of FDP tendon reinsertion into bone, they are generally complex and have a weak tensile strength. A technique for treating these injuries is to use the volar plate of the distal interphalangeal joint as a distally based flap for tendon repair. The current communication discusses the technique and its potential complications. Initial clinical experience is encouraging and the volar plate flap technique may take its place in flexor tendon surgery.

Re-repair of ruptured primary flexor tendon repairs in Zones I and II of the fingers in children

The aetiology, management, and results of acute rupture of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zones I and II of the fingers in children have not been previously investigated. The author reports on a personal series of 10 children treated over a period of 13 years. The aetiology is different when compared with adults: children less than 5 years of age usually rupture their primary repairs whilst the hand is completely immobilized in a cast; whereas teenagers usually rupture their tendons when falling down while playing. In the current series, direct re-repair was performed without lengthening at the musculo-tendinous junction, and no free tendon grafts were used. The results were worse than other paediatric series of primary flexor tendon repairs. Using the Strickland-Glogovac criteria, there was only one excellent outcome, the remaining nine being either a good (n = 5) or fair (n = 4) outcome.

Flexor tendon injuries in the child

This review aims to highlight the differences in the management of flexor tendon injuries between children and adults. These include differences in epidemiology, anatomy, classification, diagnosis, incisions and skin closure, the size of the flexor tendons, technical aspects of zones I and II repairs, core suture purchase length, rehabilitation, results, and complications of primary flexor tendon repair. Finally, one- versus two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction in children is reviewed.