Use of Inferior Gluteal Artery and Posterior Thigh Perforators in Management of Ischial Pressure Sores With Limited Donor Sites for Flap Coverage

Preference for Fasciocutaneous Flap Over Musculocutaneous Flap as a First-Line Option for Ischial Pressure Wound Reconstruction: A Review of 64 Cases

The ischial pressure wound usually comprises a large, extensive defect and involves the repair of more than a small opening. Most surgeons have used a musculocutaneous flap to fill the large dead space of an ischial pressure wound. However, sacrificing muscle tissue has a potential risk of postoperative bleeding. The transferred muscle ultimately loses function as a cushion to absorb pressure. Conservation of muscle structures may be beneficial for use in future recurrence, which is common with ischial pressure wound. We compared the difference in outcome between musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps and analyzed factors affecting complications with the flaps in ischial pressure wound reconstruction. This study reviewed the results of 64 flaps in 44 patients with ischial wounds. The wounds were reconstructed with 34 musculocutaneous flaps (53%) and 30 fasciocutaneous flaps (47%). Twenty-three cases (36%) had complete healing, and 41 (64%) had complications. There was no significant difference in outcomes between fasciocutaneous and musculocutaneous flap groups. Crude logistic regression analysis showed no significant risk factors for occurrence of major complications. When fasciocutaneous flaps were used, the neighboring perforators and muscle tissues could be conserved. With a perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap, a de-epithelized distal portion of the flap could be used to fill the dead space. Therefore, the fasciocutaneous flap may have priority over the musculocutaneous flap as a first-line option for ischial pressure wound reconstruction.

A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes of Local Flap Options for Reconstruction of Pressure Sores

INTRODUCTION

Pressure sores are agonizing complications of chronically bedridden patients. The management of these lesions particularly with respect to grades III and IV lesions are chiefly surgical and involves a multidisciplinary approach. Although there are a variety of local flap options, like fasciocutaneous flaps, musculocutaneous flaps, perforator flaps, and combinations of these to choose from, there is a paucity of literature regarding which flap is better among these in terms of complication and recurrence rates.

METHODS

The databases searched were as follows: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (January 2000 to July 2020), MEDLINE (January 2000 to July 2020), and EMBASE (January 2000 to August of 2020). Key words used were "pressure ulcer," "flaps," "surgery," "pressure sore" with limits, "human," and "English." Primary outcomes were "overall complication rates" and "recurrence rates." Overall complication was further categorized as flap necrosis, flap dehiscence, infection, and others.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles were included in the final analysis. There was a statistically significant difference among the various types of flaps for overall complication, flap dehiscence, infection, flap necrosis, and recurrence rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that musculocutaneous flaps have lower recurrence rates, and combined flaps have lower complication rates. However, various other factors, like donor site morbidity, initial defect size, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, salvage options in case of recurrence, should also be considered while choosing a flap to reconstruct a defect.

Dual Reconstruction of Lumbar and Gluteal Defects with Freestyle Propeller Flap and Muscle Flap

The reconstruction of complex tissue defects in the lumbar and gluteal areas is a surgical challenge. The use of freestyle perforator-based flaps has gained popularity in the reconstruction of these defects due to several advantages: versatility, minimal donor-site morbidity, and tension-free closure. The present study reports the outcome of using a dual coverage of lumbar and gluteal defects with a gluteus maximus rotation flap as a deep layer and a freestyle propeller perforator-based flap as a superficial layer.

Profunda femoris artery perforator flaps: a detailed anatomical study

The thigh region has many perforators when compared to the other areas in the body. Surgeons have disregarded the posterior thigh region as a potential donor site for perforator flap surgeries, presumably owing to the positioning difficulties of the patients during the intervention and inadequate anatomical information. The purpose of this study was to provide comprehensive data concerning the profunda femoris artery. Perforator flaps on an anatomical basis, and to describe anatomical landmarks, easing topographical flap dissection in various combinations. Eleven fresh cadaver thighs were obtained from different individuals using the Willed Body Program. The mean age was 43.5 years (29-63), and the male/female ratio was 7/4. We evaluated each cutaneous perforator for localization, diameter, source artery, numbers, length, and type (musculocutaneous or septocutaneous).We observed at least two perforators in all thighs in the study. Medial perforators consisted of 74.5% musculocutaneous and 25.5% septocutaneous perforators. Lateral perforators consisted of 68.3% septocutaneous perforators and 31.7% musculocutaneous perforators. Positioning difficulties of the patient during surgery and inadequate anatomical information cause surgeons to avoid this area. However, surgeons may easily perform these flaps in reconstructive surgery as a local or free flap with substantial success.

The pedicled internal pudendal artery perforator (PIPAP) flap for ischial pressure sore reconstruction: Technique and long-term outcome of a cohort study

BACKGROUND

The ischial region is the site most affected by pressure sores and has the highest recurrence and complication rates compared to other affected sites. We developed a practical and safe pedicled flap for reconstruction of ischial pressure sores based on the rich available perforators from the internal pudendal artery and the surplus of skin at the infragluteal fold.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in all patients who underwent ischial pressure ulcer reconstruction using the PIPAP flap between March 2010 and March 2017. The skin flap was designed along the gluteal fold. The skin perforators of the pudendal artery were marked with a Doppler probe in the medial region of the gluteal fold. Surgery was performed in the jackknife position, and flaps were elevated in the suprafascial plane. Patients were assessed for minor (requiring no additional surgery) and major complications (requiring additional surgery).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (34 flaps) were identified. The median follow-up period was 38 months (IQR 37). Primary closure of the donor-site was achieved in all procedures, only one flap required muscle flap transposition in order to fill the dead space. The mean operating time was 60 ± 21 minutes. In six flaps (9%) wound healing problems were noted that did not require an additional operative procedure. Among the nine flaps (27%) that required a second procedure, 3 (9%) were necessary due to recurrent ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

The PIPAP flap is a safe and reliable alternative for ischial pressure sore reconstruction, certainly when compared to available techniques. Moreover, it has significant advantages over other techniques including minimal donor-site morbidity, preservation of posterior thigh skin, buttock-line integrity and reliable vascularity.

Clinical Experience With the Combination of a Biceps Femoris Muscle Turnover Flap and a Posterior Thigh Fasciocutaneous Hatchet Flap for the Reconstruction of Ischial Pressure Ulcers

BACKGROUND

The reconstruction of ischial pressure ulcers is problematic because of the distinctive anatomical properties of the region and high recurrence rates. To date, no single technique has been proven to be effective in reducing recurrence of the ulcers. We present our experience with the combination of a biceps femoris muscle turnover flap and a posterior thigh fasciocutaneous hatchet flap and discuss the long-term results.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical analysis of 15 patients with grade 4 ischial pressure ulcers reconstructed with biceps femoris muscle turnover flaps and laterally based posterior thigh fasciocutaneous hatchet flaps was carried out between January 2010 and January 2013. Debridement and reconstruction of the ulcers were accomplished in a single stage. The posterior thigh fasciocutaneous flap was elevated in a hatchet style. The long and/or short head of the biceps femoris muscle were dissected from their insertions, turned over on their major pedicles, and their distal portions were used to obliterate the cavitary defect. The skin defect over the muscles was covered by the fasciocutaneous hatchet flap. The average age of the patients was 42.6 years and the mean follow-up time was 27.2 months.

RESULTS

Three patients had the following early postoperative complications: hematoma, suture dehiscence, and the necrosis of the short head of biceps muscle. Only 1 patient had a recurrent ulcer 15 months after surgery, which was treated with debridement and the readvancement of the fasciocutaneous flap. The overall recurrence rate was 6.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The biceps femoris muscle turnover flap combined with the posterior thigh fasciocutaneous hatchet flap is a worthwhile option to consider for the reconstruction of ischial pressure ulcers and this technique produces favorable results in terms of the lack of recurrence and complications. The use of the muscle and fasciocutaneous tissue as 2 different flaps, which have different roles in the early and late postoperative period, reduces the recurrence rate.

Treatment of ischial pressure sores with both profunda femoris artery perforator flaps and muscle flaps

Background

Reconstruction of ischial pressure sore defects is challenging due to extensive bursas and high recurrence rates. In this study, we simultaneously applied a muscle flap that covered the exposed ischium and large bursa with sufficient muscular volume and a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap for the management of ischial pressure sores.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 14 patients (16 ischial sores) whose ischial defects had been reconstructed using both a profunda femoris artery perforator flap and a muscle flap between January 2006 and February 2014. We compared patient characteristics, operative procedure, and clinical course.

Results

All flaps survived the entire follow-up period. Seven patients (50%) had a history of surgery at the site of the ischial pressure sore. The mean age of the patients included was 52.8 years (range, 18-85 years). The mean follow-up period was 27.9 months (range, 3-57 months). In two patients, a biceps femoris muscle flap was used, while a gracilis muscle flap was used in the remaining patients. In four cases (25%), wound dehiscence occurred, but healed without further complication after resuturing. Additionally, congestion occurred in one case (6%), but resolved with conservative treatment. Among 16 cases, there was only one (6%) recurrence at 34 months.

Conclusions

The combination of a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and muscle flap for the treatment of ischial pressure sores provided pliability, adequate bulkiness and few long-term complications. Therefore, this may be used as an alternative treatment method for ischial pressure sores.