Subfascial Directionality of Perforators of the Distal Lower Extremity: An Anatomic Study Regarding Selection of Perforators for 180-Degree Propeller Flaps

Peroneal Artery Adipofascial Flaps for Coverage of Distal Leg and Rearfoot

Chronic wounds of the lower extremity can pose several obstacles for the treating physician as well as the patient. Peroneal artery adipofascial flaps have been shown to be a reliable and durable option for reconstruction of these defects for many reasons, including ease of dissection, minimized donor site mobility, reliability of take to underlying surfaces, and cosmetically more pleasing outcome. This article discusses the current literature regarding the use of peroneal artery adipofascial flaps and our surgical technique for harvest, transfer, and postoperative course for this versatile flap.

Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction

Reconstruction of the lower extremity is considered a major challenge due to frequent bone exposure and the absence of local tissue redundancy, as well as often due to the presence of vascular insufficiency. Many surgeons have preferred free flaps especially for reconstructing the more distal lower limb defects until the evolution of pedicled perforator flaps and propeller flaps in particular provided a like-with-like reconstruction of the lower extremity without affecting the main vessels of the limb or the underlying muscles, and without the risk of any microanastomosis especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps as local flaps in the lower extremity are best suited for small- and medium-sized defects with minimal donor-site morbidity, regardless of the cause of the defect. Any of the three source vessels of the leg can provide reliable perforators for propeller flap coverage of the distal leg and foot. The three main risk factors that are relative contraindications may be advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease.

Pedicled perforator flaps for mid-tibial soft tissue reconstruction in medically compromised patients

Background

The soft tissue of the central pretibial area is difficult to reconstruct often requiring free tissue transfer. Especially medically compromised patients are not ideal candidates for free tissue transfer and may benefit from expeditiously harvested local flaps with limited donor site morbidity. As muscle flaps are rare, pedicled flaps based on lateral perforators represent an alternative as the arc of rotation can often be limited to 90°.

Material and Methods

A retrospective analysis of patient data was conducted to identify patients over the age of 60 years with comorbidities that underwent pretibial soft tissue reconstruction with a single-pedicle perforator flap. Patient demographics, size and cause of the defect, flap dimension, arc of rotation and complications were recorded.

Results

Five patients with an average age of 71.4 years were included. The arc of rotation was 69°, all flaps healed. There were two recurrences of osteomyelitis.

Conclusion

Lateral perforators originating from the anterior tibial artery or peroneal artery are adequate source vessels for single pedicled perforator flaps even in medically compromised patients. A perforator located proximal to the defect allows limiting the arc of rotation to less than 90°, which increases the safety of the flap. Patients benefit from a simple procedure without a microvascular anastomosis and a donor site confined to one extremity.

The Microvascular Peroneal Artery Perforator Flap as a "Lifeboat" for Pedicled Flaps

Pedicled perforator flaps have expanded reconstructive options in extremity reconstruction. Despite preoperative mapping, intraoperative findings may require microvascular tissue transfer when no adequate perforators can be found. The free peroneal artery perforator flap may serve as a reliable back-up plan in small defects.

Redefining Vascular Anatomy of Posterior Tibial Artery Perforators: A Cadaveric Study and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Perforator flaps whether in a free or pedicled form are essential in leg reconstruction, requiring meticulous dissection based on a detailed understanding of vascular topographic anatomy. Numerous investigators have addressed this issue. However, the directionality of their fascial exit has not been greatly discussed in the literature. Subfascial course of the perforating vessel is a crucial determinant for optimal perforator selection especially when the propeller perforator flap option is considered, because an angulated fascial penetration would eventually result in perforator kinking which would additionally compromise vascular patency. The aim of the current study was to investigate the vascular anatomy of posterior tibial artery evaluating a wide range of parameters, including perforators' subfascial directionality, to precisely determine constant reliable perforator sites, in relation to surface landmarks on the medial aspect of the lower leg.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Dissections in 30 lower legs from 25 fresh cadavers were performed. The lower leg was divided into 3 equal vascular zones. Measurements were taken in reference to anatomical landmarks. Perforator clusters to 5-cm intervals from medial malleolus were recorded and analyzed. Vessels with external diameter less than 0.5 mm were excluded. Data regarding the number, distribution, type, external diameter, length from posterior tibial artery, distance, and subfascial directionality were collected and treated.

RESULTS

A total of 155 perforators were identified (average number, 5 per leg; average diameter, 1.0 mm). Septocutaneous (127/155) perforators predominated, followed by musculocutaneous (19/155) and septomusculocutaneous (9/155). Most was concentrated in the middle (73/155) and distal (64/155) tertile. There were no septomusculocutaneous perforators at the distal third of the leg, whereas septocutaneous perforators were encountered into all vascular tertiles. An average of 2 comitant veins accompanied each perforator. Length and diameter related to the perforators' location. There was a significant association between perforator length and type. Cluster analysis revealed that reliable perforators were identified within the 21 to 25, 26 to 30, and 16 to 20 cm intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically optimal perforators for the first time were precisely located in relation to subfascial directionality, vascular diameter, and length from the source artery. Continuous improving details of vascular anatomy will further evolve perforator flaps' applications.

Posterior tibial artery perforator flaps for coverage of Achilles region defects

BACKGROUND

Defects of the Achilles tendon region still represent a tricky issue in lower limb surgery. Among the several reconstructive possibilities, local propeller perforator flaps have gained popularity in the last decade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report our experience with eight patients affected by small-to-moderate soft-tissue defects of the Achilles tendon region, who underwent surgical reconstruction with local flaps based on posterior tibial perforator branches.

RESULTS

All patients healed successfully in terms of aesthetic and functional aspect. In only one case a transient venous congestion was observed and this resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the surgical technique requires much care and skill, including an extremely gentle dissection of perforator vessels, local propeller flaps should be considered the first-line choice for reconstruction in small-to-medium size soft-tissue defects in the Achilles region.