Pectoralis Major Turnover Versus Advancement Technique for Sternal Wound Reconstruction

Predictors of prolonged hospitalization in modified sternoplasty following postoperative mediastinitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a serious complication following cardiac surgery, and demands early intervention as any delay in diagnosis and management may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. DSWI is associated with increased length of hospitalization (LOH) and economic burden in this patient population. The aim of this study was to determine predictors for increased length of hospitalization in patients who underwent the Modified Sternoplasty technique for deep sternal wound infection following cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken on data from patients who underwent the Modified Sternoplasty surgery for DSWI between September 2010 and January 2020. Patients' characteristics that were recorded included medical history, type of the original heart surgery, length of hospitalizations, and risk factors including hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and morbidity and mortality rates following the Modified Sternoplasty.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients underwent the Modified Sternoplasty surgery with an average length of hospitalization of 24.63 + 22.09 days. Multivariable analysis showed that only gender was considered a predictor of length of hospitalization when controlling for comorbidities, with average length of hospitalization longer for women than men (35.4 vs. 20.9, p = .04).

CONCLUSION

The Modified Sternoplasty surgery is a novel surgical technique for managing DSWI complicated by sternal dehiscence with exposed heart and great vessels. Female gender was associated with increased length of hospitalization in our patient cohort, with average length of hospitalization for women almost twice that of males.

The management of deep sternal wound infection: Literature review and reconstructive algorithm

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is an important complication of open thoracic surgery, with a reported incidence of 0.5-6%. Given its association with increased morbidity, mortality, inpatient duration, financial burden, and re-operation rates, an aggressive approach to treatment is mandated. Flap reconstruction has become the standard of care, with studies demonstrating improved outcomes with reduced mortality and resource usage in patients undergoing early versus delayed flap reconstruction. Despite this, no evidence-based standard for the management of DSWI exists. We performed a thorough review of the literature to identify principles in management, using a PRISMA compliant methodology. Ovid-Embase, Medline and PubMed databases were searched for relevant papers using the search terms "deep sternal wound infection," and "post-sternotomy mediastinitis" to December 2019. Duplicates were removed, and the search narrowed to look at specific areas of interest i.e. negative pressure wound therapy, flap reconstruction, and rigid fixation. The reference list of included articles underwent full text review. No randomized controlled trials were identified. We review the current management techniques for patients with DSWI, and raise awareness for the need for further high quality studies, and a standardized national cardiothoracic-plastic surgery guideline to guide management. Based on our findings and the authors' own experience in this area, we provide evidence-based recommendations. We also propose a reconstructive algorithm.

Superior epigastric artery perforator flap for reconstruction of deep sternal wound infection

BACKGROUND

The treatment of deep wound sternal infection requires loco-regional pedicled flaps, usually with muscular flaps. Perforator propeller flaps represent the ultimate progress in the history of reconstructive surgery. We report here our experience with the superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) flaps to repair sternal defect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six patients presenting deep sternal wounds infection were treated with SEAP propeller flap, between March 2015 and June 2017. The mean age was 71.5 (range 53-83) years. The mean length and width of the defect were 16.2 × 7 cm (ranging 8-20 × 4-10). An elliptical skin flap pedicled on the SEAP was harvested in the inframammary fold and rotated up to 90° to cover the defect.

RESULTS

All SEAP flaps achieved a successful entire coverage of the defect. The mean size of the skin paddle of the flap was 20.2 × 7.3 cm (ranging 14-27 × 6-9). All flaps were able to provide a complete sternal wound cover. Venous congestion was present in five cases and adequately treated by leech therapy; necrosis was distal in one case, and interesting the entire superficial flap in two cases but with deep tissues remaining viable and able to cover the mediastinum: an infected flap required revision. Satisfyingly, at 2-years postoperative follow-up all-patients were alive with a successful mediastinal cover.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEAP Perforator propeller flap is an alternative to muscle flaps to achieve treatment of deep and large sternal wound infection.

Reconstruction of sternal defects after sternotomy with postoperative osteomyelitis, using a unilateral pectoralis major advancement muscle flap

Background: The pectoralis major flap, which is usually harvested bilaterally, is considered a workhorse flap in the reconstruction of sternal defects. After a median sternotomy for open heart surgery, 1%-3% of patients develop deep infection and dehiscence of the sternal wound, some of which will eventually require reconstructive surgery. Our aim was to describe the clinical feasibility and associated complications of the unilateral pectoralis major advancement flap in the reconstruction of sternal defects. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all adult patients who were operated on using a unilateral pectoralis major flap for reconstruction of the chest wall at the Linköping University Hospital during 2008–18 was made using data retrieved from medical records. Results: Forty-three patients had reconstructions with unilateral pectoralis major flaps. Three flaps failed completely, and another 10 patients developed complications that required further operation. The factors that were independently associated with loss of the flaps and complications were: older age, male sex, the number of different antibiotics used, and a long duration of treatment with negative wound pressure. Fewer wound revisions before the reconstruction resulted in more complications. The factors that were independently associated with prolonged time to complete healing were emergency reoperation after the initial operation and complications after reconstruction. Conclusion: The unilateral pectoralis major advancement flap has proved to be a useful technique in the reconstruction of most sternal defects after sternal wound infection in older patients. There is, however, need for a follow-up study on a larger number of procedures to evaluate the long-term outcome compared with other methods of sternal reconstruction.

Pectoralis major turnover flap based on thoracoacromial vessels for sternal dehiscence

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of long and deep sternal defects has been challenging. The pectoralis major can be used in the conventional turnover method that requires the internal thoracic vessel. We developed a new turnover pectoralis major flap based on thoracoacromial vessels. The purpose of this report is to present results from 14 patients.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with a mean age of 73.6 years (range, 53-83 years) who had sternal defects underwent reconstruction via this procedure. The defects were caused by mediastinitis and sternal osteomyelitis in six and eight patients, respectively. The internal thoracic artery (ITA) was harvested in two patients. The mean defect size was 2.4 × 15.5 cm (ranging 1-4.3 × 13-18 cm). After elevation of the lateral border of the muscle and ligation of the third to fifth perforators from ITA, the lateral side was turned over and the medial lower portion of the flap was additionally transplanted to the defect.

RESULTS

The mean flap size was 10.7 × 18 cm (ranging 9-13 × 15-21 cm). For 11 patients, defects healed without any complications. Discharge after flap reconstruction was observed in three patients, two of whom were managed using conservative treatments. Only one patient who needed additional debridement required transplantation of the contralateral pectoral major flap.

CONCLUSIONS

This muscle flap is nourished primarily by the thoracoacromial vessel. The long length and large volume of the muscle flap could be successfully turned over with this procedure even in patients that had their internal thoracic artery sacrificed.