Outcome Analysis of 541 Women Undergoing Breast Conservation Therapy

An In Vitro Approach for Investigating the Safety of Lipotransfer after Breast-Conserving Therapy

The application of lipotransfer after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and irradiation in breast cancer patients is an already widespread procedure for reconstructing volume deficits of the diseased breast. Nevertheless, the safety of lipotransfer has still not been clarified yet due to contradictory data. The goal of this in vitro study was to further elucidate the potential effects of lipotransfer on the irradiated remaining breast tissue. The mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A was co-cultured with the fibroblast cell line MRC-5 and irradiated with 2 and 5 Gy. Afterwards, cells were treated with conditioned medium (CM) from adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC), and the effects on the cellular functions of MCF-10A cells and on gene expression at the mRNA level in MCF-10A and MRC-5 cells were analyzed. Treatment with ADSC CM stimulated transmigration and invasion and decreased the surviving fraction of MCF-10A cells. Further, the expression of cytokines, extracellular, and mesenchymal markers was enhanced in mammary epithelial cells. Only an effect of ADSC CM on irradiated fibroblasts could be observed. The present data suggest epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like changes in the epithelial mammary breast cell line. Thus, the benefits of lipotransfer after BCT should be critically weighed against its possible risks for the affected patients.

A prospective cohort study to analyze the interaction of tumor-to-breast volume in breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy with reconstruction

PURPOSE

We explored the impact of the relative volume of a tumor versus the entire breast on outcomes in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy and reconstruction (M + R). We hypothesized that there would be a threshold tumor:breast ratio (TBR) below which patient-reported outcomes (PRO) would favor BCT and above which would favor M + R.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancers undergoing BCT or M + R. A prerequisite for inclusion, analysis of tumor and breast volumes was conducted from three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions to calculate the TBR. Three-dimensional photography was utilized to calculate pre- and postoperative volumes and assess symmetry. Oncologic, surgical, and patient-reported outcome data were obtained from relevant BREAST-Q modules administered pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The BCT cohort had significantly smaller tumor volumes (p = 0.001) and lower TBRs (p = 0.001) than patients undergoing M + R overall. The M + R group, however, comprised a broader range of TBRs, characterized at lower values by patients opting for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Postoperative satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial, and sexual well-being scores were significantly higher in the BCT cohort, while physical well-being significantly favored the M + R cohort 480.2 ± 286.3 and 453.1 ± 392.7 days later, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to BCT, M + R was used to manage a broad range of TBRs. The relative importance of oncologic and surgical risk reduction, symmetry, and number of procedures can vary considerably and may limit the utility of TBR as a guide for deciding between BCT and M + R. Clinical Trial StatementThis study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov as "A Prospective Trial to Assess Tumor:Breast Ratio and Patient Satisfaction Following Lumpectomy Versus Mastectomy With Reconstruction", Identifier: NCT02216136.

Oncologic safety of immediate autologous fat grafting for reconstruction in breast-conserving surgery

IMPORTANCE

Autologous fat grafting (AFG), or lipofilling, has been used for immediate reconstruction at the time of breast-conserving surgery in order to achieve a satisfactory cosmetic outcome in patients with breast cancer and an unfavorable tumor-to-breast volume ratio or unfavorable tumor location. However, the oncologic safety of this technique is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether AFG performed simultaneously with breast-conserving surgery is associated with differences in local relapse rates and disease-free survival.

DESIGN

Matched retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with or without AFG between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively enrolled and matched for age, staging, grade, tumor histology, and tumor immunohistochemical profile.

MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S)

The cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and disease-free survival were the primary end points, while distant recurrence and overall survival were the secondary end points.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients were followed. Cases were matched with controls at a 1:4 ratio. There was no difference in LRR or distant recurrence of breast cancer between the two groups. The annual LRR rate was 0.86% in patients who received immediate AFG vs. 0.7% in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery alone (p ≥ 0.05). Number of lymph nodes was the sole independent risk factor for local recurrence (p = 0.045). No significant differences in disease-free survival rates were found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

At a mean follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences in locoregional recurrence rates were found between patients who received immediate AFG and those who underwent breast-conserving surgery alone. These findings corroborate previous research demonstrating the oncological safety of immediate AFG reconstruction, further suggesting that this technique as a safe, effective way to achieve optimal cosmetic outcomes in primary breast cancer surgery without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes.

Surgical Outcome and Cosmetic Results of Autologous Fat Grafting After Breast Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 222 Fat Grafting Sessions in 109 Patients

BACKGROUND

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT) often lead to breast deformity. Reconstruction of these defects is a surgical challenge. Lately, the popularity of autologous fat grafting in these patients is growing. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes and aesthetic results of autologous fat grafting after BCS and RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A database of all patients who underwent fat grafting after BCS and RT was prospectively maintained. Patient demographics, clinical and surgical characteristics and intra- and postoperative complications were analysed. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative photographs were evaluated by a four-member expert-panel assessing the aesthetic outcome (Harvard scale, five-point aesthetic scale and an overall score).

RESULTS

Between June 2008 and January 2016, 109 consecutive patients (114 breasts) underwent 222 fat grafting procedures. The mean clinical postoperative follow-up was 26 ± 19 months (range 10-97). The median number of fat grafting sessions sufficient for a satisfactory surgical result was two (range 1-6). Localized infections occurred in four patients, all treated effectively with oral antibiotics. Fat necrosis that required excision under local anaesthesia occurred once. The overall cosmetic appearance was rated 5.1/10 before and 7.2/10 after reconstruction (p < 0.01). A significant improvement was noted in breast symmetry, volume, shape and scarring.

CONCLUSION

Fat grafting after BCS and RT provides significant aesthetic improvement of the breast. It has a positive effect on the postsurgical scar and irradiated tissue and helps to restore the volume deficit, which makes it suitable as a reconstructive approach in this patient group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Long-term objective esthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy

The prediction of unfavorable long-term esthetic outcome (AO) is important for patient consultation. We aimed to analyze variables characterizing the improvement and impairment of AO over time after breast-conserving surgery. A subgroup of a prospective, monocenter cohort study was analyzed to evaluate the results of the BCCT.core software (Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment.cosmetic results) which was used to objectively assess the AO before (n = 356), shortly after (n = 294) and in median 3 years after surgery (n = 356). We analyzed potential influencing factors (such as body mass index, (y)pT-stage, weight of resected specimen, etc.) on the AO using logistic regression analyses (n = 256). Finally, we tried to characterize groups of patients with improving or impaired AO over time (n = 294). Predictors for an unfavorable AO were an axillary lymphadenectomy (OR = 4.05), a tumor in the 12 o'clock position (OR = 2.22), a tumor stage larger or equal to (y)pT2 stage (OR = 2.11), and a surgical specimen weight >75 g (OR = 2.71). Patients with lower specimen weight were more likely to improve in the long-term follow-up (p = 0.018), whereas patients with a higher (y)pT-stage tended to become impaired with time. Although overall AO decreased over time, nearly half of the patients with an unfavorable AO shortly after surgery improved in the long-term follow-up. Predictors of unfavorable AO can be used in patient consultation preoperatively to prepare them for the postsurgical period and/or to recommend surgical alternatives (e.g., more complex oncoplastic techniques). Knowledge of improvement and impairment may help patients and physicians in the postsurgical consultation setting.

Systematization of Oncoplastic Surgery: Selection of Surgical Techniques and Patient-Reported Outcome in a Cohort of 1,035 Patients

Introduction

Functional and aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery are vital endpoints for patients with primary breast cancer. A large variety of oncoplastic techniques exist; however, it remains unclear which techniques yield the highest rates of local control at first surgery, omission of reexcision or subsequent mastectomy, and merits the highest degree of patient satisfaction.

Methods

In this retrospective case cohort trial with a customized investigational questionnaire for assessment of patient satisfaction with the surgical result, we analyzed 1,035 patients with primary, unilateral breast cancer and oncoplastic surgery from 2004 to 2009.

Results

Analysis of patient reported outcome (PRO) revealed that 88 % of the cohort was satisfied with their aesthetic result using oncoplastic techniques following the concept presented. These results also were achieved in difficult tumor localizations, such as upper inner and lower inner quadrant. Conversion rate from breast-conserving therapy to secondary mastectomy was low at 7.2 % (n = 68/944 patients). The systematization of oncoplastic techniques presented—embedded in a multimodal concept of breast cancer therapy—facilitates tumor control with a few number of uncomplicated techniques adapted to tumor site and size with a median resection of 32 (range 11–793) g. Five-year recurrence rate in our cohort was 4.0 %.

Conclusions

Patient´s satisfaction was independent from age, body mass index, resection volume, tumor localization, and type of oncoplastic surgery (p > 0.05). We identified postoperative pain as an important negative impact factor on patient´s satisfaction with the aesthetic result (p = 0.0001).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4396-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Centrifugation versus PureGraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy

Background

Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) leads to a progressive and deteriorating breast deformity. Fatgrafting is ideal for breast reconstruction after BCT. The most frequently utilized technique for fat processing is centrifugation. The PureGraft device (Cytori Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA) is a new method that involves washing and filtering the fat to prepare the graft. We compared the subjective and objective outcomes of two fat-processing methods, centrifugation and PureGraft filtration.

Methods

Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months. To measure the subjective outcome, we distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients both preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The BCCT.core software evaluated the objective outcome of breast reconstruction by fatgrafting.

Results

The Breast-Q results indicated a tremendous improvement in the modules “Satisfaction with Breast” and “Psychosocial Well-being”. The “Sexual Well-being” scale also improved. Only the module “Satisfaction with Breasts” significantly differed between groups; patients treated with the PureGraft fat exhibited better outcomes. The BCCT.core results did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusion

One year postoperatively, the outcomes of the use of PureGraft bags or centrifugation to process fat for breast reconstruction after BCT did not differ. The unpredictability of the results following fatgrafting procedures is likely due to interindividual differences with yet-undisclosed causes.