Statistical Analysis Using the OMENS Classification in Oriental Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia: A Comparative Analysis With Western Centers

Determination of Novel, Cranium-Based Relationships for Construct Placement in Microtia Reconstruction for Hemifacial Microsomia Patients

OBJECTIVE

Determine if the ideal location of the construct in microtia reconstruction for hemifacial microsomia (HFM) can be more accurately derived from measurements on the cranium.

DESIGN

High-resolution computerized tomography (CT) images were analyzed through craniometric linear relationships.

SETTING

Our tertiary care institution from 2000 to 2021.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients diagnosed with HFM and microtia, who had high-resolution craniofacial CT scans, yielding 36 patients accounting for 44 CT scans.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

First, the integrity of the posterior cranial vault among HFM patients was determined. If proven to be unaffected, it could be used as a reference in the placement of the construct. Second, the position of the ear in relation to the cranium was assessed in healthy age-matched controls. Third, if proven to be useful, the concordance of these cranium-based relationships could be validated among our HFM cohort.

RESULTS

The posterior cranial vault is unaffected in HFM (P > .001). Further, craniometric relationships between the tragus and the Foramen Magnum, as well as between the tragus and the posterior cranium, have been shown to be highly similar and equally precise in predicting tragus position in healthy controls (P > .001). These relationships held true across all age groups (P > .001), and importantly among HFM patients, where the mean absolute difference in predicted tragus position never surpassed 1.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Relationships between the tragus and the cranium may be used as an alternative to distorted facial anatomy or surgeon's experience to assist in pre-operative planning of construct placement in microtia reconstruction for HFM patients.

Vascular variation of temporoparietal fascia in microtia associated with hemifacial microsomia

The study analyzed vascular variations in microtia associated with hemifacial microsomia (HFM). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 patients with microtia and HFM, who underwent computed tomography angiography between November 2011 and May 2022. The vascular course and branching supplying the TPF were analyzed. Craniometric measurements were conducted to determine the horizontal distance from the porion and fronto-zygomatic suture (F-Z suture) to the vessels. On the affected side, the TPF was primarily supplied by either the superficial temporal artery (STA) or the postauricular artery-originated STA (Po-STA). The Po-STA (n = 29) was more prevalent than the STA (n = 18), and mostly exhibited a single frontal branch (n = 20). Craniometric analysis revealed that the Po-STA was closer to the porion, ear vestige, and F-Z suture than the STA on the non-affected side. Furthermore, a significant correlation was observed between the severity of mandibular hypoplasia and presence of Po-STA variation (Cramer's V = 0.498, p = 0.005). Microtia associated with HFM exhibits vascular variations in the TPF - in particular, a unique Po-STA variation. The Po-STA is prone to injury during ear reconstruction because of its proximity to the external auditory canal and ear vestige. Surgeons should be cautious of these anatomical variations for safer ear reconstruction procedures, and utilize preoperative imaging for meticulous planning.

Interrater Reliability for Classifying Craniofacial Microsomia Severity: A Call for Objective Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

The severity of craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is generally classified using the Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Soft tissue, Nerve (OMENS) classification score. The global assessment of the Phenotypic Assessment Tool for Craniofacial Microsomia (PAT-CFM), is a pictorial modification of the OMENS classification. The aim of this study was to assess the interrater reliability of the PAT-CFM global assessment score.

DESIGN

In this prospective cohort study, three clinicians completed the global assessment form of the PAT-CFM. The mandible was classified based on orthopantomogram- and/or computed tomography images.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients with CFM or microtia.

Interrater agreement was calculated using the weighted Krippendorff alpha (α), with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

In total, 53 patients were included (106 hemifaces). The reliabilities of the main classification components ranged from high for the mandible (α = 0.904 [95% CI 0.860-0.948]) and ear (α = 0.958 [95% CI 0.934-0.983]) subscales, to tentative for the orbital summary score (α = 0.682 [0.542-0.821]), and nerve summary score (α = 0.782 [0.666-0.900]) subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of the ear and radiographic mandible scales of the PAT-CFM global classification were high, while the orbit, facial nerve and soft tissue subscales may have limited reliability. Research focusing on radiographic severity scores for hypoplasia of the orbits and soft tissues, as well as objective measures for overall facial hypoplasia using non-ionizing forms of imaging for early classification, are warranted.

Distribution and Phenotype of Goldenhar Syndrome and Its Association With Other Anomalies

The purpose of this study was to investigate the distribution and phenotype of Goldenhar syndrome (GS) and its association with other anomalies. The samples consisted of 18 GS patients (6 males and 12 females; mean age at investigation, 7.4 ± 4.8 y) who were treated or followed up at the Department of Orthodontics, Seoul National University Dental Hospital between 1999 and 2021. The prevalence of side involvement and degree of mandibular deformity (MD), midface anomalies, and association with other anomalies were evaluated using statistical analysis. The prevalence of unilateral and bilateral MD did not differ (55.6% versus 44.4%). In unilateral MD cases, there was a tendency for higher prevalence of more severe Pruzansky-Kaban types than mild ones (type I, 10%; type IIa, 10%; type IIb, 50%; type III, 30%). Despite hypoplasia of the condyle/ramus complex, compensatory mandibular body growth occurred in 33.3% of GS patients (more severe side in bilateral MD cases, 37.5%, and ipsilateral side in unilateral MD cases, 30%). Class II molar relation was more prevalent than class I and class III molar relations (72.2% versus 11.1% versus 16.7%, P <0.01). Al total of 38.9% of patients had congenitally missing tooth. #7 facial cleft was found in 44.4% of patients. In midface anomalies, ear problem was the most common anomaly, followed by hypoplasia/absence of zygomatic arch and eye problem (88.9% versus 64.3% versus 61.1%, P <0.01). Association with the midface, spine, cardiovascular, and limb anomalies did not differ between unilateral and bilateral MD cases. These results might provide a basic guideline for diagnosis and treatment planning for GS patients.

A Proposal for the Classification of Temporomandibular Joint Disc Deformity in Hemifacial Microsomia

Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is the second most common congenital craniofacial disease and has a wide spectrum of symptoms. The classic diagnostic criterion for hemifacial microsomia is the OMENS system, which was later refined to the OMENS+ system to include more anomalies. We analyzed the data of 103 HFM patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discs. The TMJ disc classification was defined into four types: D0 for normal disc size and shape; D1 for disc malformation with adequate length to cover the (reconstructed) condyle; D2 for disc malformation with inadequate length to cover the (reconstructed) condyle; and D3 for no obvious presence of a disc. Additionally, this disc classification was positively correlated with the mandible classification (correlation coefficient: 0.614, p < 0.01), ear classification (correlation coefficient: 0.242, p < 0.05), soft tissue classification (correlation coefficient: 0.291, p < 0.01), and facial cleft classification (correlation coefficient: 0.320, p < 0.01). In this study, an OMENS+D diagnostic criterion is proposed, confirming the conjecture that the development of the mandibular ramus, ear, soft tissue, and TMJ disc, as homologous and adjacent tissues, is affected to a similar degree in HFM patients.

Quantitative Analysis on Cartilage Growth Between Ipsilateral and Contralateral Donor Sites in Microtia Patients

BACKGROUND

Costal cartilage harvest is required in patients with unilateral microtia when autologous reconstruction is being considered. However, whether an ipsilateral or contralateral donor site should be used remains controversial. This is the first study to compare cartilaginous growth between ipsilateral and contralateral donor sites in patients with unilateral microtia.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of 58 patients, the lengths of the sixth to ninth costal cartilages and 3 position-defining measurements with respect to the sixth to ninth costochondral junctions were calculated using 3-dimensional costal cartilage imaging. Patients were divided into subgroups, and the lateral differences between isolated microtia and hemifacial microsomia and between the growing and adult age groups, were compared.

RESULTS

In the isolated group, the sixth and seventh costal cartilages were longer on the contralateral side. The transverse dimension on the contralateral side, with respect to the sixth and seventh costochondral junctions, was also larger than that on the ipsilateral side in growing patients. However, no significant difference was observed between the 2 sides in the hemifacial microsomia group; there was also no difference between the age-related groups in this regard (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that age- and side-related differences in donor sites should be considered in patients with isolated microtia.

Surgical Microtia Reconstruction in Hemifacial Microsomia Patients: Current State and Future Directions

Background:

Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is one of the most common congenital craniofacial disorders. Among many other features, microtia is present in the large majority of these patients. However, mainly due to the unilateral hypoplastic anatomy, microtia reconstruction among this patient population remains a reconstructive challenge for plastic surgeons. Given that no clear standards exist, an evidence-based synthesis of the literature was devised.

Methods:

A systematic search of Pubmed, Medline, and Embase was carried out, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies discussing surgical microtia reconstruction for HFM patients were retained. Qualitative data regarding study design, challenges addressed, specific recommendations, and their respective strengths/limitations were extracted from each. Retrieved recommendations were consolidated and assigned a level of evidence grade.

Results:

Although only 11 studies were included in this review, these provided 22 main recommendations regarding the eight HFM-specific challenges identified, which were of either grade C (n = 5) or D (n = 17). Included studies addressed construct location (n = 7), the low hairline (n = 6), soft tissue construct coverage (n = 6), earlobe reconstruction (n = 6), construct projection (n = 5), anomalies of the relevant neurovascular systems (n = 2), retroauricular construct coverage (n = 2), and sizing of the construct (n = 2).

Conclusions:

Given the many persisting reconstructive challenges regarding surgical microtia reconstruction for HFM patients, the authors present a comprehensive and evidence-based consolidation of recommendations specific to these challenges. The authors hope this systematic review can appropriately guide plastic surgeons and will ultimately improve care for this patient population.

A new treatment strategy for hemifacial microsomia: Auricular reconstruction with an expanded two-flap method and simultaneous mandibular distraction osteogenesis

BACKGROUND

Owing to the complex clinical manifestations of hemifacial microsomia (HFM), multidisciplinary cooperation is required to achieve better therapeutic effects in terms of function and aesthetics. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of the expanded two-flap auricular reconstruction combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of HFM.

METHODS

This surgical strategy was performed in three stages. In the first stage, the retroauricular skin was expanded with a tissue expander and a mandibular distraction device was installed. In the second stage, the traditional expanded two-flap method for auricular reconstruction was adapted, and the framework was fabricated with costal cartilage and wrapped with the expanded skin flap, retroauricular fascia flap, and full-thickness skin graft. In the final stage, the tragus and lobule were rebuilt, the concha cavity deepened, and the mandibular distraction device removed.

RESULTS

From January 2014 to November 2018, 166 HFM patients underwent auricular reconstruction with the expanded two-flap method and simultaneous mandibular extension in our hospital. The median follow-up period was 9.3 months. Of the 166 patients, 154 patients and their families were satisfied with the results, and only 16 patients experienced complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This three-stage technique of simultaneous auricular reconstruction and mandibular distraction osteogenesis is safe and effective in achieving facial symmetry, improving occlusal contact, shortening treatment course, and relieving patient's suffering, especially for HFM patients.

A decade of clinical research on clinical characteristics, medical treatments, and surgical treatments for individuals with craniofacial microsomia: What have we learned?

AIM

This article provides a review of a decade of clinical research studies on clinical features, medical interventions, and surgical interventions for individuals with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). We also provide recommendations for future clinical research.

METHOD

A systematic search of literature was conducted in Embase and PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid. All publications from 2010 to 2020 that included at least 10 individuals with CFM were considered relevant for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 91 articles were included. In the past decade, many new studies on CFM have been published providing more insight on the diagnosis and management of patients with CFM. This review encompasses findings on the clinical difficulties patients with CFM encounter, including the craniofacial and extracraniofacial characteristics of patients with CFM and its related clinical consequences on breathing, feeding, speech, and hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable number of large multicenter studies have been published in recent years, providing new insights in the clinical consequences of CFM. The phenotypic variety between patients with CFM makes patient-specific treatment tailored to individual needs essential. The research and development of clinical care standards might be challenging because of the heterogeneity of CFM. Future research on clinical and patient-reported outcomes can help identify optimal treatment strategies. Cooperation between craniofacial centers, using uniform registration and outcome measurement tools, could enhance research and future care for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

OMENS+ Classification Correlations Analysis of Craniofacial Microsomia in China: The Relationship Between Macrostomia and Mandibular Hypoplasia

ABSTRACT

Macrostomia is a rare congenital craniofacial deformity that influences the appearance and function of patients. In most cases, it coexists with craniomaxillofacial deformities such as craniofacial microsomia (CFM). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between macrostomia and mandibular hypoplasia so as to facilitate the early detection and diagnosis of children with CFM. It included 236 patients diagnosed with CFM. All underwent facial expression analysis, multi-angle photography, computed tomography, and three-dimensional reconstruction of soft and hard tissues. The clinical classification was performed according to OMENS+. Spearman (rank) correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the severity of macrostomia (C1 and C2) and the degree of mandibular involvement (M1, M2a, M2b, and M3), and the correlation among the components of OMENS+. Of the 80 cases of macrostomia (34%) reported, 72 cases (90%) were C1 and 8 (10%) were C2. The analysis of OMENS+ revealed significant correlations among OMENS+ components. Also, a high correlation was observed between macrostomia (C) and hypoplasia of the mandible (M) (P = 0.002). Macrostomia was closely related to mandibular hypoplasia among children diagnosed with CFM. These results suggested that patients with macrostomia, who might also have craniofacial malformations caused by other first branchial arch anomalies, should be comprehensively physically examined for other syndromes.

Correlations Between Mandible Condylar Structures and External Ear Deformities in Hemifacial Microsomia With Three-Dimensional Analysis

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to explore correlations between mandible and ear deformities and quantitative volumetric relations between condylar structures and external ear in hemifacial microsomia. The authors reconstructed three-dimensional craniofacial models from 212 patients with unilateral hemifacial microsomia (the unaffected side as the controls). Patients were evaluated by Pruzansky-Kaban and Marx classification, and divided into 3 age groups (0-6, 7-12, and >12 years old). The mandible condylar structures, including condyle and the condylar skeletal unit, were selected (except the classification of the mandibular or ear deformities (M3)). Along with the external ear (except the classification of the mandibular or ear deformities (E4)), their volumes were measured and analyzed. Spearman correlation coefficient analysis was applied. There was a positive correlation between the mandible and ear deformities (r = 0.301, P < 0.001). Either between the condyle and external ear (P = 0.071-0.493) or between the condylar unit and external ear (P = 0.080-0.488), there were no volumetric relations on the affected side, whereas on the unaffected side were (r = 0.492-0.929 for condyle, r = 0.443-0.929 for the condylar unit, P < 0.05). In most cases, the condylar structures of the classification of the mandibular or ear deformities (M2b) were significantly smaller than the classification of the mandibular or ear deformities (M2a). Results suggested deformities of mandibular condylar structures and ear did not correlate, although deformities of mandible and ear did. The condylar deformity might develop independently from microtia and be more severe within relatively more abnormal temporomandibular joints.

Hemifacial Microsomia: Clinical Features and Associated Anomalies

ABSTRACT

Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is the second most common congenital anomaly of the face after cleft lip and palate. There is a considerable variability in the extent and severity of affection of the bones and soft tissues of the face arising from these two arches. Different classification systems have been described for HFM with the mandible and/or the ear defects being key features needed for any classification system. Nowadays, the most widely used system is the orbital, mandibular, ear, facal nerve, soft tissue (OMENS) classification, later modified to the OMENS+ to include extracraniofacial manifestations.The aim of this study was to review the demographic characteristics and clinical findings of a group of Egyptian patients with HFM and to correlate the findings with data retrieved from the literature.Thirty-nine patients were identified and included in this study. Right side was predominantly affected in 19 patients (48.7%), 9 patients (23%) had left side affection (23%) and 11 patients (28.3%) had bilateral affection, with overall male-to-female ratio of 1:1.4. The majority of patients had a normal orbit (64%), mildly hypoplastic mandible with functioning temporomandibular joint (58% with type M1 or M2a), normal facial nerve (82%), and minimal to mild soft-tissue hypoplasia (52%). Significant ear deformity affected the bigger percentage of the patients (E3: 44%, E2: 14%)The data demonstrate the phenotypic variability of HFM and suggest a degree of relationship among the components of HFM. Some epidemiological aspects and clinical findings in our study did not always parallel those reported in western literatures. Small sample size is the main limitation of the study. Further, and if possible multi-center, studies are recommended.

Serial measurements of facial asymmetry using a wooden tongue depressor in patients with congenital microtia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Congenital microtia may be associated with hemifacial microsomia, but little is known about their correlation and development with aging. Historically, facial asymmetry is easily assessed by observing the occlusal cant using a tongue depressor. We serially measured the occlusal cant in children with microtia to evaluate change in facial asymmetry with growth.

METHODS

Since 2011, frontal photographs of patients with congenital microtia biting a tongue depressor were obtained and reviewed. The occlusal angle was compared between the baseline and final photographs, and the change was compared between cant-positive (>3° at baseline) and cant-negative (<3° at baseline) groups. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine variables associated with the change in occlusal angle.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 patients were enrolled. With a mean age of 5.4 years at baseline and a mean follow-up of 3.9 years, clinically significant aggravation was observed in 15.4% and 24.2% of cant-positive and cant-negative patients, respectively. Hemifacial microsomia (OR, 4.825; p = 0.005) and occlusal angle at baseline (OR, 0.821; p = 0.045) were associated with aggravation, but the severity of microtia showed no significant association.

CONCLUSIONS

When hemifacial microsomia was present, the occlusal cant seemed to be aggravated in children with microtia at later ages. When the occlusal cant was present without noticeable hemifacial microsomia, some compensation in facial asymmetry was expected. The use of a wooden tongue depressor is a simple, non-invasive, and radiologic hazard-free aid to detect notable change in facial asymmetry in children with microtia.

Distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia and its association with other anomalies

Objective

To investigate the distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia (HFM) and its association with other anomalies.

Methods

This study included 249 Korean patients with HFM, whose charts, photographs, radiographs, and/or computed tomography scans acquired during 1998–2018 were available from Seoul National University Hospital and Dental Hospital. Prevalence according to sex, side involvement, degree of mandibular deformity, compensatory growth of the mandibular body, and Angle's classification, and its association with other anomalies were statistically analyzed.

Results

Prevalence was not different between male and female patients (55.0% vs. 45.0%, p > 0.05). Unilateral HFM (UHFM) was more prevalent than bilateral HFM (BHFM) (86.3% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Although distribution of the Pruzansky–Kaban types differed significantly in patients with UHFM (I, 53.0%; IIa, 18.6%; IIb, 24.7%; III, 3.7%; p < 0.001), no difference was observed in occurrence between the right and left sides (52.6% vs. 47.4%, p > 0.05). Among patients with BHFM, prevalence of different Pruzansky–Kaban types on the right and left sides was greater than that of the same type on both sides (67.6% vs. 32.4%, p < 0.05). Despite hypoplasia of the condyle/ramus complex, compensatory growth of the mandibular body on the ipsilateral side occurred in 35 patients (14.1%). Class I and II molar relationships were more prevalent than Class III molar relationships (93.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Forty-eight patients (19.3%) had other anomalies, with 50.0% and 14.4% in the BHFM and UHFM groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with HFM require individualized diagnosis and treatment planning because of diverse phenotypes and associations with other anomalies.