The Use of Retrograde Limb of Internal Mammary Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction With DIEAP Flap: Anatomical and Clinical Study

The Effect of Venous Augmentation on Complication Rates in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

With the rising popularity of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in breast reconstruction, use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) to augment venous outflow has been proposed as a strategy to prevent venous congestion, a complication positively associated with flap volume. This study evaluated the impact of routine SIEV venous augmentation on the risk of vascular complications or operative fat necrosis in the context of flap size and operating time.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study compared complication rates of patients with SIEV-augmented DIEP flaps to controls over a 3-year period. Outcomes assessed included vascular complications, defined as venous congestion or compromise requiring take-back, partial flap necrosis, total flap loss, as well as operative fat necrosis. Relative risk was modeled by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess for an interaction effect by flap mass.

RESULTS

The study sample included 197 patients with 316 flaps. The mean mass of the SIEV-augmented flaps was significantly greater than in the control group (832.9 vs. 653.9 g; p = 0.0007). After adjustment for flap characteristics, patient demographic factors, and comorbidities, pooled risk of vascular complication and operative fat necrosis was found to be significantly lower in the SIEV-augmented group compared to controls (hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% CI [0.11-1.00]; p = 0.0489). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated no effect interaction by flap weight (p = 0.5139).

CONCLUSION

Routine venous outflow augmentation via anastomosis of SIEV to the internal mammary vein perforator at the second intercostal space significantly reduced the risk of vascular complications and operative fat necrosis, regardless of flap weight. No significant increase in operative time was observed among cases in which augmentation was performed.

Prophylactic Venous Supercharging in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Surgery: A Retrospective Dual-Center Study

BACKGROUND

 Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is nowadays considered the gold standard in breast reconstruction. However, venous congestion is still a leading cause of free flap failure. Despite the conspicuous articles regarding the use of a secondary venous anastomosis, there is a lack in the literature regarding the prophylactic use of a secondary venous route to reduce the incidence of complications during breast reconstruction.

METHODS

 A double-center retrospective study based on women undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction was conducted, dividing patients into case group (DIEP flaps with double venous anastomosis) and control group (DIEP flaps with single venous anastomosis). Demographic and surgical data and complications were compared and statistically analyzed, and a reconstructive algorithm was proposed to improve the flap insetting.

RESULTS

 In total, 154 patients were included in the study, divided into case group (74 patients) and control group (80 patients). The median age at the time of surgery was 49.09 years (range: 29-68 years), slightly lower in group 1 when compared with group 2. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.52 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2), in particular 25.47 kg/m2 (range: 23.44-28.63 kg/m2) in group 1 and 25.58 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2) in group 2. No statistical differences were found between groups in terms of BMI and smoking and comorbidities history. The average operative times were 272.16 minutes (range: 221-328 minutes) in group 1 and 272.34 minutes (range: 221-327 minutes) in group 2, with no significant difference between groups, as well as ischemia time (44.4 minutes in group 1 [range: 38-56 minutes] and 49.12 minutes in group 2 [range: 41-67 minutes]). Statistical analysis showed a reduction in short-term complications and a statistically significant reduction for take-backs in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

 Our study suggests that venous supercharging of DIEP flap by performing dual venous anastomosis can be routinely and safely done prophylactically, and thus not only after intraoperative assessment of venous congestion, to avoid flap venous congestion and decrease the rates of re-exploration.

An Algorithmic Approach to Dual-System Venous Drainage for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Few studies compared the use of the deep venous system alone versus combined superficial and deep venous drainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The objective of this study was to compare DIEP flap breast reconstruction using either the deep venous system alone versus dual-system venous drainage and to propose an algorithm for flap design and orientation and vein selection to facilitate consistent use of dual-system venous drainage.

METHODS

Patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between March of 2017 and April of 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Flaps were divided into 2 groups: deep venous system only (group 1) or dual system (group 2). Outcomes included take-back to the operating room, flap loss and thrombosis, and operative time.

RESULTS

A total of 244 DIEP flaps in 162 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 130 flaps were included in group 1 (53.3%) and 114 flaps were included in group 2 (46.7%). Sixteen flaps (6.6%) required immediate take-back to the operating room, and take-back rates were not significantly different between groups ( P = 0.606). The flap loss rate was significantly higher in group 1 at 2.5% versus group 2 at 0% ( P = 0.031). Flap thrombosis occurred in 8 flaps (3.3%) and tended to occur more frequently in group 1, but this finding did not reach significance (group 1, 5.4%; group 2, 0.9%; P = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of dual-system venous drainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction decreases the rate of flap loss. The authors' algorithm can be used to guide selection of flap laterality, rotation, and veins and recipient vessels to facilitate routine use of dual-system venous drainage.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Anatomical features of a crossing vein connecting left and right internal mammary veins: A preliminary study with computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

In breast reconstruction with free flaps, retrograde venous anastomosis into the internal mammary vein (IMV) is often unavoidable. Utility of a crossing vein between the right and left IMV, one of the anatomical foundations which make retrograde flow possible, has been reported but only with a few detailed features. This study evaluated the presence, actual location, and diameter of the crossing veins using preoperative imaging such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI). Moreover, this is a preliminary non-invasive study to clarify these processes on a larger scale.

METHODS

We included 29 cases of unilateral breast reconstruction performed between July 2018 and September 2023 at our institution using unipedicled or bipedicled free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps with retrograde venous anastomosis to only one IMV at the level of anastomosis. No congestion or necrosis was observed. In the final 24 cases with sufficient imaging coverage of preoperative contrast-enhanced images (15 CECT and 9 CEMRI), the crossing veins of IMVs were detected and the number, localization, and diameter were measured.

RESULTS

In 20 cases of 24 images, the crossing veins between IMVs were completely identified (83%). In 18 of the cases, only one crossing vein was established immediately ventral to the xiphoid process, averaging 19.3 ± 7.18 mm caudal to the fibrous junction between the sternal body and xiphoid process. The average diameter of the veins was 1.57 ± 0.42 mm. In two other cases, the second crossing vein originated on the dorsal surface of the sternum, but it was a very thin vein of about 0.4 mm. Three images indicated incomplete identification of the crossing vein at the xiphoid process, and in one case, no crossing vein was observed between bilateral IMVs.

CONCLUSION

The contrast-enhanced imaging study revealed an anatomic feature that the crossing veins (about 1.5 mm in diameter) connecting the right and left IMVs are located just ventral to the xiphoid process. Furthermore, the crossing veins can be identified on contrast-enhanced images, and refinement of this method is expected to lead to future non-invasive anatomical investigations in an even larger number of cases.

A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps

BACKGROUND

Abdominally based free flaps are commonly used in breast reconstruction. A frequent complication is venous congestion, which might contribute to around 40% of flap failures. One way to deal with it is venous supercharging. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the scientific evidence for the effects of venous supercharging.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane library. The included articles were critically appraised, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included. Most studies had serious study limitations and problems with directness. Three studies report 'routine' use of venous supercharging and performed it prophylactically in patients who did not have clinical signs of venous congestion. Seventeen studies report on flap complications, of which one is a randomised controlled trial demonstrating statistically significant lower complication rates in the intervention group. The overall certainty of evidence for the effect of a venous supercharging on flap complications, length of hospital stay and operative time, in patients without clinical signs of venous congestion, is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝), and low on and surgical takebacks (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝). Twenty-one studies presented data on strategies and overall certainty of evidence for using radiological findings, preoperative measurements, and clinical risk factors to make decisions on venous supercharging is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊝ ⊝ ⊝).

CONCLUSION

There is little scientific evidence for how to predict in which cases, without clinical signs of venous congestion, venous supercharging should be performed. The complication rate might be lower in patients in which a prophylactic venous anastomosis has been performed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022353591).

Acromiothoracic Venous Supercharge for Abdominal-Based Free Flaps in Breast and Chest Wall Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Supercharging the venous drainage of free abdominal flaps in breast reconstruction has been well described in the literature, with diverse options used to augment venous drainage. In this study, we present our experience in using the acromiothoracic vein (ATV)/thoracoacromial vein (TAV) as a secondary recipient vein for the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) of free, muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in breast and chest wall reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 523 free, muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps the senior author (H.H.K.) performed between 2009 and 2022 for breast and chest wall reconstruction; 46 cases required venous super drainage. Seventeen patients had ipsilateral SIEV anastomosed into the second internal mammary vein, 5 had ipsilateral SIEV anastomosed into flap second deep inferior epigastric vein, and 24 required the use of the (ATV)/(TAV), which will be the focus of this study.

RESULTS

The study included 24 female (20 breast and 4 chest wall reconstruction) patients ranging in ages between 39 and 72 years. They had a median follow-up of 26 months. Combined muscle splitting and cutting techniques were used to expose the ATV/TAV. Increase in operative time ranged between 10 and 20 minutes (median, 12 minutes). Vein coupler sizes were 1.5 to 3 mm. The mean weight of the flap was 740 g (range, 460-1300 g). There was 1 flap failure (salvage with latissimus dorsi flap performed), whereas 23 flaps wholly survived.

CONCLUSIONS

The ATV/TAV is a suitable recipient for venous supercharging free flaps used to reconstruct breast and chest wall defects.

Use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein in breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap

Background

Autologous breast reconstruction is highly regarded in reconstructive surgery after mastectomy. DIEP flap reconstruction represents the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. The major advantages of DIEP flap reconstruction are its adequate volume, large vascular caliber and pedicle length. Despite reliable anatomy, there are procedures where the plastic surgeon's creativity is required, not only to shape the new breast, but also to overcome microsurgical challenges. An important tool in these cases is the superficial epigastric vein (SIEV).

Methods

150 DIEP flap procedures performed between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated for SIEV use. Intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Rate of anastomosis revision, total and partial flap loss, fat necrosis and donor site complications were evaluated.

Results

In a total of 150 breast reconstructions with a DIEP flap performed in our clinic, the SIEV was used in 5 cases. The indication for using the SIEV was to improve the venous drainage of the flap or as a graft to reconstruct the main artery perforator. Among the 5 cases, no flap loss occurred.

Conclusions

Use of the SIEV is an excellent method to expand the microsurgical options in breast reconstruction with DIEP flap surgery. It provides a safe and reliable procedure to improve venous outflow in cases of inadequate outflow from the deep venous system. The SIEV could also provide a very good option for fast and reliable application as an interposition device in case of arterial complications.

Anatomical basis of retrograde thoracic veins flow and its implications in complex thoracic wall reconstructive surgery

Purpose

Internal thoracic veins are increasingly used as recipient’s vessels in chest wall reconstructive surgery due to their predictable anatomy and to the possibility to make a double venous anastomosis, exploiting the retrograde flow within them. Over the years, retrograde flow had been explained by the absence of valves in internal thoracic veins, which have been found recently instead. Therefore, our aim is to analyze the retrograde flow and its relationship with valves in the internal thoracic veins.

Methods

We evaluated 32 internal thoracic veins of 16 fresh-frozen specimens with undamaged thoracic cages by dynamic analysis focused on retrograde flow assessment through a partial external circulation system obtained cannulating the subclavian veins. Gross anatomical and morphological evaluations about the presence of valves and their pattern were then made.

Results

Efficient, partial, and absent retrograde flow was, respectively, found in 17/30, 8/30 and ITVs and 5/30 internal thoracic veins. Following Arnez’s classification, 20/32 Type I and 12/32 Type II internal thoracic veins were identified. Valves were observed in 10/16 specimens (62.50%) corresponding to 36.67% of examined veins (11/30). Three valves were found between the 2nd intercostal space and 12 valves in the 3rd intercostal space. 13/15 valves were bicuspid, 2/15 tricuspid. A significant correlation (p < 0.001) between the retrograde flow and the presence of valves in internal thoracic veins was observed.

Conclusion

Our study suggests a possible influence of the presence and the number of valves in the efficient retrograde flow of the internal thoracic veins, suggesting that, especially for more complex cases, a preoperative or intraoperative evaluation of the chest wall drainage should be recommended.

Utilizing the Retrograde Flow of Internal Mammary Vessels as a Donor Pedicle

Introduction  The aim of this study is to assess the results of retrograde flow of internal mammary artery and vein (IMA/V) as a donor vessel for free flap microvascular anastomosis (MVA). This need arises with bipedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, when all four zones with extra fat need to be harvested for unilateral breast reconstruction coupled with poor midline crossover of circulation naturally or because of midline scar. Large anterolateral thigh flaps for chest wall cover, with multiple perforators from separate pedicles, also need supercharging. This needs an additional source of donor vessels, antegrade IMA/V being the first one.

Materials and Methods  Retrospective study of microvascular breast reconstruction using retrograde internal mammary donor vessels.

Results  Out of 35 cases, 20 cases had distal IMA/V, with retrograde flow, as donor vessel for second set of arterial and venous anastomosis. In two cases, retrograde IMA/V was used for the solitary set of MVA. In remaining 13 cases, either retrograde IMA or V was utilized either as a principal or accessory donor. No flap was lost. Venous and arterial insufficiency happened in one case each, both were salvaged. Two cases developed partial necrosis, needing debridement and suturing. One case developed marginal necrosis. Only one case developed fat necrosis with superadded infection on follow-up.

Conclusion  Distal end of IMA and IMV on retrograde flow is safe for MVA as an additional or sole pedicle. It is convenient to use being in the same field. It enables preservation of other including thoracodorsal pedicle and latissimus dorsi flap for use in case of a complication or recurrence.

Bilateral Transverse Upper Gracilis Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A 4-Year Retrospective Study of the "2-in-1" Technique and a Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap is a reliable alternative to abdominally based breast reconstruction because of its advantageous anatomy. However, the limited tissue volume prevents reconstruction of large breasts. The bilateral TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction can overcome this problem.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed regarding unilateral breast reconstruction with bilateral TUGs at the Queen Victoria Hospital from 2015 to 2019. Associations between categorical variables were examined with Fisher exact test, and any differences in continuous variables by complication status were evaluated with Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for independent samples. A relevant systematic review was conducted with a meta-analysis of proportions using the Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation for the estimation of the overall survival rates.

RESULTS

Ten cases were identified with 6 having a delayed reconstruction. Median age and body mass index were 50.8 years and 23.9 kg/m2, respectively, and average flap weight was 268.3 g. One flap was placed superiorly with its pedicle anastomosed to the retrograde internal mammary vessels, except of half of the cases where a second anterograde vein was used. The mean follow-up was 21.4 months, and all flaps survived. Two patients returned to theater, and 4 experienced donor-site problems. The presence of complications was not associated with age, ever smoking, body mass index, TUG weight, or anastomosis to retrograde internal mammary vein. The systematic review resulted in 8 eligible articles with a total sample of 156 flaps. The overall survival rate was 96.8%. In 6 cases, the indication was Poland syndrome (7.7%), and in 48.7%, axillary vessels were also used as recipient vessels. The estimated overall flap survival rate was 100% (95% confidence interval, 99%-100%), and no significant heterogeneity was noted (I2 = 0%, P = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The "2-in-1" technique can lead to symmetrical aesthetically pleasant results for both recipient and donor sites. Our case series and the conducted systematic review reiterate the reliability of this approach.

Meta-analysis of the effects of venous super-drainage in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Venous congestion is the most common vascular complication of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps. Adding a second venous drainage by anastomosing a flap vein and a recipient vein (super-drainage) is considered the solution of choice. Evidence to support this procedure, had not yet been confirmed by an analysis of the literature. We aimed to provide this evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the literature (MedLine, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar), for studies discussing venous congestion and venous super-drainage in DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. Thirteen of the 35 articles compared results between one or two venous anastomoses. Meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Pooled risk ratio (RRs) for congestion, fat necrosis, partial necrosis, and total necrosis with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effect model with the Mantel-Haenszel method. The need to return to surgery (95% CI) was estimated with a random effect model using the DerSimonian and Liard method.

RESULTS

We showed a statistically significant advantage of super-drainage to reduce the venous congestion of the flap (RR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.34, p-value <.001), partial flap necrosis (RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30-0.84, p-value .008), total flap necrosis (RR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.85, p-value .023), and the need to take the patient back to surgery for perfusion-related complications (RR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.99, p value .048).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing a second venous anastomosis between the SIEV and a recipient vein (venous superdrainage) reduces venous congestion and related complications in DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

Internal Mammary Vein Valves: A Histological Study

It is widely accepted that the internal mammary vein (IMV) is valveless. However, few anatomical studies are available on the presence or absence of IMV valves. To test the hypothesis that the IMV is valveless, we performed microscopic histological examination of the IMV. IMV samples were collected from 10 human fresh frozen cadavers. For a control, the small saphenous vein (SSV) was obtained. Histological stains were performed. Microscopic examination showed that a venous valve was found in 8 of 20 IMVs. The structure of the valve leaflet consisted of two parts. There was a “thick part” located near the wall of the vein that consisted of smooth muscle cells and fibers. There was also a “thin part” located near the center of the venous lumen that lacked smooth muscle cells. The size of the thick part of the IMV valve was smaller than the SSV valve, whereas there was no difference in the size of the thin part between the IMV and SSV. IMV valves exist. Our results that an IMV valve was present in less than half of IMVs and there was a small-sized valve leaflet suggest that the IMV valve may be rudimentary.

Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction to a Single Set of Internal Mammary Vessels: Technique, Safety, and Outcomes after 250 Flaps

BACKGROUND

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. In bilateral cases, both flaps are often anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels on either side of the sternum. The authors propose a method in which both flaps are anastomosed to only the right side internal mammary artery and vein.

METHODS

Between November of 2009 and March of 2018, 125 patients underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with this technique. One flap is perfused by the anterograde proximal internal mammary artery and the second one by the retrograde distal internal mammary artery after presternal tunneling. Patient demographics and operative details were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty flaps were performed. One hundred fifty-two flaps were prophylactic or primary reconstructions (60.8 percent), 70 were secondary reconstructions (28 percent), and 28 were tertiary reconstructions (11.2 percent). Mean patient age was 46 years, and the mean body mass index was 25 kg/m. Sixty patients underwent radiation therapy or chemotherapy (48 percent). The authors encountered one significant partial failure (0.4 percent) and nine complete flap failures (3.6 percent). The authors did not see a statistically significant predisposition for failure comparing the retrograde with the anterograde flow flaps, nor when comparing the tunneled with the nontunneled flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' results show that anastomosing both DIEP flaps to a single set of mammary vessels is safe and reliable. The authors conclude that the retrograde flow through the distal internal mammary artery is sufficient for free flap perfusion and that subcutaneous tunneling of a free flap pedicle does not predispose to flap failure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Successful free flap salvage upon venous congestion in bilateral breast reconstruction using a venous cross-over bypass: A case report

Abdominal free flaps such as the muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ms-TRAM) or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap represent the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. We describe a salvage procedure during bilateral free flap breast reconstruction due to insufficient venous drainage using a venous cross-over bypass. A 54-year-old woman with a thrombosis of the left subclavian port-system in the medical history was elected for simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with ms-TRAM and DIEP flaps. Intraoperatively, a venous congestion of the DIEP flap, which was connected to the left cranial internal mammary vessels, appeared. In the absence of sufficient ipsilateral venous recipient vessels, we performed a salvage procedure requiring a 15 cm small saphenous vein graft and presternal subcutaneous tunneling. The flap vein was anastomosed end-to-end with the contralateral caudal internal mammary vein using a coupler system. The postoperative course was uneventful and both flaps survived. We describe the cross-over venous emergency bypass as a useful tool in unexpected venous thrombosis during bilateral free flap breast reconstruction.

Anastomosis of the Superficial Inferior Epigastric Vein to the Internal Mammary Vein to Augment Deep Inferior Artery Perforator Flaps

Use of the retrograde limb of the internal mammary vein has been described previously as a lifeboat for venous congestion but not prophylactically. Maximizing the length of the deep inferior artery perforator (DIEP) flap pedicle, identifying and dissecting the superficial inferior epigastric vein proximally in every patient, and taking advantage of the retrograde internal mammary vein are all technical details that facilitate the additional venous anastomosis and flap inset. Performing a second venous anastomosis routinely using the superficial inferior epigastric vein to the retrograde internal mammary vein helps with flap inset.

Inset of Unilateral Dual Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Using Nonabdominal Free Tissue Transfer

BACKGROUND

Large breasted patients are difficult to reconstruct using free tissue transfer after mastectomy when abdominal tissue is inadequate. For these, two unilateral free flaps may be required. This study reviews the authors' experience using transverse upper gracilis and profunda artery perforator flaps.

METHODS

Through retrospective chart review, subjects were divided into three groups based on vascular anastomotic orientation: group 1, thoracodorsal and internal mammary; group 2, noncrossed internal mammary; and group 3, crossed internal mammary. Statistical comparison determined differences between groups for peri-operative "take-backs" and flap survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-one subjects underwent 42 free tissue transfers for unilateral breast reconstruction. Perioperative complications requiring return to the operating room occurred as follows for each group: group 1, two of four flaps (50 percent); group 2, two of two flaps (100 percent); and group 3, two of 36 flaps (5.5 percent). Long-term flap survival was as follows: group 1, three of four flaps (75 percent); group 2, zero of two flaps (0 percent); and group 3, 36 of 36 flaps (100 percent). Both the incidence of perioperative complications (p = 0.0011) and flap survival (p = 0.0008) were statistically significant in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of double free tissue transfer consisting of transverse upper gracilis or profunda artery perforator flaps is a feasible option for unilateral autologous breast reconstruction. In the authors' experience, horizontal inset with crossed pedicles to the internal mammary system is the safest and most reliable technique for flap and pedicle inset.