The effect of TENS on random pattern flap survival in nicotinized rats

Intra- and Early Postoperative Evaluation of Malperfused Areas in an Irradiated Random Pattern Skin Flap Model Using Indocyanine Green Angiography and Near-Infrared Reflectance-Based Imaging and Infrared Thermography

Background: Assessment of tissue perfusion after irradiation of random pattern flaps still remains a challenge. Methods: Twenty-five rats received harvesting of bilateral random pattern fasciocutaneous flaps. Group 1 served as nonirradiated control group. The right flaps of the groups 2–5 were irradiated with 20 Gy postoperatively (group 2), 3 × 12 Gy postoperatively (group 3), 20 Gy preoperatively (group 4) and 3 × 12 Gy preoperatively (group 5). Imaging with infrared thermography, indocyanine green angiography and near-infrared reflectance-based imaging were performed to detect necrotic areas of the flaps. Results: Analysis of the percentage of the necrotic area of the irradiated flaps showed a statistically significant increase from day 1 to 14 only in group 5 (p < 0.05). Indocyanine green angiography showed no differences (p > 0.05) of the percentage of the nonperfused area between all days in group 1 and 3, but a decrease in group 2 in both the left and the right flaps. Infrared thermography and near-infrared reflectance-based imaging did not show evaluable differences. Conclusion: Indocyanine green angiography is more precise in prediction of necrotic areas in random pattern skin flaps when compared to hyperspectral imaging, thermography or clinical impression. Preoperative fractional irradiation with a lower individual dose but a higher total dose has a more negative impact on flap perfusion compared to higher single stage irradiation.

Patientenzufriedenheit von 1827 Patienten nach verschiedenen Rekonstruktionsmethoden im Gesichtsbereich in Abhängigkeit von Alter, Defektgröße und Lokalisation

HINTERGRUND

Nach Tumoroperationen erfolgt ein Defektverschluss mit den für den individuellen Fall optimalen chirurgischen Methoden. Besonders im Kopf-Hals--Bereich ist das Ergebnis sehr wichtig. Ziel der retrospektiven Studie war es, Rekonstruktionsmethoden von Defekten entsprechend Alter, Lokalisation und Größe nach funktionellen und ästhetischen Gesichtspunkten zu vergleichen.

PATIENTEN UND METHODIK

Die betroffenen Patienten wurden mittels Fragebögen angeschrieben. 1827 Patienten (Alter von 18 bis 92 Jahren, Median: 56 Jahre) beurteilten postoperative Probleme, ästhetisches sowie funktionelles Ergebnis und das Gesamtresultat. Aus der Patientenakte wurden Größe und Lokalisation des Defektes sowie die Art des Verschlusses dokumentiert.

ERGEBNISSE

Die Dehnungslappenplastik erhielt bezüglich des Gesamtresultats mit einer sehr guten oder guten Bewertung (86 %) das beste Ergebnis. Lappenplastiken und Hauttransplantate wurden schlechter beurteilt. Postoperative Beschwerden traten signifikant häufiger nach lokalen Lappenplastiken auf. Die Sichtbarkeit der Narbe wurde von älteren Patienten bei allen Defektgrößen (< 150 mm² , 150-300 mm² , > 300 mm² ) geringer beurteilt als von jüngeren. Narben in der zentralen Gesichtspartie wurden als sichtbarer wahrgenommen. Geschlecht und Rauchen hatten keinen Einfluss.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN

Narben in zentralen Gesichtsregionen werden stärker wahrgenommen. Ältere Patienten beurteilten die Narbenbildung insgesamt als unauffälliger. Dehnungslappenplastiken, auch unter Wundrandspannung, führen zu sehr guten Ergebnissen und einer hohen Patientenzufriedenheit.

Patient satisfaction in 1,827 patients following various methods of facial reconstruction based on age, defect size and site

BACKGROUND

Defect coverage following tumor excision requires a case-by-case decision as regards the optimal reconstruction technique. In the head and neck region in particular, the cosmetic outcome is of major importance. The objective of the present study was to compare various reconstruction methods in terms of their functional and aesthetic outcome based on patient age, defect size and site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall, 1,827 patients (age: 18-92 years, median age: 56 years) were contacted. Using a standardized questionnaire, they were asked to assess postoperative complications, cosmetic and functional outcome, and the overall result of the surgical procedure. In addition, patient records were used to collect data on defect size and site as well as the type of surgical procedure employed.

RESULTS

Rated as very good or good (86 %), defect closure by advancement flaps received the highest scores in terms of overall result. Other flaps and skin grafts were rated less favorably. Postoperative complications were significantly more common after local flaps. Irrespective of defect size (< 150 mm² , 150-300 mm² , > 300 mm² ), older patients considered the visibility of the scar to be less prominent than younger individuals. Scars in the central facial region were perceived to be more visible. Gender and smoking habits had no impact on the results of the survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Scars in the central facial region were perceived to be more prominent. Overall, older individuals considered their scars to be less conspicuous. Even though they are initially associated with greater tension, advancement flaps resulted in very good aesthetic and functional results and a high level of patient satisfaction.