Clinical implications of single- versus multiple-site keloid disorder: a retrospective study in an Asian population

Risk factors associated with keloid infections: A five-year retrospective study

Keloid infections reduce patient-reported quality of life greatly. Characteristics and risk factors of keloid infections have not been thoroughly studied. So, a retrospective cohort study was conducted focusing on the potential risk factors, microbiologic cultures and histological findings. Keloid patients consulting for surgical interventions were included in this study. Data were collected from their electronic medical records. 564 patients were recruited with the keloid infection rate being 22.4%. For adult patients, age above 40 years (OR, 2.84; P = .000), disease duration of 12 years or more (OR, 3.03; P = .000), the number of keloids over 3 (OR, 1.59; P = .050) and the presence of family history (OR, 1.91; P = .027) were significantly associated with keloid infections. Suppurative keloids were located mostly in thorax (61.79%). For the under-age subgroup(n = 25), family history was frequently seen in patients with infections. Microbiologic cultures revealed a mixed spectrum of bacteria including Staphylococcus (25%), Actinomyces (30%) and Prevotella (10%). The rate of epidermoid cysts was 19.7% in histological examination. Age > 40 years, disease duration ≥12 years, the number of keloids >3 and the presence of family history are risk factors for keloid infections.

Advances in the pathogenesis and clinical application prospects of tumor biomolecules in keloid

Keloid scarring is a kind of pathological healing manifestation after skin injury and possesses various tumor properties, such as the Warburg effect, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), expression imbalances of apoptosis-related genes and the presence of stem cells. Abnormal expression of tumor signatures is critical to the initiation and operation of these effects. Although previous experimental studies have recognized the potential value of a single or several tumor biomolecules in keloids, a comprehensive evaluation system for multiple tumor signatures in keloid scarring is still lacking. This paper aims to summarize tumor biomolecules in keloids from the perspectives of liquid biopsy, genetics, proteomics and epigenetics and to investigate their mechanisms of action and feasibility from bench to bedside. Liquid biopsy is suitable for the early screening of people with keloids due to its noninvasive and accurate performance. Epigenetic biomarkers do not require changes in the gene sequence and their reversibility and tissue specificity make them ideal therapeutic targets. Nonetheless, given the ethnic specificity and genetic predisposition of keloids, more large-sample multicenter studies are indispensable for determining the prevalence of these signatures and for establishing diagnostic criteria and therapeutic efficacy estimations based on these molecules.

Association of Leptin Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Keloids in the Chinese Han Population

BACKGROUND The association between leptin receptor (LEPR) polymorphisms and keloids is still unclear. Our study aimed to explore the association between LEPR gene polymorphisms and keloids in the Chinese Han population. MATERIAL AND METHODS We implemented a case-control study in a cohort of 352 keloid patients and 299 healthy controls to analyze the correlation between 4 SNPs (rs1137101, rs1938496, rs6588147, and rs7555955) and keloids. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood by using TGuide M16 (Tiangen). Genotyping of LEPR SNPs was performed using an improved multiple ligase detection reaction (iMLDR) by Shanghai Genesky Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. RESULTS We found that patients caring the AA genotype of rs1137101 and the CC genotype rs1938496 tend to have the increased risk of keloids (P=0.026, P=0.047). Carrying the GA, AA gene type, and G allele frequencies of rs7555955, patients were more likely to have to keloids (P=0.030, P=0.016, P=0.018, respectively). There were no significant differences in genotype distribution and allele frequencies of rs6588147 between cases and controls. The association of rs1137101 and rs7555955 under dominant, recessive, and allele models exhibited significant differences among family-history keloid patients, no-family-history keloid groups, and normal controls (χ²=6.471, P=0.039; χ²=6.477, P=0.039; χ²=6.197, P=0.045, respectively). Similarly, the OR of rs1137101 in the recessive model was significantly higher in patients with a family history of keloids than those in controls. Nonetheless, there are significant ORs of rs1938496 and rs6588147 among the mild-moderate keloid, severe keloid, and control groups. CONCLUSIONS The LEPR gene polymorphisms are associated with keloid formation and severity, especially in patients with a positive family history.

Ameliorating Fibrotic Phenotypes of Keloid Dermal Fibroblasts through an Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Extracellular Matrix Remodeling

Keloid and hypertrophic scars are skin fibrosis-associated disorders that exhibit an uncontrollable proliferation of fibroblasts and their subsequent contribution to the excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the dermis. In this study, to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, we investigated the pivotal roles of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in modulating fibrotic phenotypes of keloid and hypertrophic dermal fibroblasts. Our initial findings revealed the molecular signatures of keloid dermal fibroblasts and showed the highest degree of skin fibrosis markers, ECM remodeling, anabolic collagen-cross-linking enzymes, such as lysyl oxidase (LOX) and four LOX-like family enzymes, migration ability, and cell–matrix traction force, at cell–matrix interfaces. Furthermore, we observed significant EGF-mediated downregulation of anabolic collagen-cross-linking enzymes, resulting in amelioration of fibrotic phenotypes and a decrease in cell motility measured according to the cell–matrix traction force. These findings offer insight into the important roles of EGF-mediated cell–matrix interactions at the cell–matrix interface, as well as ECM remodeling. Furthermore, the results suggest their contribution to the reduction of fibrotic phenotypes in keloid dermal fibroblasts, which could lead to the development of therapeutic modalities to prevent or reduce scar tissue formation.

Location Propensity for Keloids in the Head and Neck

Importance: The difficulty associated with concealing keloids located in the face and neck regions often results in disfigurement and psychological stress for patients. Objective: The purpose of this review is to determine if specific regions on the head and neck have a greater propensity to develop keloids to alert the facial plastic surgeon of regional keloid risk. Evidence Review: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Embase computerized searches were performed through January 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction following a predetermined protocol identifying 1445 keloid studies. Findings: The prevalence of keloids in different regions of the head and neck was evaluated among 1598 head and neck keloids in the final analysis. Three of nine studies evaluated keloids specific to the ear and described a combined 1194 ear keloids locations (53.0% lobule, 22.9% cartilaginous region, 0.3% both, and 23.7% unspecified). One study reported exclusively on 82 neck keloids 72% of which were located in the submental or submandibular region. The remaining five studies evaluated 322 head and neck keloids more generally and showed 70.2% ear, 9.6% unspecified, 6.5% peri-/postauricular, 5.6% beard area, 2.2% scalp/forehead, 2.2% chin, 1.6% lateral face, 1.6% neck, and 0.3% central face keloids. Conclusions and Relevance: The ear, periauricular regions, bearded facial regions, and submandibular and submental sites show the highest propensity for keloid development in the head and neck region. The lowest keloid risk occurred in the central face region. Risk factors in relation to facial and neck regions associated with the formation of keloids should be taken into consideration before performing elective procedures in keloid susceptible individuals.

Could -79 °C Spray-Type Cryotherapy Be an Effective Monotherapy for the Treatment of Keloid?

Cryotherapy has been regarded as an effective modality for the treatment of keloids, and the spray-type device is one of the novel cryotherapeutic units. However, the biological mechanisms and therapeutic effects of this technique are incompletely studied. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of our cryotherapy protocol with molecular and pathologic evidence for the treatment of keloids. We evenly split each of ten keloid lesions into a non-treated (C-) and treated (C+) area; the C+ area was subjected to two freeze-thaw cycles of spray-type cryotherapy using -79 °C spray-type CryoPen™. This treatment was repeated after an interval of two weeks. The proliferation and migration abilities of the fibroblasts isolated from the dermis under the cryotherapy-treated or untreated keloid tissues (at least 5 mm deep) were compared and pathologic findings of the full layer were evaluated. Molecular analysis revealed that the number of dermal fibroblasts was significantly higher in C+ group as compared with C- group. The dermal fibroblasts from C+ group showed more than two-fold increase in the migration ability as compared with the fibroblasts from C- group. The expression of matrix metallopeptidase 9 was increased by more than two-fold and a significant increase in transforming growth factor beta 1 expression and Smad2/3 phosphorylation level was observed in C+ group. C+ group showed more extensive lymphoplasmacytic infiltration with thicker fibrosis and occasional "proliferating core collagen" as compared with C- group. Thus, -79 °C spray-type cryotherapy is ineffective as a monotherapy and should be used in combination with intralesional corticosteroids or botulinum toxin A for favourable outcomes in the treatment of thick keloids.

Massive ear keloids: Natural history, evaluation of risk factors and recommendation for preventive measures - A retrospective case series

Keloid disorder (KD) is an inherited wound healing ailment, frequently seen among Africans /African Americans and Asians.  Genetics of this disorder continues to be obscure and poorly understood.  Clinical manifestation of KD is quite variable and very diverse, spanning from individuals with one or very few small keloidal lesions, to those with numerous and very large lesions covering large portion of their skin. Ears are common locations for development of keloids.  Ear piercing is by far the leading triggering factor for ear keloid formation in genetically predisposed individuals. Although there are numerous publications about ear and earlobe keloids, there is a void in medical literature about massive ear keloids.  This paper focuses on the natural history of massive ear keloids and risk factors that lead to formation of these life-changing and debilitating tumors and recommendations for prevention.

Risk factors of keloids in Syrians

Background

Keloid is a benign fibrous growth, which presents in scar tissue of predisposed individuals. It is a result of irregular wound healing, but the exact mechanism is unknown. However, several factors may play a role in keloid formation. To date, there are no studies of keloids in Syria, and limited studies on Caucasians, so we have investigated the risk factors of keloids in Syrians (Caucasians), and this is the main objective of this study.

Methods

Diagnosis of keloids was clinically made after an interview and physical examination. We did a histopathological study in case the physical examination was unclear.

The following information was taken for each patient; sex, Blood groups (ABO\Rh), cause of scarring, anatomical sites, age of onset, number of injured sites (single\multiple) and family history.

Results

We have studied the clinical characteristics of 259 patients with keloids,130 (50.2 %) females and 129 (49.8 %) males. There were 209 (80.7 %) patients with keloids in a single anatomical site compared to 50 (19.3 %) patients with 130 keloids in multiple anatomical sites, 253 (97.68 %) patients with keloids caused by a single cause for each patient compared to 6 (2.32 %) patients with keloids caused by two different causes for each patient.

Keloids could follow any form of skin injury, but burn was the most common (28.68 %). Also, keloids could develop at any anatomical sites, but upper limb (20 %) followed by sternum (19.17 %) was the most common. Over half of the patients developed keloids in the 11–30 age range. 19.3 % (50/259) of patients had family history, 76 % (38/50) of them had keloids located in the same anatomical sites of relative, also, 66 % (33\50) of them had keloids caused by the same cause.

The following information was found to be statistically significant; people with blood group A (p = 0.01) compared with other blood groups, spontaneous keloids in patients with blood group A (p = 0.01), acne in males (p = 0.0008) compared to females, acne in someone who has a previous acne keloid (p = 0.0002), burn in someone who has a previous burn keloid (p = 0.029), family history, especially for spontaneous (p = 0.005), presternal (p = 0.039) and shoulder (p = 0.008) keloids, people in second and third decades (p = 0.02) (p = 0.01) respectively.

Conclusion

Age of onset, sex, cause of scarring, blood groups, anatomical site, presence of family history and the number of site (multiple\single) were significant in keloid formation in Syrians.