Treatment of cranial synostosis: the directive growth approach

The Directive Growth Approach for Nonsyndromic, Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: Patient and Clinical Outcomes

Deformities of the cranium in patients with nonsyndromic single-suture synostosis occur because of growth restriction at fused sutures and growth over compensation at normal sutures. Traditional surgery includes ostectomies of the synostotic suture to release these restricted areas and osteotomies to enable immediate cranial remodeling. In the process of reshaping the cranium, traditional approaches usually involve obliteration of both the normal functioning suture and the pathologic suture. The directive growth approach (DGA) is a new, simpler, more natural way to repair deformities caused by single-suture cranial synostosis. The DGA works by reversing the original deforming forces by temporarily restricting growth in areas of over compensation and forcing growth in areas of previous synostotic restriction. Most importantly, it preserves a normal functioning suture to allow for improved future cranial growth. Eighteen consecutive nonsyndromic patients with unilateral coronal synostosis were used to illustrate the efficacy of the DGA. Ten patients who underwent DGA treatment were compared with a control group of 8 patients treated with traditional frontal orbital advancement. Postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) comparison measurements were taken, including bilateral vertical and transverse orbital dimensions, lateral orbital rim to external auditory canal, and forehead measurements from the superior aspect of the orbital rim to the pituitary fossa. The traditional treatment group showed absence of the coronal sutures bilaterally on long-term CT scans. The DGA group showed normal coronal sutures on the unaffected sides. Postoperative CT measurements showed no statistical difference between the 2 techniques (P < 0.05).

Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study

OBJECTIVE Sagittal craniosynostosis results in a characteristic scaphocephalic head shape that is typically corrected surgically during a child's 1st year of life. The authors' objective was to determine the potential impact of being born with sagittal craniosynostosis by using validated health state utility assessment measures. METHODS An online utility assessment was designed to generate health utility scores for scaphocephaly, monocular blindness, and binocular blindness using standardized utility assessment tools, namely the visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG) and time trade-off (TTO) tests. Utility scores were compared between health states using the Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Univariate regression was performed using age, sex, income, and education as independent predictors of utility scores. RESULTS Over a 2-month enrollment period, 122 participants completed the online survey. One hundred eighteen participants were eligible for analysis. Participants rated scaphocephaly due to sagittal craniosynostosis with significantly higher (p < 0.001) median utility scores (VAS 0.85, IQR 0.76-0.95; SG 0.92, IQR 0.84-0.98; TTO 0.91, IQR 0.84-0.95) than both monocular blindness (VAS 0.60, IQR 0.50-0.70; SG 0.84, IQR 0.68-0.94; TTO 0.84, IQR 0.67-0.91) and binocular blindness (VAS 0.25, IQR 0.20-0.40; SG 0.51, IQR 0.18-0.79; TTO 0.55, IQR 0.36-0.76). No differences were noted in utility scores based on participant age, sex, income, or education. CONCLUSIONS Using objective health state utility scores, authors of the current study demonstrated that the preoperatively perceived burden of scaphocephaly in a child's 1st year of life is less than that of monocular blindness. These relatively high utility scores for scaphocephaly suggest that the burden of disease as perceived by the general population is low and should inform surgeons' discussions when offering morbid corrective surgery, particularly when driven by aesthetic concerns.