Maxillary Involvement in Hemifacial Microsomia: An Objective Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Craniofacial Skeleton

Three-dimensional Analysis of the Temporal Bone Morphology in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the morphology of temporal bone in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM).

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A craniofacial centre.

PATIENTS

Ninety-four patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia.

INTERVENTIONS

Mimics 21.0 (Materialise Inc., Belgium) was used to locate temporal bone landmarks on preoperative computed tomography data. The spatial Cartesian coordinate system was established in 3-matic 13.0 (Materialise Inc., Belgium). The coordinates of each landmark and the distances and angles between the landmarks were calculated. A classification system was used to quantify the severity of the zygomatic arch deformity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The bilateral differences in coordinates, linear and angular measurements, and the severity of temporal bone deformity (TTL δ, Psag δ, Paxiδ, and Tsag δ) among the groups were compared using the paired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared to those of the unaffected side, the landmarks of the inner ear and petrous part on the affected side showed a decrease in the Z-coordinate or an increase in the X-coordinate. A superolateral rotation tendency of the temporal bone on the affected side was found. There were no significant differences in the linear and angular measurements between the groups. The degree of zygomatic arch deformation was lower in the mild group; however, no significant difference was found between the moderate and severe groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CFM, asymmetry of the temporal bone and its inner organs (vestibulocochlear organ, facial nerve, and vessels) exists in multiple dimensions; its severity is not completely consistent with the degree of mandibular involvement.

Interrater Reliability for Classifying Craniofacial Microsomia Severity: A Call for Objective Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

The severity of craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is generally classified using the Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Soft tissue, Nerve (OMENS) classification score. The global assessment of the Phenotypic Assessment Tool for Craniofacial Microsomia (PAT-CFM), is a pictorial modification of the OMENS classification. The aim of this study was to assess the interrater reliability of the PAT-CFM global assessment score.

DESIGN

In this prospective cohort study, three clinicians completed the global assessment form of the PAT-CFM. The mandible was classified based on orthopantomogram- and/or computed tomography images.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients with CFM or microtia.

Interrater agreement was calculated using the weighted Krippendorff alpha (α), with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

In total, 53 patients were included (106 hemifaces). The reliabilities of the main classification components ranged from high for the mandible (α = 0.904 [95% CI 0.860-0.948]) and ear (α = 0.958 [95% CI 0.934-0.983]) subscales, to tentative for the orbital summary score (α = 0.682 [0.542-0.821]), and nerve summary score (α = 0.782 [0.666-0.900]) subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of the ear and radiographic mandible scales of the PAT-CFM global classification were high, while the orbit, facial nerve and soft tissue subscales may have limited reliability. Research focusing on radiographic severity scores for hypoplasia of the orbits and soft tissues, as well as objective measures for overall facial hypoplasia using non-ionizing forms of imaging for early classification, are warranted.

A decade of clinical research on clinical characteristics, medical treatments, and surgical treatments for individuals with craniofacial microsomia: What have we learned?

AIM

This article provides a review of a decade of clinical research studies on clinical features, medical interventions, and surgical interventions for individuals with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). We also provide recommendations for future clinical research.

METHOD

A systematic search of literature was conducted in Embase and PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid. All publications from 2010 to 2020 that included at least 10 individuals with CFM were considered relevant for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 91 articles were included. In the past decade, many new studies on CFM have been published providing more insight on the diagnosis and management of patients with CFM. This review encompasses findings on the clinical difficulties patients with CFM encounter, including the craniofacial and extracraniofacial characteristics of patients with CFM and its related clinical consequences on breathing, feeding, speech, and hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable number of large multicenter studies have been published in recent years, providing new insights in the clinical consequences of CFM. The phenotypic variety between patients with CFM makes patient-specific treatment tailored to individual needs essential. The research and development of clinical care standards might be challenging because of the heterogeneity of CFM. Future research on clinical and patient-reported outcomes can help identify optimal treatment strategies. Cooperation between craniofacial centers, using uniform registration and outcome measurement tools, could enhance research and future care for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Association of Mandibular Dysplasia With Maxillary Volumetric and Linear Measurements in Children With Hemifacial Microsomia

In hemifacial microsomia (HFM), the correlations between mandibular dysplasia and maxillary deformities in HFM patients have not yet been assessed. The objective of the present study was to examine the association of maxillary volumetric and linear measurements with mandibular ramus height or corpus length on the affected side in children with unilateral HFM.In this retrospective research, a total of 70 children with unilateral HFM were enrolled at our department from 2010 to 2019. Demographic information was recorded, and computed tomographic scan were reconstructed and analyzed by segmentation, volumetric, and cephalometric measurements. Analyses involved independent sample t-test, univariable, and multivariable linear regression.In the overall population, mandibular ramus height (MRH) was positively associated with the maxillary bone volume (MBV) (r = 0.484, P < 0.001) and maxillary total volume (MTV) (r = 0.520, P < 0.001). Similarly, mandibular corpus length (MCL) was significantly associated with the MBV (r = 0.467, P < 0.001) and MTV (r = 0.520, P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the MRH or MCL were significantly and independently associated with MBV or MTV (MRH/MBV β = 0.420, P < 0.001; MRH/MTV β = 0.391, P < 0.001; MCL/MBV β = 0.403, P < 0.001; MCL/MTV β = 0.307, P < 0.01).These results demonstrated that the MBV and MTV are independently associated with MRH or MCL on the affected side in children with unilateral HFM, suggesting a potential interaction between mandibular dysplasia and maxillary deformities.

Three-Dimensional Measurement of Maxillary Involvement in Hemifacial Microsomia in Children

In hemifacial microsomia (HFM), the aberrant mandible structure has always been the focus of attention. How the maxillary development being affected is not clear. The authors sought to comprehensively evaluate the hemifacial maxillary deficiency and to assess for Pruzansky-Kaban score correlation.This is a retrospective research of children with HFM. Demographic information were recorded, and computed tomographic scan were reconstructed and analyzed by segmentation, volumetric and cephalometric measurements. Analyses involved paired t-test, independent sample t-test and one-way analyses of variance.Demographic information revealed 67 patients diagnosed with HFM were included: 10.4 percent type I, 38.8 percent IIa, 28.4 percent type IIb, 22.4 percent type III. The maxillary total volume was found to be significantly decreased on the affected side in patients with type IIa (P = 0.0426) and IIb (P = 0.0004). No notable differences in maxillary sinus volume were found. No significant differences in maxillary width measurements were found between groups type I and III. A descending trend in maxillary bone volume ratio, an increasing trend in maxillary posterior width ratio and a decreasing trend in maxillary middle height ratio was observed from group I to IIb (pmbv* = 0.020; pmpw* = 0.002; pmmh* = 0.004).This study comprehensively characterized the hemifacial microsomia maxillary deficiency. For maxillary total volume and transverse development, the type III group presented characteristics similar to the type I group. We concluded that the severity of maxillary deficiency is not completely consistent with the mandibular deformity classification.

Early hemi-mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis contributes to compensatory maxillary growth

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis at an early age is the standard hemifacial microsomia treatment. Nevertheless, the recurrence rate remains high and the definition of early age is controversial. We explored the optimal timing for mandibular distraction, when the surrounding skeleton, such as maxilla, can grow compensatory, to reduce recurrence. Hemifacial microsomia patients were prospectively divided into Groups A (1-3 years old) and B (4-6 years old), according to maxillary and mandibular growth curves. Computed tomography scans were obtained before distractor implantation and after removal surgery. Maxillary volume increase percentage was the main outcome indicator; other indicators (maxillary symmetry and complications) were secondary outcomes. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and all but one patient in Group A (failed distraction) completed the study. Two patients had facial nerve injury and another two had mouth-opening limitation, which was relieved after coracoid resection. The difference in percentage increase in maxillary volume between the affected and unaffected sides was 5.06 ± 2.73% and 3.18 ± 1.99% in Groups A and B, respectively, suggesting better compensatory growth in younger patients (P = 0.004). Maxillary symmetry was apparently elevated after mandibular distraction. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis was confirmed to be feasible and safe at age <4 years.

Using principal component analysis to describe the midfacial deformities in patients with craniofacial microsomia

PURPOSE

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is the result of a disturbance in embryologic development and is characterised by an asymmetric, mostly unilateral facial underdevelopment. The aim of this study is to understand the midfacial involvement in CFM using principal component analysis (PCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-operative data from 19 CFM and 23 control patients were collected. A set of 71 landmarks was placed on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of all skulls to compare both populations. PCA visualised variation within both groups and calculated the vector of change. Linear measurements were taken to compare ratios between the populations and between the affected and unaffected sides in CFM patients.

RESULTS

PCA defined a vector that described shape changes between both populations. Videos showed the variation within the control and CFM group and the transformation from a mean CFM skull into a normal phenotype. Linear measurements showed a significant difference between the affected and unaffected sides in CFM patients.

CONCLUSION

PCA has not been applied on asymmetrical data before, but it has proved to be a useful method to describe CFM. The virtual normalisation of a mean CFM skull enables visualisation of the bony shape changes, which is promising to delineate and to plan surgical correction and could be used as an outcome measure.

Oculoauriculovertebral spectrum and maxillary sinus volumes : CT-based comparative evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, by comparing maxillary sinus volumes, how asymmetries related to oculoauriculovertebral spectrum (OAVS) affect upper-jaw development.

METHODS

From pre-existing multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) datasets, we selected 20 cases of 11 female and 9 male patients aged 6.1-24 years who were clinically and radiographically symmetrical (group 1) plus 20 cases of 8 female and 12 male patients aged 5.7-23.9 years who had OAVS (group 2). After three-dimensional reconstruction of the datasets, the volumes of the left and right maxillary sinuses were calculated and compared based on patient groups and based on the sides affected or unaffected by OAVS. To this end, the OAVS patients were subdivided into a group in whom both external acoustic pores were radiographically present (group 2a) and a group in whom the pore on the affected side was congenitally missing (group 2b).

RESULTS

Intrarater reliability was very high (0.997). Significantly larger volumes of the maxillary sinuses, amounting to a mean of 13.4 ml, were observed in the control group than in the asymmetric OAVS groups where the volumes averaged 9.8 ml or 10.3 ml, respectively (p = 0.03). No statistically significant differences in sinus volumes were found between the two OAVS groups (p = 0.557) and between the sides affected or unaffected by the OAVS (p = 0.8311 in group 2a and 0.4961 in group 2b).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we found the volumes of both maxillary sinuses to be somewhat smaller in the asymmetric patients than in the symmetric control group. This might indicate that OAVS was associated with a mild generalized hypoplasia of the maxilla, but significantly different sinus volumes were not seen between the affected and unaffected sides.

Is There a Difference in Orbital Volume Between Affected and Unaffected Sides in Patients With Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia?

PURPOSE

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is characterized by malformations of structures derived from the first and second pharyngeal arches. The orbit is variably affected. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in orbital volume between affected and unaffected sides in patients with unilateral CFM. The specific aims were to 1) measure orbital volume, 2) compare affected and unaffected sides, 3) evaluate the correlation between clinical evaluation of orbital size and volumetric measurement, and 4) determine whether there is a correlation between orbital volume and severity of mandibular deformity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective case series of patients with unilateral CFM from Boston Children's Hospital (Boston, MA) who had a computed tomographic (CT) scan. Manual segmentation of the orbit using Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was performed on CT images of the 2 orbits. The predictor variable was laterality (affected vs unaffected side) and the primary outcome variable was orbital volume. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare these measurements and determine whether the affected side differed from the unaffected side. The correlation between orbital volume and Pruzansky-Kaban type of mandibular deformity, as documented in the medical record, was determined using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included. Orbital volume was 10% smaller on the affected side (P = .001) in 80% of patients. There was no correlation between orbital size and severity of mandibular involvement.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed a marked difference in orbital volume between affected and unaffected sides in patients with unilateral CFM. These differences were small and might not be clinically relevant. Orbital volume did not correlate with severity of mandibular deformity.

Facial Paralysis in Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia: Frequency, Distribution, and Association With Other OMENS Abnormalities

Although facial paralysis is a fundamental feature of hemifacial microsomia, the frequency and distribution of nerve abnormalities in patients with hemifacial microsomia remain unclear. In this study, the authors classified 1125 cases with microtia (including 339 patients with hemifacial microsomia and 786 with isolated microtia) according to Orbital Distortion Mandibular Hypoplasia Ear Anomaly Nerve Involvement Soft Tissue Dependency (OMENS) scheme. Then, the authors performed an independent analysis to describe the distribution feature of nerve abnormalities and reveal the possible relationships between facial paralysis and the other 4 fundamental features in the OMENS system. Results revealed that facial paralysis is present 23.9% of patients with hemifacial microsomia. The frontal-temporal branch is the most vulnerable branch in the total 1125 cases with microtia. The occurrence of facial paralysis is positively correlated with mandibular hypoplasia and soft tissue deficiency both in the total 1125 cases and the hemifacial microsomia patients. Orbital asymmetry is related to facial paralysis only in the total microtia cases, and ear deformity is related to facial paralysis only in hemifacial microsomia patients. No significant association was found between the severity of facial paralysis and any of the other 4 OMENS anomalies. These data suggest that the occurrence of facial paralysis may be associated with other OMENS abnormalities. The presence of serious mandibular hypoplasia or soft tissue deficiency should alert the clinician to a high possibility but not a high severity of facial paralysis.