Craniosynostosis incision: scalpel or cautery?

ASRA Pain Medicine consensus practice infection control guidelines for regional anesthesia and pain medicine

BACKGROUND

To provide recommendations on risk mitigation, diagnosis and treatment of infectious complications associated with the practice of regional anesthesia, acute and chronic pain management.

METHODS

Following board approval, in 2020 the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) commissioned evidence-based guidelines for best practices for infection control. More than 80 research questions were developed and literature searches undertaken by assigned working groups comprising four to five members. Modified US Preventive Services Task Force criteria were used to determine levels of evidence and certainty. Using a modified Delphi method, >50% agreement was needed to accept a recommendation for author review, and >75% agreement for a recommendation to be accepted. The ASRA Pain Medicine Board of Directors reviewed and approved the final guidelines.

RESULTS

After documenting the incidence and infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia and interventional pain procedures including implanted devices, we made recommendations regarding the role of the anesthesiologist and pain physician in infection control, preoperative patient risk factors and management, sterile technique, equipment use and maintenance, healthcare setting (office, hospital, operating room), surgical technique, postoperative risk reduction, and infection symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Consensus recommendations were based on risks associated with different settings and procedures, and keeping in mind each patient's unique characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations are intended to be multidisciplinary guidelines for clinical care and clinical decision-making in the regional anesthesia and chronic interventional pain practice. The issues addressed are constantly evolving, therefore, consistent updating will be required.

Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial

INTRODUCTION

Electrocautery is used widely in surgical procedures, but making skin incision has routinely been performed with scalpel rather than electrocautery, for fear that electrocautery may cause poor incision healing, excessive scarring and increased wound complication rates. More and more studies on general surgery support the use of electrocautery for skin incision, but research comparing the two modalities for scalp incision in neurosurgery remains inadequate. This trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of needle-tip monopolar for scalp incision in supratentorial neurosurgery compared with steel scalpel.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this prospective, randomised, double-blind trial, 120 eligible patients who are planned to undergo supratentorial neurosurgery will be enrolled. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups. In controlled group scalp incision will be made with a scalpel from the epidermis to the galea aponeurotica, while in intervention group scalp will be first incised with a steel scalpel from the epidermis to the dermis, and then the subcutaneous tissue and galea aponeurotica will be incised with needle-tip monopolar on cutting mode. The primary outcomes are scar score (at 90 days). The secondary outcomes include incision pain (at 1 day, on discharge, at 90 days) and alopecia around the incision (at 90 days), incision blood loss and incision-related operation time (during operation), incision infection and incision healing (on discharge, at 2 weeks, 90 days).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial will be performed according to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. This study has been validated by the ethics committee of West China Hospital. Informed consent will be obtained from each included patient and/or their designated representative. Final results from this trial will be promulgated through publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200063243.

Psychosocial Impact of Coronal Access Scars in Craniosynostosis Procedures on Patients and Their Families

ABSTRACT

The coronal incision is the mainstay for access in craniosynostosis surgery. Scarring is a common concern of parents whose children are offered an open procedure. To the author's knowledge, there are no previous studies looking at the psychosocial impact of scarring from coronal access incisions for craniosynostosis procedures. The author's study focused on patients undergoing procedures for nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis.This study comprised 3 parts: worldwide survey regarding coronal access incisions for craniosynostosis surgery, questionnaire to determine the psychosocial impact of the scars on patients and their parents, and measurement of postoperative scars in craniosynostosis patients.Survey responses from 46 craniofacial centers worldwide revealed a zig-zag was the most commonly utilized incision. Seventy-two percent of survey responses reported problems with postoperative stretching of the scar; only 20% of centers reported formal data collection of whether families were affected by this.Psychology questionnaires revealed that the majority of patients and their parents were not bothered by the zig-zag coronal scars. Patient felt the scars were less noticeable than the parents. Parent perceptions improved with age and time postsurgery.Coronal access scars following craniosynostosis surgery appear to stretch more in the supra-auricular region compared with the midline.These findings are useful for the craniofacial multidisciplinary team to inform parents contemplating surgery and who may be concerned about the impact of the scar in the future.

A Technique for Minimizing the Need for Hemotransfusion in Non-Syndromic Craniosynostosis Surgery

ABSTRACT

Surgery for craniosynostosis is associated with excessive blood loss, as well as morbidity and mortality risks. This study investigated the effectiveness of a surgical technique for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis intervention in controlling bleeding, assessed based on the volume of blood transfused. The cohort included 73 children who underwent nonsyndromic craniosynostosis surgery during a 3-year period. Retrospective evaluation of patient parameters included sex, weight, and age at the time of surgery; type of craniosynostosis; duration of surgery; hemoglobin concentration before and after surgery; rate of transfusion; and volume of transfused blood (mL/kg). The surgical technique involved skin incision and subgaleal dissection using electrocautery with a Colorado needle tip. The pericranium was not removed but instead kept in situ, and orbiectomy was performed using piezosurgery. Of the 73 children in the cohort, 75.3% underwent fronto-orbital advancement and were included in the analysis. The average age was 10.9 months (range: 4-96 months), with 68.5% boys and 31.5% girls (P < 0.001). The most common type of craniosynostosis was trigonocephaly (57.5%), followed by scaphocephaly (19.2%). The mean duration of the surgery was 2 hours and 55 minutes. Blood transfusion was needed in 56.2% of patients, with a mean volume of 8.7 mL/kg body weight transfused intraoperatively. No complications or fatalities were observed. These results suggested that meticulous, continuous control of homeostasis is paramount in minimizing blood loss during surgical repair of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

Scalpel Versus Diathermy in Wound Healing After Mucosal Incisions: A Split-Mouth Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the healing of scalpel and diathermy incision wounds in the oral mucosa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective split-mouth study conducted from January 2015 to April 2017 among patients undergoing either Le Fort I or anterior maxillary osteotomy (or both). The study groups were classified based on the different techniques used to make the incision (group A, incision made by a scalpel; group B, incision made by diathermy). Wound healing was assessed on the first, third, seventh, and tenth postoperative days using the Southampton scoring system. Data were statistically analyzed using the Student t test for continuous variables and the χ² test for categorical variables, and P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Among the 113 participants included in the study, the age range was 16 to 35 years and male patients comprised 50.4%. The rates of postoperative complications of wound healing were 68.1% (n = 77) in group A and 77% (n = 87) in group B. Wound healing showed a statistically significant difference between the techniques (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that wounds caused by scalpel incisions healed better than those caused by diathermy incisions in the oral mucosa.

Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution

OBJECT The authors present a retrospective cohort study examining complications in patients undergoing surgery for craniosynostosis using both minimally invasive endoscopic and open approaches. METHODS Over the past 10 years, 295 nonsyndromic patients (140 undergoing endoscopic procedures and 155 undergoing open procedures) and 33 syndromic patients (endoscopic procedures in 10 and open procedures in 23) met the authors' criteria. Variables analyzed included age at surgery, presence of a preexisting CSF shunt, skin incision method, estimated blood loss, transfusions of packed red blood cells, use of intravenous steroids or tranexamic acid, intraoperative durotomies, procedure length, and length of hospital stay. Complications were classified as either surgically or medically related. RESULTS In the nonsyndromic endoscopic group, the authors experienced 3 (2.1%) surgical and 5 (3.6%) medical complications. In the nonsyndromic open group, there were 2 (1.3%) surgical and 7 (4.5%) medical complications. Intraoperative durotomies occurred in 5 (3.6%) endoscopic and 12 (7.8%) open cases, were repaired primarily, and did not result in reoperations for CSF leakage. Similar complication rates were seen in syndromic cases. There was no death or permanent morbidity. Additionally, endoscopic procedures were associated with significantly decreased estimated blood loss, transfusions, procedure length, and length of hospital stay compared with open procedures. CONCLUSIONS Rates of intraoperative durotomies and surgical and medical complications were comparable between endoscopic and open techniques. This is the largest direct comparison to date between endoscopic and open interventions for synostosis, and the results are in agreement with previous series that endoscopic surgery confers distinct advantages over open surgery in appropriate patient populations.