Modified Fixation of Acrylic Cranioplasty in the Setting of Titanium Allergy

Epidural Effusion as Allergic Reaction Following Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty: An Illustrative Case and Review of the Literature

Well-described complications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty in pediatric patients include surgical site infection, post-operative hematoma, cerebral edema, and implant fracture. We present a rare case of hypersensitivity to PEEK presenting as an epidural effusion in a 7-year-old male receiving a PEEK cranioplasty following a decompressive craniectomy. Within three weeks, the patient experienced fever and emesis. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was high (>130 mm/Hr) as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) (6.4 mg/dL). A brain MRI with contrast demonstrated both subgaleal and epidural fluid collections with T2 isointense columns projecting from the galeal surface, through the holes in the implant to the dural surface. The patient appeared clinically well. A sterile tap of the pericranial fluid showed no growth, b2-transferrin was negative, but the IgG level was high (>129.2 mg/dL) in the tap fluid. High-dose steroids reduced the epidural collection, but then the collection returned with steroid wean. A second cranioplasty operation replaced the PEEK flap with autologous bone. Postoperative imaging demonstrated markedly reduced fluid collections and a decreased midline shift. The patient remained clinically intact throughout the experience. PEEK allergy following cranioplasty is a rare entity and must be distinguished from infection or hematoma. Medical treatment with steroids can be attempted, but, if refractory, then appropriate treatment may necessitate removal of the offending PEEK implant.

A systematic review of cranioplasty material toxicity in human subjects

PURPOSE

Local and systemic toxic reactions to implanted materials can result in morbidities. However, little is reported about cranioplasty implants. Therefore, we performed a systematic review on the toxicity of different materials used for cranioplasty implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted by browsing the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. All human studies that identified toxic (aseptic) reactions to any types of material used as cranioplasty implants or onplants, published up to January 1, 2019, were included in the review.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were identified. Collectively, 36 patients endured some type of toxic reaction to an implanted material. Eleven studies presented several types of toxicity for PMMA cranioplasties in several tissue types. One article highlighted the risk of neurotoxicity for PMMA cranioplasty. Three articles presented toxic reactions to calcium phosphate and titanium implants. Three additional articles presented toxic reactions to PEEK, polypropylene-polyester, and polyethylene.

CONCLUSION

All materials currently used for cranioplasty showed occasional toxicity and morbidities. Therefore, none can be considered completely biologically inert. We found that aseptic inflammatory reactions have been underreported in the literature due to a high incidence of infections with questionable evidence.

Allergic Epidural Effusion Following Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty

Cranioplasty is a common procedure in neurosurgical practice. However, some complications may occur after the operation. We here presented a case of bilateral skull defect and underwent cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) prosthesis. The patient developed epidural effusion on both sides 7 days after surgery. The effusion was light yellow and transparent, and laboratory examinations revealed normal glucose level, negative bacteriological results, and increased IgG protein concentration. The effusion disappeared after treatment with dexamethasone and drainage. We speculated that the epidural effusion was because of delayed type allergic reactions after PEEK cranioplasty. However, further studies are needed to investigate its related mechanisms.

The effect of manufacturing techniques on custom-made titanium cranioplasty plates: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effect of varying techniques on the surface characteristics of pressed titanium cranioplasty plates, commonly manufactured in laboratory practice. The aim was to highlight the variety of techniques currently used, assess these methods of manufacture and produce manufacturing recommendations.

METHODS

A questionnaire identified manufacturing methods commonly used by maxillofacial prosthetists. The plate surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry. The surface differences and titanium compositions were statistically analysed.

RESULTS

Bead blasting with aluminium oxide (Al₂O₃) showed a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in titanium surface composition, replaced by a large aluminium content. Trimming tool choice had a significant impact (p = 0.001) on surface contamination by smoothing wheel material deposition; however passivation and anodising techniques had no significant effect (p = 0.293 and p = 0.257, respectively) on the surface composition or roughness of titanium samples.

CONCLUSIONS

A large range of manufacturing techniques of titanium cranioplasty plates was confirmed and significant differences were found. Amongst other recommendations, bead blasting with Al₂O₃ is not recommended for commercially pure titanium implant surface finishing due to aluminium contamination. The recommendations outlined will minimise manufacturing time, reduce risk of complication (thus costs) and unify methods to enable a safe, reliable treatment.