Cranial Base and Posterior Cranial Vault Asymmetry After Open and Endoscopic Repair of Isolated Lambdoid Craniosynostosis

Long-term outcomes of nonsyndromic isolated unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis

This study combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to evaluate outcomes of isolated nonsyndromic unilateral lambdoid synostosis at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Volumetric, linear, and angular analyses were performed on long-term postoperative and normal control scans. Preoperative and postoperative clinical photographs were evaluated for the presence of dysmorphic frontofacial features. Among 26 included patients, median age of surgery was 10 months and mean postoperative follow-up was 5.9 ± 5.7 years. Two (7.7%) patients underwent secondary cranial vault procedures. At most recent follow-up, 2 (7.7%) subjects reported intermittent headaches. Twenty (90.9%) of 22 patients were assigned Whitaker grade I. Among 9 subjects with long-term imaging at age 11.5 ± 5.3, posterior vault asymmetry, posterior fossa deflection angle, cranial base angle, and ear position asymmetry all remained greater than in the control group. Of subjects included in the frontofacial feature analysis (n = 10), 50% had resolution of all dysmorphic frontofacial features present preoperatively. Overall, most subjects who underwent PVR did not require revisional surgery and had good outcomes both aesthetically and functionally. Despite residual abnormalities in the cranial base and posterior vault, most had resolution of parietal bossing and facial scoliosis. Ear position asymmetry was the most common dysmorphic feature at long-term follow-up.

Calvarial Vault Remodeling Technique for Lambdoid Craniosynostosis

SUMMARY

Premature fusion of the lambdoid suture is the most uncommon single-suture synostosis. It presents with a classic "windswept" appearance, a trapezoid-shaped head, and significant skull asymmetry notable for an ipsilateral mastoid bulge and contralateral frontal bossing. Because of the rarity of lambdoid synostosis, little is known about optimal techniques for its treatment. In particular, the proximity of the lambdoid suture to critical intracranial structures such as the superior sagittal and transverse sinuses represents a potential for significant intraoperative bleeding. Prior work has shown that parietal asymmetry persists after repair in these cases. In this article, the authors present a technique for the treatment of unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis along with two representative cases. This calvarial vault remodeling technique requires the removal of both ipsilateral and contralateral parietal bones. These are moved across hemispheres and reinset on opposite sides to help correct the parietal asymmetry. Obliquely orientated barrel stave osteotomies are performed to provide a safe mechanism for correction of occipital flattening. The authors' early results show improvement in correction of volume asymmetry 1 year postoperatively relative to patients treated with prior calvarial vault remodeling techniques. The authors believe the technique presented here corrects the windswept appearance in patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis and also reduces the potential for complications. Further work will be necessary to confirm this technique's long-term efficacy in a larger cohort.

Determination of Novel, Cranium-Based Relationships for Construct Placement in Microtia Reconstruction for Hemifacial Microsomia Patients

OBJECTIVE

Determine if the ideal location of the construct in microtia reconstruction for hemifacial microsomia (HFM) can be more accurately derived from measurements on the cranium.

DESIGN

High-resolution computerized tomography (CT) images were analyzed through craniometric linear relationships.

SETTING

Our tertiary care institution from 2000 to 2021.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients diagnosed with HFM and microtia, who had high-resolution craniofacial CT scans, yielding 36 patients accounting for 44 CT scans.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

First, the integrity of the posterior cranial vault among HFM patients was determined. If proven to be unaffected, it could be used as a reference in the placement of the construct. Second, the position of the ear in relation to the cranium was assessed in healthy age-matched controls. Third, if proven to be useful, the concordance of these cranium-based relationships could be validated among our HFM cohort.

RESULTS

The posterior cranial vault is unaffected in HFM (P > .001). Further, craniometric relationships between the tragus and the Foramen Magnum, as well as between the tragus and the posterior cranium, have been shown to be highly similar and equally precise in predicting tragus position in healthy controls (P > .001). These relationships held true across all age groups (P > .001), and importantly among HFM patients, where the mean absolute difference in predicted tragus position never surpassed 1.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Relationships between the tragus and the cranium may be used as an alternative to distorted facial anatomy or surgeon's experience to assist in pre-operative planning of construct placement in microtia reconstruction for HFM patients.

Cognitive Development in Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lambdoid craniosynostosis affects approximately 1 in 33 000 live births per year, and surgical correction is often sought in order to achieve normocephaly and allow for adequate brain growth. However, the effects of lambdoid synostosis and its treatment on cognitive development are unknown.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

A systematic review of Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov was conducted in January 2022. Included studies assessed cognitive development of patients with nonsyndromic unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Results of developmental tests were compared to normative data or controls to generate Hedges' g for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 3 studies describing general cognition showed that cases scored significantly lower than their peers, but within 1 standard deviation (g = 0.37, 95% CI [-0.64, -0.10], P = .01). Meta-analysis of verbal and psychomotor development showed no significant differences in children with lambdoid synostosis. Studies were of fair quality and had moderate-to-high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis may score slightly below average on tests of general cognition in comparison to normal controls, but results in other domains are variable. Analyses were limited by small sample sizes. Multidisciplinary care and involvement of a child psychologist may be helpful in identifying areas of concern and providing adequate scholastic support. Further research recruiting larger cohorts will be necessary to confirm these findings and extend them to other developmental domains such as attention and executive function.

Spring-Assisted Surgery of Unilambdoid Craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is traditionally treated with extensive cranial vault reconstructions (CVRs). Although less invasive techniques, such as endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy, have been successful, they also present difficulties. An alternative method is distraction osteogenesis using either manually controlled devices or specially designed springs. In this study, the authors provide the first comparison of spring-assisted surgery (SAS) with CVR for the treatment of unilambdoid synostosis (ULS). Fourteen consecutive patients (8 CVR and 6 SAS) treated for ULS at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2005 and 2018 were included. Skull shape and deviations were evaluated using previously defined measurement points on 3-dimensional computed tomography scans preoperatively, at spring removal, and at 3 years of age. Posterior and middle cranial fossa (PCF and MCF, respectively), skull-base cant, facial twist, and mastoid bulge (MB) were measured, and clinical data were obtained from chart reviews. The results indicated that at the 3-year follow-up, PCF, MCF, and MB improved in both groups, with no significant difference in outcome observed between methods. In the SAS group, duration of operation [61±27 min (mean±SD)] and perioperative bleeding (3.5±2.8 mL/kg body weight) were both significantly lower relative to the CVR group (P<0.05). These findings showed that both SAS and CVR resulted in similar improvements in treating ULS, although neither produced complete normalization of skull shape. The results suggest that early diagnosis and operation allow less extensive SAS to be performed without adversely affecting the results.

Shared Decision-Making: Process for Design and Implementation of a Decision Aid for Patients With Craniosynostosis

To describe the process of developing a craniosynostosis decision aid.

We conducted a mixed-methods exploratory study between August 2019 and March 2020 to develop a decision aid about surgical treatment for single suture craniosynostosis.

A single tertiary care academic children's hospital.

The decision aid development team consisted of surgeons, research fellows, a clinical nurse practitioner, clinical researchers with expertise in decision science, and a university-affiliated design school. Qualitative interviews (N = 5) were performed with families, clinicians (N = 2), and a helmeting orthotist to provide feedback on decision aid content, format, and usability.

After cycles of revisions and iterations, 3 related decision aids were designed and approved by the marketing arm of our institution. Distinct booklets were created to enable focused discussion of treatment options for the 3 major types of single suture craniosynostosis (sagittal, metopic, unicoronal).

Three decision aids representing the 3 most common forms of single suture craniosynostosis were developed. Clinicians found the decision aids could help facilitate discussions about families' treatment preferences, goals, and concerns.

We developed a customizable decision aid for single suture craniosynostosis treatment options. This tool lays the foundation for shared decision-making by assessing family preferences and providing clear, concise, and credible information regarding surgical treatment. Future research can evaluate this tool's impact on patient-clinician discussions about families' goals and preferences for treatment.

Minor Suture Fusion is Associated With Chiari Malformation in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis

Here, we focused on the association between minor suture fusion and Chiari malformation (CM) occurrence in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC), and evaluated how the minor suture affects the posterior cranial fossa by measuring the posterior fossa deflection angle (PFA). In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 137 patients who underwent surgery for NSC at Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center between April 2010 and May 2022 were analyzed. Clinical data from Aichi Developmental Disability Center Central Hospital was collected for 23 patients as the external validation set. Among the 137 patients, 123 were diagnosed with NSC and the remaining 14 with syndromic craniosynostosis. Of the 123 NSC patients, 23 patients presented with CM. Multivariate analysis showed that occipito-mastoid fusion was the only significant risk factor for CM ( P =0.0218). Within the NSC group, CM patients had a significantly increased PFA (6.33±8.10 deg) compared with those without CM (2.76±3.29 deg, P =0.0487). Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients with occipito-mastoid suture fusion had a significantly increased PFA (6.50±7.60 deg) compared with those without occipito-mastoid fusion (2.60±3.23 deg, P =0.0164). In the validation cohort, occipito-mastoid suture fusion was validated as an independent risk factor for CM in univariate analysis. Minor suture fusion may cause CM associated with NSC. Chiari malformation could develop due to an increased PFA due to minor suture fusion, which causes growth disturbance in the affected side and compensatory dilation in the contralateral side within the posterior cranial fossa.

Craniometric and Aesthetic Outcomes in Craniosynostosis Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the published comparative aesthetic outcomes, and its determinants, for craniosynostoses surgically treated by minimally-invasive cranial procedures and open cranial vault remodeling (CVR).

DESIGN

PRISMA-compliant systematic review.

SETTING

Not-applicable.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Articles were included if they compared spring cranioplasty, strip minimally-invasive craniectomy or CVR for outcomes related to aesthetics or head shape. Forty-two studies were included, comprising 2402 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The craniometric and PROM used to determine surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (59%) evaluated sagittal craniosynostosis, with metopic (7;17%) and unicoronal (4;10%) the next most prevalent. Thirty-eight studies (90%) included CVR, 24 (57%) included strip craniectomy with helmeting, 9 (22%) included strip craniectomy without helmeting, 11 (26%) included spring cranioplasty, and 3 (7%) included vault distraction. A majority of studies only used 1 (43%) or 2 (14%) craniometric measures to compare techniques. In sagittal synostosis, 13 (59%) studies showed no difference in craniometric outcomes, 5 (23%) showed better results with CVR, 3 (14%) with strip craniectomy, and 1 (5%) with springs. In studies describing other synostoses, 10/14 (71%) were equivocal. Subjective outcome measures followed similar trends. Meta-analysis shows no significant difference in cranial index (CI) outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures in patients with sagittal synostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in CI outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures. The majority of literature comparing craniometric and aesthetic outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures shows equivocal results for sagittal synostosis. However, the heterogeneity of data for other craniosynostoses did not allow meta-analysis.

Management of Sagittal and Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: Minimally Invasive Approaches

The resurgence of strip craniectomies began in the mid-1990s with advances in surgical technique and anesthesia coupled with the critical observation that earlier interventions benefitted from an easily molded skull. Jimenez and Barone's pioneering introduction of endoscopic approaches to strip craniectomies coupled with postoperative helmeting in newborns and young infants and Claes Lauritzen's introduction of spring-mediated cranioplasty began the era of minimally invasive approaches in the surgical correction of craniosynostosis. This article provides technical descriptions of these treatment modalities, a comparative literature review, and our institutional algorithms for the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis and unilambdoid craniosynostosis.

Management of Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is a condition characterized by the premature fusion of 2 or more skull bones. Craniosynostosis of the lambdoid suture is one of the rarest forms, accounting for 1-4% of all craniosynostoses. Documented cases are separated into simple (single suture), complex (bilateral), and associated with adjacent synostoses ("Mercedes Benz" Pattern) or syndromes (i.e., Crouzon, Sathre-Chotzen, Antley-Bixler). This condition can manifest phenotypic deformities and neurological sequelae that can lead to impaired cognitive function if improperly treated or left undiagnosed. Preferred surgical techniques have varied over time but all maintain the common goals of establishing proper head shape and preventing of complications that could contribute to aforementioned sequelae.

SUMMARY

This comprehensive review highlights demographic distributions, embryological development, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, neurological sequelae, radiologic findings, surgical techniques, surgical outcomes, and postoperative considerations of patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis presentation. In addition, a systematic review was conducted to explore the operative management of lambdoid craniosynostosis using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, with 38 articles included after screening. Key Messages: Due to a low volume of published cases, diagnosis and treatment can vary. Large overlap in presentation can occur in patients that display lambdoid craniosynostosis and posterior plagiocephaly, furthering the need for comprehensive analysis. Possessing the knowledge and tools to properly assess patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis will allow for more precise care and improved outcomes.

Conventional posterior cranial vault expansion: indications and results-review of the literature

In the late 1980s, craniofacial surgery units reported suboptimal cosmetic results, cranial volume restriction, and intracranial hypertension after anterior cranial vault remodeling in bilateral coronal synostosis associated with severe brachyturricephaly. A possible explanation was a severe associated growth restriction of the posterior calvaria with radiological synostosis at the lambda sutures. "Conventional" or "fixed" posterior cranial vault expansion techniques were developed to address these limitations, sometimes as the first surgical step in a two-staged protocol of total calvarial reconstruction, combined with suboccipital decompression in cases of symptomatic cerebellar tonsillar herniation or, more easily, to resolve the characteristic occipital flattening of lambdoid synostosis. Various surgical approaches have been described; however, the indications for and timing of surgical treatment and postoperative evaluation of results still remain controversial. Although more invasive, conventional posterior cranial vault expansion has proven to be safe and offers a remodeled and protective bony vault immediately after surgery, but the underlying cranial base malformation remained untreated, with implications in the postoperative growth of the facial skeleton. Overcorrection, rigid stabilization, and grafting are also concerns to be addressed.

Extended experience in parieto-occipital expansion surgery by meander technique-clinical and radiological evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Brachycephaly and anterior and posterior plagiocephaly appear as an isolated entity or manifest in syndromic conditions. In severe cases, possible treatment options currently comprise either cranioplasty or osteogenetic distraction. The aim of this paper is to retrospectively review the perioperative course of a series of children treated by posterior meander expansion technique at our institution with focus on the course of postoperative intracranial volume and eventual tonsillar descent evolution.

METHODS

Forty-two children received a posterior cranial vault remodeling by means of a posterior meander technique during a 7-year period. Hospital records were reviewed, and pre- and postoperative MRIs were analyzed for intracranial volume, cephalic and asymmetry index, and tonsillar position over time.

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was 11.5 months (range 17 days-10 years). Nineteen children had a symmetrical cranial deformity, twenty-three an asymmetrical synostosis. Half of the cohort showed a syndromic condition. Transfusions were administered in the majority (92.2%) of the cases. A significant postoperative increase of intracranial volume was present from 1188.9 ± 370.4 cm³ to 1324.8 ± 352.9 cm³ (p < 0.001). The asymmetry index showed a significant improvement postoperatively: 0.86 ± 0.06 versus 0.91 ± 0.05 (p < 0.001), while the cephalic index showed a non-statistical change (0.91 ± 0.11 versus 0.88 ± 0.08). Tonsillar herniation, bilateral or homolateral, showed no significant changes at early control, while a nonsignificant amelioration of tonsillar descent was seen among children older than 12 months at late imaging follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Among the osteoplastic techniques, the posterior meander technique offers several advantages, such as early mobilization of the child, less bony defects, absence of implants, and a small complication rate. However, further comparative studies among different surgical techniques are needed.

Computational modelling of patient specific spring assisted lambdoid craniosynostosis correction

Lambdoid craniosynostosis (LC) is a rare non-syndromic craniosynostosis characterised by fusion of the lambdoid sutures at the back of the head. Surgical correction including the spring assisted cranioplasty is the only option to correct the asymmetry at the skull in LC. However, the aesthetic outcome from spring assisted cranioplasty may remain suboptimal. The aim of this study is to develop a parametric finite element (FE) model of the LC skulls that could be used in the future to optimise spring surgery. The skull geometries from three different LC patients who underwent spring correction were reconstructed from the pre-operative computed tomography (CT) in Simpleware ScanIP. Initially, the skull growth between the pre-operative CT imaging and surgical intervention was simulated using MSC Marc. The osteotomies and spring implantation were performed to simulate the skull expansion due to the spring forces and skull growth between surgery and post-operative CT imaging in MSC Marc. Surface deviation between the FE models and post-operative skull models reconstructed from CT images changed between ± 5 mm over the skull geometries. Replicating spring assisted cranioplasty in LC patients allow to tune the parameters for surgical planning, which may help to improve outcomes in LC surgeries in the future.

Endoscopic Spring-Mediated Distraction for Unilambdoid Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis treatment modalities have changed over time. These have included open calvarial remodeling, suturectomy with helmet molding, hand-powered distraction devices, and spring-mediated distraction. Implantable springs were first described for their use in treatment of craniosynostosis in 1998 (Lauritzen et al, Plast Reconstr Surg 121;2008:545-554). They have been used for the correction of craniosynostosis involving single and multiple sutures and have been placed through both endoscopic and open approaches. Their use for correction of lambdoid synostosis has been previously only described using an open approach (Arnaud et al, Child Nerv Syst 28;2012:1545-1549). The senior author has performed spring-mediated distraction for treating unilambdoid craniosynostosis using an endoscopic approach, which is described below and has not previously been reported by other authors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our series of endoscopic unilambdoid synostosis repairs is included in this article. Patients were analyzed based on patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes. The operation commences by approaching the lambdoid suture endoscopically through a 2- to 3-cm incision lateral to the lambdoid suture. Burr holes are placed on either side of the suture and a suturectomy is performed. Springs are bent preoperatively to a predetermined force. Two springs are placed across the suturectomy defect and the skin is closed. The patient is monitored for improvement in head shape and cranial X-rays are performed to measure the degree of distraction.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent endoscopic spring-mediated distraction for unilambdoid craniosynostosis. The average age at the time of operation was 9.4 months. The median force of each spring placed was 7.0 N. The median length of hospital stay after spring placement was 2 days. Springs were removed at 5.6 months on average. Five patients had X-rays immediately after placement and prior to removal. Each spring expanded an average distance of 15.3 mm. There were no surgical complications. Three patients had both preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans available. The angle of the cranial base, calculated by comparing foramen magnum to cribriform plate angles, improved 5.8° (12.3 preoperatively to 6.6 postoperatively).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic spring-mediated distraction is a safe and effective method of treatment for unilambdoid craniosynostosis. The series represents the largest experience with this technique. The approach can be considered in all patients with unilambdoid synostosis given the efficacious improvement in vault remodeling, low patient morbidity, short operating time, and minimal inpatient stay.

A Novel Sand Dollar and Staves Technique for Unilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Unilateral lambdoid synostosis (ULS) is the rarest form of craniosynostosis. Due to the associated cranio-caudal shift seen in ULS, surgical correction is technically challenging from a morphological standpoint. Herein, the authors present a novel "Sand-Dollar and Staves" technique for the repair of ULS.

METHODS

A zigzag coronal incision is performed, and an anteriorly-based pericranial flaps are elevated. Prefabricated cutting guides are placed and the calvarium is marked. To treat the flattening on the ipsilateral side, a wedged suturectomy is performed with additional barrel staves. A large circle centered over the bulging on the contralateral side is cut out above the open lambdoid suture. This piece is barrel staved in a radial fashion, leaving the center intact and creating a Sand-Dollar appearance. This disk is then flattened and trimmed. The modified Sand-Dollar is fixed using an absorbable plating system. While gentle pressure is applied to the Sand-Dollar piece as it is being secured, the ipsilateral side demonstrates compensatory filling. Results are evaluated using the Whitaker Classification.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent surgical correction with this technique. The procedure was performed at mean age of 11.7 months. The mean operative time was 2.5 hours. Intraoperative blood loss was 50 to 100 ml. Total hospitalization time was 2 to 3 days. No post-operative complications were encountered. Whitaker scores ranged from 1 to 1.5. The mean follow-up was 10 months.

CONCLUSION

The Sand-Dollar and Staves procedure is a novel, single-stage approach for the management of ULS with decreased operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay with satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.

Comparative analysis of cranial vault remodeling versus endoscopic suturectomy in the treatment of unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Unilateral lambdoid synostosis is the premature fusion of a lambdoid suture or sutures and represents the least common form of craniosynostosis, occurring in 1 in 40,000 births. Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) and endoscopic suturectomy with helmet therapy (ES) are surgical approaches that are used to allow for normal brain growth and improved craniofacial symmetry. The authors conducted a comparative outcomes analysis of patients with lambdoid synostosis undergoing either CVR or ES.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients with nonsyndromic lambdoid synostosis who underwent surgical correction identified from a single-institution database of patients with craniosynostosis seen between 2000 and 2018. Cranial growth was measured in head circumference percentile and z score.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (8 female and 11 male) with isolated unilateral lambdoid synostosis were identified (8 right and 11 left). Six underwent CVR and 13 underwent ES. No statistically significant differences were noted between surgical groups with respect to suture laterality, the patient's sex, and length of follow-up. Patients treated with ES presented and underwent surgery at a younger age than those treated with CVR (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Operating and anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, and ICU and total hospital days were significantly lower in ES (all p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pre- and postoperative head circumference percentiles or z scores between groups up to 36 months postoperatively. No patients required reoperation as of last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic management of lambdoid synostosis is safe, efficient, and efficacious in terms of intraoperative and long-term cranial growth outcomes when compared to CVR. The authors recommend this minimally invasive approach as an option for correction of lambdoid synostosis in patients presenting early in their course.

Cost comparison of surgical management of nonsagittal synostosis: traditional open versus endoscope-assisted techniques

OBJECTIVE

Management of craniosynostosis at an early age is important for mitigating the risk of abnormal cranial development, but treatment can result in significant expenses. Previous research has shown that endoscope-assisted craniectomy (EAC) is less costly than open cranial vault remodeling (CVR) for patients with sagittal synostosis. The aim of this study was to strengthen the existing body of healthcare cost research by elucidating the charges associated with open and endoscopic treatment for patients with nonsagittal synostosis.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of data obtained in 41 patients who underwent open CVR and 38 who underwent EAC with postoperative helmet therapy for nonsagittal, single-suture craniosynostosis (metopic, coronal, and lambdoid) between 2008 and 2018. All patients were < 1 year of age at the time of surgery and had a minimum 1 year of follow-up. Inpatient charges, physician fees, helmet charges, and outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean ages of the children treated with EAC and open CVR were 3.5 months and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients undergoing EAC with postoperative helmet therapy required more outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year than patients undergoing CVR (4 vs 2; p < 0.001). Overall, 13% of patients in the EAC group required 1 helmet, 30% required 2 helmets, 40% required 3 helmets, and 13% required 4 or more helmets; the mean total helmeting charges were $10,072. The total charges of treatment, including inpatient charges, physician fees, outpatient clinic visit costs, and helmet charges, were significantly lower for the EAC group than they were for the open CVR group ($50,840 vs $95,588; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the additional charges for postoperative helmet therapy and the more frequent outpatient visits, EAC is significantly less expensive than open CVR for patients with metopic, coronal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis. In conjunction with the existing literature on clinical outcomes and perioperative resource utilization, these data support EAC as a cost-minimizing treatment for eligible patients with nonsagittal synostosis.

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery for Infantile Craniosynostosis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) for craniosynostosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis (2004-2018) of 500 consecutive infants with craniosynostosis treated by ESC with orthotic therapy at a single center. Operative outcomes included transfusions, complications, and reoperations as well as head circumference change based on World Health Organization percentiles. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with blood transfusion. Paired t tests were used for within-patient comparisons and Fisher exact test to compare syndromic and nonsyndromic subgroups.

RESULTS

ESC was associated with low rates of blood transfusion (6.6%), complications (1.4%), and reoperations (3.0%). Risk factors for transfusion included syndromic craniosynostosis (P = .01) and multiple fused sutures (P = .02). Median surgical time was 47 minutes, and hospital length of stay 1 day. Transfusion and reoperation rates were higher among syndromic patients (both P < .001). Head circumference normalized by 12 months of age relative to World Health Organization criteria in infants with sagittal, coronal, and multisuture craniosynostosis (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ESC is a safe, effective, and durable correction of infantile craniosynostosis. ESC can achieve head growth normalization with low risks of blood transfusion, complications, or reoperation. Early identification of craniosynostosis in the newborn period and prompt referral by pediatricians allows families the option of ESC vs larger and riskier open reconstruction procedures.

A systematic review of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 2: the nonsagittal single sutures

OBJECTIVE

Despite increasing adoption of endoscopic techniques for repair of nonsagittal single-suture craniosynostosis, the efficacy and safety of the procedure relative to established open approaches are unknown. In this systematic review the authors aimed to directly compare open surgical and endoscope-assisted techniques for the treatment of metopic, unilateral coronal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis, with an emphasis on quantitative reported outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant articles were identified from 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to August 2017. The quality of methodology and bias risk were assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.

RESULTS

Of 316 screened records, 7 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis of the evidence, of which none were eligible for meta-analysis. These reported on 111 unique patients with metopic, 65 with unilateral coronal, and 12 with lambdoid craniosynostosis. For all suture types, 100 (53%) children underwent endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis surgery and 32 (47%) patients underwent open repair. These studies all suggest that blood loss, transfusion rate, operating time, and length of hospital stay were superior for endoscopically treated children. Although potentially comparable or better cosmetic outcomes are reported, the paucity of evidence and considerable variability in outcomes preclude meaningful conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data comparing open and endoscopic treatments for metopic, unilateral coronal, and lambdoid synostosis suggest a benefit for endoscopic techniques with respect to blood loss, transfusion, length of stay, and operating time. This report highlights shortcomings in evidence and gaps in knowledge regarding endoscopic repair of nonsagittal single-suture craniosynostosis, emphasizing the need for further matched-control studies.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 1: the sagittal suture

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis the authors aimed to directly compare open surgical and endoscope-assisted techniques for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis, focusing on the outcomes of blood loss, transfusion rate, length of stay, operating time, complication rate, cost, and cosmetic outcome.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant articles were identified from 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to August 2017. The quality of methodology and bias risk were assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Effect estimates between groups were calculated as standardized mean differences with 95% CIs. Random and fixed effects models were used to estimate the overall effect.

RESULTS

Of 316 screened records, 10 met the inclusion criteria, of which 3 were included in the meta-analysis. These studies reported on 303 patients treated endoscopically and 385 patients treated with open surgery. Endoscopic surgery was associated with lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), shorter length of stay (p < 0.001), and shorter operating time (p < 0.001). From the literature review of the 10 studies, transfusion rates for endoscopic procedures were consistently lower, with significant differences in 4 of 6 studies; the cost was lower, with differences ranging from $11,603 to $31,744 in 3 of 3 studies; and the cosmetic outcomes were equivocal (p > 0.05) in 3 of 3 studies. Finally, endoscopic techniques demonstrated complication rates similar to or lower than those of open surgery in 8 of 8 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic procedures are associated with lower estimated blood loss, operating time, and days in hospital. Future long-term prospective registries may establish advantages with respect to complications and cost, with equivalent cosmetic outcomes. Larger studies evaluating patient- or parent-reported satisfaction and optimal timing of intervention as well as heterogeneity in outcomes are indicated.

Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Surgery for craniosynostosis remains a crucial element in successful management. Intervention by both endoscopic and open approaches has been proven effective. Given the differences in timing and indications for these procedures, differences in perioperative outcomes have yet to be thoroughly compared between the two approaches. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches in order to better influence the management paradigm of craniosynostosis.

METHODS

We followed recommended PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched to identify all potentially relevant studies published from inception to February 2018 which were then screened against a set of selection criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions.

RESULTS

Twelve studies satisfied all the selection criteria to be included, which described a pooled cohort involving 2064 craniosynostosis patients, with 965 (47%) and 1099 (53%) patients undergoing surgery by endoscopic and open approaches respectively. When compared to the open approach, it was found that the endoscopic approach conferred statistically significant reductions in blood loss (MD = 162.4 mL), operative time (MD = 112.38 min), length of stay (MD = 2.56 days), and rates of perioperative complications (OR = 0.58), reoperation (OR = 0.37) and transfusion (OR = 0.09), where all p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Both endoscopic and open approaches for the surgical management of craniosynostosis are viable considerations. The endoscopic approach confers a significant reduction in operative and postoperative morbidity when compared to the open approach. Given that specific indications for either approach should be considered when managing a patient, the difference in perioperative outcomes remain an important element of this paradigm. Future studies will validate the findings of this study and consider long-term outcomes, which will all contribute to rigor of craniosynostosis management.

The Pantheon Variant of the Classic Cathedral Dome Procedure for Parieto-Occipital Skull Deformities

OBJECTIVE

To describe a new technique for the reconstruction of parieto-occipital skull deformities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The technique is a variant of the previously described "cathedral dome procedure" used for frontal skull deformities. The authors apply the same principle of remodeling by making meridional slat craniotomies surrounding the depressed dome of the posterior skull deformity, followed by "green-stick fracture-reshaping" of the meridional slats to elevate and support the excised depressed dome. The authors present an illustrative patient with a follow-up of 2 years and an excellent cosmetic result.

CONCLUSION

The authors introduce a new operative technique for the reconstruction of parieto-occipital skull deformities with excellent long-term results. The freshly reconstructed occiput resembles the dome of the pantheon in Rome, Italy, whose unique features inspired us to name this procedure the "Pantheon" variant of the cathedral dome operation.

Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Craniosynostosis: Do We Really Understand the Indications, Outcomes, and Risks?

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy has been introduced as a means to correct various forms of craniosynostosis. Although some authors have deemed the procedure safe and effective, many questions remain regarding this promising yet developing approach. The authors discuss 4 cases where patients were inadequately treated with endoscopic strip craniectomy resulting in a recommendation of complete secondary open cranial vault reconstruction. In addition, the authors present the findings from an informal survey of craniofacial colleagues to highlight an important discrepancy between published and anecdotal reports of complications. Finally, the authors highlight the need for further investigation into the proper indications and clinical outcomes of endoscopic strip craniectomy to better understand the role of this technique in the treatment of craniosynostosis.

Minimally Invasive Suturectomy and Postoperative Helmet Therapy : Advantages and Limitations

Various operative techniques are available for the treatment of craniosynostosis. The patient's age at presentation is one of the most important factors in the determination of the surgical modality. Minimally invasive suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy may be performed for relatively young infants, whose age is younger than 6 months. It relies upon the potential for rapid brain growth in this age group. Its minimal invasiveness is also advantageous. In this article, we review the advantages and limitations of minimally invasive suturectomy followed by helmet therapy for the treatment of craniosynostosis.