Residents’ Perceptions of Plastic Surgeons as Craniofacial Surgery Specialists

The Perception of Plastic Surgery by Community-Based, Private Practice Nurses: A French National Descriptive Study

Plastic surgery is a dynamic field but remains poorly understood by general practitioners, medical students, health professionals, and the public. The main health care professionals in the community who are involved in the follow-up of plastic surgery patients are nurses; they help to facilitate wound healing and rehabilitation in the postoperative period. In this study, the authors assessed the medical knowledge and perceptions of plastic surgery by nurses working in the community setting and explored their understanding of classical scenarios commonly encountered in reconstructive surgery. An online survey was designed to assess the demographics of nurses working in the community in France and their knowledge of plastic surgery. This was disseminated to all practicing nurses working outside of hospitals by means of an online social network from the period of April 2019 to June 2019. The survey was completed by 318 nurses. Specific training in plastic surgical nursing will be required to optimize the management of these patients following discharge from hospital. This gap in knowledge may affect patient recovery negatively.

The perception of plastic surgery by physiotherapists: a French national descriptive study

Background

Plastic surgery is a transversal discipline that many people misunderstand, including general practitioners, medical students, paramedics and the public. Plastic surgeons often collaborate with physiotherapists for post-acute care and rehabilitation. They ensure optimal post-operative recovery of the patient. Herein, the authors assessed the medical knowledge and perceptions of plastic surgery by physiotherapists working outside health centers and explored their attitudes towards classic reconstructive surgery scenarios.

Methods

To assess physiotherapists' medical knowledge and perceptions of plastic surgery, the authors conducted an online questionnaire survey. A total of 1,262 physiotherapists responded.

Results

The physiotherapists confirmed the suspected lack of knowledge regarding the plastic surgery field. Although they were generally aware that plastic surgeons perform cosmetic procedures and treat burns, they were largely unaware that plastic surgeons perform hand surgeries and microsurgical operations. More than 70% of them stated that they did not have the necessary knowledge to properly manage patients in this specialty. This lack of knowledge can sometimes have a negative impact on patients' recovery, particularly for fear of making a mistake.

Conclusions

Physiotherapists, outside the hospital, have an incomplete conception of plastic surgery. They would need a specific plastic surgery training in order to manage these patients in an optimal way.

The Public Recognizes Plastic Surgeons as Leading Experts in the Treatment of Congenital Cleft and Craniofacial Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the public perception of plastic surgeons (PS) as craniofacial surgery specialists.

METHODS

Members of the public (N = 1514) were asked to choose 1 or 2 specialists that they perceived to be an expert for 13 craniofacial surgery-related scenarios. Response patterns were distributed as "plastic surgeon alone" (PS alone), "PS combined with other specialists", or "no plastic surgeon" (No PS). Sociodemographic data, previous plastic surgery contact, and source of reported information were also collected.

RESULTS

"Plastic surgeon alone" was significantly (all P < 0.05) more recognized as experts than all other response patterns particularly in congenital anomalies-related scenarios (83.33%). There was a significantly (all P < 0.05) poor understanding of the role of PSs in head/neck infection management, chronic facial palsy management, dental disease management, head and neck cancer surgery, vascular malformation surgery, and facial fracture surgery. Sex, age, education level, health care professional, prior plastic surgery contact, and source of reported information were not significant (all P < 0.05) determinants of "PS" as the response in bivariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Public recognized PSs as experts primarily in treatment of congenital cleft and craniofacial anomalies, but as the overall scope of craniofacial surgery practice was poorly understood and known, improved public education is needed.