Assessment of Labionasal Structures in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip

Spontaneous Growth of the Palatal Plates in the Cleft Lip and Palate

OBJECTIVE

This is a prospective study examining palatal casts from patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in the first month of life, immediately before cheiloplasty, and immediately before palatoplasty. None of the patients receives presurgical orthopedics (nasoalveolar molding).

DESIGN

In this prospective study, upper arch plaster models were taken 3 times during the treatment: in the first month of life (T1), before the cheiloplasty (T2), and before the palatoplasty (T3). Anatomic landmarks were defined and linear anthropometric measurements were obtained afterward. Dimensional analysis was performed using 3D software. Two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey test was performed for statistical analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary, institutional.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients with UCLP of either sex with less than 1 month of life and without any other syndrome.

INTERVENTION

No intervention was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Reduction of the cleft without using orthopedics apparatus.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant reduction in the cleft gap comparing T1 to T3. There was also a significant reduction in the intercanine width comparing T2 and T3, and T1 and T3. There was significant increase in the posterior arch width comparing T2 and T3, and T1 and T3. The palatal plate's width increased in all times analyzed.

CONCLUSION

The palatal cleft narrows spontaneously as well in both midpoint and posterior point during the first 6 months of patient's treatment. This event was enhanced by cheiloplasty. This surgery might have a greater influence on the anterior arch width than in the posterior arch region.

Preoperative analysis of upper lip in patients with upper cleft lip/palate before lip repair

Background

The postoperative morphological appearances vary widely patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate (UCL/P), whether it is complete or incomplete cleft. The main reason of bilateral lip asymmetry after cleft lip surgery lies in the lack of personalized measurement and design before surgery. In this study, we aim to individually investigate areas of the upper lip on cleft and non-cleft sides in patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate (UCL/P).

Methods

Ninety-two patients with UCL/P (group 1: <1 year, group 2: 1–2 years) were included in the study. Group 1 included 37 patients with incomplete UCL/P and 29 with complete UCL/P; group 2 included 11 and 15 patients, respectively. The total area of the upper lip on the cleft side (Q8) was divided into Q3, Q4, and Q5 (further divided into a1 and a2), and the upper lip on the non-cleft side (Q7) was divided into Q2 and Q1 (further divided into A1 and A2). Area ratios between the cleft and the non-cleft sides were calculated, and certain parameters were tested for correlations with these ratios.

Results

Values of Q8/Q7 were partially overlapped between patients with complete and incomplete UCL/P. Significant correlations were noted between differences in height of the philtrum column (a–h) and the prolabial area ratio between the cleft and the non-cleft side (Q3/Q2) (P=0.032). Moreover, a significant correlation was noted between a1/A1 and the ratio of the lateral labial area between the cleft and the non-cleft side (Q5/Q1) (P=0.001).

Conclusions

The conventional classification of unilateral cleft lip as incomplete and complete does not completely and accurately reflect individual malformations. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze unilateral cleft lips individually to determine the repair technique and to predict postoperative outcomes.

Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy on Alveolar and Palatal Cleft Deformities in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy in the improvement of alveolar and palatal cleft deformity on unilateral (UCLP) versus bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 19 UCLP (14 boys and 5 girls) and 8 BCLP (7 boys and 1 girl) infants completed NAM therapy were included in this study. Standardized parameters of cleft width of alveol and palate were measured on photocopies taken from the pre- and post-treatment plaster casts. To assess the intragroup differences, paired-samples test in UCLP and Wilcoxon test in BCLP groups were used. Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Significant decreases in alveolar and palatal cleft gaps were achieved in an average period of 3.3 ± 1.9 and 3.7 ± 1.6 months in UCLP and BCLP patients, respectively. The alveolar cleft decreased 7.85 ± 4.59 mm in UCLP and 4.25 ± 3.13 and 3.81 ± 3.50 mm in right and left alveolar cleft sides in BCLP, respectively. The palatal clefts were decreased 4.63 ± 2.44 mm in medial and 3.72 ± 2.62 mm in posterior parts in UCLP. The decrements in BCLP were 3.00 ± 2.75 mm in medial and 2.88 ± 2.75 mm in posterior palatal cleft distances. No significant differences were determined in the amount of alveolar or palatal cleft closure between UCLP and BCLP groups. The only decrease in arch width was 1.39 mm in medial part of palate in UCLP.

CONCLUSION

The NAM device provides significant decreases in both alveolar and palatal cleft deformities in UCLP and BCLP infants, as compared with their birth status.

Does a Premaxillary Setback and Lip Adhesion Have a Negative Impact on Lip Outcome in Bilateral Cleft Patients?

BACKGROUND

The early premaxillary setback and lip adhesion remains as a controversial maneuver in the treatment of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. This study aimed to assess extent of preoperative deformity and lip outcomes during the first year after surgery in bilateral cleft patients who underwent premaxillary setback and lip adhesion and to compare to those with primary lip repair.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted of 16 nonsyndromic consecutive bilateral complete cleft lip patients (with and without Simonart band), who underwent primary cleft lip repair. Patients were allocated in group 1 without premaxillary setback and group 2 with premaxillary setback and lip adhesion. Preoperative and postoperative linear measurements were used for intergroup and intragroup comparisons.

RESULTS

Cutaneous lip height of patients in group 2 significantly (P < 0.05) improved after combined premaxillary setback and lip adhesion and primary cleft lip repair. There were no significant (all P > 0.05) differences in intragroup 1 comparisons, and in intergroup comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral cleft patients with a protruded and deviated premaxilla over 10 mm discrepancy of the lateral maxillary achieved noninferior lip symmetry 1 year postoperatively compared with patients with less severe original deformity.