A Reduction in Radiation Exposure During Pediatric Craniofacial Computed Tomography

Weighing In on the Controversy: Preoperative Imaging in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis Leads to Strategic Changes in Surgical Care

BACKGROUND

Clinical findings in children with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis are characteristic, and therefore clinicians have questioned the need for confirmatory imaging. Preoperative computed tomographic imaging is a powerful tool for diagnosing associated anomalies that can alter treatment management and surgical planning. The authors' aim was to determine whether and how routine preoperative imaging affected treatment management in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients within their institution.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center review of all patients who underwent cranial vault remodeling for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis between 2006 and 2014 was performed. Patient data included demographics, age at computed tomographic scan, age at surgery, results of the radiographic evaluation, and modification of treatment following radiologic examination.

RESULTS

Of 194 patients diagnosed with single-suture craniosynostosis, 29 were diagnosed with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Additional radiographic anomalies were found in 19 unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients (65.5 percent). These included severe deviation of the anterior superior sagittal sinus [n = 12 (41.4 percent)], Chiari I malformation [n = 1 (3.4 percent)], and benign external hydrocephalus [n = 2 (6.9 percent)]. The radiographic anomalies resulted in a change in management for 48.3 percent of patients. Specifically, alteration in frontal craniotomy design occurred in 12 patients (41.4 percent), and two patients (6.9 percent) required further radiographic studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical findings in children with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis are prototypical, preoperative computed tomographic imaging is still of great consequence and continues to play an important role in surgical management. Preoperative imaging enabled surgeons to alter surgical management and avoid inadvertent complications such as damage to a deviated superior sagittal sinus. Imaging findings of Chiari malformation and hydrocephalus also permitted judicious follow-up.

CLINICAL QUESTIONS/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Imaging in craniosynostosis: when and what?

PURPOSE

Currently, the interest on craniosynostosis in the clinical practice is raised by their increased frequency and their genetic implications other than by the still existing search of less invasive surgical techniques. These reasons, together with the problem of legal issues, make the need of a definite diagnosis for a crucial problem, even in single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC). Although the diagnosis of craniosynostosis is primarily the result of physical examination, craniometrics measuring, and observation of the skull deformity, the radiological assessment currently plays an important role in the confirmation of the diagnosis, the surgical planning, and even the postoperative follow-up. On the other hand, in infants, the use of radiation or the need of sedation/anesthesia raises the problem to reduce them to minimum to preserve such a delicate category of patient from their adverse effects.

METHODS, RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This review aims at summarizing the state of the art of the role of radiology in craniosynostosis, mainly focusing on indications and techniques, to provide an update not only to pediatric neurosurgeons or maxillofacial surgeons but also to all the other specialists involved in their management, like neonatologists, pediatricians, clinical geneticists, and pediatric neurologists.

Feed and Swaddle: An Alternative to Infant Sedation for Craniofacial Imaging

Objective:

The gold standard for diagnosis of craniosynostosis is a clinical examination and motionless head computed tomography (CT). Computed tomography sedation is associated with increased cost, resource utilization, medical, and possible developmental risks. This study investigates whether a “feed and swaddle” protocol can be used to achieve diagnostic quality craniofacial imaging without the use of infant sedation.

Design:

Prospective cohort study.

Setting:

Tertiary academic medical center.

Patients:

Ninety patients <18 months of age undergoing evaluation for craniosynostosis from 2012 to 2018.

Interventions:

A feed and swaddle protocol.

Main Outcome Measures:

Diagnostic level imaging without the use of infant sedation.

Results:

Eighty-five (94%) achieved a diagnostic quality craniofacial CT scan using the “feed and swaddle” method. Mean patient age was 24.0 ± 10.0 weeks. Craniosynostosis was diagnosed in 74% of patients. Mean age of patients with successful completion of a CT scan was 23.7 ± 9.6 weeks, compared to 27.2 ± 17.1 weeks for unsuccessful completion. Mean weight for the successful group was 15.6 ± 2.9 pounds and 15.9 ± 2.5 pounds for the unsuccessful group. Mean travel distance was 59.2 ± 66.5 miles for successful patients and 66.5 ± 61.5 miles for unsuccessful patients. For the unsuccessful patients, there were no delays in surgical planning or scheduling.

Conclusion:

The “feed and swaddle” protocol described here is an effective alternative to infant sedation for motionless craniofacial CT imaging.