Combined External-Endoscopic Endonasal Assisted Removal of a Nail Gun

Management of an Unusual Intranasal Foreign Body Abutting the Cribriform Plate: A Case Report and Review of Literature

A 35-year-old man with history of schizophrenia presented 3 weeks after placing a screw in his right nostril. Initial imaging showed a screw in the right ethmoid sinus with the tip penetrating the right cribriform plate. On exam, the patient was hemodynamically stable with purulent drainage in the right nasal cavity but no visible foreign body. While most nasal foreign bodies occur in children and are generally removed at the bedside, intranasal foreign bodies in adults tend to require further assessment. The foreign body in this case was concerning for skull base involvement and the patient was brought to the operating room (OR) with neurosurgery for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and removal of foreign body. The screw was removed and the patient recovered with no signs of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak postoperatively. Any concern for skull base or intracranial involvement should call for a full evaluation of the mechanism of injury and intervention in a controlled environment.

Presentation, workup, and management of penetrating transorbital and transnasal injuries: A case report and systematic review

BACKGROUND

A foreign body (FB) penetrating intracranially after passing transorbitally or transnasally is a rare occurrence. However, otolaryngologists are increasingly being asked to participate in the care of these patients for both endoscopic removal of the object and repair of any skull base defects.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the presentation, workup, and management of transnasal or transorbital penetrating FB injury.

METHODS

Systematic review of the presentation, workup, and management of transnasal or transorbital penetrating FB injury; plus, a case report of a 53-year-old woman with a transorbital penetrating rose bush branch. We searched medical literature data bases, which resulted in 215 total titles, which were then narrowed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-five cases of transorbital or transnasal low-velocity trauma that involved the paranasal sinuses were reviewed from 33 articles. The average age was 30 years, 40% of the objects were made of wood. Fifty-seven percent of the cases were transorbital, whereas 43% were transnasal. Forty-six percent of the surgical interventions were completed endoscopically or with endoscopic assistance. Complications of injury were common, with 66% of patients experiencing cerebrospinal fluid leaks; 23%, permanent blindness; 17%, meningitis; 14%, ophthalmoplegia; 9%, decreased visual acuity; and 3%, brain abscess. Our patient presented with a traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leak, and recovered well after transorbital and endoscopic removal of the branch, skull base repair, and a prolonged course of antibiotics and antifungal medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Transnasal and transorbital penetrating FB injuries are a relatively uncommon occurrence but when they do occur require rapid workup and interdisciplinary management to prevent acute and delayed complications.

Transnasal Penetration of a Ballpoint Pen: Case Report and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Transnasal penetration by a nonmissile foreign body is a rare injury. Consequently, appropriate management remains controversial. We report a case of transnasal penetration by a ballpoint pen and review the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first living patient who sustained carotid artery damage from a transnasal penetrating intracranial injury.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 56-year-old female presented with a ballpoint pen lodged through her left nostril. She exhibited right cranial nerve palsies (III, IV, VI, and V1). A computed tomography (CT) scan of the head revealed a foreign body in the left nasal cavity traversing the ethmoid/sphenoid and likely through the right superior orbital fissure and cavernous sinus, with the distal tip adjacent to the right atrium. CT angiography revealed nonopacification of the right internal carotid artery (ICA) from the mid-petrous segment to the ophthalmic segment. Subsequently, she underwent coil embolization of the proximal right ICA, followed by a right frontotemporal craniotomy with anterior temporal lobectomy to skeletonize the pen and right distal ICA, and finally clipping of the ICA distal to the pen and prompt transnasal endoscopic removal of the pen. There were no hemorrhagic complications. She awoke at her neurologic preoperative baseline.

CONCLUSION

Injuries such as the one described here should be managed through a multidisciplinary approach. The trajectory of the foreign body should be delineated through CT imaging, along with vascular imaging if appropriate. If there are signs of vascular injury, then attempts to maintain proximal and distal control are prudent to avoid hemorrhagic complications. This combined endovascular-endoscopic-open craniotomy approach has not been reported previously in the literature.