Management of Craniosynostosis at an Advanced Age: Controversies, Clinical Findings, and Surgical Treatment

The Lost and Variable Cause: A Systematic Review of Shunt-Related Craniosynostosis Occurrence

OBJECTIVE

Shunt-related craniosynostosis (SRC) is the premature fusion of cranial sutures possibly due to a loss of tension across dura and suture lines after placement of a shunt for hydrocephalus. As modifications in approaches toward shunting represent a modifiable risk factor, prior literature has investigated the determinants and outcomes. However, the data remain highly variable and are limited by single-institution studies.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to February 2022 was conducted. Studies were screened by 2 reviewers for eligibility based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

In the 9 included articles, the average follow-up time for the entire cohort ranged from 1.5 to 4.2 years. The pooled incidence of SRC across all 9 studies was 6.5% (140/2142), with an individual range of 0.53% (1/188) to 48.8% (61/125). The average time from shunt placement to SRC diagnosis ranged from 0.25 years to 4.6 years. 61% (65/110) of cases included only one suture, 88% (25/28) of these involved the sagittal suture, and those cases with multiple fusions also had 98% involvement of the sagittal suture (45/46). Overall, 94% (1783/1888) of patients had a fixed shunt placed.

CONCLUSIONS

Shunt-related craniosynostosis is likely an underreported complication in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Older age at shunt placement, increased number of shunt revision procedures, and lower valve pressure settings may be risk factors for SRC development. Results also indicate that craniosynostosis can develop months to years after shunting. Future quality studies with standardization of data reporting processes are warranted to investigate this clinical problem.

Frontal sinus hypoplasia in unoperated older patients with craniosynostosis: a pilot study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with unoperated craniosynostosis have different frontal sinus pneumatization than unaffected controls.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed between 2009 and 2020 of previously unoperated patients with craniosynostosis older than 5 years old at first presentation to our institution. Total frontal sinus volume (FSV) was calculated using 3D volume rendering tool in Sectra IDS7 PACS system. Age-matched normative FSV data was collected from 100 normal CT scans for the control group. The two groups were statistically compared using Fisher's exact test and T-test.

RESULTS

Study group included nine patients, 5-39 years old, median age 7 years. Frontal sinus pneumatization was absent in 12% of the normal 7-year-old controls, while frontal sinus pneumatization was absent in 89% of the studied craniosynostosis patients (p < .001). Mean FSV of the study group (113 ± 340 mm3) was significantly different from that of age matched control mean FSV (2016 ± 2529 mm3) (p = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

Frontal sinus pneumatization is suppressed in unreleased craniosynostosis and may be an intracranial space conservation phenomenon. This absent frontal sinus can have implications in future frontal region trauma and frontal osteotomies.

Treatment Delays in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis: A 30-Year Retrospective Case-Control Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic and Family Status on Access to Care

BACKGROUND

Patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) generally undergo corrective surgery before 1 year of age to the mitigate morbidities and risks of delayed repair. The cohort of patients who receive primary corrective surgery after 1 year and factors associated with their gaps to care is poorly characterized in literature.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted for NSC patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at our institution and affiliates between 1992 and 2022. Patients whose surgery occurred after 1 year of age were identified and matched 1:1 by surgical date to standard-care control subjects. Chart review was conducted to gather patient data regarding care timeline and sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Odds of surgery after 1 year of age were increased in Black patients (odds ratio, 3.94; P < 0.001) and those insured by Medicaid (2.57, P = 0.018), with single caregivers (4.96, P = 0.002), and from lower-income areas (+1% per $1000 income decrease, P = 0.001). Delays associated with socioeconomic status primarily impacted timely access to a craniofacial provider, whereas caregiver status was associated with subspecialty level delays. These disparities were exacerbated in patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis, respectively. Patients with multisuture synostosis were susceptible to significant delays related to familial strain (foster status, insurer, and English proficiency).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients from socioeconomically strained households face systemic barriers to accessing optimal NSC care; disparities may be exacerbated by the diagnostic/treatment complexities of specific types of craniosynostosis. Interventions at primary care and craniofacial specialist levels can decrease health care gaps and optimize outcomes for vulnerable patients.

Normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis in young children is common and unrecognized

OBJECTIVE

Sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) is usually diagnosed during early childhood by the presence of scaphocephaly. Recently, our group found 3.3% of children under 5 years of age with normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis (NSC) using computed tomography (CT) scans. This paper aims to validate our preliminary findings using a larger cohort of patients, and analyze factors associated with incidental NSC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of head CT scans in patients aged 0 to 71 months who presented to the emergency department of our tertiary care institution between 2008 and 2020 was completed. Patients with syndromes associated with craniosynostosis (CS), history of hydrocephalus, or other brain/cranial abnormalities were excluded. Two craniofacial surgeons reviewed the CT scans to evaluate the presence and extent of CS. Demographic information, gestational age, past medical and family history, medications, and chief complaint were recorded as covariates, and differences between patients with and without CS were analyzed. Furthermore, comparison of the prevalence of CS across age groups was studied. Additional analysis exploring association between independent covariates and the presence of CS was performed in two sub-cohorts: patients ≤ 24 months of age and patients > 24 months of age.

RESULTS

A total of 870 scans were reviewed. SC was observed in 41 patients (4.71% - 25 complete, 16 incomplete), all with a normal cranial index (width/length > 0.7). The prevalence of SC increased up to 36 months of age, then plateaued through 72 months of age. Patients under 2 years of age with family history of neurodevelopmental disease had 49.32 (95% CI [4.28, 567.2]) times higher odds of developing CS. Sub-cohort of patients above 24 months of age showed no variable independently predicted developing CS.

CONCLUSION

NSC in young children is common. While the impact of this condition is unknown, the correlation with family history of neurodevelopmental disease is concerning.

The management of Chiari malformation type 1 and syringomyelia in children: a review of the literature

In anticipation of the "Chiari and Syringomyelia Consensus Conference" held in Milan in 2019, we performed a systematic literature review on the management of Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) and syringomyelia (Syr) in children.We aimed to summarize the available evidence and identify areas where consensus has not been reached and further research is needed.In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we formulated seven questions in Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) format. Six PICOs concerned CM1 children with/without additional structural anomalies (Syr, craniosynostosis, hydrocephalus, tethered cord, and cranio-vertebral junction anomalies), and one PICO Syr without CM1. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and NICE databases from January 1, 1999, to May 29, 2019. Cohort studies, controlled and randomized clinical trials (CCTs, RCTs), and systematic reviews were included, all pertinent only to patients ≤ 18 years of age.For CM1, 3787 records were found, 460 full texts were assessed and 49 studies (46 cohort studies, one RCT, and two systematic reviews) were finally included. For Syr, 376 records were found, 59 full texts were assessed, and five studies (one RCT and four cohort studies) were included. Data on each PICO were synthetized narratively due to heterogeneity in the inclusion criteria, outcome measures, and length of follow-up of the included studies.Despite decades of experience on CM1 and Syr management in children, the available evidence remains limited. Specifically, there is an urgent need for collaborative initiatives focusing on the adoption of shared inclusion criteria and outcome measures, as well as rigorous prospective designs, particularly RCTs.

Appropriateness of Computed Tomography Scanning in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

Although physicians from a variety of specialties encounter infants with possible craniosynostosis, judicious use of computed tomography (CT) imaging is important to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare expense. The present study seeks to determine whether differences in specialty of ordering physician affects frequency of resulting diagnostic confirmations requiring operative intervention.

METHODS

Radiology databases from 2 institutions were queried for CT reports or indications that included "craniosynostosis" or "plagiocephaly." Patient demographics, specialty of ordering physician, confirmed diagnosis, and operative interventions were recorded. Cost analysis was performed using the fixed unit cost for a head CT to calculate the expense before 1 study led to operative intervention.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-two patients were included. 184 (48.2%) CT scans were ordered by craniofacial surgeons, 71 (18.6%) were ordered by neurosurgeons, and 127 (33.3%) were ordered by pediatricians. One hundred four (27.2%) patients received a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention. Craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons were more likely than pediatricians to order CT scans that resulted in a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention (P < 0.001), with no difference between craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons (P = 1.0). The estimated cost of obtaining an impact CT scan when ordered by neurosurgeons or craniofacial surgeons as compared to pediatricians was $2369.69 versus $13,493.75.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians who more frequently encounter craniosynostosis (craniofacial and neurosurgeons) had a higher likelihood of ordering CT images that resulted in a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention. This study should prompt multi-disciplinary interventions aimed at improving evaluation of pretest probability before CT imaging.

Intracranial pressure, brain morphology and cognitive outcome in children with sagittal craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with sagittal craniosynostosis are at increased risk of developing raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and neurocognitive deficiencies such as reduced attention, planning, speech, behavioural and learning disabilities.

AIM

To determine if the existing literature supports a correlation between elevated ICP and negative cognitive outcome in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis. Secondly, to investigate if the risk of developing neurocognitive deficiencies can be explained by changes in brain morphology in this patient category.

METHODS

Systematic literature review in PubMed.

RESULTS

A total of 190 publications were reviewed to determine a possible correlation between raised ICP and cognitive outcome, of which four were included in the study. No significant association was found. Forty-four publications on brain morphology in sagittal craniosynostosis were identified, of which 11 were included in the review. Clear evidence of morphologic changes in multiple areas of the brains of sagittal craniosynostosis patients was found in the literature.

CONCLUSION

The existing literature does not support an association between increased ICP and negative global cognitive outcome measures in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis. Brain morphology is altered in areas related to neurocognition and language in the same patient group. These changes might play a role in the development of neurocognitive deficiencies, though no definitive link is yet established, and further investigation is warranted.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis are sometimes touted as equivalent to cranial vault reconstruction. While techniques for sagittal synostosis have been reviewed previously, evidence regarding open and less invasive surgical techniques for metopic, coronal, and lambdoid synostosis has yet to be reviewed.

METHODS

Systematic searches were performed using Embase.com and PubMed. Included studies reported short- or long-term outcomes, compared at least 2 standard techniques, discussed single-suture coronal, metopic, or lambdoid craniosynostosis, and enrolled at least 20 study participants. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, and also performed full text review and data extraction. Given heterogeneous outcomes, qualitative synthesis was performed after data extraction.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 2348 articles. Of these, 313 were removed as duplicates, and 1935 were excluded during title/abstract review. After full text review of 100 articles, 19 were selected for data extraction. The heterogeneity of outcomes precluded meta-analysis and required qualitative synthesis. While short-term outcomes indicated decreased morbidity of minimally invasive techniques, only 2 articles presented long-term reoperation rates. One study reported higher reoperation rates in the less invasive technique, and the second reported no reoperations in the median follow-up period of 33 months.

CONCLUSION

Studies comparing long-term outcomes between different surgical techniques for single-suture craniosynostosis remain deficient. The development of standardized outcome measures is essential, and prospective, multicenter studies are necessary to assess the long-term efficacy of these procedures.

Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Nonsyndromic Patients: An Evaluation of Indications and Safety

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications, safety, and short-term outcomes of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) in patients with no identified acrocephalosyndactyly syndrome (study) and to compare those to a syndromic cohort (controls).

METHODS

Demographic and perioperative data were recorded and compared across the study and control groups for those who underwent PVDO between January 2009 and December 2016. Univariate analysis was conducted using χ and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Sixty-three subjects were included: 19 in the nonsyndromic cohort, 44 in the syndromic cohort. The cohorts had similar proportion of subjects exhibiting pansynostosis (42.1% of nonsyndromic versus 36.4% of syndromic, P = 0.667). The nonsyndromic cohort was significantly older (4.04 ± 3.66 years versus 2.55 ± 3.34 years, P = 0.046) and had higher rate of signs of raised intracranial pressure (68.4% versus 25.0%, P = 0.001) than the syndromic cohort. There was no significant difference in perioperative variables or rate of complications (P > 0.05). The mean total advancement distance achieved was similar, 27 ± 6 mm in the nonsyndromic versus 28 ± 8 mm in the syndromic cohort (P = 0.964). All nonsyndromic subjects with signs of raised intracranial pressure demonstrated improvement at an average follow-up of 22 months.

CONCLUSION

As in the syndromic patient, PVDO is a safe and, in the short-term, effective modality for cranial vault expansion in the nonsyndromic patient. The benefits and favorable perioperative profile of PVDO may therefore be extended to patient populations other than those with syndromic craniosynostosis.