Assessing Risk Factors for Hospital-Based, Acute Care Within Thirty Days of Craniosynostosis Surgery Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project

Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis Correlation Between Ethnicity, Race, and Pattern of Affected Suture Type: Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have sought to analyze risk factors associated with craniosynostosis and while syndromic craniosynostosis is often linked to genetic mutations, the factors impacting nonsyndromic cases are less investigated. The aim of current meta-analysis is to evaluate the relationship between ethnicity and suture type in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients.

METHODS

The search term "craniosynostosis [Title/Abstract] AND (race [Title/Abstract] OR ethnicity [Title/Abstract])) NOT (syndrome [Title/Abstract])" was used to search the PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases. Analyses were conducted separately for each racial and ethnic group for each suture type cohort. Odds ratios were conducted for each suture cohort and confounders were adjusted using linear mixed-effect models. Because of the homogeneity of the populations and categorical nature of the classification, binary logistic regression was run on aggregate data.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 165 articles. After reviewing titles, abstracts, and manuscript contents of these articles, 5 studies were ultimately included in a meta-analysis. Studies with missing data for a particular cohort or variable were excluded from the respective analysis. Hispanic children had higher odds of sagittal suture involvement (OR: 1.53, P <0.001), whereas Asian had coronal suture (OR: 2.47, P <0.001). Both Asian and African American children had significantly lower odds of sagittal suture involvement (OR: 0.50, P <0.001 and OR: 0.7, P =0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The relationship between ethnicity and craniosynostosis has been suggested as a risk factor, but without definitive conclusion. Present meta-analysis findings demonstrated association between ethnicity and suture type, however further research with larger scale and geographically varied data is warranted.

Socioeconomic Influence on Surgical Management and Outcomes in Patients with Craniosynostosis - A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Disparities in insurance and socioeconomic status (SES) may impact surgical management and subsequent postoperative outcomes for patients with craniosynostosis. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on possible differences in surgical care, including procedure type, age at surgery, and differences in surgical outcomes such as complications, length of hospital stay, and child development based on SES.

DESIGN

The databases Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched between May and July 2022. Following PICO criteria, studies included focused on patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis; corrective surgery for craniosynostosis; comparison of insurance, income, or zip code; and surgical management of postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 724 articles. After three stages of screening, 13 studies were included. Assessed outcomes included: type of procedure (6 articles), age at time of surgery (3 articles), post-operative complications (3 articles), referral delay (2 articles), length of stay (2 articles), hospital costs (2 articles), and child development (1 article). Of the studies with significant results, insurance type was the main SES variable of comparison. While some findings were mixed, these studies indicated that patients with public medical insurance were more likely to experience a delay in referral, undergo an open rather than minimally-invasive procedure, and have more complications, longer hospitalization, and higher medical charges.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that SES may be associated with several differences in the management of patients with craniosynostosis. Further investigation into the impact of SES on the management of patients with craniosynostosis is warranted to identify possible interventions that may improve overall care.

"Healthcare Disparities in the Care of Children with Craniosynostosis in the United States: A Systematic Review"

BACKGROUND

Healthcare inequity is a pressing concern in pediatric populations with craniofacial conditions. Little is known about the barriers to care affecting children with craniosynostosis. This systematic review investigates disparities impacting care for children with craniosynostosis in the U.S.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases from inception to December 2022: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Studies were screened for eligibility by two authors. All original articles that focused on disparities in access, treatment, or outcomes of craniosynostosis surgery were included. Studies describing disparities in other countries, those not written English, and review articles were excluded (Figure 1).

RESULTS

An initial database search revealed 607 citations of which 21 met inclusion criteria (Figure 1). All included studies were retrospective reviews of databases or cohorts of patients. The results of our study demonstrate that barriers to access in treatment for craniosynostosis disproportionally affect minority children, children of non-English speaking parents and those of lower socioeconomic status or with Medicaid. Black and Hispanic children, non-English speaking patients, and children without insurance or with Medicaid were more likely to present later for evaluation, ultimately undergoing surgery at an older age. These patients were also more likely to experience complications and require blood transfusions compared to their more privileged, white peers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a discrepancy in treatment received by minority patients, patients with Medicaid, and those who are non-English speaking. Further research is needed to describe the specific barriers that prevent equitable care for these patients.

Associated Risk Factors for Extended Length of Stay Following Cranial Vault Remodeling for Craniosynostosis: Analysis of the 2012 to 2021 NSQIP-Pediatric Database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with extended length of stay (LOS) for pediatric patients with craniosynostosis undergoing cranial vault remodeling (CVR).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012 to 2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Pediatric patients below 2 years old with craniosynostosis who underwent CVR were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases-9/10 codes. Patients were dichotomized according to whether they encountered an extended postoperative hospital LOS, which was defined as LOS greater than the 75th percentile for the entire cohort (4 days). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, postoperative adverse events, and health care resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of prolonged LOS.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 9784 patients, 1312 (13.4%) experienced an extended LOS. The extended LOS cohort was significantly older than the normal LOS cohort (normal LOS: 225.1±141.8 d vs. extended LOS: 314.4±151.7 d, P<0.001) and had a smaller proportion of non-Hispanic white patients (normal LOS: 70.0% vs. extended LOS: 61.2%, P<0.001). Overall, comorbidities and adverse events were significantly higher in the extended LOS cohort than the normal LOS cohort. On multivariate logistic regression, independent associations of extended LOS included age, race and ethnicity, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, impaired cognitive status, structural pulmonary abnormalities, asthma, and neuromuscular disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that age, race, comorbidities, and perioperative complications contribute to extended LOS after CVR for craniosynostosis. Further investigations to further elucidate the risk factors of extended LOS is warranted to optimize patient outcomes.

Applicability of predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmission risk in paediatrics: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To summarise multivariable predictive models for 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions (UHRs) in paediatrics, describe their performance and completeness in reporting, and determine their potential for application in practice.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCE

CINAHL, Embase and PubMed up to 7 October 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English or German language studies aiming to develop or validate a multivariable predictive model for 30-day paediatric UHRs related to all-cause, surgical conditions or general medical conditions were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study characteristics, risk factors significant for predicting readmissions and information about performance measures (eg, c-statistic) were extracted. Reporting quality was addressed by the 'Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis' (TRIPOD) adherence form. The study quality was assessed by applying six domains of potential biases. Due to expected heterogeneity among the studies, the data were qualitatively synthesised.

RESULTS

Based on 28 studies, 37 predictive models were identified, which could potentially be used for determining individual 30-day UHR risk in paediatrics. The number of study participants ranged from 190 children to 1.4 million encounters. The two most common significant risk factors were comorbidity and (postoperative) length of stay. 23 models showed a c-statistic above 0.7 and are primarily applicable at discharge. The median TRIPOD adherence of the models was 59% (P₂₅-P₇₅, 55%-69%), ranging from a minimum of 33% to a maximum of 81%. Overall, the quality of many studies was moderate to low in all six domains.

CONCLUSION

Predictive models may be useful in identifying paediatric patients at increased risk of readmission. To support the application of predictive models, more attention should be placed on completeness in reporting, particularly for those items that may be relevant for implementation in practice.

Association of hospital characteristics and insurance type with quality outcomes for pediatric craniosynostosis patients

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to assess the association of insurance status and hospital ownership type with inpatient hospital outcomes among a nationally representative population of pediatric craniosynostosis neurosurgery patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2006-2012 Kids Inpatient Database. Primary outcomes including length of stay, and favorable discharge disposition were assessed for all pediatric neurosurgery patients who underwent a neurosurgical procedure for craniosynostosis.

RESULTS

Pediatric neurosurgery patients with private insurance had a reduced length of stay of 0.75 days compared to patients insured by Medicaid. Compared to private, investor-owned hospitals, Government, non-federal, and private, not for profit hospital ownership types were associated with an increased length of stay greater than 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding of increased LOS for craniosynostosis patients seen in other hospital ownership types compared to those seen in private, investor-owned hospitals is indicative of the possible role that financial incentives may play in influencing quality metrics. Although we observed a shortened LOS for privately-insured patients compared to patients insured by Medicaid, we found no difference in favorable discharge disposition based on insurance status. This suggests that patients with shorter LOS have similar outcomes and are likely not being prematurely discharged.

National Database Reported Outcomes Following Craniosynostosis Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

While there has been ample interest and literature published regarding craniosynostosis surgical technique, there are few reports on adverse hospital and health system outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe rate of and risk factors for complications, and adverse outcomes following craniosynostosis reconstruction.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database and identified all patients undergoing craniosynostosis repair from 2012 to 2016. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant associations between preoperative risk factors and adverse outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to identify independent risk factors and causes of prolonged operative times, transfusions, reoperation, prolonged length of hospital stays, and readmission.

RESULTS

There were 3924 patients included who underwent craniosynostosis repair, of whom 1732 underwent frontoorbital advancement and 2192 underwent cranial vault remodeling. Transfusion was the most common NSQIP reportable outcome, occurring for 66.5% of all patients. The incidence of reoperation was 2.4% and readmission was 3.0%.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a large descriptive analysis of craniosynostosis repair throughout the United States. Largely nonmodifiable patient risk factors lead to worse health system metrics, with young age, gastrointestinal comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologist scores of 3 and greater, reoperation, and a prolonged length of stay as independent risk factors for readmission. This analysis can be used to identify the standard of practice in synostosis care and enhance the implementation of ancillary care services to provide safe and cost-effective care for patients undergoing craniosynostosis repair.

Twenty-Year Outcome Experience With Open Craniosynostosis Repairs: An Analysis of Reoperation and Complication Rates

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention during infancy for both syndromic and nonsyndromic patients with craniosynostosis remains the criterion standard of treatment with the 2 main options being open vault remodeling versus minimally invasive surgery. Although open cranial vault remodeling was initially considered a high-risk procedure, many advances have improved its safety. Despite this, there is a paucity of literature on the long-term outcomes of contemporary open craniosynostosis repair.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary open cranial vault repair for craniosynostosis by a single surgeon (J.A.A.) at New York-Presbyterian Hospital from 1995 to 2015 was performed.

RESULTS

For primary open repair, 81 patients (46 males, 35 females) were analyzed, and affected sutures included unicoronal (28), bicoronal (7), metopic (24), sagittal (11), lambdoid (2), and multisuture (9). Fourteen patients (17.3%) were syndromic. Mean (SD) operative patient age was 13.81 (16.24) months: 34 (42%) were 0 to 6 months; 26 (32%), 7 to 12 months; and 21 (26%), 12 months of age or older. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean (SD) estimated blood loss for the plastic surgery portion of all cases was 74.53 (72.34) mL, and total estimated blood loss was 174.93 (182.23) mL. Mean (SD) hospital length of stay was 4.31 (1.59) days. One syndromic patient was readmitted for a wound infection (1.2%) that was successfully treated with antibiotics, and 2 syndromic patients (2.5%) had reoperation for fronto-orbital readvancement.

CONCLUSIONS

This 20-year experience demonstrates the safety of modern open craniosynostosis repairs at a large academic medical center with low rates of mortality (0%), complications (1.2%), and reoperations (2.5%).