Does Type of Cleft Palate Repair Influence Postoperative Eustachian Tube Dysfunction?

Impact of palatoplasty techniques on tympanic membrane findings and hearing prognosis in children with cleft palate

OBJECTIVE

Children with cleft palate (CP) are at high risk of developing otitis media with effusion (OME) due to Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction. Palatoplasty has been reported to decrease the frequency of middle ear disease and improve ET function, and although various techniques have been developed, there is no consensus on the differences in the impact of different techniques on the middle ear. The purpose of this study was to determine the differential effects of palatoplasty on middle ear function and hearing.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational survey of pediatric patients who underwent palatoplasty for CP between June 2010 and October 2018 at Tohoku University Hospital. Cases were divided into three groups depending on the palatoplasty procedures performed: the push-back palatoplasty group, the two-flap palatoplasty group, and the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty group. We examined the differences in clinical characteristics between patients who underwent each procedure. The primary outcome variable was tympanic membrane (TM) findings, and the secondary outcome was hearing test results.

RESULTS

Children who underwent the two-flap palatoplasty had a higher tympanostomy tube (TT) insertion rate and a higher total number of TT insertions than those who underwent the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty or the push-back palatoplasty. The TM retraction rate tended to be lower in the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty group than in the push-back palatoplasty group or the two-flap palatoplasty group. The hearing test results at the last visit were not significantly different among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Children who underwent the two-flap palatoplasty had a higher rate of TT insertions, potentially increasing the risk of TM perforation. In contrast, the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty group had a lower tendency for TM regression, possibly due to improved ET function and reduced incidence of OME. It is important to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each technique before selecting one suitable for the child's cleft and arch width. Additionally, it is important to conduct regular follow-up of TM findings and hearing test results even after palatoplasty.

Relevance of cleft palatal width in short-term otologic outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Children with cleft palate are at increased risk for Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and conductive hearing loss from chronic otitis media. While it has been proposed that the severity of ETD is related to the severity of cleft palate, data are lacking to support this hypothesis. An improved understanding of the relevance of cleft width may have prognostic value that could inform decisions on the timing of tympanostomy tube placement and choice of tympanostomy tube design. The objective of this study was to assess severity of ETD in children with narrow, moderate, and wide cleft palate, with examination of hearing outcomes, number of tympanostomy procedures, and incidence of otologic complications.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted on 58 patients with primary palatoplasty performed at a single academic medical center from January 1, 2016-December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the number of otologic procedures performed after the initial palatoplasty. Secondary outcomes included audiometric findings, number of tympanostomy tube placements, presence of effusion at the time of myringotomy, and occurrence of any postoperative otologic complication. Outcomes were compared for patients with narrow (<10 mm), moderate (10-15 mm), and wide (>15 mm) cleft palate. Analysis included consideration of cleft palatal morphology (Veau I - IV), presence of Robin sequence or syndromes, and risk factors for otitis media.

RESULTS

Patients with moderate and wide cleft palate underwent higher mean numbers of otologic procedures [narrow: 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9, 1.7); moderate: 1.6 (95% CI 1.1, 2.1); wide: 1.8 (95% CI 1.2, 2.4)]. Moderate and wide cleft palate were less likely to have normal hearing after their first tympanostomy (narrow: 50%, 10/20; moderate: 25%, 6/24; wide: 36%, 5/14). Patients with a wide cleft palate had a shorter median time between first and second tympanostomy procedures (median, IQR; narrow: 27.0, 20.8-35.7; moderate 20.4, 16.3-25.9; wide 17.3, 11.5-23.4).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patients with wider cleft palate may be more susceptible to severe ETD. Further large-scale study may help to allow for more informed and personalized clinical decision making for management of cleft palate, incorporating cleft width for prognosis of risks for persistent middle ear dysfunction.

Outcomes of Tympanoplasty After Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze graft success rates and hearing outcomes in patients with a history of cleft palate (CP) repair undergoing tympanoplasty.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Per PRISMA guidelines, the databases were searched from date of inception through December 14, 2021. Studies of patients with previous CP repair who underwent tympanoplasty were included. Meta-analysis of proportions, continuous measures, odds ratios (ORs), and meta-regression were used to analyze graft success and hearing outcomes after tympanoplasty.

RESULTS

A total of 323 patients with CP repair and 1169 controls were included. The proportion of graft success was 86.7% (95% CI, 76.1%-94.5%) in patients with CP repair and 88.8% (95% CI, 76.9-96.8) in controls. There was no difference in odds of graft success between patients with CP repair and controls (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.5-1.8]; P = .870). Age was not a significant moderator of graft success in patients with CP repair (r = 0.1 [95% CI, -0.2 to 0.3]; P = .689) or controls (r = -0.0 [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.1]; P = .952). Comparing mean differences between pre- and postoperative air-bone gap was not statistically significant in patients with CP repair and controls (0.2 dB [95% CI, -3.1 to 3.4]; P = .930). Odds of functional success (postoperative air-bone gap <20 dB) were not different between the groups (OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4]; P = .450).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis does not endorse anatomic or functional differences between patients with CP repair and controls after tympanoplasty. However, there is a paucity of evidence for younger children. Further studies are warranted to elucidate specific risk factors for tympanoplasty outcomes in young patients with previous CP repair.

Impact of a Modified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini on Hearing and Middle Ear Function in Cleft Palate Children-a Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Many children with cleft palate also exhibit hearing loss and middle ear dysfunction, which could last for years. There are still arguments on how to treat this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a modified restoration of tensor veli palatine (TVP) on hearing and middle ear function in the cleft palate children.

METHODS

This retrospective study was completed using records of the cleft palate children who received surgery in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from May 2013 to December 2020. They were divided into 2 groups: Group 1: children who received cleft palate surgery without specific restoration of TVP; Group 2: children who received palate surgery with a specific TVP restoration technique. Perioperative information was collected. The conductive auditory brainstem response and the 226-Hz tympanometry before and after the cleft surgery were compared intragroup and intergroup.

RESULTS

Totally 42 children were included in this study, 21 children in each group. There were no significant differences considering clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. The modified TVP restoration didn't increase operation time or complication compared with no TVP restoration. Statistically, neither the auditory brainstem response air conduction hearing thresholds nor the 226-Hz tympanometry results had significant differences between the 2 groups after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified restoration of TVP was not time-consuming and did not increase complications. The beneficial effect of the modified TVP restoration on the hearing or the middle ear function of cleft palate children was uncertain around 6 months after surgery compared with no restoration.

The effect of intervelar veloplasty under magnification (Sommerlad's Technique) without tympanostomy on middle ear effusion in cleft palate patients

Objective

Different surgical techniques and management approaches have been introduced to manage the cleft palate (CP) and its complications, such as otitis media with effusion (OME) and auditory problems. The optimal method, as well as the ideal time for palatoplasty and ventilation tube insertion, are the subject of controversy in the literature. We aimed to evaluate The Effect of Intervelar Veloplasty under Magnification (Sommerlad’s Technique) without Tympanostomy on Middle Ear Effusion in Cleft Palate Patients.

Methods

non-syndromic cleft palate patients from birth to 24 months who needed primary palatoplasty from April 2017 to 2019 were enrolled in this study. intravelar veloplasty (IVVP) surgery under magnification has been done by the same surgeon. Likewise, Otoscopy, Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), and tympanometry were performed for all the patients before and six months after palatoplasty.

Results

Tympanograms were classified into two categories according to shape and middle ear pressure, and it was done in 42 children (84 ears). Type B curve was seen in 40 cases (80 ears) before surgery which reduced significantly (P < 0.005) to 12 cases in the left ear and 14 cases in the right ear after surgery. So, after surgery, 70 % of the tympanogram of left ears and 66.6 % of the tympanogram of Rt ears were in normal condition (type A tympanometry). ABR was done for 43 patients (86 ears) before surgery and six months after palatoplasty. Data were shown that 40 of the patients had mild to moderate hearing loss before surgery, which reduced significantly (P < 0.005) to 9 in the left ear and 11 in the right ear after palatoplasty. So, after surgery, 79 % of ABR of left ears and 73.8 % of ABR of right ears were in normal status (normal hearing threshold).

Conclusions

Intervelar veloplasty under magnification (Sommerlad’s technique) significantly improved the middle ear effusion without the need for tympanostomy tube insertion.

Management of noncleft velopharyngeal insufficiency

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Velopharyngeal insufficiency in the absence of an overt cleft-palate is a less common and often missed cause of a resonance disorder. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide the reader with an overview of the clinical assessment. Highlight the need for multidisciplinary involvement. Discuss the process of decision-making related to a repair and finally comment on the preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the advent of small calibre videonasendoscopes, evaluation of the size, location, and closure pattern of the velopharyngeal gap has improved the surgeons' ability to provide a tailored repair. Evolutions in technique including posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation and buccal flap advancement in palatal lengthening have all increased the options available to the patient and treating team.

SUMMARY

Multidisciplinary assessment by trained specialist from speech and language pathology and surgery remain the cornerstone in the evaluation and management of this patient cohort. Many have a chromosomal anomaly that should be tested for and managed accordingly. These patients are often diagnosed late and have developed additional compensatory speech disorders that often need to be addressed following repair of the palate. Targeted thoughtful assessment will allow for a greater likelihood of successful repair.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Eustachian Tube in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate Compared With Normal Controls

The authors compared the morphological features of the Eustachian tube (ET) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CL/P) and normal controls using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CBCT images of 51 CL/P patients (28 males and 23 females, mean age: 18.5 ± 8.0 years) and a control group of 52 patients (22 males and 30 females, mean age: 25.23 ± 10.65 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The Eustachian tube angle (ETA), Eustachian tube length (EL), and auditory tube angle (ATA) were measured on CBCT images. The ETA, EL, and ATA in the CL/P and normal control groups were 30.4 ± 6.2 and 36.7 ± 7.5°; 24.7 ± 3.7 and 27.7 ± 4.3 mm; and 142.4 ± 7.8 and 136.3 ± 4.1°, respectively. All between-group differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). There were no significant between-gender differences in either group (all P > 0.05). Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The morphological features of the ET, measured via multiplanar reconstruction CBCT, differed between CL/P patients and normal controls. CBCT can be used to evaluate ET morphological features.

Association between symptomatic submucous cleft palate and otologic disease: A retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is the most common congenital malformation of the posterior palate and characterized in part by palatal muscle diastasis. Patients with SMCP are considered symptomatic when suffering from velopharyngeal insufficiency which leads to hypernasality of speech and excess nasal air emission. SMCP results from defects in the muscles thought to be responsible for regulating the patency of the eustachian tube which can lead to a number of middle ear pathologies and ultimately hearing loss. Hearing loss, especially at a young age, can make speech acquisition a challenge. The purpose of this study was to review patients with symptomatic SMCP (SSMCP) who have presented to our center and report on the association between SSMCP and otologic disease.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of all patients presenting to our center between 2004 and 2016. Patients with SSMCP were identified through a patient database maintained on site. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of SMCP and documentation of the presence or absence of otologic disease. Once identified patient records were reviewed and various demographic and patient factors were recorded. Patients were then grouped into cohorts of those with and without otologic disease and those requiring tympanostomy tubes and not. T-tests were then used to compare various factors between cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were identified and 58 met inclusion criteria (mean age 5.8 years, male:female 36:22). 27.5% of patients were diagnosed with a genetic condition. 69% of patients had otologic disease and 47% required at least one set of bilateral tympanostomy myringotomy tubes. The cohort with ear disease tended to have worse scores on ACPA testing though this was not statistically significant. There were no significant demographic differences between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with symptomatic SMCP suffer from a higher incidence of otologic disease and bilateral myringotomy tube placement than the general population. This is an important potential comorbidity in SSMCP patients as it can act as a further barrier to speech acquisition. Further research is needed to determine if otologic disease can be used for prognostication or treatment purposes.