Nasal Septal Chain Suture: A New Suturing Technique

Submucosal Trans-Septal Suturing Technique After a Septal Extension Graft with Porous High-Density Polyethylene: A Technical Report

BACKGROUND

Porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE) is an alternative material for a septal extension graft (SEG) in oriental rhinoplasty when autologous cartilage is limited. Although nasal packing (NP) and trans-septal suturing (TSS) techniques are routine procedures to obviate the dead space after septoplasty, they are associated with certain discomforts and complications.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the application of a submucosal trans-septal suturing (STSS) technique after SEG with pHDPE.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 60 female participants who underwent SEG with pHDPE. The participants were randomly divided into the NP group and STSS group. The extra surgical duration of NP and STSS, pain, nasal obstruction, and sleeping disturbance as well as postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between group NP and group STSS in terms of mean age. The mean extra surgical duration of group STSS was significantly longer than group NP. There were significant higher pains of group NP at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively, compared with group STSS. The NP group also experienced significantly more nasal obstruction and sleep disturbance within 48h postoperatively compared to the STSS group. There was one infection in each group, minor bleeding in two NP patients, and one STSS patient. There was no major bleeding, hematoma, graft exposure, or septal perforation in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Although STSS needs a longer extra surgical duration than NP, it significantly improves the patient's postoperative comfort with a faster return to normal respiration compared to NP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Is nasal septal suturing an alternative technique to nasal packing?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nasal septal suturing is a commonly used alternative treatment to nasal packing after septoplasty. Besides alleviating postoperative discomfort, extensive studies have shown that nasal septal suturing is more effective than nasal packing. However, its clinical benefits remain controversial.

METHODS

We will perform a systematic review of nasal packings effect-related outcome in comparison to nasal septum suture among septoplasty patients by searching 8 databases, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). All eligible studies will be screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers will extract the data. Moreover, Review Manage 5.3 will be used for quality assessment and data analysis. Then, the random effects model or fixed effects model will be applied according to the heterogeneity. In conformity with the GRADE criteria, the merits of the evidence and recommended strength will be assessed.

RESULTS

This protocol will guide subsequent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The differences in efficacy between nasal septal suturing and nasal packing after septoplasty will be evaluated in terms of efficiency, adverse reaction, comfort degree, and other factors.

CONCLUSION

This proposed study will explore the possibility of adopting nasal septal suturing as an alternative to nasal packing after septoplasty. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER:: doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WF3GX.

A Modification to the Nasal Septal Chain Suture Which Improves Its Application

INTRODUCTION

A novel modification to the nasal septal chain suture which makes its application easier and faster without using any special surgical instrument has been described in this study. The advantage of the modification was evaluated in terms of the suture application time.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients with a mean age of 30.1 ± 10.6 (18-58) years were evaluated in 2 groups. A nasal septal chain suture was applied with the previously described technique and the new modification for each group after the patients underwent septoplasty. The suture application time for all of the patients was recorded.

RESULTS

The mean suture application time was 455.2 ± 36.5 (380-530) seconds in the previous technique group and 404.7 ± 29.4 (340-450) seconds in the modified technique group. The use of new modification of the technique was found to shorten the suture application time significantly (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The modified nasal septal chain suture that has been described in this study can be an option to nasal septal suturation since it can be used with absorbable or nonabsorbable materials, is easy to remove, and does not cause pain during suture removal.