A Thirty-Year Experience With Head and Neck Flap Reconstruction:

Description of the Pedicled Osteo-Muscular Flap of Split Temporal Muscle

Background

Reconstruction of the head and neck is dominated by free flaps, and for bone reconstruction by fibula and scapula flaps. However, this choice is sometimes difficult to make in patients who cannot tolerate an extensive and lengthy surgical procedure. In addition, vascular micro-anastomoses are sometimes complicated in patients who have been previously irradiated. Pedicle flaps remain an option and can sometimes be considered as first choice for head and neck reconstruction.

Purpose

In this study, we describe the feasibility of a split temporal muscle pedicled flap with coronal harvesting for a reconstruction that can reach the midline.

Study design sample covariates

Ten fresh-frozen human cadaver heads were dissected, and the length of the split flap was noted, followed by the length of the non-split flap.

Results

The mean length was 155.7 mm (± 20.0) for the split flap, from the point of rotation to the tip of the coronoid process. These results coincide with the tragus-midline distance, which makes it possible to consider reconstruction of the midline, especially the maxilla and the mandible, which has not yet been described in the literature.

Conclusions and relevance

This technique would then allow a supply of pedicled vascularized bone for loco-regional reconstruction.

Flap loss in head and neck reconstruction: Is there a singular cause for failure?

Despite the high success rates reported in head and neck reconstruction, free flap failures continue to persist. Understanding the factors associated with flap loss and improving overall success are paramount. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the factors influencing flap revision and free tissue transfer survival in head and neck reconstruction. The study included 70 patients with defects in the lower two-thirds of the head and neck region and underwent reconstruction using free flaps. Patient age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities and data on the location and aetiology of the defect, the specific type of flap employed, the recipient artery and vein chosen, instances of revision and the overall success of the flap were collected. The investigation aimed to establish correlations between these variables as well as flap success and revision rates. No statistically significant differences were observed in arterial and venous anastomosis revision rates, or flap survival, in relation to variables such as age, gender, flap type, smoking status, comorbidities, recipient artery or vein and the number of vein anastomoses. The malignant tumour group exhibited a lower requirement for arterial revision and a higher flap survival rate compared to the benign tumour group. This study underscores the comparable safety profiles of perforator-based and conventional flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Furthermore, it reveals that patient characteristics are not contraindications for free tissue transfer. Additionally, the quantity of the veins and choice of recipient vessels are flexible and do not significantly impact flap success. The higher rates of flap success in patients with malignant aetiology requires further investigation.

Outcomes Associated with Multiple Free Tissue Transfers Performed in a Single Day

Background: Although microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) remains technically challenging, surgeons may need to perform >1 MFTT operations in a given day. Objective: To compare MFTT outcomes in cases where surgeons completed one versus two flaps per day by measuring flap viability and complication rates. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of MFTT cases from January 2011 to February 2022 with >30-day follow-up. Outcomes, including flap survival and operating room takeback, were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 1096 patients meeting inclusion criteria (1105 flaps), there was a male predominance (n = 721, 66%). Mean age was 63.0 ± 14.4 years. Complications requiring takeback were identified in 108 flaps (9.8%) and were greatest for double flaps in the same patient (SP) (27.8%, p = 0.06). Flap failure occurred in 23 (2.1%) cases and was also greatest for double flaps in the SP (16.7%, p = 0.001). Takeback (p = 0.06) and failure (p = 0.70) rates were not different between days with one versus two unique patient flaps. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing MFTT, those treated on days in which surgeons perform two unique cases compared with single cases will demonstrate no difference in outcomes, as measured by flap survival and takeback, whereas patients with defects requiring multiple flaps will experience greater takeback and failure rates.

Does experience affect surgical margins in head and neck basal cell carcinoma?

Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of surgical experience in a high volume head and neck surgery department on basal cell carcinoma margin status. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 546 patients surgically treated for primary basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck region was done. Resections were performed by 4 specialists with equal experience in head and neck surgery and 4 ENT residents at the same level of surgical training. A margin of 3-5mm was chosen, according to guidelines. Results: The study consisted of 304 males and 242 females, mean age of 69 (range 26 – 100). Most of the tumors were located on the nose (165 pts; 30,2%) and auricle (119; 21,7%). The most common histological subtype was nodular (119; 21,7%). Tumor size was up to 20mm in 394 cases (72%). Positive surgical margins were found in 112 cases (20,5%). There was no difference in terms of positive surgical margins between residents (19/119 cases; 15,9%) and specialists (93/426; 21,8%; p=0.161). Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that adequate surgical training in dedicated head and neck surgery department is an efficient factor in obtaining free surgical margins in head and neck basal cell carcinoma.

Reconstruction with Free Flaps of Head and Neck Cancer Defects: A National Cohort Study

The purpose of this study was to determine the perioperative mortality rate, reintervention rate, and total healthcare costs for head and neck cancer patients who underwent free tissue transfer (FTT) in Colombia. The prognostic factors associated with those results were estimated.

Current practices in microvascular reconstruction in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Despite major advances in the field of head and neck microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) over the past several decades, there are no standardized perioperative regimens for the care of patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgery, and continued variation in practice exists. This study aimed to report current trends in the field of MFTT performed by otolaryngologists, including surgeon training, institutional operative practices, and perioperative management.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

A survey of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited residency programs and American Head and Neck Society fellowship sites was conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy-one (62.8%) programs responded, with 67 (94.4%) routinely performing MFTT and 23 (32.4%) having a dedicated microvascular fellowship program. Of institutions performing MFTT, 66 (98.5%) reported the use of a two-surgeon team, most commonly both otolaryngologists (76.3%). Institutional MFTT volumes and donor site frequency are reported. Postoperative care includes routine admission to the intensive care unit (75.2%), step-down unit (15.0%), or general care floor (8.1%). Postoperative flap monitoring practices, including modalities, personnel, and timing/frequency show institutional variation. Despite differences in postoperative monitoring regimen and management (sedation, anticoagulation, antibiotic use), surgeon-reported measures of flap success rate (95.7%, standard deviation [SD] 4.7%) and complication rate (6.8%, SD 2.4%) show little difference across institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Many elements of MFTT perioperative care show continued variation at an institutional level. There is a notable shift toward the two-team approach within otolaryngology. Self-reported flap complication and success rates showed no significant differences based on perioperative care and monitoring regimen. Further study of perioperative practices should focus on standardization of care to improve overall outcomes in this complex patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 129:138-145, 2019.

A Clinical Care Pathway to Reduce ICU Usage in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction

Objective

To design and implement a postoperative clinical care pathway designed to reduce intensive care usage on length of stay, readmission rates, and surgical complications in head and neck free flap patients.

Methods

A postoperative clinical care pathway detailing timelines for patient care was developed by a multispecialty team. In total, 108 matched patients receiving free tissue transfer for reconstruction of head and neck defects in the year before (prepathway), year after (early pathway), and second year after (late pathway) pathway implementation were compared based on postoperative length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and rates of medical/surgical complications.

Results

Median length of stay decreased from 10 to 7.5 and 7 days in the pre-, early, and late-pathway groups, respectively ( P = .012). Readmission rate decreased from 16% in the prepathway group to 0% and 3% in the early and late-pathway groups. The number of patients admitted to the ICU postoperatively decreased from 100% to 36% and 6% in the pre-, early, and late-pathway groups, respectively ( P = .025). The rates of surgical and medical complications were equivalent.

Discussion

This pathway effectively reduced ICU admission, length of stay, and readmission rates, without increasing postoperative complications. These outcomes were sustainable over 2 years.

Implications for Practice

Free flap patients may not require routine ICU admission and may be taken off ventilatory support in the operating room. This effectively reduces costly resource use in this patient population. Similar pathways could be introduced at other institutions.

Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery

Head and neck reconstruction following surgical extirpative management of head and neck cancer requires critical assessment and meticulous correction of both aesthetic and functional deficits to optimize the physical and psychological well-being of the patient. Unique to head and neck cancers is the potential alteration of one's senses, breathing, speech, and swallowing functions, as well as overall head and neck aesthetics. When possible, tissue defects are replaced with similar tissues, though donor sites may be anatomically local, regional, or distant. The "reconstructive ladder" provides a heuristic approach to restoring the functional and aesthetic integrity of the head and neck cancer patient. Local tissue-rearrangement, grafts, flaps, and prosthetics are all options in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. The aim of this chapter is to familiarize the reader with the aims of reconstructive surgery, techniques employed to restore form and function as well as challenges and outcomes.

AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines? Perioperative antithrombotic management in head and neck surgery

Head and neck surgeons are commonly faced with surgical patients who have underlying medical problems requiring antithrombotic therapy. It is difficult to achieve a balance between minimizing the risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage in the perioperative period. Data from randomized, controlled trials are limited, and procedure-specific bleed rates are also difficult to pinpoint. The decision is made more difficult when patients with moderate-to-high risk for thromboembolic events undergo procedures that are high risk for bleeding. This is true for many head and neck oncologic surgeries. Furthermore, although elective procedures may be delayed for optimization of antithrombotic medication, emergent procedures cannot. Head and neck surgery often represents the most challenging of all these circumstances, given the potential risk of airway compromise from bleeding after head and neck surgery.