Evaluation of Protraction Face-Mask Therapy on the Craniofacial and Upper Airway Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

The effect of facemask in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with cleft lip and palate usually present a Class III skeletal pattern. Facemask (FM) is one of the conventional orthodontic treatment modalities used to address the skeletal discrepancy in cleft patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential effectiveness of FM in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients.

SEARCH METHODS

Search without restrictions except language in seven databases since inception and hand searching until January 2019 was conducted. Detailed search strategies were developed for each database which were based on the PubMed strategy and adapted accordingly.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled studies assessing the effect of FM in UCLP patients were to be included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

After retrieval and selection of the studies, data extraction was performed. Both angular and linear cephalometric measurements were collected. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CΙs) between treated and untreated UCLP patients concerning the pre- and post-treatment angular measurements of each group were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

From nine eligible studies, five were included in the meta-analysis investigating the use of FM in patients and controls with UCLP (with and without maxillary expansion). Statistically significant differences were evident for SNA/S-N-ss, SNB/S-N-sm, ANB/ss-N-sm, and SN-MP. FM was found to induce an increase of SNA (WMD = 2.12 degrees, 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.66), ANB (WMD = 4.17 degrees, 95% CI: 3.60 to 4.74), and SN-MP angles (WMD = 2.60 degrees, 95% CI: 1.10 to 4.10) and a decrease of SNB angle (WMD = -1.94 degrees, 95% CI: -2.48 to -1.40) in UCLP patients. Low to moderate heterogeneity was observed.

LIMITATIONS

They emerge due to risk of bias, exclusion of non-English papers and methodological characteristics of the included papers.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available data, FM seems to improve the sagittal skeletal relationships in UCLP patients, increasing the SNA and ANB angles and decreasing the SNB angle. Moreover, in the vertical dimension, FM increases the SN-MP angle. Regarding dental measurements, there are controversial results. More high-quality studies need to be conducted in order to further clarify the impact of FM on UCLP patients.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO: CRD42019131619.

Immediate and late follow-up effects of class III early correction in cleft lip and palate patients treated with maxillary protraction

Abstract Introduction There is no consensus about the immediate and latte follow-up effects of maxillary protraction in cleft lip and palate patients. Objective To evaluate the stability of Class III early treatment in cleft lip and palate patients through maxillary expansion and protraction. Material and method The sample consists in three lateral cephalometric radiographs of 28 patients (mean pre-treatment age of 6.7±1.8 years) who presented cleft lip and palate and were treated with maxillary expansion and Petit facial mask. The angular (SNA, SNB, ANB, SN.GoGn, FMA, Z Angle) and linear (overjet, Co-A, Co-Gn, Nperp-A, Nperp-Pg, AO-BO) cephalometric measures were evaluated through the Dolphin® software, in three moments: T0 (initial), T1 (after treatment), and T2 (follow-up). Data were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer test. The correlation between cephalometric measures and patient’s age was determined by Pearson’s chi-squared test. Result The SNA, ANB, and AO-BO measures increased considerably (p<0.05), and they did not present any differences compared to the initial ones after the follow-up time. The overjet measure increased (p<0.05) after treatment and, even with its decrease at the follow-up time, it was still higher than at the beginning (p<0.05). The Z angle showed improvement with treatment and remained stable at the follow-up time. Conclusion After treatment (maxillary expansion associated with protraction), there was a skeletal pattern improvement. During the follow-up period, those alterations decreased to a measure close to the beginning. There was an improvement in the dental pattern and facial profile that continued in the follow-up period.

Three-dimensional assessment of the pharyngeal airway in Japanese preschoolers with orofacial clefts

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Individuals with orofacial clefts often experience respiratory problems because of nasopharyngeal abnormalities. Pharyngeal airway morphology is thought to differ among the various cleft types. We measured three-dimensional (3D) airway volume using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis to evaluate and compare pharyngeal airways in Japanese preschoolers with and without orofacial clefts.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

We enrolled 83 subjects (37 boys, 46 girls; mean age = 4.66 ± 0.56 years) with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts and 16 noncleft healthy subjects (seven boys, nine girls; mean age = 5.30 ± 0.52 years) as controls. The subjects were divided into five groups. Four groups were based on the cleft type: isolated cleft palate, unilateral cleft lip and alveolus), unilateral cleft lip and palate, and bilateral cleft lip and palate. The fifth group included the noncleft controls. All subjects were examined with CBCT, and the 3D airway volume was measured. We analyzed group differences statistically using analysis of covariance with the Bonferroni post hoc pairwise comparison tests for the corrected means.

RESULTS

Compared with the noncleft group, each cleft group exhibited significantly decreased total and nasal airway volumes and increased superior and inferior pharyngeal airway volumes. The differences were all statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that anatomical differences exist in pharyngeal airway volumes among various cleft groups and in those without a cleft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 130:533-540, 2020.