A Volumetric and Craniometric Analysis of Cranial Base Differences in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis

Understanding the heterogenicity of unicoronal synostosis - A morphometric analysis of cases compared to controls

BACKGROUND

Preoperative severity of unicoronal synostosis varies greatly and involves the frontal bone, skull base and orbits. Degree of deformity affects long-term morphological and functional outcomes after surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the morphological heterogenicity and investigate its relation to patient-specific factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, non-syndromic unicoronal synostosis patients treated between 2006 and 2022 at Necker Hospital, France or Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, were included and matched to controls. Severity of skull base, orbital and posterior skull asymmetry, degree of anterior plagiocephaly and Harlequin deformity, lateralisation, head circumference, age, timing of metopic fusion and fusion of peri-pterionic sutures were investigated.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients and ninety-three controls were included. Skull base asymmetry was linearly related to orbital asymmetry (p < 0.001), correlated with earlier CT scans (p = 0.004) and anterior (p < 0.001) and posterior (p = 0.03) plagiocephaly. Posterior plagiocephaly was more common in patients (31%) compared with controls (5%) (p < 0.001). A patent metopic suture above nine months of age was associated with severe Harlequin deformity (p = 0.04) and a lower head circumference when fused (p = 0.03). Fronto-sphenoidal suture fusion was associated with later CT scans (p < 0.001) and less skull base asymmetry (p = 0.002). Spheno-parietal fusion was correlated with decreased skull base asymmetry (p = 0.03). Right lateralisation was more common in females.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogenicity of unicoronal synostosis seems to be predominantly explained by variability in skull base morphology. Peri-pterionic fusions might limit deformity.

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Frontal Bossing and Temporal Pinching in Patients with Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using Curvature Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sagittal craniosynostosis results in varying degrees of frontal bossing and bilateral temporal pinching. This study assessed the three-dimensional changes in these regions using curvature analysis and volumetric analysis before and 1 year after extended sagittal strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of three-dimensional photographs of 50 subjects treated with ESC with postoperative helmet therapy and 50 age-matched controls was performed. Images were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Forehead convexity and temple concavity were quantified. Computed tomographic scans of subjects with and without sagittal synostosis were analyzed to assess the percentage of total intracranial volume (ICV) in the anterior cranial fossa before and after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy.

RESULTS

Forehead convexity in the ESC with postoperative helmet therapy group preoperatively (24.49 ± 3.16 m -1 ) was significantly greater than controls (22.48 ± 3.84 m -1 ; P = 0.005). Forehead convexity significantly decreased after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy (18.79 ± 2.43 m -1 ; P < 0.001) and did not differ from controls (19.67 ± 3.08 m -1 ; P = 0.115). The ESC group had more concave temples preoperatively (-10.27 ± 4.37 m -1 ) as compared with controls (-6.99 ± 3.55 m -1 ; P < 0.001). Temple concavity significantly decreased after ESC (-4.82 ± 3.17 m -1 ; P < 0.001) and did not differ from controls (-5.64 ± 3.27 m -1 ; P = 0.075). In the ESC group, the percentage ICV in the anterior cranial fossa decreased from 22.03% to 18.99% after surgery, whereas the anterior volume in controls was stable (17.74% to 16.81%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ESC group had significantly greater forehead convexity, temple concavity and anterior cranial fossa volume compared with controls. One year after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy, forehead convexity, temple concavity, and percentage ICV in the anterior fossa were comparable to controls.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Virtual Coordinate System in Unicoronal Synostosis

We propose a landmark-based, virtual coordinate system, specifically designed for assessment of asymmetrical craniofacial anatomy associated with unicoronal synostosis.

Method

CT scans of 33 patients with nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis were included. Proposed mid-sagittal plane was compared with commonly used sagittal planes: (1) nasion, sella, and basion (N-S-BA); (2) midplane of bilateral frontozygomatic sutures (midFZ); and (3) the skull gravity center plane, to evaluate reliability and validity in the assessments of the anterior and posterior skull base.

Results

The proposed midplane is similar to the midFZ plane in describing the direction of the anterior skull base. However, it has less bias than the N-S-BA (P < 0.001), and the gravity center planes (P < 0.001). The proposed midplane measures the direction of the posterior skull base plane, similar to the midFZ and gravity center planes, but it has less measurement deviation than the N-S-BA plane (P < 0.001). The most protrusive point on the frontal bone in unicoronal patients is contralateral to the fused suture and distant from the mid-sagittal plane by 13.93 ± 4.01 mm. In addition, it is more anteriorly positioned, by 5.32 mm (P < 0.001), when compared with the corresponding point on the synostotic side. The uppermost point of the supraorbital rim on the synostotic side is cephalic to that of the contralateral side by 4.09 mm (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Prioritized orientation of an averaged Frankfort horizontal plane, followed by the location of the mid-sagittal and coronal planes, can generate a reliable and valid coordinate framework for the assessment of asymmetric skull shape in unicoronal synostosis.

Craniometric and Volumetric Analysis of Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis: 10 Year Update

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to quantitatively establish the volumetric changes observed with posterior vault distraction osteogenesis in the anterior, middle, and posterior thirds of the cranial vault; characterize change in cranial length, width, and height, correlating these changes to demographic variables that may help identify why younger kids gain more volume; and describe the short-term position of the transport segment.

METHODS

Multisuture craniosynostosis patients who underwent posterior vault distraction osteogenesis were retrospectively reviewed. Pediatric, dose-reduced, thin cut helically acquired head computed tomography scans were analyzed on Materialise Mimics v22 (Materialise, Ghent, Belgium). Pre and post-PVDO and "old" and "young" cohort were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients met inclusion criteria. The change in cranial length was significantly less at a median of 14.9 mm [Interquartile range (IQR) 11.8, 31.6] compared to the X-ray measured AP distraction distance (30 mm [IQR 24, 33]; P < 0.001) and significantly less than the theoretically calculated distance (23 mm [IQR 19, 31]; P = 0.012). Median anterior cranial height was shorter post PVDO (82.9 mm, [IQR 64.8, 92.6] versus 78.7 mm [IQR 57.0, 88.7]; P = 0.030). The younger cohort saw a greater increase in total intracranial volume (median 335.1 mL [IQR 163.2, 452.3, median 37.1%] versus 144.6 mL [IQR 119.0, 184.8, median 12.0%]; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to quantify volumetric changes to the anterior, middle, and posterior cranial vaults and demonstrates benefits of preforming PVDO at a younger age to help control turricephaly and produce greater percentage volumetric increases.

Weighing In on the Controversy: Preoperative Imaging in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis Leads to Strategic Changes in Surgical Care

BACKGROUND

Clinical findings in children with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis are characteristic, and therefore clinicians have questioned the need for confirmatory imaging. Preoperative computed tomographic imaging is a powerful tool for diagnosing associated anomalies that can alter treatment management and surgical planning. The authors' aim was to determine whether and how routine preoperative imaging affected treatment management in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients within their institution.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center review of all patients who underwent cranial vault remodeling for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis between 2006 and 2014 was performed. Patient data included demographics, age at computed tomographic scan, age at surgery, results of the radiographic evaluation, and modification of treatment following radiologic examination.

RESULTS

Of 194 patients diagnosed with single-suture craniosynostosis, 29 were diagnosed with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Additional radiographic anomalies were found in 19 unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients (65.5 percent). These included severe deviation of the anterior superior sagittal sinus [n = 12 (41.4 percent)], Chiari I malformation [n = 1 (3.4 percent)], and benign external hydrocephalus [n = 2 (6.9 percent)]. The radiographic anomalies resulted in a change in management for 48.3 percent of patients. Specifically, alteration in frontal craniotomy design occurred in 12 patients (41.4 percent), and two patients (6.9 percent) required further radiographic studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical findings in children with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis are prototypical, preoperative computed tomographic imaging is still of great consequence and continues to play an important role in surgical management. Preoperative imaging enabled surgeons to alter surgical management and avoid inadvertent complications such as damage to a deviated superior sagittal sinus. Imaging findings of Chiari malformation and hydrocephalus also permitted judicious follow-up.

CLINICAL QUESTIONS/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Test-retest validation of a cranial deformity index in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis

Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) affects many infants resulting in abnormalities affecting the forehead and orbits. As a result, the deformity caused by UCS is very noticeable and there are several surgical treatment options available to normalize the head shape. However, there is a lack of consistently used outcome measures, resulting in difficulty assessing surgical outcomes and on-going debate over optimal treatments. Current techniques to quantify deformity in UCS are cumbersome, provide limited information, or are based on subjective assessments. In this study, a cranial deformity index was developed to quantify abnormality at the frontal bones for UCS that is accessible, user-friendly, and generates objective surface distance measurements. The cranial deformity index is defined as the Euclidean distance at the point of the largest deviation between the deformed skull compared to a reference skull. In addition, the index was successfully used to quantify post-operative changes in a single case of UCS that underwent corrective surgery. The reproducibility of the index was assessed using test-retest reliability and was demonstrated to be highly reproducible (ICC = 0.93). A user-friendly measurement index that is based on open-source software may be a valuable tool for surgical teams. In addition, this information can augment the consultation experience for patients and their families.

Craniometric and Volumetric Analyses of Cranial Base and Cranial Vault Differences in Patients With Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Sagittal Craniosynostosis

PURPOSE

How different from "normal" are the cranial base and vault of infants with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal synostosis (NSSS)? This study quantitatively addresses this question utilizing computed tomography (CT) analytic technology.

METHOD

Head CT scans of infants with NSSS and normocephalic controls were analyzed using Mimics to calculate craniometric angles, distances, and segmented volumes. Craniometric measurements and asymmetry indices were compared between NSSS and control groups using linear regressions controlling for age. Ratios of anterior-, middle-, and posterior-to-total cranial vault volume were compared between groups using beta regressions controlling for age.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with NSSS and 19 controls were identified. Cranial index and interoccipital angle were significantly smaller in NSSS compared with controls (P = 0.003 and <0.001, respectively). Right-but not left-external acoustic meatus angle and internal acoustic meatus-to-midline distance were significantly greater in NSSS than in controls (P = 0.021 and 0.016, respectively). NSSS patients and controls did not significantly differ in any asymmetry indices, except for the articular fossa angle asymmetry index (P = 0.016). Anterior vault volume proportion was greater in NSSS relative to controls (proportion ratio = 1.63, P < 0.001). NSSS trended toward a smaller posterior vault volume proportion (P = 0.068) yet did not differ in middle vault volume proportion compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

In this small study, patients with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis had relatively similar cranial base measurements, and larger anterior vault volumes, when compared with controls. Further work is needed to confirm the possibility of rightward asymmetry of the anterior cranial base.

Postsurgical Changes in Osseous Dysmorphology of the Midface and Mandible in Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Early management of unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) aims to treat the cranial abnormality with the hope of improving middle and lower facial morphology. This study analyzed osseous volume and 3-dimensional distances in the midface and mandible of patients with UCS to assess changes in facial symmetry following a cranial vault procedure.

METHODS

Patients who underwent fronto-orbital advancement for UCS repair between 1981 and 2012 with follow-up of at least 3 years were included. Computed tomography-based 3-dimensional reconstructions of the mandible and LeFort III midface were divided by 3 midline osseous landmarks and measured for volume. Distances between 11 osseous landmarks were measured in the midface and mandible. Ratios between the measurements on synostotic and nonsynostotic sides were calculated. Presurgical to postsurgical changes were evaluated with paired samples t tests. The study was powered to detect differences between preoperative and postoperative ratios of at least 3%.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included. Mean age at initial imaging was 4.7 ± 3.2 months (range, 0.4-9.2 months) with postoperative follow-up of 9.0 ± 5.3 years (range, 3.3-17.0 years). Midfacial symmetry of osseous volume improved following surgery (synostotic to nonsynostotic ratio, 94.1% vs 98.9%, P = 0.044). The width (P < 0.001), height (P = 0.039), and anterior-posterior depth of the midface (P = 0.011) also became more symmetric. In the mandible, however, volumetric and linear symmetry did not improve.

CONCLUSIONS

Symmetry of the midface, but not the mandible, improves significantly following the cranial procedure in patients with UCS.