Utility of Brainstem Trigeminal Evoked Potentials in Patients With Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia Treated by Microvascular Decompression:

Blink reflex monitoring in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

Aim: To determine the value of the blink reflex in evaluating trigeminal sensory function during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.Methods: The blink reflex (BR) in 103 patients with primary typical trigeminal neuralgia treated by microvascular decompression (MVD) was tested pre- and intraoperatively. The changes in BR were recorded. All patients underwent general anesthesia with intravenous propofol and fentanyl. Surgical efficacy and complications were evaluated after surgery. The relationship between intraoperative changes in the BR and postoperative trigeminal sensory function was analyzed.Results: The BR was elicited in all patients before surgery, and no significant difference was found between the affected side and the contralateral side. In 93 of the 103 cases, the BR was successfully elicited during MVD surgery. Therefore, the recordability of the BR was 90.29%. R1 latency on the affected side and the contralateral side were 11.62 ± 4.96 ms and 11.66 ± 4.37 ms, respectively. During MVD surgery, R1 of the BR disappeared on the affected side in 7 cases and remained in 86 cases. After the operation, 98 of the 103 patients had immediate and complete remission of trigeminal neuralgia symptoms, and 5 cases had partial remission. The 7 patients whose R1 disappeared during the surgery all experienced facial numbness postoperatively. Of the 86 patients whose R1 remained, only 2 patients had postoperative facial numbness. Of the 10 patients whose R1 was not recordable during the operation, one complained of postoperative facial numbness. No patients had complications such as facial paralysis, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and death.Conclusions: Conclusion: The blink reflex may allow monitoring of trigeminal sensory function during microvascular decompression under general anesthesia.

Disentangling EEG responses to TMS due to cortical and peripheral activations

BACKGROUND

the use of combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) for the functional evaluation of the cerebral cortex in health and disease is becoming increasingly common. However, there is still some ambiguity regarding the extent to which brain responses to auditory and somatosensory stimulation contribute to the TMS-evoked potential (TEP).

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

to measure separately the contribution of auditory and somatosensory stimulation caused by TMS, and to assess their contribution to the TEP waveform, when stimulating the motor cortex (M1).

METHODS

19 healthy volunteers underwent 7 blocks of EEG recording. To assess the impact of auditory stimulation on the TEP waveform, we used a standard figure of eight coil, with or without masking with a continuous noise reproducing the specific time-varying frequencies of the TMS click, stimulating at 90% of resting motor threshold. To further characterise auditory responses due to the TMS click, we used either a standard or a sham figure of eight coil placed on a pasteboard cylinder that rested on the scalp, with or without masking. Lastly, we used electrical stimulation of the scalp to investigate the possible contribution of somatosensory activation.

RESULTS

auditory stimulation induced a known pattern of responses in electrodes located around the vertex, which could be suppressed by appropriate noise masking. Electrical stimulation of the scalp alone only induced similar, non-specific scalp responses in the in the central electrodes. TMS, coupled with appropriate masking of sensory input, resulted in specific, lateralized responses at the stimulation site, lasting around 300 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

if careful control of confounding sources is applied, TMS over M1 can generate genuine, lateralized EEG activity. By contrast, sensory evoked responses, if present, are represented by non-specific, late (100-200 ms) components, located at the vertex, possibly due to saliency of the stimuli. Notably, the latter can confound the TEP if masking procedures are not properly used.

[Objective assessment of mental nerve local anesthesia]

AIM

To study the reaction of the mental nerve to selective stimulation of thin nerve fibers by thermal stimuli during conduction anesthesia.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The pilot study involved 24 healthy volunteers: 13 subjects were injected with a 4% solution of articaine-containing anesthetic with a vasoconstrictor in a ratio of 1:200 000 (pH 4.8-5.4) and 11 subjects - a 3% solution of mepivacaine-containing local anesthetic without a vasoconstrictor (pH value 5.8-6.4). The registration of evoked potentials was performed twice: before local anesthesia and 5 minutes after anesthesia. With the help of disposable carpal dental injectors, local anesthesia was performed near the mental foramen in order to anesthetize the innervation region of the mental nerve through a conductive type. The evoked potentials (VP) were recorded on a Nicolet instrument (USA) with Bravo evoked potentials software. The study of thermal EPs was performed using a Contact heat evoked potential stimulator (CHEPS) device ('Medoc Ltd, Ramat Yishai', Israel). The base and peak temperature were set at 33 and 54 °C, correspondingly.

RESULTS

The evoked potentials for thermal stimulation demonstrated a significant decrease in the amplitude of all components and the elongation of the LP of the main negative-positive N2-P2 complex after anesthesia compared with the initial thermal EP. The complete disappearance of thermal responses was observed in 14 (58%) of 24 study participants, minor changes were seen in 3 (12.5%) cases only. The total response disappearance was observed in 10 (77%) of 13 participants after articaine and in 3 (27%) of 11 - after mepivacaine (p<0.05), weak changes were registered in 2 (15%) cases in the articaine group and in 1 (9%) case in the mepivacaine group.

CONCLUSION

A 4% solution of articaine is somewhat more effective for pain relief of teeth and bone since it often causes deeper anesthesia, and a 3% solution of mepivacaine without a vasoconstrictor is physiologically more suitable for working with soft tissues.