Safety Outcomes in Endoscopic Versus Open Repair of Metopic Craniosynostosis:

Impact of Social Vulnerability, Race, and Urbanicity on Surgical Timing for Patients With Craniosynostosis

Prior studies have linked the timing of craniosynostosis surgeries to several postoperative outcomes. However, less is known regarding the influence of sociodemographic factors on surgical timing for this population. This study investigates the influence of social vulnerability index (SVI), race, and urbanicity on the timing of craniosynostosis surgery.

Retrospective data from 2013 to 2023 were queried from Cosmos, a national deidentified database from Epic electronic health record. Patients were stratified into sociodemographic cohorts, and chi-square tests were used to compare the proportion of each cohort undergoing craniosynostosis surgeries before and after 6 months of age.

More than 3000 patients were identified for each predetermined metric for sociodemographic analysis (SVI n = 3369, race n = 3541, urbanicity n = 3375). The proportion of patients undergoing surgery at 5 months or less decreased and those undergoing any surgery at 6 months or more increased (P < .0001) with increasing SVI. There was also a significant association of surgical timing and patient race (P < .0001) but not urbanicity.

SVI and patient race are associated with the timing of craniosynostosis surgery. Specifically, higher social vulnerability and certain racial groups are correlated with delayed surgical intervention. This delay in presentation may result in the inability to take advantage of more minimally invasive options, such as strip craniectomy with or without cranial spring placement. These findings highlight the need for targeted, patient-specific, interventions to address disparities in access to timely craniosynostosis surgery.

Open versus endoscopic surgery with helmet molding therapy in non-syndromic patients with craniosynostosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment-related costs

OBJECTIVE

There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal treatment for craniosynostosis as diverse factors influence the election between endoscopic and open surgery. Previous evidence favors endoscopic procedures. However, evidence remains unfulfilled by a limited number of patients and clustered in very few centers worldwide making it difficult to define it as a replicable technique in different populations. In recent years, evidence regarding endoscopic-assisted procedures has gone through a considerable spurt showing an increased interest among surgeons globally showing optimal outcomes in different populations and centers. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we performed an updated analysis of previous reviews, including only non-syndromic patients. We also seek to provide a summary of the tendency of treatment observed in the literature. Similarly, this is the first study to include total costs within its analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three previous meta-analyses published in 2018 yielded 11 eligible papers. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid to fill the gap of information between 2018 and 2024. Twenty-three total articles were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

Variables analyzed were baseline characteristics, length of stay, blood loss, transfusion rates and volume, operative time, and costs. The analysis of data concluded a younger age at surgery in patients undergoing endoscopic surgery (p ≤0.00001). Blood loss, transfusion rates, and volumes depicted favored outcomes for endoscopy with less blood loss during surgery (p ≤0.00001), operative time (p ≤0.00001), and transfusion rates (p ≤0.00001) as well as lower transfused volumes (p ≤0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic surgery carries fewer complications than open surgery. Treatment-related costs are highly decreased in endoscopic procedures after including costs related to outpatient care. Open surgery can be considered in older children if no endoscope or experienced surgeons in endoscopic procedures are available.

Craniosynostosis: Current Evaluation and Management

ABSTRACT

Craniosynostosis is characterized by the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, which can lead to abnormal skull shape and restricted skull growth. Although most cases are present in isolation, some are associated with genetic syndromes, such as Pfeiffer, Muenke, Couzon, Apert, and others, which increases the complexity of care. Today, a spectrum of surgical options to treat craniosynostosis are available and range from traditional open cranial vault remodeling to newer and less invasive suturectomy-based techniques. Which procedure is offered to a patient depends on not only the specific synostosis pattern but also factors such as patient age, the need for additional procedures or interventions, and evidence of elevated intracranial pressure. Thorough consultations with families to discuss achievable goals for cosmesis and function are essential in providing optimal care to each impacted child.

Endoscopic surgery for craniosynostosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis, a developmental craniofacial anomaly, can impair brain development and cause abnormal skull shape due to premature closure of one or more cranial sutures. Traditional surgical treatments have evolved from open operations to minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the endoscopic approach in craniosynostosis correction.

METHODS

Adhering to Cochrane Group standards and the PRISMA framework, this review utilized databases like PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on clinical and surgical outcomes of endoscopic craniosynostosis operations up to December 2023. Inclusion criteria emphasized studies with at least five patients undergoing endoscopic procedures, while exclusion criteria involved non-English papers, incomplete texts, and overlapping data. Statistical analysis used R software with various packages, and methodological bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I framework.

RESULTS

The review included 30 studies (4 prospective, 26 retrospective) with 2561 patients. The median age at operation was 3.20 months. Findings showed a mean operative time of 68.06 min, median hospital stay of 1.28 days, and mean blood loss of 29.89 ml. Blood transfusion was required in 9.97% of cases. Helmet therapy post-operation was common, with a median duration of 9 months. The rate of postoperative complications was 1.86%, and the reoperation rate was 3.07%. No procedure-related mortality was observed. The study noted substantial variations in the handling of craniosynostosis and a lack of consensus on the optimal timing and surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic techniques for craniosynostosis repair demonstrate safety and effectiveness, characterized by low complication risks and favorable surgical outcomes. However, due to the limitations of observational studies and inherent heterogeneity, further comprehensive and controlled trials are needed to validate these findings and understand the long-term outcomes of the endoscopic approach.

Prospective Evaluation of Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Children with Craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children aged 2 to 7 years, who have undergone surgery for craniosynostosis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

A tertiary pediatric academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Children with craniosynostosis who underwent surgical correction, and who were 2-7 years old at the time of the study. Children from families that did not speak English were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Caregivers were asked to fill out the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Core Parent Report and the PedsQL Cognitive Functioning Scale.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PedsQL: Psychosocial Health Summary Score, Physical Health Summary Score, Total Core Score, Cognitive Functioning Scale Score. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater QoLSubject factors: comorbidities, syndromic status, type of craniosynostosis, type of surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 53 subjects, of whom 13.2% had a syndrome. Core and cognitive scores did not depend on presence of a syndrome or suture involved. Subjects who underwent posterior cranial distraction achieved higher Total Core Scores than subjects who underwent open vault remodeling. Among subjects with sagittal craniosynostosis, there was a tendency for higher scores among children who underwent minimally-invasive surgery compared to those who underwent open vault remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates similar HRQL among children with and without a syndrome, higher HRQL among children undergoing posterior cranial distraction than those undergoing open vault remodeling, and trends towards higher HRQL in children with sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent minimally-invasive surgery compared to those who underwent open vault remodeling.

Surgical Treatment of Trigonocephaly, Simplified Technique for Moderate Cases

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of trigonocephaly has increased worldwide over the past 2 decades. Early identification and appropriate treatment are critical. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes and the effect of metopic suture excision, perisutural frontal bone shave, and bilateral pericranial flap method on the shape of the forehead after surgical correction in infants with moderate trigonocephaly.

METHODS

The present study was performed as a cross-sectional study on 40 infants of 3 to 12 months old with trigonocephalus who underwent metopic suture excision and pericardial flap surgery in Mofid Pediatric Hospital from 2016 to 2022. The definitive diagnosis of patients' trigonocephaly was made based on clinical signs and computed tomography scan findings by a plastic surgeon.

RESULTS

Overall in 40 patients operated by this technique, 23 (57.5%) of cases were males, and 17 (42.5%) were females. The mean age of patients was 7.86 ± 2.22 months. Hospital stay was 2 to 4 days (mean: 3 d), intensive care unit admission was in 33 cases for 24 hours, and no intensive care unit admission for 7 cases. Blood was transfused during surgery for 25 patients, and 15 patients did not require blood transfusion use. Results were evaluated in 6 to 12 months after surgery by 3 independent plastic surgeons, with pre and postoperative photos. Satisfaction with the results of forehead shape was excellent for 60% of patients, good for 37.5%, and moderate for 2.5%. Only one female patient had a recurrence after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the pericranial flap method after full metopic suture excision and frontal shave was very effective in the treatment of infants with moderate trigonocephaly.

Shared Decision-Making: Process for Design and Implementation of a Decision Aid for Patients With Craniosynostosis

To describe the process of developing a craniosynostosis decision aid.

We conducted a mixed-methods exploratory study between August 2019 and March 2020 to develop a decision aid about surgical treatment for single suture craniosynostosis.

A single tertiary care academic children's hospital.

The decision aid development team consisted of surgeons, research fellows, a clinical nurse practitioner, clinical researchers with expertise in decision science, and a university-affiliated design school. Qualitative interviews (N = 5) were performed with families, clinicians (N = 2), and a helmeting orthotist to provide feedback on decision aid content, format, and usability.

After cycles of revisions and iterations, 3 related decision aids were designed and approved by the marketing arm of our institution. Distinct booklets were created to enable focused discussion of treatment options for the 3 major types of single suture craniosynostosis (sagittal, metopic, unicoronal).

Three decision aids representing the 3 most common forms of single suture craniosynostosis were developed. Clinicians found the decision aids could help facilitate discussions about families' treatment preferences, goals, and concerns.

We developed a customizable decision aid for single suture craniosynostosis treatment options. This tool lays the foundation for shared decision-making by assessing family preferences and providing clear, concise, and credible information regarding surgical treatment. Future research can evaluate this tool's impact on patient-clinician discussions about families' goals and preferences for treatment.

Impact of age at endoscopic metopic synostosis repair on anthropometric outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic strip craniectomy for metopic craniosynostosis relies on rapid growth and postoperative helmeting for correction. Endoscopic repair is generally performed before patients reach 4 months of age, and outcomes in older patients have yet to be quantified. Here, the authors examined a cohort of patients treated with endoscopic repair before or after 4 months of age to determine aesthetic outcomes of delayed repairs.

METHODS

Data from eligible patients were retrospectively assessed and aggregated in a dedicated metopic synostosis database. Inclusion criteria were radiographically confirmed metopic synostosis and endoscopic treatment. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: those younger than 4 months and those 4 months or older at the time of repair. The frontal width and interfrontal divergence angle (IFDA) were measured on reconstructed CT images. These measurements, alongside operative time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion rates, were compared between groups using the Student t-test or chi-square test.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 28 patients treated before 4 months of age and 8 patients treated at 4-6 months of age. Patient sex and perioperative complications did not differ by age group. Older age at repair was not significantly associated with 1-year postoperative IFDA (140° ± 4.2° vs 142° ± 5.0°, p = 0.28) or frontal width (84 ± 5.2 vs 83 ± 4.4 mm, p = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

One-year postoperative IFDA and frontal width do not differ significantly between patients treated before and after 4 months of age. Further study with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm the longevity of these results at skeletal maturity.

Trigonocephaly: Quantitative Comparison of the Complete Vault Reconstruction and Minimally Invasive Suturectomy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to present and compare outcomes and complications of conventional open reconstruction and minimally invasive correction of metopic synostosis in patients who underwent treatment of trigonocephaly in our center between 2015 and 2019.

METHODS

The hospital database was searched for hospitalization and surgical information, as well as imaging of individuals with trigonocephaly. Postoperative evaluation of the patients was performed during the follow-up sessions. The radiological evaluation was based on brain computed tomography scans taken 2 years following the operation.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (19 females and 45 males) had their trigonocephaly corrected surgically. Thirty-five patients (9 females and 26 males) had complete vault reconstruction surgery, while 29 patients (10 females and 19 males) had minimally invasive suturectomy (MIS). The postoperative cephalic width/intercoronal distance ratio and interpupillary distance/interfrontozygomatic distance ratio assessment showed no differences in the outcome of both groups (P value > 0.05). Minimally invasive techniques resulted in less intraoperative bleeding, a shorter stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, and a shorter surgery and anesthesia duration (P value < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of trigonocephaly can result in a satisfactory correction of the deformity. MIS delivers a comparable result to complete vault reconstruction with less invasiveness and hospitalization and can be considered a reasonable option for patients in their early months of life. Patients must, however, undergo long-term cosmetic, behavioral, and developmental evaluations.

Geographic Financial Analysis of Craniosynostosis Surgery in the United States

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the financial implications of demographic and socioeconomic factors upon the cost of surgical procedures for craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of admissions for craniosynostosis surgery in the United States from 2015 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Patient demographics, case volume, and surgical approach were analyzed in context of hospital charges.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 3869 patients were admitted for surgery for craniosynostosis. In multivariate regression accounting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, hospital admission charges were significantly higher in patients with longer hospital length of stay (P < 0.001), longer ICU length of stay (P < 0.001), living in an underserved area (P = 0.046), preoperative risk factors (P = 0.016), and those undergoing open procedures (P < 0.001); hospital admission charges were significantly lower in patients with White race (P = 0.020) and those treated at high-volume centers (P < 0.001). In multivariate regression, ICU length of stay was significantly higher in patients with preoperative risk factors (P < 0.001), undergoing open procedures (P < 0.001), government insurance (P = 0.018), and not treated at high-volume centers (P = 0.005). There were significant differences in admission charges (P < 0.001), charge-to-cost ratios (P < 0.001), and likelihood of being treated at high-volume craniofacial centers (P < 0.001) across geographic regions of the country.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, there is significant sociodemographic variability in charges for craniosynostosis care, with increased hospital charges independently associated with non-White race, preoperative risk factors, and living in an underserved area.

Superior Long-term Appearance of Strip Craniectomy Compared with Cranial Vault Reconstruction in Metopic Craniosynostosis

Background:

Strip craniectomy with orthotic helmet therapy (SCOT) is an increasingly supported treatment for metopic craniosynostosis, although the long-term efficacy of deformity correction remains poorly defined. We compared the longterm outcomes of SCOT versus open cranial vault reconstruction (OCVR).

Methods:

Patients who underwent OCVR or SCOT for isolated metopic synostosis with at least 3 years of follow-up were identified at our institution. Anthropometric measurements were used to assess baseline severity and postoperative skull morphology. Independent laypersons and craniofacial surgeons rated the appearance of each patient’s 3D photographs, compared to normal controls.

Results:

Thirty-five patients were included (15 SCOT and 20 OCVR), with similar follow-up between groups (SCOT 7.9 ± 3.2 years, OCVR 9.2 ± 4.1 years). Baseline severity and postoperative anthropometric measurements were equivalent. Independent adolescent raters reported that the forehead, eye, and overall appearance of SCOT patients was better than OCVR patients (P < 0.05, all comparisons). Craniofacial surgeons assigned Whitaker class I to a greater proportion of SCOT patients with moderate-to-severe synostosis (72.2 ± 5.6%) compared with OCVR patients with the same severity (33.3 ± 9.2%, P = 0.02). Parents of children who underwent SCOT reported equivalent satisfaction with the results of surgery (100% versus 95%, P > 0.99), and were no more likely to report bullying (7% versus 15%, P = 0.82).

Conclusions:

SCOT was associated with superior long-term appearance and perioperative outcomes compared with OCVR. These findings suggest that SCOT should be the treatment of choice for patients with a timely diagnosis of metopic craniosynostosis.

Predictors of Blood Transfusion for Endoscopic Assisted Craniosynostosis Surgery

ABSTRACT

Blood loss is a main cause of morbidity after craniofacial procedures. The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence and predictors for transfusion of blood products in the endoscopic assisted strip craniectomy population. Data was prospectively collected from a single-center multi-surgeon cohort of 78 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic assisted strip craniectomy for craniosynostosis between July 2013 and December 2020. The authors reviewed patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes. Of the 78 patients, 26 patients were transfused yielding an overall rate of transfusion of 33%. The most common fused suture was sagittal (n = 42, 54%) followed by metopic (n = 15, 19%), multiple (n = 10, 13%), coronal (n = 7, 9%) and finally lambdoid (n = 4, 5%). On univariate analysis, patients' weight in the transfusion cohort were significantly lower than those who did not receive a transfusion (5.6 ± 1.1 versus 6.5 ± 1.1 kg, P = 0.0008). The transfusion group also had significantly lower preoperative hemoglobin compared to the non-transfusion group (10.6 versus 11.1, P = .049). Eleven percent patients admitted to step-down received a transfusion, whereas 39% of patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit received a transfusion (P = 0.042). On multivariate analysis, only higher patient weight (operating room [OR] 0.305 [0.134, 0.693], P = 0.005) was protective against a transfusion, whereas colloid volume (OR 1.018 [1.003, 1.033], P = 0.019) predicted the need for a transfusion. Our results demonstrate that endoscopic craniosynostosis cases carry a moderate risk of transfusion. Individuals with lower weight and those that receive colloid volume are also at elevated risk.

Open Repair Versus Closed Repair: A Cost-Analysis of the Two Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Craniosynostoses

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to quantify the hospitalization charges of the 2 general surgical approaches in the treatment of craniosynostosis and determine if there was a significant difference between the 2. Several studies compared them side-by-side according to specific variables, such as success rates, postoperative complications, blood loss, and length of stay, but were limited by small sample sizes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). All patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis (Q75.0) were identified. The procedures were grouped according to the approach taken, whether it was a traditional, open approach, or a closed, minimally invasive approach. The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach (open vs closed). The outcome variables were the hospital charges (US dollars) and length of stay (days). Statistical analyses were based on the univariate and multivariate linear regression models, and P value less than .05 marked the significance level.

RESULTS

Among a sample of 2,585 cases, an open approach was employed in 2,353 cases and a closed approach in 232 cases. Race, payer information, hospital region, admission status (elective vs not elective), patient location, and surgical approach (open vs closed) were all significant predictors (P < .15) of increased hospitalization charges. Relative to white patients, being in the 'other' racial class added $10,987 in hospital charges (P < .05). Relative to the Northeast, being a patient in the West added $33,459 in hospital charges (P < .01). Not being admitted electively added $72,572 (P < .01) relative to elective admissions. Finally, open repair added $59,539 (P < .01) in charges relative to closed repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional open approach added nearly $60,000 to the cost of the procedure when compared with the closed, endoscopic approach. The scope and invasiveness of the open approach demand greater surgical services, hospital services, supplies, and equipment, ultimately contributing to this increased cost.

Endoscopic-Assisted Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis: Initial Patient Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this manuscript is to introduce a novel endoscopic-assisted approach for creation of osteotomies and distractor hardware placement for unicoronal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

Only three small incisions are performed, one at the anterior fontanelle, pterional region, and upper lateral blepharoplasty location. Unicoronal strip craniectomy and osteotomies in temporal bone, nasofrontal junction, lateral orbital rim, sphenoid wing, orbital roof, and contralateral frontal bone are performed through these incisions with the assistance of a 30° 5-mm endoscope. One linear cranial distractor is inserted through the pterional incision and fixated across the unicoronal suturectomy.

RESULTS

Endoscopic-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis has been performed on 3 patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Median age at surgery was 5.4 months (95%CI 5.0-6.1). Median operative duration was 98 minutes (95%CI 91-112), and estimated blood loss was 25 mL (95%CI 15-150). Median length of distraction achieved was 25.7 mm (95%CI 21.9-28.0), based on lateral skull x-rays obtained on the last day of activation. Distractors were removed 2.3 months postoperatively (95%CI 2.1-3.1), and operative duration of distractor removal was 20 minutes (95%CI 19-29). There was 1 complication, a transient cerebrospinal fluid leak thought to have been caused by a pinpoint injury to the dura at the nasofrontal junction, which was managed expectantly and resolved spontaneously by the fourth postoperative day.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis is a promising treatment modality for children with unicoronal craniosynostosis combining the benefits of distraction osteogenesis with a minimally invasive approach. Additional experience and follow-up are needed to determine its utility, safety, and longevity.

Impact of health disparities on treatment for single-suture craniosynostosis in an era of multimodal care

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of the skull. There are two forms of treatment: open surgery and minimally invasive endoscope-assisted suturectomy. Candidates for endoscopic treatment are less than 6 months of age. The techniques are equally effective; however, endoscopic surgery is associated with less blood loss, minimal tissue disruption, shorter operative time, and shorter hospitalization. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity and insurance status on age of presentation/surgery in children with craniosynostosis to highlight potential disparities in healthcare access. Charts were reviewed for children with craniosynostosis at two tertiary care hospitals in New York City from January 1, 2014, to August 31, 2020. Clinical and demographic data were collected, including variables pertaining to family socioeconomic status, home address/zip code, insurance status (no insurance, Medicaid, or private), race/ethnicity, age and date of presentation for initial consultation, type of surgery performed, and details of hospitalization. Children with unknown race/ethnicity and those with syndromic craniosynostosis were excluded. The data were analyzed via t-tests and chi-square tests for statistical significance (p < 0.05). A total of 121 children were identified; 62 surgeries were performed open and 59 endoscopically. The mean age at initial presentation of the cohort was 6.68 months, and on the day of surgery it was 8.45 months. Age at presentation for the open surgery cohort compared with the endoscopic cohort achieved statistical significance at 11.33 months (SD 12.41) for the open cohort and 1.86 months (SD 1.1473) for the endoscopic cohort (p < 0.0001). Age on the day of surgery for the open cohort versus the endoscopic cohort demonstrated statistical significance at 14.19 months (SD 15.05) and 2.58 months (SD 1.030), respectively. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was noted with regard to insurance status (p = 0.0044); the open surgical group comprised more patients without insurance and with Medicaid compared with the endoscopic group. The racial composition of the two groups reached statistical significance when comparing proportions of White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and other (p = 0.000815), with significantly more Black and Hispanic patients treated in the open surgical group. The results demonstrate a relationship between race and lack of insurance or Medicaid status, and type of surgery received; Black and Hispanic children and children with Medicaid were more likely to present later and undergo open surgery.

Pediatric Fronto-Orbital Skull Reconstruction

Craniofacial surgery in children is a highly challenging discipline that requires extensive knowledge of craniofacial anatomy and pathology. Insults to the fronto-orbital skeleton have the potential to inflict significant morbidity and even mortality in patients due to its proximity to the central nervous system. In addition, significant aesthetic and ophthalmologic disturbances frequently accompany these insults. Craniosynostosis, facial trauma, and craniofacial tumors are all pathologies that frequently affect the fronto-orbital region of the craniofacial skeleton in children. While the mechanisms of these pathologies vary greatly, the underlying principles of reconstruction remain the same. Despite the limited data in certain areas of fronto-orbital reconstruction in children, significant innovations have greatly improved its safety and efficacy. It is imperative that further investigations of fronto-orbital reconstruction are undertaken so that craniofacial surgeons may provide optimal care for these patients.

Distinguishing craniomorphometric characteristics and severity in metopic synostosis patients

The decision about which metopic synostosis patients should undergo surgery remains controversial. Multiple measures for radiographic severity have been developed in order to determine the optimal criteria for treatment. The aim of this study was to perform an extensive craniomorphometric analysis of patients who underwent surgery for metopic synostosis to validate and compare the various severity scales developed for this non-syndromic craniosynostosis. A comparative morphometric analysis was performed using computed tomography scans of preoperative metopic synostosis patients (n=167) and normal controls (n=44). Measurements included previous and newly developed metopic severity indices. Volumetric and area analyses were used to determine the degree of anterior cranial area and potential volume restrictions. Of the severity indices measured, the frontal angle, endocranial bifrontal angle (EBF), adjusted EBF (aEBF), anterior cranial fossa angle, horizontal cone angle, and bitemporal/biparietal distance ratio were significantly different in the metopic subjects relative to controls overall. However, metopic index, orbital rim angle, foramen ovale distance, and cranial volume exhibited no significant difference from controls. Only the frontal angle and aEBF correlated with the changes in anterior cranial dimensions observed in metopic synostosis. In conclusion, the frontal angle and aEBF provide the most accurate measures of severity in metopic synostosis.

Machine Learning Applied to Registry Data: Development of a Patient-Specific Prediction Model for Blood Transfusion Requirements During Craniofacial Surgery Using the Pediatric Craniofacial Perioperative Registry Dataset

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of ≥1 cranial sutures and often requires surgical intervention. Surgery may involve extensive osteotomies, which can lead to substantial blood loss. Currently, there are no consensus recommendations for guiding blood conservation or transfusion in this patient population. The aim of this study is to develop a machine-learning model to predict blood product transfusion requirements for individual pediatric patients undergoing craniofacial surgery.

METHODS

Using data from 2143 patients in the Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry, we assessed 6 machine-learning classification and regression models based on random forest, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), neural network, gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector machine, and elastic net methods with inputs from 22 demographic and preoperative features. We developed classification models to predict an individual's overall need for transfusion and regression models to predict the number of blood product units to be ordered preoperatively. The study is reported according to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist for prediction model development.

RESULTS

The GBM performed best in both domains, with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 ± 0.03 (95% confidence interval) and F-score of 0.91 ± 0.04 for classification, and a mean squared error of 1.15 ± 0.12, R-squared (R) of 0.73 ± 0.02, and root mean squared error of 1.05 ± 0.06 for regression. GBM feature ranking determined that the following variables held the most information for prediction: platelet count, weight, preoperative hematocrit, surgical volume per institution, age, and preoperative hemoglobin. We then produced a calculator to show the number of units of blood that should be ordered preoperatively for an individual patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Anesthesiologists and surgeons can use this continually evolving predictive model to improve clinical care of patients presenting for craniosynostosis surgery.

Comparison of Head Shape Outcomes in Metopic Synostosis Using Limited Strip Craniectomy and Open Vault Reconstruction Techniques

AIM

Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS), with its trigonocephalic head shape, is often treated with either limited incision strip craniectomy (LISC) followed by helmet orthotic treatment, or open cranial vault reconstruction techniques (OCVR). There is controversy regarding resultant shape outcomes among craniofacial surgeons. Those adverse to LISC claim normal head shape is never attained, while proponents believe there is gradual correction to an equivalent outcome. This study aims to quantitate, over time, the three-dimensional (3D) head shapes in patients who have undergone LISC or OCVR intervention for MCS.

METHODS

Sixty-three 3D images of 26 patients with MCS were analyzed retrospectively. Head shape analyses were performed at: (1) preoperative, (2) 1-month postoperative, (3) 10 to 14 months postoperative (1 year), and (4) 2 years postoperative. Composite 3D head shapes of patients were compared at each time point. Two-dimensional (2D) standardized cross sections of the forehead were also compared.

RESULTS

Composite head shapes for both groups were nested, to allow visual comparison as the child's forehead grows and expands. The difference between LISC and OCVR 2D cross sections was calculated; 108.26 mm preoperatively, 127.18 mm after 1-month postoperative, 51.05 mm after 10 to 14 months postoperative, and 27.03 mm after 2 years postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found excellent head shape outcomes for both the LISC and OCVR techniques at 2 years of age. It also corroborates the slow and progressive improvement in head shape with the LISC technique. This study highlights the advantages of 3D photography for measurement of contour outcomes, utilizing both 2D vector and 3D whole head analytical techniques.

Spring-Assisted Surgery for Treatment of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

ABSTRACT

Craniosynostosis (CSS), the premature fusion of calvarial sutures, most commonly involves the sagittal suture. Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) is a traditional method of CSS correction. Minimally invasive methods are becoming widely accepted, including spring-assisted surgery (SAS). The equipment required for SAS is minimal therefore adaptable to resource challenged health systems. This paper outlines the experience of SAS in Moldova.A retrospective study was performed for patients treated with SAS for sagittal CSS from 2011 to 2018 in Moldova. Perioperative data were recorded including age, length of surgery, blood loss, volume transfused and length of stay. Four patients had pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans which were used to calculate changes in cephalic index, normative cephalic index, and intracranial volume.Thirteen patients underwent SAS. Diagnoses were made clinically and confirmed with CT. Mean age at surgery was 4.0 months, and length of surgery 62.7 minutes. All but one patient received a blood transfusion, as is standard of practice in Moldova. The mean length of post-operative recovery in ICU was 30.9 hours. No complications required surgical revision. Springs were removed after 4 to 5 months. All patients had a subjective improvement in scaphocephaly. Based on the available CT scans, an increase in cephalic index (7.3%), normative cephalic index (11.8%), and intracranial volume (38.1%) was observed. One patient underwent SAS at 11 months and required cranioplasty for asymmetry at the time of spring removal.SAS is a safe and cost-effective method of CSS correction that can be utilized in countries with limited health system resources.

Comparative analysis of cranial vault remodeling versus endoscopic suturectomy in the treatment of unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Unilateral lambdoid synostosis is the premature fusion of a lambdoid suture or sutures and represents the least common form of craniosynostosis, occurring in 1 in 40,000 births. Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) and endoscopic suturectomy with helmet therapy (ES) are surgical approaches that are used to allow for normal brain growth and improved craniofacial symmetry. The authors conducted a comparative outcomes analysis of patients with lambdoid synostosis undergoing either CVR or ES.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients with nonsyndromic lambdoid synostosis who underwent surgical correction identified from a single-institution database of patients with craniosynostosis seen between 2000 and 2018. Cranial growth was measured in head circumference percentile and z score.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (8 female and 11 male) with isolated unilateral lambdoid synostosis were identified (8 right and 11 left). Six underwent CVR and 13 underwent ES. No statistically significant differences were noted between surgical groups with respect to suture laterality, the patient's sex, and length of follow-up. Patients treated with ES presented and underwent surgery at a younger age than those treated with CVR (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Operating and anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, and ICU and total hospital days were significantly lower in ES (all p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pre- and postoperative head circumference percentiles or z scores between groups up to 36 months postoperatively. No patients required reoperation as of last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic management of lambdoid synostosis is safe, efficient, and efficacious in terms of intraoperative and long-term cranial growth outcomes when compared to CVR. The authors recommend this minimally invasive approach as an option for correction of lambdoid synostosis in patients presenting early in their course.

Cost comparison of surgical management of nonsagittal synostosis: traditional open versus endoscope-assisted techniques

OBJECTIVE

Management of craniosynostosis at an early age is important for mitigating the risk of abnormal cranial development, but treatment can result in significant expenses. Previous research has shown that endoscope-assisted craniectomy (EAC) is less costly than open cranial vault remodeling (CVR) for patients with sagittal synostosis. The aim of this study was to strengthen the existing body of healthcare cost research by elucidating the charges associated with open and endoscopic treatment for patients with nonsagittal synostosis.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of data obtained in 41 patients who underwent open CVR and 38 who underwent EAC with postoperative helmet therapy for nonsagittal, single-suture craniosynostosis (metopic, coronal, and lambdoid) between 2008 and 2018. All patients were < 1 year of age at the time of surgery and had a minimum 1 year of follow-up. Inpatient charges, physician fees, helmet charges, and outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean ages of the children treated with EAC and open CVR were 3.5 months and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients undergoing EAC with postoperative helmet therapy required more outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year than patients undergoing CVR (4 vs 2; p < 0.001). Overall, 13% of patients in the EAC group required 1 helmet, 30% required 2 helmets, 40% required 3 helmets, and 13% required 4 or more helmets; the mean total helmeting charges were $10,072. The total charges of treatment, including inpatient charges, physician fees, outpatient clinic visit costs, and helmet charges, were significantly lower for the EAC group than they were for the open CVR group ($50,840 vs $95,588; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the additional charges for postoperative helmet therapy and the more frequent outpatient visits, EAC is significantly less expensive than open CVR for patients with metopic, coronal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis. In conjunction with the existing literature on clinical outcomes and perioperative resource utilization, these data support EAC as a cost-minimizing treatment for eligible patients with nonsagittal synostosis.

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery for Infantile Craniosynostosis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) for craniosynostosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis (2004-2018) of 500 consecutive infants with craniosynostosis treated by ESC with orthotic therapy at a single center. Operative outcomes included transfusions, complications, and reoperations as well as head circumference change based on World Health Organization percentiles. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with blood transfusion. Paired t tests were used for within-patient comparisons and Fisher exact test to compare syndromic and nonsyndromic subgroups.

RESULTS

ESC was associated with low rates of blood transfusion (6.6%), complications (1.4%), and reoperations (3.0%). Risk factors for transfusion included syndromic craniosynostosis (P = .01) and multiple fused sutures (P = .02). Median surgical time was 47 minutes, and hospital length of stay 1 day. Transfusion and reoperation rates were higher among syndromic patients (both P < .001). Head circumference normalized by 12 months of age relative to World Health Organization criteria in infants with sagittal, coronal, and multisuture craniosynostosis (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ESC is a safe, effective, and durable correction of infantile craniosynostosis. ESC can achieve head growth normalization with low risks of blood transfusion, complications, or reoperation. Early identification of craniosynostosis in the newborn period and prompt referral by pediatricians allows families the option of ESC vs larger and riskier open reconstruction procedures.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis are sometimes touted as equivalent to cranial vault reconstruction. While techniques for sagittal synostosis have been reviewed previously, evidence regarding open and less invasive surgical techniques for metopic, coronal, and lambdoid synostosis has yet to be reviewed.

METHODS

Systematic searches were performed using Embase.com and PubMed. Included studies reported short- or long-term outcomes, compared at least 2 standard techniques, discussed single-suture coronal, metopic, or lambdoid craniosynostosis, and enrolled at least 20 study participants. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, and also performed full text review and data extraction. Given heterogeneous outcomes, qualitative synthesis was performed after data extraction.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 2348 articles. Of these, 313 were removed as duplicates, and 1935 were excluded during title/abstract review. After full text review of 100 articles, 19 were selected for data extraction. The heterogeneity of outcomes precluded meta-analysis and required qualitative synthesis. While short-term outcomes indicated decreased morbidity of minimally invasive techniques, only 2 articles presented long-term reoperation rates. One study reported higher reoperation rates in the less invasive technique, and the second reported no reoperations in the median follow-up period of 33 months.

CONCLUSION

Studies comparing long-term outcomes between different surgical techniques for single-suture craniosynostosis remain deficient. The development of standardized outcome measures is essential, and prospective, multicenter studies are necessary to assess the long-term efficacy of these procedures.

Minimally invasive approaches to craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis (CS) is defined as the premature fusion of one or more calvarial sutures. This carries several consequences, including abnormal/asymmetric cranial vault development, increased intracranial pressure, compromised neurocognitive development, and craniofacial deformity. Definitive management is surgical with the goal of protecting cerebral development by re-establishing normal cranial vault expansion and correcting cosmetic deformity. In today's practice, CS surgery has advanced radically from simple craniectomies to major cranial vault reconstructive (CVR) procedures. More recently there has been considerable interest in endoscopic assisted surgery (EAS). Theoretical benefits include decreased operative time, morbidity, blood loss, postoperative pain, cost and faster recovery times. In this focused review, we summarize the current body of literature reporting clinical outcomes in EAS and review the data comparing EAS and CVR.