Posterior Fossa Re-Exploration for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia: Operative Findings and Surgical Techniques

Microvascular Decompression Using the Gelatin Sponge Insertion Technique for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the primary surgical intervention for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), with Teflon being the most conventional decompressing material. However, Teflon has been associated with adhesion and granulomas after MVD, which closely correlated with the recurrence of TN. Therefore, we developed a new technique to prevent direct contact between Teflon and nerve. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of MVD using the gelatin sponge (GS) insertion technique with that of Teflon inserted alone in treating primary TN.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and the follow-up data of 734 patients with unilateral primary TN who underwent MVD at our center from January 2014 to December 2019. After exclusions, we identified 313 cases of GS-inserted MVD and 347 cases of traditional MVD. The follow-up exceeded 3 years.

RESULTS

The operating time of the GS-inserted group was longer than that of the Teflon group (109.38 ± 14.77 vs 103.53 ± 16.02 minutes, P < .001). There was no difference between 2 groups in immediate surgical outcomes and postoperative complications. The yearly recurrence rate for GS-inserted MVD was lower at first (1.0%), second (1.2%), and third (1.2%) years after surgery, compared with its counterpart of Teflon group (3.7%, 2.9%, and 1.7% respectively). The first-year recurrence rate (P = .031) and total recurrence rate in 3 years (P = .013) was significantly lower in the GS-inserted group than Teflon group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated better outcomes in GS-inserted MVD groups (P = .020).

CONCLUSION

The application of the GS insertion technique in MVD reduced first-year postoperative recurrence of TN, with similar complications rates compared with traditional MVD.

Revisiting the Efficacy of Redo Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia

BACKGROUND

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective nondestructive neurosurgical procedure for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, some patients may undergo surgery failure or experience pain recurrence, sparking debates on the need for reoperation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 103 cases of patients with primary TN who underwent redo MVD at our center between January 2020 and December 2022. Comparative prognostic assessments were performed by comparing these cases against a cohort of 348 patients who underwent primary MVD during the same study period.

RESULTS

During the redo MVD cases, arachnoid membranes adhesions (80.6%) and Teflon adhesions with/without granuloma (86.4%) as well as remaining vascular compression (36.9%) were observed. After the reoperation, an immediate relief rate of 94.2% was observed. During a mean follow-up period of 17.4 ± 4.4 months, a long-term relief rate of 89.3% was achieved. Postoperative complications included 3 cases of persistent paresthesia, 1 case each of hearing loss, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and facial palsy. Ten cases without evident compression received nerve combing and all experienced immediate complete relief, with only 1 patient experiencing recurrence 9 months after surgery. Compared to the primary MVD group, the reoperation group had a higher average age, longer disease duration, and operating time (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in immediate relief rate, long-term relief rate, or complications between the 2 groups. The main cause of persistent symptom was inadequate decompression, such as missing the offending vessel; while the recurrent was primarily due to Teflon adhesion or granuloma formation.

CONCLUSIONS

The redo MVD for TN is equally efficacious and safe compared to the primary procedure, with an emphasis on meticulous dissection and thorough decompression. Additionally, nerve combing proves to be an effective supplementary option for patients without obvious compression.

Repeat Surgery for Recurrent or Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgery can effectively treat Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but postoperative pain recurrence or nonresponse are common. Repeat surgery is frequently offered but limited data exist to guide the selection of salvage surgical procedures. We aimed to compare pain relief outcomes after repeat microvascular decompression (MVD), percutaneous rhizotomy (PR), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to determine which modality was most efficacious for surgically refractory TN.

METHODS

A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, including studies of adults with classical or idiopathic TN undergoing repeat surgery. Primary outcomes included complete (CPR) and adequate (APR) pain relief at last follow-up, analyzed in a multivariate mixed-effect meta-regression of proportions. Secondary outcomes were initial pain relief and facial numbness.

RESULTS

Of 1299 records screened, 61 studies with 68 treatment arms (29 MVD, 14 PR, and 25 SRS) comprising 2165 patients were included. Combining MVD, PR, and SRS study data, 68.8% achieved initial CPR after a repeat TN procedure. On average, 49.6% of the combined sample of MVD, PR, and SRS had CPR at final follow-up, which was on average 2.99 years postoperatively. The proportion (with 95% CI) achieving CPR at final follow-up was 0.57 (0.51-0.62) for MVD, 0.60 (0.52-0.68) for PR, and 0.35 (0.30-0.41) for SRS, with a significantly lower proportion of pain relief with SRS. Estimates of initial CPR for MVD were 0.82 (0.78-0.85), 0.68 for PR (0.6-0.76), and 0.41 for SRS (0.35-0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Across MVD, PR, and SRS, about half of TN patients maintain complete CPR at an average follow-up time of 3 years after repeat surgery. In treating refractory or recurrent TN, MVD and PR were superior to SRS in both initial pain relief and long-term pain relief at final follow-up. These findings can inform surgical decision-making in this challenging population.

Microvascular decompression: Diversified of imaging uses, advantages of treating trigeminal neuralgia and improvement after the application of endoscopic technology

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN) is a unilateral and severe facial pain disease, which seriously affects the patient's quality of life. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is currently the most effective surgical method, and it is the only treatment for the etiology of CTN. Imaging for MVD has been increasingly used, and the advantages and disadvantages of endoscopy-assisted vascular decompression surgery have been controversially debated. In this review, we aimed to discuss the advantages of MVD in the treatment of patients with CTN, the importance of using imaging in disease management, and the improvements of vascular decompression surgery through the application and maturity of endoscopic techniques. Compared with other surgical methods, MVD has more prominent short- and long-term treatment effects. Its selection depends on the accurate discovery of neurovascular compression by preoperative imaging. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging plays a diverse role in MVD, not only in identifying the responsible vessels but also in determining the prognosis and as a tool for scientific research. The use of endoscopic techniques provides improved visualization of the MVD and additional benefits for vascular decompression surgery.

Teflon Granuloma: A Common Cause of Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a common pain syndrome of the nervous system,. Although about 90% patients who were refractory to medications could be free from pain after microvascular decompression (MVD), some patients did experience recurrence. The study aimed to analyze clinical characteristics of patients with recurrent TN, recurrence factors of TN, and prognosis after re-do MVD.

METHODS

Clinical data and at least 12 months follow-up of patients with recurrent TN who underwent re-do MVD in our hospital from 2005 to 2020 were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients with recurrent TN were enrolled eventually; adhesive arachnoid membranes were found in all patients. Teflon granuloma was found in 10 patients, new neurovascular compression (NVC) in 3 patients, and vascular displacement in 1 patient. Pain disappeared in 12 patients and relieved in 2 patients, but 4 patients experienced mild facial numbness and 1 patient suffered from incision infection after re-do MVC. No serious surgery-related complications and pain recurrences were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Teflon granuloma was the most common cause of TN recurrence in current study, new NVC was also saw in some patients. Patients with recurrent TN could get satisfactory results from re-do MVD.

A Systematic Review of Repeat Microvascular Decompression for Recurrent or Persistent Trigeminal Neuralgia

OBJECTIVE

When conservative therapy fails, microvascular decompression (MVD) has been the preferred treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, the management of recurrent or persistent TN after MVD can often be difficult. The purpose of the present systematic review was to objectively analyze and summarize the reported literature regarding the feasibility of repeat MVD.

METHODS

We conducted a database search using the MEDLINE and PubMed databases until July 2020. The search terms used for title and abstract screening were as follows: "recurrent trigeminal neuralgia," "persistent trigeminal neuralgia," "repeat microvascular decompression," and "reexploration." The inclusion criteria for the systematic review were as follows: clinical studies (excluding case studies), repeat MVD treatment of TN, and studies that had recorded the pain relief outcomes, operative findings, and complications (if any).

RESULTS

Of the 1771 initial results obtained, we performed a full text screening of 43 studies, and, ultimately, 19 were deemed eligible. A total of 2247 patients had undergone MVD for TN, of whom, 311 had experienced recurrence (13.84%). Of the 311 patients, 178 had undergone repeat MVD. The average pain-free interval was 27.75 months after the first MVD. The effective rate of repeat MVD was 91.66%, and 71.48% of the patients had had obvious compression found at repeat MVD. The postoperative complication rate after repeat MVD was 37.31% and was due to postoperative adhesions around the nerve and nerve injury caused by partial sensory rhizotomy. The most common complication after repeat MVD was facial numbness (21.89%), although the incidence of other complications was <5%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with recurrent or persistent pain after MVD, the findings from our systematic review support that repeat MVD remains a feasible treatment for recurrent or persistent TN.

Long Time Efficacy and Safety of Microvascular Decompression Combined with Internal Neurolysis for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression (MVD) combined with internal neurolysis (IN) in the treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN) after MVD.

Methods

Sixty-four patients with recurrent TN admitted to the hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were divided into two groups according to the surgical method. Twenty-nine patients, admitted from January 2014 to December 2015, were treated with MVD alone, whereas 35 admitted from January 2016 to December 2017 were treated with MVD+IN. The postoperative efficacy, complications, and pain recurrence rate of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

The efficacy of the MVD+IN and MVD groups were 88.6% and 86.2%, and the cure rates were 77.1% and 65.5% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). The cure rate (83.3%) of patients in the MVD+IN group, who were only found thickened arachnoid adhesions during the operation that could not be fully released, was significantly higher than that of the MVD group (30.0%) (p<0.05), while the efficacy (91.7% vs. 70%) of the two groups was not statistically different (p>0.05). For patients whose arachnoid adhesions were completely released, there had no significant difference (p>0.05) in the efficacy (87% vs. 94.7%) and recurrence rate (5.0% vs. 11.1%). The incidence of postoperative facial numbness (88.6%) in the MVD+IN group was higher than that in the MVD group (10.3%) (p<0.01). The long-term incidence of facial numbness was not statistically significant (p>0.05). In the 18–36 months follow-up, the recurrence rate of patients in the MVD+IN group (9.7%) and in the MVD group (16%) were not statistically different (p>0.05).

Conclusion

A retrospective comparison of patients with recurrent TN showed that both MVD and MVD combined with IN can effectively treat recurrent TN. Compared with MVD alone, MVD combined with IN can effectively improve the pain cure rate of patients with recurrent TN who have only severe arachnoid adhesions. The combination does not increase the incidence of long-term facial numbness and other complications.

Redo surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: reasons for re-exploration and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

To investigate the causes of failure and recurrence after microvascular decompression (MVD) for trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) and to analyze the results of redo surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-three cases of redo surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Reasons for re-exploration were categorized into 4 groups based on the operative findings. Patient characteristics, outcomes of re-exploration, and operative complications were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Reasons for redo surgery were divided into arterial compression in 13 patients (21%), venous compression in 11 patients (17%), prosthesis-related in 25 patients (40%), and adhesion or negative exploration in 14 patients (22%). Immediate pain relief was obtained in 59 patients (94%) postoperatively with newly developed facial numbness in 17 patients (27%). Of these, 48 patients (76%) maintained pain-free 1 year postoperatively. Overall recurrence was noted in 17 patients (27%) during the median 49-month follow-up period. Most recurrences occurred within 1 year after redo surgery, but the prosthesis-related patients showed a continuous recurrence up to 4 years. Patients having vascular compression showed significantly better pain control than those without vascular contact in Kaplan-Meier analyses (p = 0.0421). No prognostic factor for pain-free 1 year after redo surgery was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Redo surgery is effective for patients with remaining vascular compression rather than those without vascular contact. Teflon contact onto the nerve root should be avoided because it is a potential risk for recurrence and causes poor prognosis after redo surgery.

Petrosal Vein Involvement in Neurovascular Conflict in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Contact of the main stem of the petrosal vein (PV) to the nerve root is a rare cause of trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). The implication of the PV in relation with neurovascular contact (NVC) is not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the operative procedures in microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with PV involvement in the long-term.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 34 cases (7.0%) in 485 consecutive MVDs for TGN, whose PV main stem had contact with the trigeminal nerve root (PV-NVC). PV-NVCs were divided into 2 groups: concomitant arterial contact or no concomitant arterial contact. Surgical techniques, outcomes, complications, and recurrence were assessed.

RESULTS

The anatomical relationship of the PV with the trigeminal nerve root was consistent with preoperative 3-dimensional imaging in all patients. Pain relief was obtained in most patients immediately after surgery (97.1%) by separating the PV from the nerve root. Postoperative facial numbness was noted in 9 patients (26.5%). Symptomatic venous infarctions occurred in 2 patients (5.9%). Recurrence of facial pain occurred in 3 patients (8.8%) with a median 48 mo follow-up period. Re-exploration surgery revealed adhesion being the cause of recurrence. The statistical analyses showed no difference in the surgical outcomes of the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Separating the PV from the nerve root contributes to pain relief in patients with PV conflict regardless of concomitant arteries. Preserving venous flow is crucial to avoid postoperative venous insufficiency.

Long-Term Retrospective Analysis of Microvascular Decompression in Patients With Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Objective: To explore the clinical characteristics of patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and the experience of microvascular decompression (MVD) in the treatment of such patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data, imaging examination results, surgical methods, and treatment efficacies in 127 patients with recurrent typical TN from January 2005 to December 2014. Results: The age of the recurrent group was higher than that of the non-recurrent group (p < 0.05). The duration of pain before the first MVD procedure was longer in the recurrent group than in the non-recurrent group (p < 0.05). Patients in the recurrent group were more likely to have compression of the trigeminal nerve by the vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) or multiple vessels than patients in the non-recurrent group (p < 0.05). A Kaplan-Meier curve showed a median pain-free survival of 12 months after the first MVD procedure. The severity of pain (preoperative visual analog scale [VAS] score) in patients with recurrence was lower than that in patients with first-onset TN (p < 0.05). Vessel compression, Teflon compression or granuloma and arachnoid adhesion were considered the main causes of recurrence. Postoperative Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scores in the redo MVD group were excellent (T = 2) for 69 patients (53.33%) and good (T = 3) for 46 patients (36.22%). The postoperative follow-up was 63-167 months (105.92 ± 25.66). During the follow-up, no recurrence was noted. All complications were cured or improved. Conclusions: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective surgical method for the treatment of TN. For recurrent patients, reoperation can achieve good results.

Teflon versus Ivalon in Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A 2-Center 10-Year Comparison

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia features jolts of pain along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. If patients fail conservative management, microvascular decompression (MVD) is typically the next step in treatment. MVD consists of implanting a separating material, often Teflon, between the nerve and compressive lesions. A review found similar success and complication rates between Teflon and Ivalon, another commonly used material. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes and complications associated with Teflon and Ivalon in MVD.

METHODS

We conducted a 2-center retrospective cohort study of trigeminal neuralgia treated with MVD between 2005 and 2019. Patients with no postoperative follow-up were excluded. Postoperative pain was graded using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score. Relapse was defined as a BNI score of 4-5 during follow-up after initial pain improvement or an initial BNI score of 1-3.

RESULTS

The study included 221 MVD procedures in 219 patients. Ivalon was implanted in 121 procedures, and Teflon was implanted in 100 procedures. Multivariate analysis found that implant type had no effect on final BNI score (P = 0.305). Relapse rates were similar at 5- and 10-year follow-up (5-year: Ivalon 10.7%, Teflon 18.0%, P = 0.112; 10-year: Ivalon 11.6%, Teflon 19.0%, P = 0.123). There was no difference in postoperative immediate facial numbness (P = 0.125). Postoperative hearing difficulty was higher in the Ivalon cohort (8.4% vs. 1.0%; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference in final BNI score or risk of relapse between Ivalon and Teflon. Complications were similar, although Ivalon was more associated with temporary postoperative hearing loss.

Use of Superior Petrosal Venous Complex to Transpose the Superior Cerebellar Artery in Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Trigeminal neuralgia is a cause of severe facial pain, usually provoked by a neurovascular conflict, commonly involving the superior cerebellar artery (SCA).¹ The superior petrosal venous complex is in the way toward the nerve through a retrosigmoid approach and can narrow the working area around trigeminal nerve.^2-4 Nonetheless, instead an obstacle it can be faced in selected cases as an adjunct to help to transpose the offending arterial loop, avoiding undesired venous sacrifice. We present a case of a 64-year-old man with left-sided severe shock-like pain in the V3 territory suggestive of trigeminal neuralgia (Video 1). Preoperative imaging depicted a neurovascular conflict between SCA and trigeminal nerve root. A retrosigmoid approach was implemented, and stimulation of the compression point was consistent with the preoperative referred pain.⁵ Considering the thick superior petrosal vein (SPV), we transposed the offending artery and anchored it over a SPV tributary.⁶ In this way no prosthetic material was placed in contact with trigeminal nerve, minimizing chance of recurrence.^7-9 No abnormality on neurophysiological monitoring was reported, and postoperative imaging demonstrated no edema or hemorrhage, as well successful displacement of SCA. Patient presented complete resolution of pain and no new neurological deficit after 1 year of follow-up. This case is an uncommon report depicting a helpful intraoperative decision to be considered in selected cases to avoid venous sacrifice and preclude prosthetic material in contact with the nerve. Anatomical pictures courtesy of the Rhoton Collection, American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS)/Neurosurgical Research and Educational Foundation (NREF).

Surgical Management of the Trigeminocerebellar Artery in Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia

BACKGROUND

The trigeminocerebellar artery (TCA) is a variant branch of the basilar artery supplying the trigeminal nerve root and cerebellar hemisphere, which may contribute to trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). Despite its unique anatomic description, information regarding the preoperative diagnosis and surgical management of TCA is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our preoperative diagnosis of TCA using 3-dimensional (3D) images and surgical management of TGN cases with TCA involvement.

METHODS

We reviewed our 15 patients with TCA involvement (3.3%) among 460 consecutive patients undergoing microvascular decompression for TGN. In this study, all patients were examined using 3D images using GammaPlan (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). TCAs were divided into 2 groups based on surgical findings: encircling type and intraneural type. Biographical data, radiological findings, and operative video recordings were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical outcomes and follow-up were assessed and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

TCA involvement was confirmed preoperatively in 14 of the 15 patients using 3D images. All patients were operated with our unique transposition technique and became pain free immediately after the surgery. Pain-free status was maintained during the follow-up period (3.5 ± 2.6 yr) in all patients but one in whom pain recurred 4 yr after the initial surgery. Re-exploration revealed an adhesion between the Teflon felt and the nerve root.

CONCLUSION

Although TCA involvement is rare, an accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential because the decompression technique may differ from those used for other common cases. Scrutinizing anatomically rare variation with 3D images is recommended for predicting TCA involvement.

Factors That May Affect Delayed Relief Of Trigeminal Neuralgia After Microneurosurgery And The Long-Term Outcomes Associated With Delayed Relief

Objective

Microvascular decompression (MVD) combined with partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) with the retrosigmoid approach has become the most effective surgical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). There is variability in the pain relief processes observed in postoperative patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed relief (DR) and its predictors after MVD and/or PSR for the treatment of TN and study the long-term effects associated with DR.

Methods

Patients with primary TN who underwent MVD and/or PSR by the same surgeon at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from March 2009 to December 2017 were included in the study, and all patients were followed for at least 1 year after the operation. DR was defined as follows: no changes in the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) score on the third day after surgery and a BNI score of I-II in the absence of any medication after a period of pain. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative differences were compared between the DR and non-DR groups, and the relationships between the various factors and DR was analyzed.

Results

A total of 105 patients, including 20 patients with DR (19%), 78 patients with non-DR (74%), and 7 patients without relief, were included in this study. The follow-up period ranged from 13 months to 118 months (average, 5.39 years/65 months). The duration of postoperative pain in the DR group was 3-365 days, with an average of 108 days. Statistical analysis found that no factor predicted the occurrence of DR, and the occurrence of postoperative DR did not affect the long-term effects observed in patients.

Conclusion

DR did not affect the long-term effects after MVD and/or PSR. Therefore, it is recommended that patients should be monitored for approximately 3 months after MVD and/or PSR and then evaluated for surgical effects. No reoperations should be performed immediately.