Microsurgical Treatment of Ruptured True Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm in the Distal Portion of the Posterior Communicating Artery

Microsurgical Approach for True Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: Literature Review and Illustrative Case

True posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms are rare. Although true PCoA aneurysms have been reported to be located close to the internal carotid artery, at the middle part of PCoA, or close to the posterior cerebral artery; the best surgical approach to treat true PCoA aneurysms in each location remains unclear. We conducted a literature review using data from PubMed. Data on demographics, location, and projecting direction of the aneurysm, surgical approach, and surgical complications were collected. A total of 47 true PCoA aneurysms were included. Twenty-nine aneurysms originated from the proximal portion, 10 from the middle portion, and 6 from the distal portion; there were two giant aneurysms. The ipsilateral pterional approach was used for 37 true PCoA aneurysms (27 in proximal portion, 8 in middle portion, and 2 in distal portion of PCoA). The anterior temporal approach was used for two distal-portion aneurysms and one giant aneurysm. The anterior subtemporal approach was used for one distal-portion aneurysm. The subtemporal approach was used for two middle-portion aneurysms and one giant aneurysm. The contralateral pterional approach was used for two proximal-portion and one distal-portion aneurysms. Although most true PCoA aneurysms can be treated by the pterional approach, other means such as anterior temporal and subtemporal approaches can be applicable for aneurysms in the middle and distal portions of the PCoA or giant aneurysms. Surgeons should select an appropriate approach for each aneurysm while considering the advantages and disadvantages of each technique.

Treatment of true posterior communicating artery aneurysms: Endovascular experience in a single center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The true posterior communicating artery (TPCoA) aneurysms are rare and endovascular treatment for such lesions is limited in literature.

METHODS

From January 2012 to March 2017, eight TPCoA aneurysms were treated endovascularly and included in our present study. The procedural complication and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Seven of eight aneurysms (87.5%) were ruptured. Stent-assisted coiling was used in one case that a stent was deployed via PCoA-ipsilateral P2 segment. The dual-microcatheter technique was used in one case. The remaining six cases were treated by coiling alone. One patient (12.5%) suffered perioperative complication, of which a coil herniated into parent vessel during the procedure without symptomatic stroke or other adverse event after the procedure. The initial embolization results showed complete occlusion in five cases and residual neck in three. Six patients (75%) had a mean of 15-month angiographic follow-up and two of them revealed recurrence (33.3%). Clinical follow-up was available in seven patients (87.5%) and all patients showed favorable clinical outcome with mRS score 0.

CONCLUSION

TPCoA aneurysms are rare and challenging lesions with high rupture rate in literatures. Endovascular treatment may be a feasible alternative for TPCoA aneurysms. Primary coiling, as well as adjunctive strategies, such as stent-assisted coiling or dual catheter techniques may be considered. Further study in a larger population is necessary.