The Fate of the Mandibular Reconstruction Plate

Risk Factors for Plate Infection, Exposure, and Removal in Mandibular Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Mandibular plate reconstruction (MPR) is often indicated after tumor ablation, osteoradionecrosis excision, and traumatic bone loss to restore oral functionality and facial cosmetics. There are limited analyses identifying risk factors that lead to plate infection (PIn), exposure, and removal ("plate complications").

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary medical center.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MPR from 2013 to 2022 were identified. Risk factors for plate complications were analyzed based on demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. Multivariable analysis was conducted with logistic regression. Survival analysis was conducted with a Cox model.

RESULTS

Of the 188 patients analyzed, 48 (25.5%) had a plate complication [infection: 22 (11.7%); exposure: 23 (12.2%); removal: 35 (18.6%)]. Multivariate analysis revealed predictive associations between at least 1 plate complication and the following variables: smoking status, soft tissue defect size, number of plates, average screw length, and various postoperative complications. Other associations approached the threshold for significance. Prior and adjuvant radiation therapy, type of free flap, stock versus custom plates, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were not associated with plate complications. No plate complication was independently associated with lower overall survival. PIn (hazard ratio, HR: 7.99, confidence interval, CI [4.11, 15.54]) and exposure (HR: 3.56, CI [1.79, 7.08]) were independently associated with higher rates of plate removal.

CONCLUSION

Plate complications are relatively common after MPR. Smoking history, specific disease characteristics, hardware used during surgery, and postoperative complications may help identify higher-risk patients, but additional larger-scale studies are needed to validate our findings and resolve discrepancies in the current literature.

Comprehensive Treatment and Reconstructive Algorithm for Functional Restoration after Ballistic Facial Injury

Background:

Ballistic facial injuries are rare, with most trauma centers reporting 1–20 cases annually. These patients present significant management challenges to reconstructive surgeons, not only due to their rarity but also due to the complex decision-making process that is involved. The aim of this study was to review our experience with the application of craniofacial microsurgery in management of facial gunshot wounds.

Methods:

A retrospective review of a single-surgeon experience at a level I trauma center from 2011 to 2020 for patients sustaining self-inflicted gunshot wounds to the face requiring microsurgical reconstruction was performed. Outcomes included reconstructive techniques, free flap type and indication, airway evolution, feeding modality, respective timing of interventions, and complications.

Results:

Between 2012 and 2021, 13 patients presented for microsurgical reconstruction at our institution for gunshot wounds to the face. The majority (90%) of patients were men, and the average age at time of injury was 26. The median from the time of injury to first free flap was 93 days. Thirteen patients represented 23 free flaps. On average, patients underwent a total of two free flaps. The most common microsurgical flap was the fibula flap (14) followed by the radial forearm flap (6).

Conclusions:

Based on our findings, we describe a novel algorithm for function restoration and aesthetic revisions based on injury location. Underlying principles include avoiding early use of reconstruction plates, establishing occlusion early, and aligning bony segments using external fixation. An algorithmic approach to these injuries can improve outcomes.

Management of Maxillofacial Trauma in Attempt Suicide Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic

The maxillofacial surgeon trained well to face the surgical challenges. In case of dealing with self-inflicted trauma, the surgeon must face the surgical as well as the psychological status of the patients. Five patients received in the emergency room suffering from maxillofacial trauma resulted from suicidal attempts. Unfortunately, 1 patient died, the other patients managed by providing surgical and psychological support. The cornerstone of managing such type of trauma needs appropriate communication between the family, surgical team, and the psychiatric.