Standardization of Cranial Index Measurement in Sagittal Craniosynostosis:

Efficacy and safety of sagittal synostosis surgery in older (> 12 months) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Sagittal synostosis is the most common isolated craniosynostosis. Surgical treatment of this synostosis has been extensively described in the global literature, with promising outcomes when it is performed in the first 12 months of life. However, in some cases, patients older than 12 months arrive at the craniofacial center with this synostosis. A comprehensive study on efficacy and perioperative outcomes has yet to be fully explored in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the available evidence of surgical outcomes for the treatment of sagittal synostosis among older patients to analyze the efficacy and safety of synostosis surgery in this unique population.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published from inception to March 2024 reporting surgical outcomes of synostosis surgery in older patients (> 12 months) with isolated sagittal synostosis. The main outcome was the reoperation rate, with secondary endpoints including transfusion rates, aesthetic outcomes, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of the reoperation rate was 1%. The rate of excellent aesthetic results was 95%. The need for transfusion associated with the procedures was 86%, and finally, surgical complications attained a pooled ratio of 2%, indicating minimal morbidity associated with the surgical repair.

CONCLUSION

Sagittal synostosis surgery is a safe and effective procedure to perform in older patients; this meta-analysis suggests that open surgery confers a significant rate of excellent aesthetic results with a low reoperation rate and minimal complications associated with the intervention. Future research with direct comparisons among different techniques will validate the findings of this study, which will all contribute to the rigor of synostosis management.

Springs Produce Favorable Morphologic Outcomes Relative to H-Craniectomy According to a Two-Center Comparison of Matched Cases

BACKGROUND

Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of premature suture closure, and many surgical techniques are used to correct scaphocephalic skull shape. Given the rarity of direct comparisons of different surgical techniques for correcting craniosynostosis, this study compared outcomes of craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis.

METHODS

Comparisons were performed using available preoperative and postoperative imaging and follow-up data from the 2 craniofacial national referral centers in Sweden, which perform 2 different surgical techniques: craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy (the Renier technique). The study included 23 pairs of patients matched for sex, preoperative cephalic index, and age. Cephalic index, total intracranial volume (ICV), and partial ICV were measured before surgery and at 3 years of age, with volume measurements compared against those of preoperative and postoperative controls. Perioperative data included operation time, blood loss, volume of transfused blood, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Craniotomy combined with springs resulted in less bleeding and lower transfusion rates than H-craniectomy. Although the spring technique requires 2 operations, the mean total operation time was similar for the methods. Of the 3 complications that occurred in the group treated with springs, 2 were spring-related. The compiled analysis of changes in cephalic index and partial volume distribution revealed that craniotomy combined with springs resulted in superior morphologic correction.

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that craniotomy combined with springs normalized cranial morphology to a greater extent than H-craniectomy based on changes in cephalic index and total and partial ICVs over time.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Evaluation of Helmeting Therapy Duration After Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Metopic and Sagittal Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) is a minimally invasive option for early surgical treatment of metopic (MC) and sagittal craniosynostosis (SC). For ESC, however, the postoperative duration and compliance of helmet therapy are crucial to correct MC and SC asymmetry. The purpose of this study is to assess the period of postoperative band therapy and determine differences, if any, between MC and SC.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed for patients with MC and SC who underwent ESC from November 2015 to 2019. Patients received preoperative, postoperative, and post-band 3-dimensional imaging. Factors recorded included patient sex, insurance type, number of helmets needed, age at surgery, time of first helmet, and at time of completion of helmet therapy, cephalic index, interfrontal angle, and cranial vault asymmetry index.

RESULTS

Patients with SC and MC had ESC surgery at 3.3 and 3.4 months of age, respectively.Patients with SC were found to have completed banding therapy at a younger age (7.88 versus 10.0 mo), with shorter duration (4.17 versus 6.00 mo), and less number of bands (1.54 versus 2.21) than patients with MC. After regression analysis, suture type was found to be a significant predictor of total time in band therapy (P=0.039) with MC requiring a longer duration of banding therapy when compared with SC.

CONCLUSIONS

Suture type directly correlates with duration of helmeting therapy for patients, with patients with MC requiring longer periods of postop helmeting and increased number of bands as compared with SC.

Sagittal Synostectomy With Tension Band Sutures for Correction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Premature fusion of the sagittal suture is the most common form of craniosynostosis and can be treated using a variety of open or endoscopic approaches. Existing approaches have varying degrees of effectiveness. Open approaches, whether performed early or late, can be associated with significant blood loss and the need for transfusion. Endoscope-assisted approaches are minimally invasive but require months of postoperative helmet therapy to help remodel the skull. Implantation of springs or distractors requires a second operation for removal of the devices. Here, we present an alternative technique for early correction of sagittal craniosynostosis combining sagittal synostectomy with tension band sutures to remodel the skull without need for transfusion or helmet therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients treated for sagittal craniosynostosis using a synostectomy with tension band sutures at a single tertiary care institution. Data on patient demographics, operative factors, and postoperative course were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent the novel procedure. The median preoperative cephalic index was 68 and improved to 76 immediately postoperatively. The median blood loss was 10 mL while the operative duration was 112 minutes. No blood transfusions were needed. One small dural laceration was encountered that was promptly repaired. There were no postoperative complications. Patients presenting for follow-up visits showed continued improvement in head shape and cephalic index.

CONCLUSION

A modified sagittal craniectomy with tension band sutures to remodel the skull is effective in achieving immediate correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. The correction remains durable over long-term follow-up. Importantly, the technique can be performed with minimal blood loss and reduces transfusion risk, operative time, and overall morbidity compared with traditional open approaches while avoiding the need for helmet therapy necessitated by endoscopic approaches.

Health-related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents With Sagittal Synostosis

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients with sagittal synostosis (SS), and the influence of frequent headaches and surgical techniques on the HR-QoL.

METHOD

Patients with SS aged 8 to 18 years were invited to participate between June 2016 and February 2017. The Child Health Questionnaire was used to assess the HR-QoL. A detailed questionnaire was used to assess the severity of headache symptoms. The control group consisted of 353 school children aged 5 to 14 years.

RESULTS

In all, 95 parents of patients with SS were invited to participate, of whom 68 (71.6%) parents completed the CHQ-PF50. The mean age of the participating patients was 12.4 years (10.8 to 14.2). The Psychosocial- and Physical summary of the patients with SS was similar to the general population. In the distinct CHQ scales, "Family cohesion" ( P =0.02) was higher, and "Mental health" ( P =0.05) was lower compared with the general population. The type and timing of surgery did not affect the HR-QoL. Thirty-two patients (47.1%) reported having headache complaints at least once a month. The CHQ scores of SS patients with frequent headaches had a significantly lower score of mild to large effect than those without headaches.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SS have a slightly lower to similar HR-QoL compared with the general population. In all, 47.1% of SS patients have frequent headaches, resulting in lower average HR-QoL. The type and timing of surgery did not affect the results. Clinicians should be aware of lower HR-QoL in some subgroups of patients with SS.

Spring forces and calvarial thickness predict cephalic index changes following spring-mediated cranioplasty for sagittal craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Variables interacting to predict outcomes following spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) for non-syndromic craniosynostosis, including spring parameters and calvarial thickness, are poorly understood. This study assessed interactions between spring parameters and calvarial thickness to predict changes in cephalic index (CI) following SMC.

METHODS

Patients undergoing SMC for non-syndromic sagittal craniosynostosis at our institution between 2014 and 2021 were included. Calvarial thickness was determined from patient preoperative CTs using Materalise Mimics at 27 points in relation to the sagittal suture. Linear mixed effects models were used to determine interactions between anterior, middle, and posterior calvarial thickness with spring force and length.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients undergoing surgery at mean age 3.7 months were included in this study. Stronger posterior spring force interacted with thinner posterior calvarial thickness to predict greater changes in CI at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.022). When evaluating spring force and calvarial thickness set distances from the sagittal suture, stronger posterior spring force interacted with thinner posterior calvarial thickness 5 mm (p = 0.043) and 10 mm (p = 0.036) from the sagittal suture to predict changes in CI. Interactions between spring parameters and calvarial thickness in the anterior and middle positions did not significantly predict changes in CI.

CONCLUSIONS

Stronger posterior spring force interacted with thinner posterior calvaria to predict greater changes in CI 3 months following SMC for non-syndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. These results suggest dynamic interactions between several variables may impact outcomes following SMC.

Novel Method of Lateral Vault Modification in Scaphocephaly

BACKGROUND

Scaphocephaly is the commonest from of craniosynostosis. There are several surgical methods to correct this and is influenced by the areas affected. A common thread in any of these corrections is an attempt to increase the biparietal diameter by modifying the lateral vault panel (LVP). A simple and novel method is proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The records of all patients undergoing scaphocephaly correction in the craniofacial unit at the institution were reviewed from 2003 to 2019. There were 106 patients, 57 males, and 49 females. The age ranged from 6 months to 5 years with a mean of 11 months. The method of vault remodeling was LVP only in 36 (34%), subtotal vault remodeling in 59 (56%), and total vault remodeling in 11 (10%). All 106 patients underwent LVP remodeling as part of the procedure. One or 2 wedge excisions was performed to increase the curvature of the LVP and this panel was fixed on the outside of the temporal squame bone.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. Satisfactory results were obtained. The mean preoperative cephalic index was 64% and the mean postoperative index was 75%. There were minor complications such as screw visibility in a few patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Wedge excisions of the LVP is a simple and effective maneuver that can be used as strategy when performing scaphocephaly correction.

Comparison of aesthetic outcomes between open and endoscopically treated sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

In the last several decades, there has been much debate regarding the ideal treatment for sagittal synostosis. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative, anthropometric, and subjective assessments of cosmetic outcomes between open and endoscopic management of isolated sagittal synostosis.

METHODS

At their routine postoperative follow-up, pediatric patients with sagittal craniosynostosis were recruited to undergo digital cranial measurement and standardized photography for objective and subjective assessments of perioperative outcomes. Age-normalized z-scores for cephalic index, head circumference, euryon-euryon diameter (Eu-Eu), and glabella-opisthocranion diameter (G-Op) were calculated for each patient. Faculty surgeons, surgical trainees, nurses, and laypersons were asked to rate the normalcy of craniofacial appearances using a 5-point Likert scale. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with endoscopic correction and those treated with open repair.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included in the study. Thirty-one had undergone open surgical correction, and 19 had undergone endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic repair involved significantly lower operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and hospital length of stay than those with open repair (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of z-scores for head circumference (p = 0.22), cephalic index (p = 0.25), or Eu-Eu (p = 0.38). Endoscopic treatment was associated with a significantly lower G-Op (p = 0.009). Additionally, the average subjective rating of head shape was higher for endoscopic treatment when corrected for age, gender, and ethnicity (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that patients who are treated endoscopically may have an overall more normal appearance in skull morphology and cosmesis, although these results are limited by poor reliability.

Cranial molding on neonates in Ghana: mothers' perspective and their knowledge on potential harm to babies' brain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Traditional cranial molding is an ancient practice prevalent in Ghana. In this work, we aimed at assessing mothers'/caregivers' perspective and their knowledge on potential harm of cranial molding on neonates.

METHODS

Two hundred and one (201) nursing mothers with babies aged 1-12 months were sampled in a cross-sectional study using questionnaires. We assessed the mothers'/caregivers' reasons for cranial molding, their perceived benefits of this practice, and their knowledge about the potential harm this practice pose to babies.

RESULTS

Sixty four percent (64%) of mothers confirmed they practice cranial molding on their babies either on their own or through the assistance of a caretaker. However, 72% of all mothers/caregivers did not know this practice has the potential to harm the baby in any way. Mothers'/caregivers' reasons for this practice included the following: to achieve a more "beautiful" head shape, hasten the healing of the fontanelle, and limit head growth. There was a significant association between the mothers'/caregivers' level of education and the practice of cranial molding (p value < 0.05). However, there was no association between head symmetry and cranial molding (p value > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Majority of mothers/caregivers were actively engaged in cranial molding on neonates but remain ignorant about the potential harm this practice could have on their babies. Mothers/caregivers therefore need to be educated about the potential harm posed by traditional cranial molding on neonates.

Endoscopic Versus Open Total Vault Reconstruction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

: Sagittal craniosynostosis is the most common form of congenital cranial deformity. Surgical interventions are performed either open or endoscopic. Advancements in minimally invasive surgery have enabled the development of the endoscopic suturectomy technique. This is contrasted to the traditional open cranial vault reconstruction. There is a paucity of data comparing the head shape changes from both techniques. This study aims to compare the morphological outcome of endoscopic suturectomy versus total cranial vault reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study involving 55 cases of sagittal craniosynostosis, 37 of which has open total cranial vault reconstruction and 18 had endoscopic suturectomy procedure. Preoperative and postoperative 3D photographs of both groups were analyzed and compared. The change in correction between preoperative and postoperative state was measured against a crowd-driven standard for acceptable head shape.

RESULTS

Total cranial vault had higher percentage change between pre and postoperative cranial index than endoscopic suturectomy (14.7% versus 7.7%, P = 0.003). However, both techniques were able to achieve the minimum standard of 70% correction (TCV 107.5%, ES 100.4%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Total cranial vault and endoscopic suturectomy are effective in correcting scaphocephaly among children with sagittal craniosynostosis. Additionally, both techniques are able to achieve a percentage correction that exceeds the 70% benchmark established by the lay public.

Public Perception of a Normal Head Shape in Children With Sagittal Craniosynostosis

: A question that remains unanswered is at what level of surgical correction does the public perceive a head shape to be "normal" or "acceptable?" For most cases of non-syndromic asymptomatic craniosynostosis, the parents desire for surgical correction is to improve the cosmetic appearance of head shape. At the time of this writing, the intraoperative surgeons' perspective of what constitutes an acceptable head shape is the target for surgical correction. In introducing an improved objectively cosmetic goal, an appropriate outcome measure would be to assess what the general public considers a normal or acceptable head shape in children with craniosynostosis.

METHOD

Twenty-two unique images were presented via an online crowdsourcing survey of a severe case of non-syndromic sagittal craniosynosis gradually corrected to an age and gender matched normalized head shape. Participants were recruited via the Sick Kids Twitter account. Participants were invited to rate the head shapes as "normal" or "abnormal."

RESULTS

The 538 participants completed the online survey. Participants were able to reliably and consistently identify normal and abnormal head shapes with a Kappa Score >0.775. Furthermore, participants indicated that a correction of 70% is required in order for the cranial deformity to be regarded as "normal." This threshold closely reflects a normal Cranial Index, which is a widely used morphometric outcome in craniosynostosis.

CONCLUSION

Crowdsourcing provides an ideal method for capturing the general population's perspective on what constitutes a normal and acceptable head shape in children with sagittal craniosynostosis. Laypersons are able to reliably and consistently distinguish cranial deformities from a "normal" head shape. The public indicates a threshold correction of 70% in sagittal craniosynosis to regard it as a "normal" head shape.

Computer-assisted craniometric evaluation for diagnosis and follow-up of craniofacial asymmetries: SymMetric v. 1.0

PURPOSE

The current assessment of patients with craniofacial asymmetries is accomplished by physical examination, anamnesis and radiological imaging. We propose a semi-automated, computer-assisted craniofacial evaluation (SymMetric v 1.0) based on orthogonal photography of the patient's head in 3 positions. The system is simple, low-cost, no-radiation or special resources needed. Although it does not substitute CT in cases of doubt between craniosynostosis and positional plagiocephaly, multiple numeric evaluations indicate regional deformities and severity of the asymmetry, which can help in the clinical decision of indicating or not the orthosis in positional deformities, determining treatment duration or evaluating surgical outcomes after correction.

METHODS

A Matlab-based tool was developed for digital processing of photographs taken in 3 positions (anterior, superior and lateral). The software guides the user to select visible and reproducible landmarks in each photograph acquisition and calculates multiple indexes and metrics, generating a set of comprehensive plots to offer the user an overview of head and facial symmetry across the orthogonal views. For purposes of demonstration, we evaluated 2 patients (one control and one with non-sinostotic deformity).

RESULTS

The results show a clear differentiation of the control and plagiocephalic patient metrics mainly in the superior view, showing potential for diagnosis of the condition, and also detected the clinical improvement during helmet treatment in the follow-up, 3 and 5 months after orthosis' use.

CONCLUSION

We presented a proof-of-concept for a low cost, no radiation evaluation system for craniofacial asymmetries, that can be useful in a clinical context for diagnosis and follow-up of patients.

Chiari 1 malformation and untreated sagittal synostosis: a new subset of complex Chiari?

PURPOSE

Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) is a well-known association with complex craniosynostosis (CC), while it has been rarely reported in association with monosynostosis. The aim of the present study is to investigate on the association between CM1 and untreated sagittal synostosis (USS).

METHOD

The study included 48 cases of sagittal synostosis (SS), untreated for misdiagnosis and associated with CM1. The children were firstly diagnosed for CM1 by MRI (mean age 9) than for SS (mean age 10.5) by three-dimensional computerized tomography (3D-CT), which documented the absence of the sagittal suture, in the presence of residual indentation of all the other sutures. Syndromic cases were diagnosed by clinical evaluation and molecular studies.

RESULTS

Of the 48 children harboring CM1 plus USS, 21 were asymptomatic for CM1 and are still on follow-up, while 27 children were operated for syringomyelia and scoliosis and/or occurrence of symptoms, three of them had an acute presentation (two papilledema and one sleep apneas) and 11 children had a documented increase of preoperative ICP. Craniovertebral decompression (CVD) was the first-line surgery in 24 children, 16 with duroplasty and five without and eight had also cerebellar (CBL) tonsil coagulation. A cranial vault remodelling was firstly performed in three children. Fifteen percent of children submitted to CVD needed a revision for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection, while two needed both the supra- and infratentorial decompressive procedure and another two needed a treatment for the associated hydrocephalus.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study identified an USS in 27 (15.5%) of 174 CM1 children operated for a symptomatic CM1. We suggest to define this association CM1 plus USS, a new subtype of complex CM1. For the high percentage of complications and multiple procedures needed to solve the CM1, we advise to identify by 3D-CT scan these children before performing CVD. Our finding suggests also that, if left untreated, SS may lead to the delayed occurrence of a challenging subset of CM1.