Less Is More in Congenital and Pediatric Nasal Lesions

Nasal Reconstruction in 4-years-old Child Affected by Nasal wing Cleft

Congenital and pediatric nasal lesion resection and their reconstructive outcomes are not well studied. A surgeon must consider the site, depth, size, age, etiology and effect on future function (including growth). The path of total reconstruction or of portions of the cartilaginous / cutaneous nasal structure in the pediatric patient must undergo a series of totally different needs with respect to the management of the adult. First of all, it is essential to understand at what age to intervene, given that the child in the growth phase up to adolescence sees the nasal skeleton change significantly and in relation to the possible psychological repercussions that the tissue deficit can cause. This path will often require serious interventions in order to recreate a structure that is aesthetically ideal, functionally effective and finally suitable for the growth phase of the rest of the body and facial structures.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03364-y.

Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study

Skin lesions and traumas can affect the skin by leaving scars. The purpose of this study was evaluating the results of a new technique in reconstructive surgery of scars on the nose. In this technique, extra skin remaining from reduction rhinoplasty is applied to the defect remained from removing the scar.

Methods

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study performed on 33 patients who underwent reduction rhinoplasty from 2013 to 2018 due to scars on the dorsal nasal skin. Five sets of standards, criteria, and questionnaires were used to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes, scars, and nasal function. These included the Cakir concept, visual analogue scale, patient reported outcome measurement, Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, and sino-nasal outcome test-22.

Results

According to the surface polygon concept, or Cakir concept, the number of affected polygons due to scars decreased in all included patients (P < 0.05). In addition, constant improvement in patients' satisfaction, based on patient reported outcome measurement (P < 0.001) and visual analogue scale (P ≤ 0.05), as well as physicians' satisfaction, based on Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, were determined. Furthermore, evaluating the patients' breathing, based on sino-nasal outcome test-22 criteria (P < 0.09), indicated no adverse effects.

Conclusion

Excision of scars from dorsal nasal skin and conducting rhinoplasty surgery from the same access can be considered an option for reconstructing nasal scars.